All Channels
Popular
70°

Why Does Watch Dogs Fail?

Watch Dogs. A revolutionary next-generation game that would allow converts to smugly stand above their cynical partners, showing off a new era of open world gaming and visual fidelity. This is the game that is going to change the industry, and we should be salivating over it.

Back down on earth after the game’s release though, it is clear to see that Watch Dogs fails to live up to the hype, not just be a negligible margin, but a humongous chasm.

So why does Watch Dogs fail to deliver on its big next-gen flavoured promises?

Read Full Story >>
lumilounge.com
TotallyNotGlenn4325d ago

While I agree that Watch_Dogs has disappointed, this article feels speculative at best, and full of non-issues-made-issues (such as the fact that Aiden Pierce is a "white, gruff-voiced American who has family problems") that make me feel like you just don't like the game and were scraping for reasons to justify that opinion.

You do bring up some good points, though. The cross-gen thing does provide some annoying limitations--but those can be handled in ways that prevent the systems from affecting each other, and Ubisoft is a large enough developer to handle that, especially after the game's delay. I don't really know that the PS3 and Xbox 360 have anything to do with Watch_Dogs' less-than-promised appearance, but if it does, I can't help but feel like it's the result of laziness on Ubisoft's part. Though "highly-anticipated" is a major understatement for Watch_Dogs before its release, and though Ubisoft will undoubtedly make a sequel, I hope it can learn from its mistakes and that it will listen to the feedback it's getting.

TheLumilounge4325d ago

Thanks for the read and response, appreciate it! And thanks for making it a tempered response :)

I can see where you're coming from in terms of Ubisoft being lazy instead, but seeing how good Sony can make their games for PS4, it personally seems a little puzzling that Ubisoft cant squeeze better visuals out. Maybe old gen hardware is to blame, or maybe its just laziness!

I put the Aiden point due to the fact I feel a next gen game has to try and advance and move on from last gen normality. The fact that Ubisoft have resorted to a template dull character shows a lack of risk, imagination and fear of changing the norm. For me, it just exemplifies Watch Dogs' failure as the first next gen game.

TotallyNotGlenn4325d ago

lol. I vastly prefer discussions to childlike temper tantrums.

Watch Dogs was actually not the first "next gen" game at all, and not even for Ubisoft alone. Several have already come out before Watch Dogs.

To me, Ubisoft's use of Aiden just says that it wanted to tell a particular story with a particular kind of character. Aiden Pierce does fit the story Ubisoft was trying to tell. He's a former criminal who lost his daughter due to his previous crimes, and he's out for revenge. He's not there to make jokes or be sarcastic. He's there to take names until he gets to the one responsible for killing his little girl. Gruff suits the story.

As for his race or nationality, I really don't see how changing those would have improved the game in the slightest. I guess Ubisoft could have made him Mexican or something but... why? Just for kicks? What difference does it make? What problem would it solve? He can just as easily be gruff and Mexican. Why can't he be gruff and American?

thorstein4325d ago

Watch Dogs sold 8 million copies. The reviews were solid: 8s-9s. Gamers enjoy the experience.

How does any of that equal "fail" in your mind?

Oh, I see. The typical hipster review: "Game X (that has received hype) doesn't live up to my expectations, although I couldn't possibly make a game with even a 100th of the visuals and gameplay myself."

Your review is so generic and full of trolling tropes that it is unreliable in its offing.

Attention: to all of those reading this "review." Judge a book by its cover. Trolling review is trolling.

TheLumilounge4325d ago (Edited 4325d ago )

@ TotallyNotGlenn
Aiden fits the story and tone of the game, but as that story is a generic arc thats been explored numerous times, it still feels like it's being left behind in the plethora of crappy stories from the last 7 years.

Changing race and nationality isn't necessary going to make an entire story better, but I think we need a much larger range of protagonist in this generation, moving away from your usual macho-hero. The next stage for storytelling is multirace and diverse characters that dont satisfy stereotypes.

Just a personal gripe and want for the next era in narrative explorations.

TotallyNotGlenn4325d ago

TheLumilounge, there's a limit to the different kinds of stories that will suit a particular type of video game, for one. For two, I think that idea of yours that we just need to make characters from every race possible is a bad one. That's a good way to stifle creativity and alter the story, by having developers force a character into a specific race. You can't just change the skin color and tack on an accent, you know. There's a whole culture behind each race, and you have to do it justice. That's why when casting for a production, race is considered. You can't always just chuck a black guy in there and call it diverse. You have to consider the setting and the story you're trying to tell, the attitude, the characters AROUND the character in question, what makes the most sense with everything, and what works best in telling that story.

If it's race vs. story, I'll take story every freaking time. Why is it important what race the character is? I still don't understand why changing the race of a character makes a story any better than it was before. I don't know where you heard that "the next stage for storytelling" is shoving every race down people's throats just because, or where you even heard that storytelling was divided into stages or eras in the first place, but truthfully, if indeed that is the case, I'm out.

Your general theme seems to be, "I want something else." You want the next X for a game. You want the next Y for a story. I think you're spending so much time wanting what's next that you're not taking the time to fully understand or enjoy what's right in front of you, and how it works.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4325d ago
aquamala4325d ago

fail? Ubisoft just said WD sold 8 million copies

TheLumilounge4325d ago

I will admit, in terms of sales fronts, its been a huge success.

But, the article is more based at what the game aimed to achieve and bring to the table (I should have defined my view of 'success' at the start)!.

Boody-Bandit4325d ago (Edited 4325d ago )

Ubisoft, like all publishers, don't sell on consignment. So it's sold according to them in that they got their bank. If for some reason those units don't move than it's up to the etailers and retailers that purchased the game from Ubisoft to adjust the price, maybe take a loss, to move them. But that is on them and not Ubisoft. They already got paid.

Either or, shipped = sold as far as publishers are concerned.

DefenderOfDoom24325d ago

reply to thorstein - The person gave his honest opinion of the game , that should be respected ! Also did you know that UBISOFT was giving free NEXUSS cell phones (PAYOLA) to people reviewing WATCH DOGS . Also JEFF GERTZMANN from GIANT BOMB - TOTALBISCUIT , SUPER BUNNY HOP (George) all said WATCH DOGS was not a good video game ! But had potential . I have not played the game yet . To all the people who bought WATCH DOGS and had a good time playing it , well that is awesome ! And that is all that should matter . But again, there is no need to attack the author of this article and call him a troll for giving his honest opinion ! CHEERS EVERYBODY!!!!

thorstein4325d ago (Edited 4325d ago )

So, you haven't played the game yet, but feel the need to defend a trolling review?

And that is exactly what this is. As TotallyNotGlenn said, "this article feels speculative at best, and full of non-issues-made-issues."

The game is still accepted well by users (A 7.5 here from N4G users) and an 8 from 204 different sources.

I could just as easily claim (in caps for some reason) all the websites that gave it a great score, but you already seem to think that they all got free phones for doing so. And only (insert your favorite site) is unbiased.

Trolling: "make a deliberately offensive or provocative online posting with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them."

That is what this is (reread the headline if you don't believe me). Critics in general can't take criticism. But, I'd like this guy to even try to make grass look as good as it does in this game. Fact: he can't. So where does he get off criticizing something he can't possibly do? When and where did Watch Dogs "Fail?"

"Those who can, do. Those who can't criticize."

DefenderOfDoom24325d ago

8 million sold to stores not 8 million sold to consumers , that being said, WATCH DOGS did sell very well.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4325d ago
Tetsujin4325d ago

The game wasn't bad when it came to the idea of the game, and some parts of it; overall I felt the game could have done a lot better if there wasn't so much hype around it. The CtOS mini game between console and android was fun, and different, and I do agree with the author on some of the points raised especially involving character development.

What's worse, I had more fun playing outside the story than the actual story itself.

EinRobot4325d ago

Its an early game on new gen consoles, did you really expect it be much more? I would hardly call a game that has the standard issues due to being an "early in the next gen" a failure. It was the same story at the beginning of last gen.

aliengmr4325d ago

Fail? No. Live up to the hype for many? Sure

Show all comments (21)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio13d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing13d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9213d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit13d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing13d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9213d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
50°

Report: Injustice 3 in Development at NetherRealm Studios

Thanks to the slip-up of an artist working on the title, we now have more evidence that a new Injustice game is in the works.

80°

Playstation Plus Monthly Games for May: EA Sports FC 26, Wuchang: Fallen Feathers, Nine Sols

All available May 5.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
FPSRUSSIA14d ago

What's Point in commenting your basicly closing down the site.

LiViNgLeGaCY14d ago

I'm surprised it's still the old site. I thought he said starting today?

Eonjay14d ago

Its like the final episode of the Sapranos. You gonna go to make a comment and when you click add th-

Profchaos14d ago

Timezone thing maybe.... RIP

darthv7214d ago

Insert the Ferris Bueller end scene... "You're still here? It's over.."

LiViNgLeGaCY14d ago

I think the only game here for me is Nine Sols. Was always interested in that game.

TheColbertinator14d ago

Glad I don't buy FIFA games anymore

Rebel_Scum14d ago

Hey now! Thats a great month.

Nacho_Z14d ago

Good month for me, I wanted that particular footy game and thought it might be due. Anyway who cares, shame about the site I'll miss the comment sections. All the best everyone.

Show all comments (16)