RotorStorm is an unity 3d awesome war game where you are playing with a helicopter and you are alone against an entire army. Your mission is to destroy as many enemies as you can and complete all 6 challenging missions.
Unity has announced the appointment of its new CEO, and it's another former EA exec in the form of ex-Zynga COO Matthew Bromberg.
You know for an engine called Unity, it sure does keep alienating and distancing developers left and right. In their latest misguided attempt to nickel and dime their customers, Unity has decided that they will start charging developers everytime someone installs a game.
Understandably, this has left developers seriously perplexed. Basically, with what Unity is proposing, it means that bad actors can now just mass install and reinstall games in order to financially cripple a company. It’s like Unity looked at review bombing and asked itself “How can I make something like that even worse?”
Live-action Looney Tunes moment, for once I'd love to be a fly on the wall for this entire greed convo honestly, who the fuck says let's charge these developers PER install so I could just be edgy and uninstall/install.
Like Geoff says, what a joke.
Including all the legacy titles that have used the engine.
This has to be one of the most blatant and disgusting corporate greed move I've ever heard off.
Even if unity backtrack on the decision which they will, if I was a dev I'd never the engine again.
Yep, I agree with the article that if they are going to do something like this today what will they do tomorrow. Figures that the CEO is from EA's greediest time too
I've jumped ship to Unreal late last year, despite many people telling me that Unity was much better suited for the scale and budget of my project. Best decision I've made.
The CEO of Unity is an idiot and the writing was on the wall that he's gonna do something incredibly stupid like this sooner or later. I feel for the developers that are too far along in their project too migrate to another engine.
With the scale of the current backlash I can't see them going through with it in this current form, but even if they backpedal now, the trust in the leadership is probably irreparably damaged. At least it should be.
Just wait. I'm sure we'll see articles today written up about how this is a smart move.
lol yep
https://x.com/tkexpress11/s...
People all over the place with this, some want to stay, some don't sounds like a divide to me
Right on character for john riccitiello to find new scummy ways to squeeze the industry
"It's an absolute f*cking catastrophe".
Unity has announced dramatic changes to its Unity Engine business model which will see it introduce a monthly fee per new game install beginning on 1st January next year - a move that has drawn considerable criticism from the development community.
Also, according to Yahoo, last week "Unity Software Inc's President and CEO John Riccitiello Sells 2,000 Shares".
It continues: "The insider transaction history for Unity Software Inc shows a clear trend: over the past year, there have been 49 insider sells and no insider buys. This could be a red flag for potential investors, as it suggests that those with the most intimate knowledge of the company's operations and prospects are choosing to sell their shares."
* https://finance.yahoo.com/n...
@Palitera - Yep, that's the world we live in. If you're rich and powerful, the law doesn't really apply to the wealthy the same way it does normal folk. Then there's the bond system. Any rich person that goes to jail, they just get to pay some pocket change and get to be let free thank to the bail bond system! It's so nice that if you have money, you can walk around free regardless of your crimes.
He's the same sleazeball who said this in a shareholders meeting years ago when he was EA CEO,
"When you are six hours into playing Battlefield and you run out of ammo in your clip and we ask you for a dollar to reload, you’re really not that price sensitive at that point in time,”
There will be fees for installing game demos that let you buy the full game, early access and betas... Epic must be celebrating in anticipation of everyone moving to Unreal.
Yes, I feel sorry for companies that have stabilized businesses and will have to TRY to shift focus.
For premium games, the fee is not that relevant, but for small, free mobile or free web games, this is a big strike.
The balance between revenue per user and user acquisition cost is usually very tight, and now it has been severely broken.
And if you think “screw F2P and small games”, remember these are the companies and devs that might make the indie gem you might love.
if i were them I just look a way to move it into another engine, this thing unity is doing is super abussive, if it doesnt cause problems it will do for us by them increasing the price, it was also coming to gamepass i believe, imagine if people download it multiple times 🤦🏻
It’s all uncertain right now.
Unity said Microsoft would be charged in Game Pass games.
The thing is: the contracts usually have clauses that push extra costs forward to the devs.
So, if Unity keeps the policy, either MS accepts the hit alone or the costs will be forwarded to consumers or devs.
And that is why engine consolidation is the issue that it is. It allows the company that operates the very few commercial options available to do whatever they want and their consumer base can only shallow it.
Yeah, but the alternatives aren’t even close. Hopefully this will put Unreal as lead for III, AA and above, and Cocos/Godot for smaller titles.
That is not hopeful at all. That is still engine consolidation, is just transferring the power from Unity to Epic and Godot. Sure the latter is open source and therefore much safer, but the issue remains especially with Epic and the Unreal engine, those guys already partake in some real shady stuff with their store. The last thing they need is more power over development.
I agree, but, in the current state of game development, there aren't many options. It's not like we can choose to have a FOSS engine taking over right now.
Corporate greed continues to evolve in unexpected ways. I was wondering how this will work if devs choose to move onto another engine and stop subscribing to Unity. Will they have to delist games to prevent new downloads? Will Unity prevent access to the games we purchased if the devs no longer want to pay them?
Can they hamper access to games that could be technically called grandfathered in
