All Channels
Popular
350°

How Microsoft could benefit from purchasing both Crytek & Capcom

With the recent information that both Capcom & Crytek are having financial issues, Pure|News wrote an article about how it would benefit if Microsoft were to acquire both companies and how it could help them pushing the Xbox One further in both the west and in the Japanese market.

Read Full Story >>
purenews.net
Neonridr4333d ago

could you imagine if MS bought Capcom? All Monster Hunter games on Xbox platforms only? That would give them a little bit of sway in the Japanese gamers' eye methinks.

MrGunny944333d ago

Exactly my thoughts, and contrary to popular belief you can buy a Japanese Company!

Also remember Crytek, Cry Engine subscription could help the first party with the engine

I think there's a huge possibility for business here.

sinspirit4333d ago (Edited 4333d ago )

Almost every Japanese corporation can decide who buys them. When an offer is submitted the board members can vote on it. Capcom could be sold to fellow Japanese companies like Sony, Nintendo, Bandai Namco, Koei, Square Enix, Atlus, Konami, etcetera. That would be the far smarter option because of their Japanese fanbase. Not only that but it's just generally easier to negotiate with those companies that live in their region. The XBox platform can not sustain their companies size because of how reliant they are on their sales in Japan.

It is not that a company can simply walk in their and put money down and own them, and if it were like that then all the Japanese companies would have already gotten there first anyways.

People need to stop thinking, and stop hoping, that this is going to happen until it does. I really don't want to see Capcom games go even further downhill like most of Microsoft's IP's. They don't have vision.

Gazondaily4333d ago

Purchasing Capcom may benefit MS but it would just hurt the gaming landscape in the long run. I hope it doesn't happen. (I doubt that it will anyway).

blackbeld4333d ago

Rare remember?

If they managed to take over Capcom then it will be Rare all over again.

Fireseed4333d ago

@blackbeld

Yeah cause Capcoms already in the habit of releasing old IPs and great games on a regular basis...

Spotie4333d ago

@Fireseed: And we know Microsoft will fix that if they get a hold of Capcom, right?

UltimateMaster4333d ago (Edited 4333d ago )

Let's remind ourselves some history.
Rare; that's history.

UltimateMaster4333d ago (Edited 4333d ago )

I don't want any of the big 3 to buy out Capcom or Crytek.

Microsoft did an awful job with Rare. They took what was the best developers at the time (similar to what Capcom was in the PS2 era; early 7th gen) and just completely ruined it. To the point that even Japanese gamers weren't buying Xbox 360. Capcom's already f*ck up as it is.

Sony is in no way shape or form in financial health to take on this big of a risk that could flop. They have no time or resources to waste on restructuring yet another company. There would be some gain for Sony since lot of Capcom's franchises were born on PlayStation console like Devil May Cry and Resident Evil and the PS fans would buy those games; if Capcom didn't already ruined them.

Nintendo would have them making 3DS games; a major step back from the home console games we we're receiving. They could make the investment if they want to, they have the money for it.

It would just force us; the consumer; to buy a platform for their games and given Capcom's image, nobody would waste money to buy a platform they don't already own on a game that could be as disappointing as the last one was.

As far as Crytek goes; I have no idea what's gonna happen. As much as their games look good; game play wise; it's a bit stale.

Eonjay4333d ago (Edited 4333d ago )

Expect for the fact that Capcom isn't for sale. They are merely allowing for a takeover by another company. Which is most definitely different from being bought, which mean the buying takes on all liabilities and assets including IPs. So who, would be interested in becoming the primary stakeholder at Capcom? And who would Capcom agree to?

The Only sound move would be another 3rd party like Bandai. Because any major first party would cause them to lose sales on other platforms; being as though they are for sale...

gaffyh4332d ago

No chance with Capcom, Crytek is at least plausible. Though do you really want the MS, the company that destroys developers souls to buy anyone? E.g. Ensemble, Rare, Bungie etc.

BattleAxe4332d ago (Edited 4332d ago )

I Microsoft were to have the games listed bellow as exclusives, I think they would be able to rival Sony's first party lineup of games:

- Crysis
- Warface
- Homefront
- Street Fighter
- Resident Evil
- Devil May Cry
- Lost Planet
- Dead Rising
- Monster Hunter

4Sh0w4332d ago

Well 1st Crytek has denied rumors of poor financials, until I see concrete proof its just another rumor.

Second I think gamers like us tend to only look at this stuff for bragging rights, sure Microsoft "could" buy them but at what price and how bad is Capcom's financial situation? Sure you get some great games under your roof but you also take on a shiii ton of people and expenses, what return do they get on their investment?

btw, Rare had a change in staff and was stagnated, given Phil's new direction they should be in a position to do whatever they want.

UltraNova4332d ago (Edited 4332d ago )

@gaffyh

I think you are talking about Activision but to be honest MS isnt far behind in that regard, just look at Rare...

OT: The big three should steer clear for Capcom for sure especially if they are looking to sell share majority and not a complete buyout (the former could never sustain exclusivity of any form) as Enjoy above can surely agree.

As to what happens with Crytek is anyone's guess at this point, although it makes perfect sense if MS buys them considering they are PC/windows oriented and frankly their 1st party are in dire need of a good engine.

Well time will tell.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 4332d ago
lelo4333d ago (Edited 4333d ago )

"How Microsoft could benefit from purchasing both Crytek & Capcom"

Microsoft are too dumb to purchase Crytek & Capcom (or too smart depending on your point of view).

For Xbox fans it would be good business to have exclusives from Crytek/Capcom, and it would sell more consoles, specially in Japan (Monster Hunter, Street Fighter, Resident Evil, etc) ... but financially it remains to be seen if it would be good business for Microsoft.

iamnsuperman4333d ago (Edited 4333d ago )

Financially it makes no sense. There is a reason why these two companies are in this certain predicament. Microsoft is too smart to buy the company plus the baggage that will come with such a purchase. It is far easier to buy the exclusives and key personal than buy the company outright with all the issues that come along with it (Microsoft would have to kill them anyway which would incure further costs as they would need to make them first party). Business wise it makes no sense for any of the big companies to buy these companies

Bennibop4333d ago

I believe this would be terrible for the industry if Microsoft, Sony or Nintendo bough either Crytek or Capcom we would all end up with less games and the same franchises milked even more.

Magicite4333d ago

Main reason why I have never liked Xbox, was the lack of JRPGS. Bring more exclusives like Tales of Vesperia, Blue Dragon and Lost Odyssey and You can make tides turn, although unlikely.

Darrius Cole4333d ago

This article is like saying "The Xbox platform would benefit if all the Capcom & CryTek property were Xbox exclusive".

No kidding, Sherlock.

You may as well say "How Sony would benefit if they owned EA and Bethesda", or "How Nintendo would benefit if they owned Konami and Ubisoft". All these statements are correct, but it's brain-dead logic on the surface. It also lacks any knowledge or discussion of the underlying real numbers and legal work that would allow us to understand how likely and how profitable such a deal would be.

3-4-54333d ago

Do we want Capcom to become Rare ?

Studio-YaMi4333d ago

GOD NO!

I would rather they become exclusive & be bought by Nintendo,Crytek I can live without,didn't like almost all of their games.

Capcom should go to a company that cares for gamers,Nintendo is a MUCH MUCH MUCH better choice than MS tbh.

Neonridr4333d ago (Edited 4333d ago )

especially for the Monster Hunter franchise alone. Those games on the 3DS print money for Capcom.

medman4332d ago (Edited 4332d ago )

Notice the flawed thinking in some gamers...they wish for Microsoft to buy these companies. Know why? Because Sony develops talent, while Microsoft can only hope to purchase it. Sad. How about hoping and wishing Microsoft starts cultivating their own talent pool for a change and bring some forward thinking games to market? That would be really refreshing.

Loggie4332d ago

Yeah, because Sony didn't buy Naughty Dog in 2001 nor did they buy Media Molecule in 2010 either. I also hear that in 2005, Sony did not acquire Guerrilla.

nunley334332d ago

Gung-Ho should buy them or maybe Deep Silver, or someone who will straighten out Resident Evil and make another Mega Man game.

jessupj4332d ago (Edited 4332d ago )

I don't understand why Capcom never released monster hunter for the ps3, 360, xbone or ps4.

Doesn't make sense to me.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 4332d ago
NextLevel4333d ago

That's a quite a leap of faith. Microsoft doesn't seem that concerned with own their own AAA studios. Most of the studios work on apps, Kinect games, multimedia feature and updates. Not games. Which is why they constantly cycle the same franchises with their 1st party and use 3rd party for new IP.

MelvinTheGreat4333d ago

Care to back up those claims by naming those studios?

MrGunny944333d ago

I'm not seeing how that works.

RARE - Has been given green light by Phil Spencer to do whatever they want and feel like.

343 - Is pretty much doing a Halo mass marketing & games campaign

BlackTusk - Gears

Insomniac - Working on Sunset exclusive

Crytek - Assumed to be working on Ryse 2, regarding recent rumors.. but u know financial issues.

Capcom - Rumored exclusive

Platinum - Scalebound

And many more like Froza Horizon 2 and Turn 10 working on the next Forza title..

So yeah it seems people been busy..

NextLevel4333d ago

@ GunzBlazing09

You just proved my point.

RARE - 1st party
343 - 1st party
BlackTusk - 1st party
Insomniac - 3rd party
Crytek - 3rd party
Capcom - 3rd party
Platinum - 3rd party

Look at where the new IPs are coming from.....

christocolus4333d ago (Edited 4333d ago )

@nextlevel..

“Microsoft doesn't seem that concerned with own their own AAA studios. Most of the studios work on apps, Kinect games, multimedia feature and updates. Not games.”

Lol. Did you actually think about that statement before putting it into words?You actually have no point, that statement actually shows you have no idea what you are talking about.

Rare
Lionhead
Lift
Twisted pixel
Press play
And the new guys
Platform next
Lxp

They are all working on new unannounced ip. rare is said to be working on more than one new title and 343 is rounding up work on halo mcc and with a staff strength of over 250 do you really think they'll all be working on halo 5 after that? They have other stuff too.They keep making the same things? How is it wrong to keep investing in your best selling ips while funding new ips Doesn't sony and nintendo do same? MS seems to have quite a good mix of exclusives from 1st, 2nd & 3rd party partnerships.how is that bad? Scalebound,ori, quantumbreak,project spark,phantum dust, d4 etc. All owned by ms.

Also give me a list of these apps and kinect games which all ms studios are making? Also state the studios developing these apps,updates and media?

NextLevel4333d ago (Edited 4333d ago )

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/w...

Connected Experiences – Responsible for cloud service on Xbox, servers and online features
Xbox Entertainment Studios – Various interactive television projects
Lift London – Multiple AAA Cloud Based gaming projects (4+)
Soho Productions – Kinect Sesame Street TV, Upload Studios
Microsoft Studios – Sentient Team Working with internal and external teams and sharing new technologies
Microsoft Studios – Skype Xbox Engineering Team Bringing Skype communication software to Xbox platforms through Xbox Live
Microsoft Studios – Technology and Incubation Group Advancing new products and technologies
Microsoft Studios – Xbox Core Platform team API and SDK development
Microsoft Studios – Deep Tech Team Working with developers to build applications on Microsoft platforms
Microsoft Studios – Los Angeles –Responsible for creating TV series on Xbox Live – Quantum Break TV series, Halo TV series

and that doesn't even include alot of the Kinect studios.

christocolus4333d ago (Edited 4333d ago )

@nextlevel

Dude,I asked for the names of MS game studios currently developing only apps, media etc and all you did was give me a list populated with “microsoft game studios” all through. Where is 343, rare, blacktusk, turn 10, lxp etc in that list?what apps and kinect games are they working on?

Secondly,you do know that microsoft as a company is first and foremost a software company and did it occur to you that the arm of mgs developing those apps&os updates could actually be their tech/os team or even the new tv division(which is till under xbox)?sony and nintendo have those tech teams too you know. If they were game development teams they would have a name like all other actual microsoft 1st party game development studios.I.e lift, BT, 343,lxp, platform next, press play etc.

TheFanboySlayer4333d ago

@Christocolus

click the link and you'll see everything lol

christocolus4333d ago (Edited 4333d ago )

Did you even read the article you provided me with?it still doesn't prove you right but going by the first paragraph

“Microsoft Studios contains 27 studios worldwide, 20 for game development (343 Industries, Rare, Lionhead, Turn 10, Twisted Pixel, and Black Tusk, which comprises multiple teams working on multiple titles concurrently) and 7 for entertainment technology advancement and publishing making them the largest first party for a console manufacturer”

Did you see that? 7 out of 27 are entertainment and tech.

Also all the studios you listed above are not game development studios. If you read the article you would see they were labelled under non game studios but I've got it all for you to read below.

“Non Game Development

Microsoft Studios – Sentient Team Working with internal and external teams and sharing new technologies[35]
Microsoft Studios – Skype Xbox Engineering Team Bringing Skype communication software to Xbox platforms through Xbox Live[36]
Microsoft Studios – Games Testing Organization Responsible for games and entertainment testing[37]
Microsoft Studios – Technology and Incubation Group Advancing new products and technologies[38]
Microsoft Studios – Xbox Core Platform team API and SDK development[39]
Microsoft Studios – Deep Tech Team Working with developers to build applications on Microsoft platforms.[40]
Microsoft Studios – Los Angeles –Responsible for creating TV series on Xbox Live – Quantum Break TV series, Halo TV series”

Hope you understand that now and also when you look at studios like these

Microsoft Studios – Games Testing Organization Responsible for games and entertainment testing[37]
Microsoft Studios – Technology and Incubation Group Advancing new products and technologies[38]
Microsoft Studios – Xbox Core Platform team API and SDK development, I start wondering do you mean Sony and nintendo do not have studios or teams in charge of api and sdk development,
Game testing and tech incubation? Cos those teams are definitly required.

@fanboyslayer

Yeah I did read it but did you? I'm guessing you didn't take time to read the article.

JBSleek4333d ago

That would be huge for MS. Will they do it? Likely not which is strange because the amount of cash reserves they have is massive.

If Satya Nadella is serious about Xbox then MS should no doubt buy Capcom. MS has shown in the past they have no problem making big time acquisitions.

That being said I don't think a gaming company will buy Capcom. If they are bought I think it will be from investors not gaming related, which would be nice due to the games being on as many platforms as possible.

MrGunny944333d ago

Cry Engine would also help the Windows Phone department with the engine. I think it's a huge deal buying Crytek just because of the Cry Engine, getting it passed along the developers and also selling as a subscription service would allow MS to get a huge monopoly from Game Engines. (Since Crytek does not know how to do it)

Regarding Capcom, it either gets bought or it will end up like THQ where each IP is on auction.

According to the latest information of course.. I'm not inside of the company

JBSleek4333d ago

Very true. Crytek would be a huge pick up as well. Imagine being a developer for Xbox One and having free access to Cry Engine 3.

MS is a software company. They should be the leading company in APIs and software related things.

sinspirit4333d ago

CryEngine isn't a successful product as a $10 a month service on Steam. Really cheap for a big game engine program...

Being owned by Microsoft doesn't change anything.. How could Microsoft make it sell better, other than paying so much advertising that they lose money on it? If they tried to restrict CryEngine to MS platforms that wouldn't help it either. There is no such thing as a monopoly on game engines. You have no control of the industry with a game engine.

Crytek so far has no idea how to push good ideas forward. They've put some good ideas on the table with Crysis 1 and FarCry 1, but with Crysis 2,3 and Ryse they decided to go with average storyline, average gameplay, and resume to polish the visuals as much as they can for consoles. The Crysis sequels had downgrades from the first one and made PC gamers disappointed, FarCry wasn't really good until Ubisoft developed it.

KTF264333d ago (Edited 4333d ago )

Crytek ... congratulation MS
Capcom ... please No
I don't want to see next DMC Xbox exclusive

Show all comments (95)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio4d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing4d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster924d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit4d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing4d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster924d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay6d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn26d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn26d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown6d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay6d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay6d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac5d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger6d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster30006d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde6d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde6d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent757d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_5d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.