All Channels
Popular
100°

VR vs. PlayStation 4

VRFocus - Over the course of the previous two entries in VRFocus’ ‘VR vs.’ series, we have looked the two platform holders that are yet to announce their own virtual reality (VR) headsets, discussing the likelihood of Microsoft and Nintendo getting involved in the scene, and the challenges they would both face. Of course, their other rival, Sony Computer Entertainment (SCE) already has its own VR device in Project Morpheus for the PlayStation 4. But with the device still in its prototype stages and set to go up against the Oculus Rift on ever-evolving PC hardware, SCE still has plenty of hurdles ahead of it if its exciting experiment is to turn into consumer sensation.

S2Killinit4355d ago (Edited 4355d ago )

There was a point made about the PC evolving while the PS4 would not. I thought the article would then mention Sony's clever placement of the processing unit of the headset outside the headset so that a better one could be plugged in later if need be. But they didnt mention this so i thought i should. Of course the downside of this is that it would take away PS4's console advantage of being a uniform medium for VR developers. Its a give and take. Either way, im a day one. I cant wait to delve into virtual reality.

Lazyeye794355d ago

I'm really excited for Project Morpheus and hope Sony and devs really push it hard.

Also I didn't know they had the processing unit on the outside for easy access. Thanks for the info.

kingduqc4355d ago

I'm not sure how Sony is going to push VR with the ps4. To have a low persistence display (way better motion clarity, got to have this in VR) you need to refresh it at 90-95Hz with strobing black in between each frame. This eliminate the pixel persistence(because pixels are slow that's why you need black in between frame to make em disappear) You can see that if you move your mouse real fast, the persistence make so that you can see more then 1 mouse because the pixels are still showed on screen even if the mouse is long gone from that position.

On top of that, VR needs really high resolution. 1080p won't really be great and you'll see tons of jaggies. So in the end you are looking at 90-100 fps in 1440p+ to truly have a great VR experience and that the ps4 can't do. It might be able to do it with simpler games but you won't get close to triple A games in VR on a console so I'm really curious what will happen.

80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
56d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted56d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8556d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele55d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla55d ago (Edited 55d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk55d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay55d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 55d ago
Athlon10156d ago (Edited 56d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit55d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg55d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10155d ago (Edited 55d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14955d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

50°

The Best VR Platformer Games in 2026

A classic genre takes on new life in VR, so here's a rundown of the best VR platformer games available in 2026.

Read Full Story >>
xrsource.net
1Victor57d ago (Edited 57d ago )

Can’t be a good list without astro bot and moss and moss book 2 they are the cream of the crop.
If his choices are as good as those 3 games then I gotta try the rest of his list

80°

Former Xbox Exec Says Developers Didn't Want a Sony Monopoly

Former Xbox executive Ed Fries comments on the early days of Xbox, the opinion of Japanese game companies, and more.

Read Full Story >>
insider-gaming.com
69d ago Replies(2)
Reaper22_69d ago

I dont think that'll ever happen. But i must say back in the day, they were definitely trying because they were more cash rich than their competitors.

CosmicTurtle68d ago

I think MS were and still are the richer company. They tried to acquire Sega back in the day (and considered doing so again more recently), they obviously bought exclusivity to Halo which was originally shown as a Mac title. I don’t think as a company MS can claim the moral high ground here. It’s a wilful lack of self awareness.

Of course Sony would try exactly the same if they had the resources, but when the PS2 dominated the industry was in a much healthier place with an abundance of great third parties.

This has been a depressing generation as far as first party decisions are concerned. The fact we are debating business plans rather than which game is better is a sad reflection of the state of things.

Darkseeker69d ago (Edited 69d ago )

There was Nintendo as well, Sony wouldn't have had a monopoly. In fact, the world would be better today if Xbox never existed in the first place. They pretty much brought all bad practices we have today. We might have gotten all of it either way, but not this early. In term of franchises, I don't think there is anything Microsoft released that would actually be missed if it didn't exist. Even Halo the world wouldn't notice if Halo didn't exist.

S2Killinit68d ago

MS was definitely a bad influence on gaming.

raWfodog69d ago

I think almost everyone will agree that a monopoly is not good for the industry. But that being said, the competition needs to be smart and strategic with their business. Simply buying up publishers and traditional third-party studios just to keep them out of the other companies reach is not a sustainable practice. That goes for all parties so don't think I'm just referring to Xbox.

I'm no business guru by any stretch of the imagination but I firmly believe that the best way to drive consumers to your software and hardware is to invest smart in your first-party studios. Give them full support and guidance in making unique, fun games that are only available to play in your ecosystem and the gamers will come.

Reaper22_69d ago (Edited 69d ago )

But first party studios aren't enough. They only make up a small portion of the industry. Without 3rd party there would be no industry for Microsoft or sony.Developing games take time and money and sometimes you gotta make moves to stay competitive.

raWfodog69d ago

Nah, I never said first-party was enough. I said it’s the ‘best way’ to drive gamers to your platform. 3rd-party is a free-for-all and there’s no guarantee that gamers will use your hardware to play the game. If you want to push your own software and/or hardware you need first-party, or at least exclusive deals with third-party studios.

SimpleDad69d ago

They Shure did a great job... 25 years later Xbox is dead.

Reaper22_69d ago

Then why be so emotional and continue to talk about it. Xbox will never die be ause it stays in so many people's head.

lodossrage69d ago

How can you even see him being "emotional" in that comment?

If anything, you're the emotional one, constantly trying to go at anyone that says anything against Microsoft. So when you call him emotional, it comes off as deflection

Elda68d ago

I own an XBSX & I can say it's becoming irrelevant out of the 3 current consoles.

69d ago Replies(2)
Show all comments (34)