All Channels
Popular
150°

How Big Will Destiny Be?

Hardcore Gamer: Destiny is already on pace to be one of the largest shooters ever made, and the possibilities for expansion are nearly limitless.

Read Full Story >>
hardcoregamer.com
ValKilmer4364d ago

Bigger than Tom Hanks in Big!

BiggCMan4364d ago

Bigger than Val Kilmer as well? :O

ValKilmer4364d ago

Nothing is bigger than Val Kilmer. Not even Val Kilmer's ego is bigger than Val Kilmer.

JediDiah4364d ago

Val, what the heck happened to ya buddy?

JBSleek4364d ago

How is Destiny on pace to be one of the largest shooters ever? It hasn't even come out yet. Also to be mentioned with such company this early is premature.

I think people need to temper their expectations for Destiny. This type of hype can only lead to disappointment. It will surely be a good game, only time will tell if it will be a great game.

user74029314364d ago

again, downplaying destiny because it has exclusive content to ps4. ANYTHING sony you downplay haha. this guy ^ :D

JBSleek4364d ago

What? This has nothing to do with PS4. What I said was reasonable and logical.

Not one mention of consoles or PC. I stand by what I said. Destiny will be a good game, time will tell if it will be great.

No fanboy crap here.

LightDiego4364d ago

Agree with @DirtyPimp.
This guy, is a big joke. xD

WeAreLegion4364d ago

Because pre-orders for a new IP don't usually go this high.

http://www.vgchartz.com/pre...

This game is going to be HUGE.

Soldierone4364d ago

"On Pace" means that it is becoming one of the largest games. You don't need to actually see something to see that it's hinting at being something bigger.

With the Beta being so massive and two major expansion packs in the works, yes Destiny is "on pace" to be massive.

I mean it's Destiny, not Hardline. Play the Beta and see why it's "on pace." (I do agree that could set you up for disappointment, but normally when hype grows, developers try to tame it. Bungie seems to be thrilled and keeps pumping it, so there must be something big.)

dcj05244364d ago

OH they mean largest in terms of sales! I thought they meant largest in terms of in game content.

TheDrunkenJester4364d ago

I think it's referring to the size and content of the game, not how well it will sell and review.

XisThatKid4363d ago

500 million for a budget can be a start, one of (if not) the largest in industry history. The extent of virtual mass the universe is and commercially the launch of this new ip is unprecedented. It is indeed on the pace of being one of the biggest shooters. In a literal sense with its virtual universe and now growth of hype and commercial recognition of the brand title. Undeniably one of the most ambitious.
I see what your saying with the logic your speaking but it's difficult for that statement not to come of as bias

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4363d ago
uth114364d ago

Big enough that it gets more stories on n4g than even TLOU?

Rob_Ko4364d ago (Edited 4364d ago )

can't wait for Mercury - the garden world.
also I hope they will increase level cap to 10 on 23-rd, I got some sweet blue lvl 10 weapons I would love to try :)

Fiestabrian4363d ago

@battlefieldlover... They have not released any info on mercury, just that it's a option.
Venus is where the vex are and that famous artwork of venus depicts a garden like maze thing which looks beautiful. N4g and the phantom dislikes are soo stupid.

Rob_Ko4363d ago

watch the opening cinematic - he cleraly says "Mercury become a garden world"

Rob_Ko4363d ago

no worries, I know Venus is going to be jungle like planet too.

RantandRave4364d ago (Edited 4364d ago )

Is Uranus going to be in this game??? LOL!!! No seriously is it based on only our planets or multiple galaxies? The beta doesn't let me see anything else.

WeAreLegion4364d ago (Edited 4364d ago )

Confirmed planets/places, so far:

-Earth
-The Moon
-Mars
-Venus
-Europa

RantandRave4364d ago (Edited 4364d ago )

@WeAreLegion

Thank you kind sir. I truly appreciate it.
+1 Bubble as I found this very helpful.

Show all comments (33)
110°

Star Wars x Destiny Collaboration: Gear & Cosmetics Launching February 4th

Destiny 2 x Star Wars collaboration is here! Get exclusive gear, cosmetics, and accessories when Heresy launches on February 4th. Don’t miss it!

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
coolbeans520d ago (Edited 520d ago )

Fortnite-ification comes for all live-service games.

Neonridr519d ago

now this is an armor set done right.

40°

Destiny Mobile spin-off will reportedly be revealed very soon

The long-rumoured Destiny Mobile game from NetEase may finally be ready for reveal according to multiple leakers.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
280°

Xbox Passed On Destiny & Guitar Hero According To Phil Spencer

Phil Spencer talks candidly about missing out on both Destiny and Guitar Hero

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
anast667d ago

He paid billions for Starfield. This should be the real story.

667d ago Replies(1)
Sciurus_vulgaris667d ago

Microsoft bought all of Zenimax Media for 7 billion, while Sony paid 4 billion for Bungie. I think Microsoft got the better deal due to acquiring Fallout, ElderScrolls and Doom.

667d ago
anast667d ago

This can't be true. They only bought Starfield...

InUrFoxHole667d ago

@anast
Should've thought that one out buddy, lol.

anast667d ago (Edited 667d ago )

Yeah, I thought it out. I'm not sure you did. But since we are buddy's now, you're welcome.

667d ago
anast667d ago

"Clearly your parents didn't teach you"

You know you lost, when you have to resort to this tactic.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 667d ago
Profchaos667d ago

So you're saying that Microsoft has missed out on so many huge gaming franchise in the last 25 years from GTA exclusivity to guitar hero and destiny it's just laughable they had so many misses

Reaper22_667d ago

Yea, but they're still 100 times more wealthy than Sony. I would say it worked out well.

Gamingsince1981667d ago

Xbox is dead all that money doesn't help.

Hypertension140667d ago

What has work out well? It sure as hell had nothing to do with Xbox.

andy85667d ago

That isn't because of Xbox though. This is a gaming page, not an I get supplemented by father Windows page

Bathyj667d ago

Microsoft's money has nothing to do with Xbox.
Xbox is a money pit to them they would love to ditch but are after some ROI first.

Let's face it, Xbox is like a red headed stepchild that steals from you to buy drugs.

Hofstaderman667d ago (Edited 667d ago )

MIicrosoft is NOT XBOX. The current situation illustrates this. And Microsoft wants its ROI.

@Bathyj and daddy Satya has just force admitted Phil to rehab.

gold_drake667d ago

you know why MS has so much money, and it aint cause of the gaming xbox branch.

so lets not kid ourselves.

PhillyDonJawn667d ago

Xbox was shown to be more profitable than ps

jznrpg667d ago

@PhillyDownJawn not more profitable. More revenue with ABK acquisition but them going multiplat shows they are not making much profit

ocelot07667d ago

That's great for Xbox gamers ain't it that Microsoft are more wealthy than Sony. Is that really a argument use are using now lol?

Imagine me in my job. Arguing with a fellow security guard at another company. Hahah well the company I work for is worth £800m the one you work for is only work £600m!

667d ago
Knightofelemia667d ago

Microsoft may have more money but Sony has the talented studios and the games to back up those studios.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 667d ago
Chevalier667d ago

Plus turning down Marvel too. Spiderman is only exclusive to Playstation because of that

Hedstrom667d ago

Best deal deal in gaming must be when Sony bought Insomniac for 229 million dollars. They made over 800 millions on Spiderman for the ps4 alone. Thats just crazy!

XBManiac667d ago

More in the 1.000 million now.

gold_drake667d ago

another Interview?

how is he the only one who loves the spotlight as much as he does lol

Futureshark667d ago

Let's not forget he also famously passed on Spider-man, Genshin Impact and GTA3.

However it's almost kind of cute how he can keep that sh1t-eating grin and say he's a 'no regrets' kind of guy, especially when you think how much just these 5 titles could have swung the world in Xbox's favour instead of Sonys.

How he's kept his job I don't know, he must sure be keeping Papa Nadella's shaft warm somehow.

"But, but Gamepass, he introduced that!!!"

Yes he did, and now look at Xbox, all it's exclusives are coming to Playstation now rendering the platform obsolete.

DarXyde667d ago

Honestly, with that kind of track record, you can't convince me Spencer hasn't eaten it from the back in the name of self preservation. Probably unwashed...and at least twice.

That aside, my interpretation of everything here is Xbox has been mismanaged a bit too much and Nadella came down from his throne. The way it is now, I don't believe for a minute the multiplatform move was Spencer's idea. I don't even think the acquisitions was Spencer's work. At this point, I reckon he's got as much power in his role as Hunter Biden at a Ukrainian energy company.

DivineHand125667d ago

You can never tell how things will turn out if he had said yes to those games. Xbox already has access to some great IPs, however, they hardly do anything with them or fail to deliver. It's also possible their presentation wasn't good at the time, and they made sure the next presentation was better.

I believe that part of being successful is releasing things in the right place at the right time.

Many major corporations have a story similar to passing on successful business ideas. Let us look at Sony Pictures for example. Back when Marvel went bankrupt, they had the opportunity to buy the entire Marvel for only $25 Million but turned them down. An unnamed big shot at Sony reportedly claimed that “nobody gives a shit about any of the other Marvel characters,”. They ended up taking Spiderman for $10 Million instead.

https://www.avclub.com/sony...

Fast forward to today, we can see what the Marvel brand has done for Disney. Is it possible the same success would have been possible had Sony acquired those IPs. We can't say that for sure and it is possible most of those IPs that are successful today may not have been used.

Show all comments (35)