All Channels
Popular
290°

Failure to Launch -- A Destined Blunder?

PlayStation and Xbox's Preload midnight launch of Destiny did not go over as smoothly as it could have, starting the home console's answer to retailers midnight launches on the wrong foot.

Read Full Story >>
middleofnowheregaming.com
jackanderson19854289d ago

wasn't that a temporary issue that got resolved in like 5 mins? I know i got told the same for the EU version that it was midnight GMT, that came along, game didn't "unlock" so i got onto support and they said it should start shortly... which it did at around 12:30.... the download speeds though were freaking awful though ha so damn slow

Volkama4289d ago (Edited 4289d ago )

It's not so much reporting problems (though I did have a problem myself). This is about the digital preload being locked while players that received their physical copy a day early were already online playing.

They should have unlocked the digital version early if they were allowing access to retail users, but I doubt Sony or Microsoft are able to make that decision on Activision's behalf and together they were never going to be able to react to the situation within the timeframe that it was relevant.

Edit: Actually I see it is talking more about timezone differences in the U S. And it's only talking about up to 3 hours.

BlackWolf124288d ago

The servers were scheduled to go live at midnight in every region the game was releasing.

Anyone who got their retail copy of the game early shouldn't have been able to play it, and even if they could it is NOT I repeat, it is NOT Sony, Microsoft or Bungies decision to break the street date. Individual retailers do that from time to time and it is something only they control.

Volkama4288d ago

Well sure, the street date was always likely to get broken (as it always does), but it isn't the retailer that allows those players to connect and play.

Bungie/Activision are the ones controlling access to the game servers, and Microsoft/Sony would technically be able to restrict it too.

It isn't a big deal, just a bit of a jab in the face for digital distribution and pre-loading.

Letthewookiewin4289d ago

I had no problems what so ever.

OrangePowerz4289d ago

Worked perfectly fine for me, unlocked at midnight and no online issues.

Guy1054289d ago

What time zone do you live in? Did you buy it digitally or retail? You don't provide enough context to refute any claims or opinions in this article

chaos-SD4289d ago

Guy105, I like you, you have a reasonable attitude and have clearly read the piece! Thanks for doing that!

HacSawJimThugin4289d ago

Same for me. Bought it digital. East Coast United States.

slappy5084289d ago

Destiny is awesome so far, no problems getting on , nor were there any problems on Psn. Erm, overhyped?

Show all comments (21)
110°

Star Wars x Destiny Collaboration: Gear & Cosmetics Launching February 4th

Destiny 2 x Star Wars collaboration is here! Get exclusive gear, cosmetics, and accessories when Heresy launches on February 4th. Don’t miss it!

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
coolbeans494d ago (Edited 494d ago )

Fortnite-ification comes for all live-service games.

Neonridr493d ago

now this is an armor set done right.

40°

Destiny Mobile spin-off will reportedly be revealed very soon

The long-rumoured Destiny Mobile game from NetEase may finally be ready for reveal according to multiple leakers.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
280°

Xbox Passed On Destiny & Guitar Hero According To Phil Spencer

Phil Spencer talks candidly about missing out on both Destiny and Guitar Hero

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
anast642d ago

He paid billions for Starfield. This should be the real story.

642d ago Replies(1)
Sciurus_vulgaris642d ago

Microsoft bought all of Zenimax Media for 7 billion, while Sony paid 4 billion for Bungie. I think Microsoft got the better deal due to acquiring Fallout, ElderScrolls and Doom.

642d ago
anast642d ago

This can't be true. They only bought Starfield...

InUrFoxHole642d ago

@anast
Should've thought that one out buddy, lol.

anast642d ago (Edited 642d ago )

Yeah, I thought it out. I'm not sure you did. But since we are buddy's now, you're welcome.

642d ago
anast642d ago

"Clearly your parents didn't teach you"

You know you lost, when you have to resort to this tactic.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 642d ago
Profchaos642d ago

So you're saying that Microsoft has missed out on so many huge gaming franchise in the last 25 years from GTA exclusivity to guitar hero and destiny it's just laughable they had so many misses

Reaper22_642d ago

Yea, but they're still 100 times more wealthy than Sony. I would say it worked out well.

Gamingsince1981642d ago

Xbox is dead all that money doesn't help.

Hypertension140642d ago

What has work out well? It sure as hell had nothing to do with Xbox.

andy85642d ago

That isn't because of Xbox though. This is a gaming page, not an I get supplemented by father Windows page

Bathyj642d ago

Microsoft's money has nothing to do with Xbox.
Xbox is a money pit to them they would love to ditch but are after some ROI first.

Let's face it, Xbox is like a red headed stepchild that steals from you to buy drugs.

Hofstaderman642d ago (Edited 642d ago )

MIicrosoft is NOT XBOX. The current situation illustrates this. And Microsoft wants its ROI.

@Bathyj and daddy Satya has just force admitted Phil to rehab.

gold_drake642d ago

you know why MS has so much money, and it aint cause of the gaming xbox branch.

so lets not kid ourselves.

PhillyDonJawn642d ago

Xbox was shown to be more profitable than ps

jznrpg642d ago

@PhillyDownJawn not more profitable. More revenue with ABK acquisition but them going multiplat shows they are not making much profit

ocelot07642d ago

That's great for Xbox gamers ain't it that Microsoft are more wealthy than Sony. Is that really a argument use are using now lol?

Imagine me in my job. Arguing with a fellow security guard at another company. Hahah well the company I work for is worth £800m the one you work for is only work £600m!

641d ago
Knightofelemia641d ago

Microsoft may have more money but Sony has the talented studios and the games to back up those studios.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 641d ago
Chevalier641d ago

Plus turning down Marvel too. Spiderman is only exclusive to Playstation because of that

Hedstrom642d ago

Best deal deal in gaming must be when Sony bought Insomniac for 229 million dollars. They made over 800 millions on Spiderman for the ps4 alone. Thats just crazy!

XBManiac642d ago

More in the 1.000 million now.

gold_drake642d ago

another Interview?

how is he the only one who loves the spotlight as much as he does lol

Futureshark642d ago

Let's not forget he also famously passed on Spider-man, Genshin Impact and GTA3.

However it's almost kind of cute how he can keep that sh1t-eating grin and say he's a 'no regrets' kind of guy, especially when you think how much just these 5 titles could have swung the world in Xbox's favour instead of Sonys.

How he's kept his job I don't know, he must sure be keeping Papa Nadella's shaft warm somehow.

"But, but Gamepass, he introduced that!!!"

Yes he did, and now look at Xbox, all it's exclusives are coming to Playstation now rendering the platform obsolete.

DarXyde642d ago

Honestly, with that kind of track record, you can't convince me Spencer hasn't eaten it from the back in the name of self preservation. Probably unwashed...and at least twice.

That aside, my interpretation of everything here is Xbox has been mismanaged a bit too much and Nadella came down from his throne. The way it is now, I don't believe for a minute the multiplatform move was Spencer's idea. I don't even think the acquisitions was Spencer's work. At this point, I reckon he's got as much power in his role as Hunter Biden at a Ukrainian energy company.

DivineHand125642d ago

You can never tell how things will turn out if he had said yes to those games. Xbox already has access to some great IPs, however, they hardly do anything with them or fail to deliver. It's also possible their presentation wasn't good at the time, and they made sure the next presentation was better.

I believe that part of being successful is releasing things in the right place at the right time.

Many major corporations have a story similar to passing on successful business ideas. Let us look at Sony Pictures for example. Back when Marvel went bankrupt, they had the opportunity to buy the entire Marvel for only $25 Million but turned them down. An unnamed big shot at Sony reportedly claimed that “nobody gives a shit about any of the other Marvel characters,”. They ended up taking Spiderman for $10 Million instead.

https://www.avclub.com/sony...

Fast forward to today, we can see what the Marvel brand has done for Disney. Is it possible the same success would have been possible had Sony acquired those IPs. We can't say that for sure and it is possible most of those IPs that are successful today may not have been used.

Show all comments (35)