All Channels
Popular
680°

GEARS vs. Resistance

Gears of War. Resistance: Fall of Man. Two great next-gen shooters, but which one to buy? Here's the point-by-point breakdown.

marcusfenix7119d ago

GEARS FOR THE WIN!!!

Lets start a list of games that run smoother and look better on the 360, if you don't believe my list go to the reviews on ign, then you will see the light.

Call of Duty 3
Tony Hawk Project 8
Marvel Ultimate Alliance
Need for Speed: Carbon

So far the Ps3 is getting PWNED on exclusive and multiformat games.

All more reasons not to buy a ps3.

PS3alltheway7119d ago

YOU DO KNOW 360 CAME OUT 1S SO THE DEVELOPERS HAVE MOR TIME OF THE DEV KIT . PS3 CAME OUT LATE DEV. HAS LESS TIME TO DEVELOPE.

TheXgamerLive7119d ago

much the exact same time. So it doesn't matter since it's been equal time worked on both. So it's only an ok result from sony and to be honest I think IGN was being rather nice on ranking resistance. I mean play them both and you'll see there's only 1 true winner here.

Gears of War !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

lalaland7119d ago

That is just plain silly... Devs have had final dev kits for X360 for almost 15 months now, while some devs have complained they haven't gotten final dev kits for PS3 before august this year.

Secondly it has been reported for all of the games you've mentioned, that lead development has been on X360 (obviously because they didn't have final dev kits for PS3).

Thirdly, don't start with the delay thing, since, as just mentioned, final dev kits weren't being shipped to the majority of developers before august this year.

TheXgamerLive7119d ago

The dev.s can, are, and have been working on titles LONG before dev. kits came out, they do this on a PC by using system specs and the game engine, It's easy and has been and is being done for a long time, how else do you think almost 2 years ago you saw MGS4 footage, of course which looks like crap today compared to the CGi they mostly showed back then.

So no, your wrong, developers have been working on titles for same time frames basically, especially sony duh and the R-FOM title.

Sorry, no excuses this time.

uxo227118d ago (Edited 7118d ago )

So are you saying that Resistance was developed with beta dev kits. Remember, sony pushed the release of the PS3 back at least twice. I'm thinking that the PS3 dev kits were probably out months before that.

The only reason the dev kits were not called final kits is because the machine hadn't been released yet. I mean, it's not like much has changed as for as the hardware is concerned since the first promised release date of the PS3 which was spring of 06.

All I'm saying is this, don't blame the dev kits, I'm thinking that gears and resistance were both being worked on long before the x360 was released.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 7118d ago
PS3alltheway7119d ago

both games is awsome

1ST GEN GAME OF PS3 GOING HEAD TO HEAD AGAINTS 360 2ND GEN GAME WOW RESISTANCE U THE MAN.
GOW 2 YEARS OF DEVELOPMENT USES UNREAL ENGINE 3.0
RESISTANCE 1 YEAR OF DEVELPMENT BUILT ON PS3 HARDWARE WHICH ITS HARD TO DEVELOP CELL IS MONSTER

marcusfenix7119d ago (Edited 7119d ago )

IBLOWPS3ALLTHEWAY, considering all of the delays and such, most of the PS3 games have been in development for the same time, making your 1st vs. 2nd gen argument a moot point.

Yeah with Resistance's beefed up PS2 graphics LOL and Gears of Wars mindblowing visuals that set the bar for any game visually. Mass Effect will take the crown from gears.

The graphics chipset in the 360 is superior, that is why there is such a tight NDA grip o the specs for the RSX, the cell processor is an AMAZING piece of technology, but not for real-time gaming. PS3 is nice, but if you want games and better looking games get the 360.

Developers will develop for the 360 more, since it can easily be ported to the PC, they can use a large majority of the 360 code on a PC, especially next-gen gpu's.

TECHNICALLY THE GPU IN THE 360 IS A GENERATION AHEAD OF THE PS3 GPU, GET OVER IT, NOTHING YOU SAY WILL CHANGE THAT. IT HAS DOUBLE THE POLY PERFORMANCE, TRIPLE THE VERTICES PERFORMANCE.

360 GAMERS HAVE NEXT GEN HARDWARE
PS3 GAMERS HAVE NEXT GEN MOVIE PLAYER

NUFF SAID

Scrumptious7119d ago

That's what I'm sayin! Since the PS3 was delayed from spring 06, that gave developers an extra 8 months to "polish" these games, since Sony said the only thing holding the PS3 back was the poo-ray diode, right? So this 1st gen PS3 vs 2nd gen 360 arguement has no truth.

JIN KAZAMA7119d ago

will u shut the hell up. The first gen PS3 game is being compared to 2nd 360 game. What do u have to say to that. RFOM is getting just as good reviews as GOW. So please, shut up. Go play your GOW.

Munky7119d ago (Edited 7119d ago )

The reviews for RFOM (89%) are not as good as the reviews for GOW (95%), check it out. Actually here, I'll help you. ;)
RFOM:
http://www.gamerankings.com...
http://www.metacritic.com/g...
GOW:
http://www.gamerankings.com...
http://www.metacritic.com/g...

testerg357119d ago

Insomaniac has been working on this title for a while. They are a premiere developer for Sony and are get special treatment from Sony. How long has Sony displayed RFOM?

"But the relatively plain-Jane special effects and textures just don't match up with Xbox 360 shooters such as F.E.A.R. or Call of Duty 3, let alone Gears. "

Even newer titles that have been in development in a shorter amount of time beats RFOM in graphics.

power of Green 7119d ago

Welcom3 chang3, still dont know how a Duke-Nukem-like game even came close.

UrbanJabroni7119d ago

The recent post about consumers thinking the PS3 is under $300 shows the lack of information in the general population.

Everyone tries to make the argument that "you can't compare two games because one is first gen and the other is second gen." Unfortunately, that is EXACTLY what most consumers walking into a store are going to do. They are going to look at GOW and look at Resistence and assume the 360 has better graphics. THe average consumer isn't going to say "but the 360 devs had more time with the final hardware." They are going to compare the games available and thats it. Period.

Show all comments (113)
260°

Gears Of War Creator Urges Devs To Make Single-Player Games Amid EA's Live Service Focus

Gears of War's creator has spoken out against the trend of turning established franchises into live services, urging developers to focus on single-player experiences.

Relientk77463d ago

I agree with Cliff for once.

Single player games > GaaS

JEECE462d ago

Too bad he didn't have this opinion when he chased trends with Lawbreakers. Or when he chased trends with Radical Heights.

Popsicle462d ago (Edited 462d ago )

He learned from the mistake or he wouldn’t be advocating for more single player experiences. I find this refreshing in a world where we often see people so stubborn that they tend to double down on a mistake which results in making things even worse. Seriously, good for him!

JEECE462d ago

@Popsicle

Oh for sure, better late than never. And better to somewhat own up to your mistakes, rather than just blaming your release window, or advertising partners, or gamers lol.

anast462d ago

@Popsicle

Of course we will never know his intentions, but it's hard to believe he is just a naive agent that is learning from his mistakes.

-Foxtrot463d ago

He could have done one himself after Gears of War but he did Lawbreakers…look how that turned out.

RaidenBlack463d ago

Not converting Jawbreakers into F2P was the final nail in the CliffyB coffin.

Knushwood Butt462d ago

Jawbreakers would have been a better name! Heck, I might just go and trademark that right now.

BISHOP-BRASIL462d ago

@Knushwood

Aren't those a kind of candy already?

coolbeans462d ago

You're missing the point. His studio's short lifespan is what *inspired* him to make this comment in the first place.

-Foxtrot462d ago

Oh I know the point...I'm just stating the obvious and how stupid he was in the beginning to jump on a trend he had no real experience in. A first person hero shooter with heavy GaaS elements is a lot different than the multiplayer in Gears of War.

He'd have been better creating something like Gears of War again, a great single player story and a good online mode.

coolbeans462d ago

-"A first person hero shooter with heavy GaaS elements is a lot different than the multiplayer in Gears of War."

I mean... you're kinda muddying terms when Gears has always had a strong multiplayer component. Even if I grant you that, Cliffy B started cementing himself at Epic with Unreal Tournament, which was among the earliest shooter series to have "proto-GaaS elements" (downloadable maps, cosmetics, special editions that bundle stuff together). Lawbreakers and Radical Heights (were it finished) weren't major career shifts to him like they would be for, say, Fumito Ueda.

Regardless of that, it's still kinda useless to state the obvious when CliffyB himself made his comments with the benefit of hindsight already.

462d ago
CrimsonWing69462d ago (Edited 462d ago )

Look, these a-hole publishers can do this, in fact I want them to, so they can f*ck around and find out and fail hard scaring away everyone else from doing this live service push.

This industry is run by some of the dumbest corporate pieces of sh*t I’ve ever seen. They spend stupid amount of money with literally nothing that stands out from games from the previous generation (look at Arkham Knight to the $200 mill Suicide Squad comparison vids), you’re overpaying devs, and you focus on games as a service to milk consumers that a lot of them grew up off traditional games. We’re not idiots, we sniff this sh*t out and won’t touch it.

So, what’s your answer to not getting a ROI? Raise game prices and double down on GaaS so you can suck your consumers dry. That model only works for some games and even then how in hell do you expect it to work with multiple games!? They’re ruining the damn hobby with this corporate greed.

Cut back on dev budgets, cut back on how much your staff is getting paid, until sales for games bring in a profit. That’s the answer and make some games that feel like there’s passion behind them, not some cookie cut up game that feels like the entire existence behind it is to offer as little as it can with repetitive bullsh*t and selling off all this content throughout its life. It’s gross.

anast462d ago

I agree with every point here.

Redemption-64461d ago

Games do bring in a profit, it's the greed that is killing the industry. Here is a fact, live service games overall make more, significantly more money than single player games

What you should be asking is executives not wanting continuous growth or firing them. Saying devs should be fired when those who are fitting the bills and setting unrealistic expectations would make things worse. What do y9u think would happen if they released say, 30 single player games and over half of them fail? You are going after the wrong crowd.

DankSinatra462d ago

About time he learned. I guess he finally stopped blaming everyone else and took accountability for his mistakes and realized that people really don't care that much for trends or live service.

Show all comments (24)
850°

Report: Gears of War Trilogy Collection Will Be Multiplatform and Available on PS5 Day One

A new rumor suggests that the Gears of War Trilogy Collection is real, with it launching on the PS5 day one with Xbox and PC.

LG_Fox_Brazil468d ago

Yeah, I can totally see that happening. My only doubt is if they are going to announce that at the same time as the Hallo Collection or if they will try to distance both announcements to try to ease the pain

helicoptergirl468d ago

This same insider was correct about Forza Horizon 5. So this might be true. But I heard rumors are the Halo:MCC is the next big one to be announced. We'll see I guess

DefenderOfDoom2467d ago

I am hoping Halo:MCC comes to PlayStation .

Cacabunga467d ago

Someone check on Obscure Observer please

piroh468d ago

They should announce dedicated showcase for all Playstation ports, it would be less painful for their fanbase.

Anyway thank you Team Xbox and Phil i will support the games.

Profchaos468d ago

Phil should wear a crash t shirt to that

Profchaos468d ago

I see them being in the same year but halo coming alongside ns2 and if e day is early next year gears collection could come at Christmas time

The_Blue468d ago

Ease the pain? You do know these people won't even entertain us irl, ironic 😭

1Victor468d ago

NOOOOOOOOOOOO screamed an obscured observer from across the room the street.
Well I’ll check it out DAY 1 🤣 I hope the do a good job porting it and don’t have issues like MCC did when it first launched on s/x🤷🏿

Mr_cheese468d ago (Edited 468d ago )

This will be cool

TheEroica467d ago (Edited 467d ago )

Ease the pain? Pain for who? Lol. More games on more platforms is a gamer friendly approach. Locking games behind hardware is archaic and lame... Let's not turn into corporate stooges.

TheEroica467d ago

4 corporate suits voted me down. Shame. Pro gamer all the way.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 467d ago
Lightning77468d ago

I remember talking about this with someone on the forums and they made some good points. Like what exactly are these old games doing at the moment? They pushed the hardware and did everything they needed to do for that platform at the time. Now in MS case even their new games are gonna be day and date but if we're taking about old games. Those games are just sitting their not doing anything anymore. When you port the old stuff to another console, that game has life again and move few more units and a new audience.

As I said Xbox is different because their stuff is inching closer and closer to be day and date. Though both Xbox and PS have old games that are just sitting around when they could have new audiences and breathe new life into the older exclusives.

Terry_B468d ago

Just imagine how well collections of older Nintendo games would sell on pc, xbox and playstation...

NotoriousWhiz468d ago

I honestly don't expect Nintendo to gain much from releasing their games on 3rd party consoles. People are conditioned to buy Nintendo games on Nintendo hardware. Once that changes, Nintendo will probably lose out on revenue as people pass on their underpowered console to wait for their game to release on a superior console. Tons of people only have a Switch for exclusives, and those exclusives sell better than most games on the other platforms and Nintendo is able to pocket the bulk of that revenue since it is their game on their console.

Profchaos467d ago

Not very considering rom packs have been eaily accessible for years now it's only really GameCube and above you need to pick and choose because the game size is fairly large and the Wii IMO didn't emulate well considering the motion controls.

So as incredible as they are I doubt they would sell unless they are overhauling them somehow but then again I wouldn't want to see them overhauled but that's just me I still play the NES version of Mario 3 over the SNES all stars version as a example because I think it looks better.

467d ago
Sonic1881467d ago

All you had to say was Microsoft is a third party publisher now

Lightning77467d ago

Huh? They clearly are what are you trying to get at?

rlow1467d ago

That still makes and releases a console…..which knocks them out of the third party club…..nice try

Sonic1881467d ago

@rlow1

A third-party publisher that still releases a console? Sure, whatever makes you sleep at night. It doesn't take a genius to figure out what they're trying to do.

generic-user-name467d ago

The Series X/S backwards compatibility to their old classics was one of the last few selling points for those consoles.

RaidenBlack468d ago

Finally Gears 2 & 3 coming to PC !

neutralgamer1992468d ago (Edited 468d ago )

Exactly I also hope we get a fable collection since fable 2 never came to Pc

I hope we also get gears of war 4 on Pc too since only gears 5 is on steam along with tactics

ninjabutt13468d ago

Gears 4 is already on pc, maybe not in steam but its in xbox app

467d ago
isarai468d ago

Where's the goalposts gonna go now? 😀🫳🍿

helicoptergirl468d ago

Get an obscure person to bend over and then I'll show you :)

Chevalier468d ago

They're too busy crying in a corner and being served crow again though. Pretty sure everything is going to voicemail.

goken467d ago

@helicoptergirl
Normally with articles like this the person you mentioned is usually obscured from observation 🤣

Profchaos468d ago

Revenue same as always Microsoft don't care about community it's reputation and they've never been worried about losing loyal customers if you recall the Kinect era they abandoned the hardcore entirely to pursue the hardcore gamers grandma

Outside_ofthe_Box468d ago

"Where's the goalposts gonna go now?"

"It's just old games sitting around doing nothing! Might as well get money from it and a new audience you can use to potentially make it exclusive again for next gen for them to be enticed to jump ship!"

~New goalpost

468d ago
Outside_ofthe_Box468d ago (Edited 468d ago )

"Eventually Sony will likely be forced to do the same"

Is that you begging for games that you once bashed in the past? Too funny, things must be dry in your land.

Chevalier468d ago

"aren’t selling as much as Xbox - and the answer will be that they are on less platforms."

No they won't because Xbox doesn't announce sales numbers at all. So how would they compare these sales? What idiotic logic. These shareholders going to pull numbers out their backside?!

thorstein467d ago

Why doesn't he just use the one account. How many N4G tabs does he have open with different accounts?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 467d ago
neutralgamer1992468d ago

Why do you need goalposts? More gamers will get to play games. Phil said it few days ago again no game has any red line around it. Seriously man it's gaming and your choice of plastic box makes no difference

It's 2025 enjoy gaming on any platform. We should be celebrating how the Biggest gaming publisher is allowing their games to be played on all platforms but how can we get that when some people feel the need to take victory laps

468d ago
Chevalier468d ago

Well hate to say we told you so. But we called this happening as soon as we saw these big purchases and falling sales, but, a whole slew of people said this would NEVER happen. Goalpost keep moving too as if it's some weird flex.

thorstein467d ago (Edited 467d ago )

TBH, Forza, the Indiana Jones game, the next Elder Scrolls, and I hope Fable will make it over. I'm excited about those.

I don't think MS going the Sega route would be a bad thing. Nintendo and Sony are making good hardware. There's no reason to not make profit off of that.

But the goalposts moving is in reference to people who constantly approve and post disingenuous stories that they scream are true.

For instance, "you can build a comparable PC to a PS pro for $700," conveniently leaving off the OS. Or, "Sony delisted HD2 in 170 countries" when in reality, it was 170 regions of which SteamDB lists as having over 3000 regions.

neutralgamer1992467d ago

Chevalier

What is this with we. Yes most of us saw this coming and all I am saying is it's a great thing for gamers on all platforms. We should be celebrating the fact amazing games will be available to all of us instead of taking some victory lap because of a plastic box

Chevalier466d ago

"What is this with we. Yes most of us saw this coming and all I am saying is it's a great thing for gamers on all platforms. We should be celebrating the fact amazing games will be available to all of us instead of taking some victory lap because of a plastic box"

Cool and it should be celebrated. But this idiotic narrative is that it was done for us as consumers needs to die.

Lots of idiots trying to reframe this when they literally argued that this would NEVER happen when we said yes it will because Gamepass isn't profitable and sales losses all round and add in lower hardware sales and it was obvious

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 466d ago
1Victor468d ago

@isarai: “ Where's the goalposts gonna go now? 😀🫳🍿”
.
The goal post is going home crawl into the shower open the flow and start crying while rocking back and forward i obscured by the darkness of the room.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 466d ago
helicoptergirl468d ago

I haven't played any oif these games either. Will buy and go through the campgains for sure. They a co-op correct? Hope so

Yui_Suzumiya467d ago

They're amazing. If you ever played Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine then you already have an idea how they play.

Show all comments (113)
260°

It’s Time for Sony to Bring Back Killzone and Resistance

Sony is in the middle of an FPS crisis, but bringing back two much-loved PlayStation shooters could easily be the solution.

shinoff2183708d ago

I'd rather them focus on a rpg. Shooters can wait

just_looken708d ago

We have alot of rpg's but only cod for a AAA first person shooter unless you toss in xdefient but that is still fixing 2yr old beta issues.

We need more AAA fps games then rpg's

shinoff2183708d ago

Yea right. Theirs so many shooters on the market.

just_looken708d ago

@shin

Name 3 AAA fps games coming out this year

Cacabunga707d ago

I want Killzone yea, but as a gaas no buy!

Cacabunga707d ago

Yes we need some new FPS experiences.. COD is just not engaging enough. We want a Killzone back to the roots, not a Shadow Fall again..

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 707d ago
Crows90708d ago

There's tons of RPG in the market too...what's your point exactly.

RaidenBlack707d ago

No Killzone or Resistance or Factions for you ... only Concord & FairGame$

Ironmike708d ago

No more rpg for a while would love a new resistance though

DarXyde708d ago

Agree on preferring RPGs though at this exact moment, it would be great to see more horror games. Another reason why Japan Studio closing is just tragic. Loved Siren.

just_looken708d ago (Edited 708d ago )

Fuck jim ryan japan studio did so much and helped alot with ports/localization

If they were around bloodborn would be possible like how they helped with demon souls ps4 finial fantasy port.

Horror games would be nice but the jim ryan axe job helped alot in killing playstation dev numbers/freedom and increased regulation with the new censorship crap.

1Victor708d ago

If Sony is bringing back a old shooter I would prefer Warhawk or better yet Starhawk

Rynxie708d ago

No thanks. Resistance and killzone were my all time favorite fps games. I completely dominated those games. I met good people, had a ton of fun and have a lot of fond memories. I don't want them to bring back these games, unless they tackle the cheating epidemic. I know I will absolutely hate these games, if I was to play them now, with all the effing cheating going on in fps games.

Psychonaut85708d ago

Bro the market is oversaturated with quality RPGs AND bloated shitty RPGs already.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 707d ago
Inverno708d ago

I honestly don't think we'll be seeing these anytime soon, if ever. Insomniac is officially on Marvel duty since it seems that all they're working on based off the leaks, and Horizon is more of what the casuals want these days. And I now I'll get a bunch of disagrees, but keep in mind that Resistance last got a game on the PS3 (2011) and Killzone was a launch title for the PS4 (2013). 10 years is a long time to make a game, if had any interest they would've done it by now, add InFamous to that list.

just_looken708d ago (Edited 708d ago )

Your right except the dates killzone mercenary was on ps vita 2013 same with resistance burning skies back in 2012

Good-Smurf708d ago

Both of those games are either made by smaller B team or completely different developer.
Killzone Mercenary developed by Guerilla Cambridge which is now defunct.
Resistamce Burning Skies wasn't made by Insomniac but by Nihilistic Software also defunct after the failure of CoD Black Ops Declassified.

just_looken708d ago

@good i know i never said they were

I mentioned them as they were the last games under that ip well killzone was last on ps4 but still even though they are different devs they led to the lose of the ip.

I highly doubt they made up for there budget cost even killzone on ps4 had low sales for such a large ip at the time.

shinoff2183708d ago

Infamous should atleast get remastered. I'd be cool with that

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH708d ago

Resistance 3 turned me off to the series but I’d love a reboot. KillZone I think can stay dead. Give me a new Resistance like 1or 2 and I’ll be happy.

JEECE708d ago

Except Resistance 1 and 3 were far more similar, 2 was the outlier. 3 was a great return to form after 2 changed so many things from the first game.

SPEAKxTHExTRUTH708d ago

I didn’t like 3 and I didn’t find it similar to the first game.

Moegooner708d ago

2 was the best resistance game.

Michiel1989708d ago

agreed, the co-op was my fav in 2

Michiel1989708d ago

I'll keep saying it, have Bungie make a new resistance game, a match made in heaven. Although I imagine Bungie would be too proud to take over an existing IP.

Huey_My_D_Long708d ago

I honestly never cared or liked killzone. Huge resistance fan though. I remember so many nights playing melee only on USS Lexington, and I like the alt history vibe.

InUrFoxHole708d ago

Liked KZ more but both those games are better than MAG

Huey_My_D_Long707d ago

Facts.
Since I'm down memory lane, I also wish for remaster of Warhawk.

P_Bomb708d ago

I’ve been barking up that tree for years. 😢

OtterX708d ago

Keep barking, boy! Keep barking! Never give up hope. ;)

Show all comments (66)