@XBLSkull

I did a quick google search for your issue and found the following article:

https://support.us.playstat...

Please follow those steps and if they don't work then please call Sony Support

@Spartacus10 please stop XD

@Spartacus10

"Yeah if you are a retard and dont know that all PC's dont have the same specifications."

Most people that I've seen who primarily game on PC have good specs, there isn't a way to tell what every PC gamers has but It doesn't take much to get specs that have more power then the next-gen consoles, you can build a $600 PC that includes OS, M&KB that's better ( http://pcpartpicker.com/p/d... ) and LinusTechtips has a video showing a nearly 5 year old GTX 480 playing Watch Dogs at 1080p 30 fps on high while underclocked. https://www.youtube.com/wat...

"Console gamers get better graphics than most PC gamers. Its just the vocal PC elitists such as youself that create the illusion that everyone on PC gets better graphics than consoles."

How would you know? There isn't a list made up of all that information and Steam survey's don't represent all 75+ million active users since they're random and voluntary.

Right now PC hardware sales are doing great which means more and more are getting better setups. http://ca.ign.com/articles/...

@AndrewLB

The witcher 2 was a pain for people to run as well i just crossfired it and it ran fine even with ubersampling on. Even with ubersampling on i still ran it on ultra at 30 fps @1080p. But i turned it off because it didnt make the game look that much better so it ran at 60 fps without that crazy ubersampling they do.

Can I run this with a gtx 880m with 8 gb ddr5?

"Problem is: the best specs are shared by a small percentage of PC gamers, yet the fanboys treat it as the norm. To be sure, PC gaming is cheaper in the long run, but the trade off is a higher level of complication: you can't unbox a high end gaming PC and immediately get to playing any game like a console."

what does this have to do with the tech thats out there. this is something that console fanboys ignores or just dont get. if my rig can it maxx, good for me, if not o well. when i upgrade i can do it then. some how they act like devs are not trying to push the limits. we treat it as the norm because it has been there. we do treat res, fps, and old gfx effects like they're new even if we can run them at a frame rate we consider acceptable. whats not to understand.

i what is this trying to win an argument with spec. seem like your mad cause pc gamers be putting these dumb arguments in perspective.

and you completely lost me with this one "you can't unbox a high end gaming PC and immediately get to playing any game like a console."

even though alienware is a rip off, isnt what they specialize in. dont you have to install game and updates on consoles now. and another a gaming pc is not just for games, its just built for gaming.

yall fanboys are running out of ammo, just play your games like we all do.

@ Vegamyster

Wait.... so its ok if you make a guess on 75m gaming PC's based on the PC's of a few people you know, but if someone was to use a steam survey then they would be all wrong?

You also seem to be under the illusion that theoretical power = actual power.

The difference between a console and a PC GPU to a developer is that one remains relevant over time while the other gets forgotten with time.

Sure you can buy a PC costing as much as a console, but dont expect it to perform better than a console for any more than a year. (and thats assuming youre not paying for a copy of windows)

@Spartacus10

My comment stated there was no way to tell who has what, i never claimed the people I've seen represented all PC gamers as i said right after "there isn't a way to tell what every PC gamers has"

You're the one who said "Console gamers get better graphics than most PC gamers." and i replied to that with "How would you know? There isn't a list made up of all that information"

"Sure you can buy a PC costing as much as a console, but dont expect it to perform better than a console for any more than a year."

I never claimed you could, the example i used was $600 which is $200 more IF you're not taking into considering subscription fee's for console online.

"You also seem to be under the illusion that theoretical power = actual power."

That example i used has plenty of benchmarks so it's not theoretical, the CPU is over twice the speed of the console APU and the GPU can play all games better

http://cdn.videocardz.com/1...

http://media.bestofmicro.co...

http://media.bestofmicro.co...

You can build a $600-800 PC that has a better CPU and GPU than what you'll find in a $400 console.

However... Not every game is going to be optimized to make the most of that hardware, and performance from one game to the next will vary greatly. You may have the wrong kind of video card, and that game you just bought may run better on the other brand of cards. Your game may be poorly ported and requires a monster CPU to get decent performance (GTA4 was a good example of this.), and... well, that cheap PC you built doesn't exactly have a great CPU.

This myth that you can just fork over $600 and have a PC that stomps consoles on every game has been going around for too long. In order to have better performance than any console on any game across the board, you're going to have to fork over a lot more money than that.

@Spotie
Oh for God sake. Constructing a PC and getting Windows installed and a game running takes a day at the most when you don't know what you're doing.

It's not hard to build a PC.

A days work for a better and more diverse experience with the best and biggest exclusives, with a bigger game library, cheaper games that run better? Surely the whole plug and play argument is moot by now.

The last time I had issues with a game I couldn't install was Dawn of War 2 years ago. My PS4? PSN down. Sound not working. Almost every game so far has crashed. WiFi not being recognized. TLOU having slow MP matchmaking. All these things I can't fix . On a PC you can, or you don't even get those problems.

@fr0sty

"This myth that you can just fork over $600 and have a PC that stomps consoles on every game has been going around for too long. In order to have better performance than any console on any game across the board, you're going to have to fork over a lot more money than that. "

There is very few examples of a game being so poorly coded that superior hardware will lag behind weaker hardware, the example you named GTA4 is one of those rare examples and a more recent one is CoD Ghosts. If you build a $600 PC you can get a R9 270 & FX 6300, go look at benchmarks of games with that GPU and you'll see that games that are considered poorly optimized like AC4 & WD run better compared to the consoles.

With last gen you saw plently of crappy poor ports on the PS3 that ran worse then the 360 versions like Skyrim, Bayonetta, most of the modern CoD games ect, even on these new consoles they're struggling to maintain solid fps in a bunch of games so this isn't a PC only issue.

@@Spartacus10

My 4870 i bought right after i bought my xbox and ps3, ran crysis on high at 30 fps and xbox 360 and ps3 couldnt. And that card cost 130 dollars when i bought it off ebay and those consoles never ever came close to the graphics of it. It would max all games but crysis. Bad company 2 i played the crap out of it made console version look like dogcrap. High draw distances in that game on ultra and it ran it at x8 AA on as well and still got 80 fps locked hard @1080P. FAllout 3,bioshock, dragon age 1, and so many other games it maxed easy and the difference between console and pc versions of games were huge.

But i do have to give the xbox 360 credit, on the day it launched call of duty 2 was the first time a game had almost the same quality of graphics as the PC version of a game. I was shocked and actually bought the console version of the game because it looked so good and i needed to upgrade my pc at the time. Well after that it was never close again pc ran away from console again and very fast.

Image is broke on mine too

Same here

Same

me too, I thought it was Chrome

Same thing here. Glad to see I'm not alone.

Same here.. It made me check stuff and stir up some sh*t in my settings section of Chrome. it made me nervous, anxious and most of all.. It made me wonder about my (immense) vulnerability as a goat (Who are known to have 0% technical knowledge) on the internet.

I was about to say the same thing... So weird. It's like 90% of them...