All Channels
Popular
230°

Running CoD 4 on low-end hardware

Benchmark results for Call of Duty 4 run on slow/HTPC hardware.

IzKyD13316544d ago

lol, with console gaming, all you need is an HDMI cable and the right TV and your good to go, PC gaming requires more coin

iceice1236544d ago

It's true it does cost more to be a PC gamer. You can't honestly deny the fact it takes more than 350+$ to make a PC to run COD4 as good as the 360.

andyboy136544d ago

You stated a PC costs a lot more coin, but, you also said you need to hook you console up to the right TV. Well aren't the right TV's about $1000 or a lot more? well lets see $1000 for tv plus $400 for console, last time I checked you can build a pretty darn nice pc for $1400.

Don't take that as a flame
I am just trying to prove that both sides of the fight are expensive to do correctly

Kami6544d ago

yeah you could build an nice computer with that but you will also need a nice moitor with a high resolution(at least 1680x1050)and som espeakers for it and thatsanother buck there

Panthers6544d ago

A medium gaming PC costs a lot more than a console, and that is with everything taken into account.

A 32" Sony Bravia from Walmart costs $685 and is really nice. That is what I am getting next. So that is a lot less than you said.

Charmers6544d ago (Edited 6544d ago )

@Kami I don't see how that is problematic you can pick up a 22" monitor that does 1680 x 1050 for well under £200 . The cheapest 720p television I have seen retails at £300 so that is 100 more and a lower resolution.

@Panthers that depends, I built my quad with 8800gts at the same time as the PS3 was launched in my country. The PS3 was launched in my country with a price tag of £425, I built my quad with 8800gts for £500. So no having a PC rig that can beat these consoles can easily be done on a budget.

That isn't the only extra "hidden" cost with consoles. There is the small matter of game prices. With the price of console games being ridiculous at £40/£50 a go I for one am glad the PC exists because I can pick the same product up for £10/£15 less. I buy at least 1 game a month, over a year that means I save £150 over a five year period my gaming will have cost me £750 less on the PC than it would on the console.

You see this is the thing with a PC you pay for the parts and that is it but with a console you NEVER stop paying for it. In the short term a console always looks "cheap and cost effective" however in the long term if you buy a lot of games the console route proves to be the most "expensive" route to take. I have no doubt I will get a few disagrees because I have stated the obvious, but ther you go.

poopface16544d ago

Pretty much everybody wants a computer, pretty much everyone wants a tv. If you wanna play games you can add more to a computer that is kinda expensive already, or you can buy a console and connect it to your tv. Yes HD tvs cost money, but most people are buying HD tvs already, and most people will have a tv regardless of if they want to play games. Most people will not have an awsome computer unless they paid more initialy for that pc or build it themselvs.

My example: In 2005 I bought a decent pc with a crappy integrated grafix card. I paid 100$more for a used card so I could play CS:source at high settings. Thats 1100$ for a pc that cant play a year old game with full AA or AF. last year I bought a 360 for 350 and a 32 in 1080i plasma for around 500$ tahts less than I paid for my pc, and the 360 can play games better than a 850 computer could back then and today, cause most people dont build there own computer unless their more avid gamers on it, and even their likley to pay more than 850 to have the cutting edge pc that they want. I didnt buy a HD tv for my 360, I bought a 360 and a hd TV cause I wanted HD movie/tv/games(yes Im talking about upscaling my dvds not hD DVD).

IzKyD13316544d ago

i guess i hurt alot of PC gamer's feelings with my comment....

andyboy136544d ago

I agree you can get cheap tv, that is like getting a $300 computer though to game with. A proper hd tv, not a no name brand made in nowhere, is going to cost you some money. playing on a sd tv is like playing in 640 x 480. I bet a lot of crap computers can play most games well at that resolution. All I was trying to say is, you can go crappy on both sides of the spectrum. Hell, my dad has a runco 3 chip dlp projector, I still prefer a pc. Just a matter of personal opinion
$40 8600
$49 asus mobo
$40 for 2gb decent ram
$55 320gb hdd
$75 e2100 c2d 2.0ghz
$55 antec 300 case
$25 dvd burner
$50 ocz 500w power supply

Oh wait, that is cheaper than a console and would play any game really well. Also, like was said, for hd, $220 for a 20" 1680 x 1050, so, don't say pc gaming is soo damn expensive when in reality, it isn't.

I didn't throw in a mouse because that is like buying another controller, otherwise add in $30 for a decent ocz optical gaming mouse, oh no.... $20 more. It's all personal preference. Don't take this as a flame, I am just trying to prove, you can game on a ps3, a xbox 360, or a pc for about $400. Take your pick.

gta_cb6543d ago

"$40 8600
$49 asus mobo
$40 for 2gb decent ram
$55 320gb hdd
$75 e2100 c2d 2.0ghz
$55 antec 300 case
$25 dvd burner
$50 ocz 500w power supply"

a couple things you wanna change in there lol, the CPU is cr@p and so is the graphics card.

need a decent CPU like the E4700 c2d 2.4GHZ that E2100 isnt actually a c2d its a pentium dual core.

secondly the graphics card should be something like the 8800GT. i have a 8800GT and my mate has the 8600 and i ALWAYS have such an advantage compared to him when running games, and i am even using Windows Vista and he is using Windows XP.

andyboy136543d ago

GTA, I know you should have those upgrades, actually, that 2100 can hit 3ghz on average with a arctic cooler freezer 7. This was just to prove that you can dive into pc gaming for the same price as a console.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 6543d ago
Silogon6544d ago (Edited 6544d ago )

It already was on low end hardware, the xbox 360.

-SIXAXIS-6544d ago

So, I guess Call of Duty 4 still won't run on my laptop.

gk076544d ago (Edited 6544d ago )

just get a job and save your gil i did and im lovin my new joint pretty fucckin sweet i can run everything on high under win xp and 1.2 i hit disagree on accident

poopface16543d ago

where do you live, in Midgar or some sh@t? How many battles did you fight before you had enought gil for you computer?

Ricdog6544d ago

PC games, for ever!

consoles suck balls.

140°

Only nine franchises make up the top 20 all-time best-selling PlayStation chart in the US

In honour of PlayStation's 30th birthday yesterday in the US, data company Circana has dug out figures showing the top 20 best-selling PlayStation video games ever (date-range Jan 1995 to July 2025). Don't get too excited.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
JEECE245d ago

This is a great reminder of how game sales have become more concentrated in a smaller number of games/series over time. In the PS1/PS2 era a game was a success if it sold a million or a few million copies. The GTA games (3/Vice City/San Andreas) were pretty big outliers in selling as much as they did during the PS2 era. So in the minds of a lot of gamers something like FF VII feels like it was as big of a PS1 game as God of War 2018 was for PS4, but in reality far fewer people bought it (though it has obviously reached additional people through remasters, etc.).

StoneTitan244d ago

this was alwalys the case and will always be the case. with everything

245d ago
Zerobalance245d ago (Edited 245d ago )

What this says to me is, not many people are buying a PS to play PS exclusives. Like so many false narratives, like Xbox gamers don't buy games! It seems Playstation as a default system is a vanilla system to play call of duty, Minecraft, GTA games and a sports games.

badz149244d ago (Edited 244d ago )

if you look back into the PS history, it has always been the 3rd parties who sells the most games. it was just that the PS1 and PS2 were so dominant that many of those 3rd party games were exclusives. so, back during the PS1 and PS2 days, the strategy was "to sell as many consoles as possible in order to sell more 1st party exclusives" to ride on that wave. The strategy to push many 1st party exclusives to sell consoles only started with the PS3 when many of those prior 3rd party exclusives went multiplat but more accurately, it started with the PSP.

Sony saw with the PSP, which was being trounced in sales by the DS, that 3rd party exclusives are hard to come by if you're not dominating the market. So they started building more 1st party games and when the PS3 were facing difficulties in sales, they knew they had to rely on their own to differentiate the PS3 from the 360. So the strategy back then changed to "release more 1st party exclusives in order to sell more consoles".

the only manufacturer that is still consistently selling their hardware to play 1st party exclusives, is Nintendo, and that was because they gave up the armrace for power thus they can't rely on 3rd parties anymore as all multiplats play better on competing consoles. AND that's also why they are the most ominous in going after emulators and also patent trolling!

so, you're not wrong there, but not an "aha!" moment or anything. it has been this way since the last, at least, 15 years for Playstation.

244d ago
Deathdeliverer244d ago

@zerobalance

So... what this tells you is that Call of duty, being the absolute check writer that it is, has been outsold by Last of us, God of war, 2 Spider man games..... Saying Playstation exclusives doesn't sell is like saying call of duty doesn't sell because they have outsold some of iterations. Does that make sense to you?

245d ago
245d ago
Show all comments (13)
140°

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III Coming to Game Pass July 24

Everything you need to know about Modern Warfare III coming to Xbox Game Pass and PC Game Pass.

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
darthv72660d ago (Edited 660d ago )

Will be interesting to see what sort of numbers GP users draw in come tomorrow. It is believed that this is one many have been waiting for.

660d ago
thesoftware730659d ago

Darth,

That is not accurate; this game is old, and most people who want it have already bought it. You might get a small number of subs, but we will mostly see a good influx of players(not new subs) from people with Game Pass who will try it, which is what happened with D4.

CoD: BO 6 will be the test for actual sub numbers.

darthv72659d ago

That's fair... seeing as many have been saying they want CoD in GP. My comment was more of , now that its here... what can it do. Im sure there will be other titles in the franchise that will either entice or turn off different users.

Bathyj659d ago

No one's buying a console and signing up for a monthly bill just to get this game to avoid buying it. That's ridiculous. Besides everyone bagged the crap out of this on release for the 4 hour campaign.

andy85659d ago

Sweet. Never got round to it on release. I'll give the campaign a go

chicken_in_the_corn658d ago

Severly underrated game. Big improvement over 2.

50°

Why MW 2019 is still the best looking Call of Duty to date

MW 2019 is five years old at this point and on previous gen hardware, but it is still the best looking Call of Duty game to date.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
EazyC756d ago

MW was an excellent videogame. They messed up Spec Ops big time, but aside from this it was a huge step in the right direction initially. Most notably, at launch it seemed to come from a very cohesive creative vision that was felt across gameplay, to story to art style/visual direction. It was also very notably written by prominent ex-Naughty Dog guys that quit almost immediately before release.

That COMPLETELY dissolved through post-launch content and the full pivot to a "cross-mode" narrative that completely obliterated the cohesion in overall story direction. Warzone then "became" the new face of Call of Duty and the franchise completely removed itself from anything remotely creatively "good". It is a pure money machine, so I kinda get why they're doing it....but I personally completely lost interest.

I would love to see Infinity Ward move off CoD and get to make their own product with full control. They clearly have some massive talent in their ranks but it's perverted by Activision's corporate interests.