All Channels
Popular
450°

Microsoft is testing playing Xbox games in your browser

Microsoft is testing out playing games in your browser and not just any games. We're talking Xbox games - and not just last-generation titles either. In fact, even Xbox One titles are currently said to be in the works too.

And don’t think this is some watered-down experience; one source told us that he thought the experience was right around 60FPS, while another stated that this is going to be the company’s next killer gaming feature.

qwerty6764261d ago

after reading that im still not sure what it means.

does that mean i stream the game on my browser from my computer? do i have to own a copy of the game on my xbox but i switch back and forth from my browser to console?

a lot of questions.

nrvalleytime4261d ago

There's quite a few unanswered questions, but it looks like Sony is trying to do with its Android products as well. I'd far rather prefer an app rather than a browser based experience, but any type of BC with my 360 would be appreciated. But to answer your question:

"The implications here are huge for Microsoft as it removes the console from the equation to tap into the gaming market. Also, by off-loading the processing power needed to run these games, it means that they can run on any type of device. Microsoft’s current solution is not browser-locked either; it runs in Chrome as well as it does in Internet Explorer."

I've held off purchasing an Xbox One for a few reasons, but this would certainly be helpful. I imagine you still have to purchase a retail copy at some point, but think about the possibilities.

KillerByte234261d ago (Edited 4261d ago )

They will probably make it where you will need an Xbox One to stream your games to your browser but this feature will allow people to play Xbox games on their phones, laptops, desktop pcs and tablets even if it is an Microsoft, Apple or Android tablet/phone

uptownsoul4260d ago

Is this service supposed to take the place of the Xbox One or add to it?

choujij4260d ago (Edited 4260d ago )

@KillerByte23 "They will probably make it where you will need an Xbox One to stream your games to your browser "

The article states:

"The implications here are huge for Microsoft as it *removes the console* from the equation to tap into the gaming market."

That sounds pretty clear to me. And if true, it'll be another reason for me to hold off from ever buying an Xbone.

Cryptcuzz4260d ago

Or they can just have a system where you bought the game on Xbox Live and once verified that said devices is logged in, one would be able to play the game off the browser.

Obviously, that would mean only one device that is logged in would be able to do this. So you can't just have a bunch of people using your GT logged in playing on multiple devices at the same time.

It would be pretty cool if they pulled this off correctly. To me, (I know I am going to get some disagrees for saying this) it is reminiscent of Remote Play for Playstation, but implemented in a different way.

MSBAUSTX4260d ago

If they drop the Xbox One in lieu of browser gaming, there is going to be a ton of super pissed off Xbox One owners. If they make it to where I can just stream gameplay directly to my browser I will never Buy a MS product again since I already paid for an XB1.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4260d ago
mhunterjr4261d ago

Well this could be implemented in any number of ways.

It could be a backwards compatibility solution. Insert your xbox360 disc I to your xb1 console, but instead of running on the console hardware it's streamed to the consoles browser.

Or they could let you play games that you purchased digitally, on any other devices, without you having to download the file.

For xb1 games, it could be used to mask the painfully long download and install times. They could just stream games to you, while the installations takes place on the background. Then switch to local processing when plausible.

No one knows exactly how they'd end up using this service. We just know they are working on it.

Volkama4260d ago (Edited 4260d ago )

Could also approach that audience that don't buy consoles (ie directly compete with Playstation Now).

It was pretty much a given that they're working on game streaming. They were internally demoing that using Halo 4 and a Windows phone some time ago. And we've seen that recent research document on their Delorean technique to mask input latency on streamed games.

Interesting that they plan to deliver it through a browser though, that's new and... expansive. That's a huge audience right off the bat if they can pull it off.

Death4261d ago

You need to read the thesis the report is based on. No where did it say Microsoft was working on browser based games. Essentially they are working on software that eliminates the effects of lag with cloud based gaming. The program learns the way you play and predicts what you will do next. By using a prediction algorithm the game would know what you are going to do and has the ability to do it if lag becomes a factor. I found it very interesting, but it also gave me the feeling it has the potential to artificially make gamers better than they actually are. Player skill is factored in and the program is supposed to match the players skill to prevent it, but I'm not sure how much I believe it.

n4rc4260d ago

That paper came out awhile back didn't it?
Remember reading they were successfully masking a 300ms delay or something along those lines

extermin8or4260d ago (Edited 4260d ago )

But what happens if you do something unpredictable... that the game hasn't anticipated? wouldn't all hell break loose? And it needs you to have played said game to learn enough to predict fist anyway... there are several other issues that spring to mind with such a systm I find it hard to believe-a i've said about cloud compute in games in general I'll believe it when i see it.

FanboyKilla4260d ago

Lol listen to them wine like a neglected housewife. Lmfao all sony fans do is talk about what ms and xone doing lol. Leaving yo arse in the dust. Vroooooooom!!!

mmcglasson4260d ago

Sounds to me like they are trying to get their own version of PlayStation Now.

turdburgler10804260d ago (Edited 4260d ago )

It's Playstation now without the input lag thanks to predictive algorithms and you don't have to go out and throw hundreds down for a vita or some box for pstv assuming your device has browser ability. Even if your tv doesn't a $35 chromecast would solve that. It basically flips everything sony has done on end. And it gives way more types of devices to play on. Basically if it's got a screen, Internet, and a browser you can play games on it.

lelo2play4258d ago (Edited 4258d ago )

"Microsoft is testing playing Xbox games in your browser"

Anybody that wants to try something similar, there is
battlefield.play4free

http://battlefield.play4fre...

or Command and Conquer
http://www.tiberiumalliance...

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4258d ago
loopygames4260d ago (Edited 4260d ago )

They are emulating the Xbox One/Xbox 360 OS in the cloud through a browser(Firefox/IE/Chrome).

oSHINSAo4260d ago

magic word... cloud, it is posible, there are some games already using this tecnic, Warface for example.

Viperoholic4260d ago ShowReplies(5)
PCBOX4260d ago

I told you XO is a beast gaming machine.I always trusted MS.Live is the best service and they are the most innovative and creative company in entire game industry.Cloud Computing and Gaming will be the future.Thank God I have an Xbox One.Bring it on MS because you are the best.Look at the people moaning always online Xbox system.What is Destiny? Without net connection you cant play it and this is the most anticipated plus one of the top seller games of the industry.What a sense of irony.

Game ON.

Gravity_DoGG4260d ago

and some of us hate destiny for being only online. good thing I got wii u and ps4 so I don't have to worry about allways online future

Kayant4260d ago

Yes because a single Always on-line game that can be traded in,sold,lend to in the traditional sense is the same as a console that because a brick if you haven't checked in and must have someone in your friendlist for 30 days before gifting the game because lending is not possible and trade, rent, sell options which were limited to select retailers and not available at launch.

Totally the same thing /s

DougLord4260d ago

I think people don't understand that MSFT would prefer not to be in the hardware business. It looses $$, just look at Sony. They are only in it because they want to control the living room. They would prefer to be able to sell you a $50 streaming box with an Arm chip in it. The technology just isn't there YET. But it is getting there quickly. The hardware in the One is more then sufficient to handle streaming as the software and infrastructure get to the point where you don't need a local GPU to run the game. If they can get everything working right MSFT may be the 1st to offer streaming 4K gaming. They have verified the codecs and outputs are capable of 4k.

Godmars2904260d ago

Sony has dominated twice in terms of hardware whereas with MS, they've only really ever managed a success one, and that's arguable.

I think that they would best sell you a subscription, then games, with hardware being purely your problem.

Show all comments (56)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio11d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing11d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9211d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit11d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing11d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9211d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay13d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn213d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn213d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown13d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay13d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay13d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac12d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger13d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300013d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde13d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood13d ago (Edited 13d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde12d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7514d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_12d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.