All Channels
Popular
190°

Nintendo UK's response about the Philips ruling

Nintendo UK:
"On 20 June 2014, following a trial heard before Mr Justice Birss, the UK Patents Court found that the Wii, Wii U and Wii Remote infringe two patents ('498 and '650) asserted against Nintendo by Philips Electronics. The '498 and '650 patents were held to be invalid as originally granted, but Philips Electronics were permitted to make validating amendments during the course of the litigation.
"

Read Full Story >>
gamesindustry.biz
kurenaishinigami4349d ago

So one or two patent that Philips is suing nintendo for is now invalid and I guess Nintendo will prove that other patent from Philips is also invalid.

So Philips won't be abble to sue Sony for Move and Microsoft for Kinect. :D

BattleReach4349d ago

They weren't able before this because Sony and Microsoft are using other technology than Nintendo.

Nintendo is using technology which uses Infrared to track the players moves. Microsoft and Sony are both using a camera.

randomass1714349d ago

Doesn't the Wii remote use infrared technology as well?

joeorc4349d ago

Not just that but the way move works is not the same design as wiimote works like in the case the camera is inside the wiimote itself and the positionary area of tracking is from the camera looking at the wiimote sensor bar. Sonys and microsoft works in other way. But Sony's also uses a magnetometer to off set sensor drift. Which both nintendo or microsofts systems do not use. Hell Dr. Richard marks was issued a patent on design for move so phillips could sue, but I doubt it would go anywhere.

kurenaishinigami4349d ago

Patents aren't just technology, but also concepts, theories, etc...

Microsoft and Sony use different technology, but if the concept is the same then they can be sued too and suit that Nintendo is involved with Philips involves various concepts that also involve technologies that could allow these kind of concepts to be executed and all disagrees are just Microsoft and/or Sony fans being too defensive and emotional...

herbs4348d ago (Edited 4348d ago )

"interactive virtual modelling" and "human computer interaction"
Is extremely vague and sounds more like the Kinect to me not to mention Nintendo has been using IR and motion controls since the mid 80s...

herbs4348d ago

I guarantee Phillips will go after Microsoft and Sony next especially since their vague patents more accurately detail there tech.
Virtual modelling of the body = Kinect
Motion control using a camera device = Move
I'm not sure how an IR sensor equals a camera in regards to the Wiimote. The more I have read into this the more it sounds like bullshit.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4348d ago
mikel10154349d ago

Good thing they are appealing the court case.

lilbroRx4349d ago (Edited 4349d ago )

You do know that if this ruling is upheld, then Sony will be just a guilty and possibly Microsoft for Move, Playstation Eye, the Sixaxis, and Kinect

Also, the patents they are being sued for were given to Philips years after the Wii had already been on sell. One was in 2011 after Nintendo has already stopped supporting the Wii.

Though haters like you rarely care about facts. All you want is for something bad to happen to Nintendo and a excuse to trash talk them. You couldn't care less if they have actually done something wrong, nor abut the facts surrounding the issue.

randomass1714349d ago

I don't think it's all about hatred. For whatever reason, Philips won the case and Nintendo is now going to appeal. Maybe there's some validity to the claim? Or maybe Philips just made a really good case. I'm curious to see where it goes from there.

keegamer804349d ago

If I were Philips I would be embarrassed to take Nintendo to court. Mario and Zelda for cdi?

Reeze4349d ago

I guess you could say they don't Philippin' like to be sued.

Show all comments (20)
50°

U.S. patent examiner rejects Nintendo’s summoning characters patent as obvious: non-final ruling

The rejection is non-final (and even when such rejections are labeled as “final”, the process is far from over, given that there can be, at minimum, an appeal to the Federal Circuit).

Read Full Story >>
gamesfray.com
Relientk7748d ago (Edited 48d ago )

Good, as they should! A game mechanic like that shouldn't be locked behind a patent, and Nintendo didn't invent it either.

PRIMORDUS47d ago (Edited 47d ago )

Nintendo wants to keep wasting money on bullshit lawsuits, real smart in this economy. They should put that money aside for other game projects. On the other hand, I don't care if they waste it all either, and they are screwed in the future maybe that will teach them a lesson.

40°

Nintendo Completes Share Repurchase and Sets Price for Secondary Offering

Nintendo completed its share repurchase and set its secondary offering price at 8,347 yen ahead of March 16 delivery.

Read Full Story >>
4scarrsgaming.com
60°

Nintendo Suing U.S. Government Over Tariffs

Nintendo filed a lawsuit in the United States Court of International Trade.

Nintendo of America is suing the United States government over the sweeping tariffs President Donald Trump put in place last year, according to a complaint filed Friday in the U.S. Court of International Trade and obtained by Aftermath.

Read Full Story >>
aftermath.site
Deathdeliverer73d ago

Well dayum lol. Old agent orange pissing off every industry and nation.

0hMyGandhi72d ago

The fact that you have ANY disagrees will forever baffle me. And to the (apparent) MAGA contingent that exists on this website, enjoy your 8-9 dollar gas.

AuraAbjure72d ago (Edited 72d ago )

Yes, they had better be pissed after Trump told them the way they rip off the USA is over.

EveryPlatformGamer73d ago

LOL I read this on gaff, will they refund the money back to the gamers? highly unlikely. Didn't they just raise prices and pass it onto the gamers? Only Nintendo would send out the Ninjas to the US government.

-Foxtrot73d ago

That’s what I was thinking, imagine them winning hypothetically, getting a s**t load of money back which they would have lost if they hadn’t raised their prices and it’s business as normal.

It would just mean people paid more for no reason since they got the money back anyway.

Outside_ofthe_Box73d ago (Edited 73d ago )

A lot of companies partially passed the cost to consumers instead of all of it. They would still have to at least pay that back to gamers, but we know that won't happen. What's also sad is that prices won't come back down after the initial hike caused by tariffs.

People didn't understand the full repercussions of tariffs. That alone should have cost him the presidency if people knew it was a permanent price hike for consumers

Inverno73d ago

The people should sue these companies for having to over pay cause of these tariffs.

Eonjay73d ago

Naw they should sue the government for forcing the tax to begin with. No one reasonably expects these companies to absorb the taxes. Many smaller companies tried and were shut down or faced to increase prices to try to maintain their business. The tariffs effect everyone.

Inverno71d ago

I meant it mostly as a joke cause we all know the costs of these tariffs were passed onto the consumer. But it's seems no matter how vocal we are here in the states our "representatives" don't seem to care enough to represent us. And things are about to get worse.

Killer2020UK72d ago

The companies were doing what the law required then to do, the tariffs however were illegally implemented. Usually it's criminals we punish, you seem to have different ideas 🤷‍♂️

Show all comments (18)