Article says: "Of all the game developers in the world, DICE should be the last ones to ever question another developer on day one multiplayer or on launch stability. "

I think DICE would be quite qualified to answer that question given issues they have encountered in the past. They would know full well how difficult it can be.

This "article" blows things way out of proportion.

The guy simply says he is "worried" after mentioning he loved the game. He is obviously a worried fan.

On top of that, that is his personal twitter where he says "my thoughts are my own". How did this turn into a dice vs ubi article?

It's been 308 days and the GD netcode still isn't fixed in Battlefield 4. DICE SE shouldn't even peep a word about anything online-video game related.

These guys at DICE should be taking a page out of other developers books.There a fu##ing embarrassment after the state of BF4.The game still smells of tramp pish.Worry about your own games in development and pray that some of the scars that you have left can heal with the gaming community.Moron.

It doesn't sound spiteful, it just sounds like a warning. "Hey, we never got day one online working properly. Watch out Ubisoft, remember what happened to us."

I hate Battlefield, always have but even i know he's warning them.

People are against it because Hardline isn't different enough to entertain them.

A person makes a personal Tweet and suddenly the internet rages over DICE asking Ubisoft (which never actually happened) if it can deliver?

Internet...Y U Do Dis ?

Unprofessional ass hats at Dice. They should worry about their own POS of a game called Bf4 instead of wasting time on twitter.

Yeah BF4 had the second worst functioning online MP I've ever experienced. Half the time you couldn't even get online. Even today, I still get that can't connect to EA servers sometimes.

The worst online MP launch had to be Gears 2 though...I think it was so bad that it damaged the brand.

Dice actually apologized. That's more than ubisoft has ever done.

Sure it took em 9 months but with me a little humility goes a long way. Oh and I just past 200 hours on BF 4 so buggy or not it was a really fun game. That's more time than I have put into every ubisoft game combined and I own a lot. I'd say dice is the only one that can say this cause ubisoft is the new EA, and the BF4 things was kinda blown out of proportion. I bought a ps4 at launch and before Christmas I was playing online with minimal issues.

So in the end I would gladly take a fun game that's a little glitchy over a bland rehash that is still glitchy. (Assassins creed 3) come on how could anyone defend ubisoft with that one? I actually didn't finish the game because I got stuck in a rock. In between a rock and a tree to be exact. It didn't stop there either. That game was strait up unfinished and it lacked the main reason that we play games. FUN. If it was fun I would have found a way out of that rock and finished the game

lol bf4 is still broken

LOL WTF??? is this shit??? You should ask yourself is BF4 is finally stable?? not worrying about other publishers games LOL Day 1 STFU!!!!!

They are just salty BF4 was a sloppy f'd up mess at launch on PC. Definitely lost some respect as a dev they once had. You know it's bad when your old game, BF3, STILL plays better, more stable and more fluid than your new game, BF4.

Ho ho! Oh, the irony Alan...

Launch a game that works on day one - or day one hundred, even - before you start taking shots at other developers, DICE.

Why don't people read the article, the guy is a fan of the game and to is only asking uni to heed advice, because of what did has gone through.

Wow. WTF is everyones problem? A person who works for a company that made a game who's multiplayer didn't work on launch is concerned that a developer may release a game who's multiplayer doesn't work properly at launch. How is this far fetched? Someone experiences something then is worried that it could be repeated by someone else. It makes PERFECT FUCKING SENSE.