All Channels
Popular
550°

Red Dead Redemption 2 Development Gearing Up?

Play: "Rockstar appears to be ramping up development on something and it seems likely that it's Red Dead Redemption 2."

Read Full Story >>
play-mag.co.uk
4268d ago Replies(4)
Crazay4268d ago

pretty sure it was already in development. Same as Bully 2.

Hellsvacancy4268d ago (Edited 4268d ago )

I'd love a new Red Dead game as much as the next gamer, however, I would rather R* made a new ip, a sci-fi maybe (hopefully)

Basically I don't want them to be forever making sequels, you KNOW damn well GTA6 will be released at some point this gen

sikandar2014268d ago

Sci-fi really???
R* are better with Action, Adventure genre.. There is no need for them to develop any Sci-Fi related game..

Wigriff4268d ago

There's no point in being against them branching out; they're obviously very capable creatively.

Hellsvacancy4268d ago (Edited 4268d ago )

So you telling me R* couldn't make an action, adventure sci fi game, most sci fi films/games are action adventure

I think you underestimate R*

MysticStrummer4267d ago

Because action adventure sci-fi doesn't exist?

O.o

nucky644268d ago (Edited 4268d ago )

@hells.....there is enough sci-fi games already - give me RDR2!!!! I need a new-gen western fix.

edit: at everyone below who says it would be RDR3 - if it continues from redemption - it's 2. the first game was "red dead REVOLVER" #2 was REDEMPTION.....so if another red dead REDEMPTION is made,it'll be 2 - as in the second REDEMPTION game. how is this hard to understand?

OCEANGROWNKUSH4267d ago (Edited 4267d ago )

The franchise is "RED DEAD", it is likely the next game would retain that naming scheme, and change the last word in the title... "Red Dead Revolution" was rumored to be the new title many moons ago.

TH3BR3W4267d ago

Most likely it would be called read dead revenge or retribution cause of how redemption ended.

Aberdasher4266d ago

Red Dead Revengeance.

I'll shut the door on my way out.

Aberdasher4265d ago

Most of the sci-fi titles available now or upcoming are FPS's. Would you really say no to an open world sci-fi epic done by R*? Blade Runner/Total Recall/Fifth Element-esque elements, like Dfooster said. The more I think about this, the more I want it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4265d ago
Dfooster4267d ago (Edited 4267d ago )

Yeah I agree. Remember the chase scene from attack of the clones in those hover cars I've always imagined a rockstar GTA style version of that in kind of a bladerunner film noire style. Let's be honest that hasn't been done yet or at least successfully.

Deceiver_Of_The_Gods4268d ago

I liked Red Dead , but R* doesn't realease game sequels so fast , they may have openly suggested that they are gonna do it but that doesn't mean anything , a new Bully is more likely to happen as they said that after MP3 is done they might start working on it

Lionsguard4268d ago

GTA4 and GTA5 were 5 years apart. RDR is almost 5 years old.

Paytaa4267d ago

Red Dead Revolver and Red Dead Redemption were also 5 years apart.

TH3BR3W4267d ago

"I don't think we have time for a hand job joe... sheeyah huh..."

F'king love idiocracy lol

CrowbaitBob4267d ago

I like your goat. There, I said it.

Show all comments (86)
30°

Red Dead Redemption 2 Turns Into Elden Ring in New Mod, Featuring Uncle as Final Boss

Red Dead Redemption 2 mod turns the game into Elden Ring, adding spells, boss fights, and Uncle as the final boss.

110°

GTA5 Has Sold Over 220 Million Copies, Red Dead Redemption 2 Has Sold Over 79 Million Units

Take-Two announced its financial results for Q2 of fiscal year 2026, and shared an update on the sales of GTA5 and Red Dead Redemption 2.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
TheDreamCorridor184d ago

You think Rockstar views Red Dead 2 as a failure because it didn't sell 150m copies?

jznrpg184d ago

3 billion or so in revenue not including online stuff I’m sure they don’t

SethNW184d ago

I am pretty sure they don't. It was profitable and made them a lot of money. Not GTA5 money but far from failure. Maybe it is lower priority franchise, due to being smaller, but that is about the lowest they would put it as. Only thing they do consider failure is RDR2 Online, unlike GTA5 Online, that RDR2 Online flopped. Hence why it got less support. And when it come to profits, sales for both combined don't come close to GTA Online microtansactions. Hence why everything very quickly got canceled and GTA Online was top priority, so no GTA6 for a long time, no DLC for GTA5, despite there being 5 DLCs planned, at least I think it was 5, give or take one. But as I see it, they needed to rejuvenate interest and all, hence why GTA6 eventually is getting made. But what they are really looking forward to is refresh of Online.

ZeekQuattro183d ago

Only in terms of the online aspect of the game. They didn't support it as much as they did GTA V Online. I remember people being pissed about that.

jznrpg184d ago

I own a few GTAs but never played them. I love Red Dead though

Yui_Suzumiya178d ago (Edited 178d ago )

Boring and overrated. Red Dead Redemption is pretty good though. The Hundred Line: Last Defense Academy is my personal GOAT. We need more stuff like that from TooKyo.

victorMaje184d ago

I must be one of the few who are fine with the GTA6 delay. People treat that game like it’s the 2nd coming lol.

FIELDMARSHALL_P183d ago

My daughter asked me how I felt about I shrugged and said I don't care gives me time to finish up games I already have. It's all good let them make the best game they can.

RedDevils184d ago

Wish they make another Manhunt or Bully.

gold_drake184d ago

damn, thats a ridiculous number

Show all comments (11)
160°

Dan Houser: RDR2 was "behind schedule" and "over budget so much I didn’t want to think about it"

Dan Houser opens up about Red Dead Redemption 2’s rocky development, calling it behind schedule, massively over budget, and full of pressure to prove doubters wrong.

Read Full Story >>
thegamepost.com
Storm23188d ago (Edited 188d ago )

The world they built is pretty amazing. Unfortunately, the game was mostly boring to me. I definitely had fun in some parts, but it didn't do it for me as a whole like the first one did. I loved RDR so much.

The budgets and time it takes to make games these days is out of control. Such a big risk. If a game isn't a huge hit, it is often it for a studio. Scary. I really miss the PS2 and PS3 days where studeios could make 4 games in a generation and take risks in making something new. And so many were using their own engines. Those were the days.

neutralgamer1992188d ago

Agreed. I love RDR but couldn't get into RDR2. The animations take forever and game slows you down on purpose. It won't let you have fun because R* want us to play the game they want to. I know millions love RDR2 and I even bought and own it. But just wasn't for me.

It's like comparing GTA4 to saints row 2. One game was about fun while the other was about realism and that's coming from someone who beat GTA4 many times. I much rather a game be fun to play than chase realism

YodaCracker188d ago

GTA IV’s realism is what made it so much more fun for me. I loved experimenting with the physics.

Storm23187d ago

I bought RDR2 also. Put 100+ hours into it and beat it our of respect for Rockstar and all the people saying it was the greatest game ever. RDR blew my mind but might also have been the best time in gaming for me personally. l loved that PS3 gen so much.

I am excited to see what GTA6 is like.

188d ago Replies(1)