This is a statement I really disagree with. "Turn brain off, play COD", since it "is an easy game". It is a MP game. If it is easy for you, it is easy for the guy on the other team. I played (really loved it up to MW2, then I tried but couldn't like it anymore since IW imploded) with my brain at 100% or more to win more and more and always stood above average.

I'm playing through Diablo and Tomb Raider now. Earlier this year TLOU. I really don't feel like I'm using my brain more on these games than I was on competitive MW2 games. For instance: I tried to know where all my team mates were; when they got killed, always looked to see where and by each weapon, always checked my map to see where enemies where shooting without silencer etc. In the end, I was called cheater everyday because, as many other players, I had the ability to tell where the enemy team was most of the game.
So, to be honest, I consider those games much easier than most MP matches I had in my COD history.

If you are referring to accessibility, well, then I have to agree, but this is a huge merit to the game design. Anyone can play. But if you want to be top 1 on your matches, better stay focused and think about the match you're playing.

To me are just two things:
1. Loss of production value. I feel like CODs since IW implosion are not as top tier as they where.
2. Nerf-addicted design. Until MW2, your char was very powerful, but so were the enemies'. Since then, they joined the need bandwagon and, for instance, no shotgun as secondaries, perk effects watered down through two, sometimes three perks.
Just think about how powerful tier 2 perks were in MW2. Yet it was balanced because EVERY perk on this choice was godly. This is simply forbidden today.

I believe he is imitating the plane running over is balls, not dry humping it.

Yeah, it's close to the bottom. There are a couple of worse ones. Infinite Warfare definitely deserves its place.

There's a number a lot worse than Vangaurd. It's also a lot better than that car crash Treyarch released before it.

Same for me.
I was never huge into Call of Duty, but I sunk a lot of time into WaW.
Both the campaign and the multiplayer are on point. Wouldn't mind a remaster.

I quit on CoD for a long while. Though I'm the odd man out that actually really enjoyed the campaign for WWII, being I got it through Humble monthly way back when.

I agree, The Infinite campaign feels more like it's own thing that they slapped the CoD name on. If it stood on it's own, (sans the CoD name) I think it could have been it's own scifi franchise. And a damn good looking game, to boot. I never bothered to play the multiplayer.

And Ghost for that matter.

That was one I grabbed for Playstation because it pretty much just came out during the Redbox purge of videogames, and I got it for dirt cheap.

It was great coming home to an update every night, and watching one game eat up almost half my console's memory.

Agree, but this gives me hope that one day Ray Tracing can be a software based feature and not require some type of proprietary hardware to achieve. Software will always outpace Hardware so it could happen, but I feel like its going to take a lot more time to achieve the same level that RTX has already shown glimpses of so far. Really just waiting for Cyberpunk to see if RTX is actually something viable. I think if anybody can truly showcase RTX Features it would be Projekt Red.

It doesn't need to, the game was already fantastic, imo.