All Channels
Popular
220°

Why did Sony and Microsoft reverse roles at this year’s E3?

2014 E3 event showed us something interesting, as this event was much different than the previous ones. It seems that Microsoft and Sony have reversed roles, with Microsoft concentrating on nothing but games, while Sony “pulled a Microsoft” and put heavy emphasis on entertainment services and hardware. To Sony’s credit, they had lots of great games to show as well.

Perhaps the most interesting part is that gamers are loving this side of Sony. However, when Microsoft went down the route of entertainment, their announcements weren’t so well received amongst the gaming community. What is so different now, that Sony receives completely different treatment than Microsoft did? Is it the fact that when Microsoft introduced the Xbox One prior to last year’s E3, that their first announcement was non-gaming related, and focused more on the consoles entertainment capabilities? Therefore creating a different mindset amongst gamers initially?

Read Full Story >>
microsoftproductreviews.com
AngelicIceDiamond4358d ago

"did Sony and Microsoft reverse roles at this year’s E3?"

Says Microsoftproductreviews.com

jebabcock4358d ago

Lol... it's okay no one believes this tripe... sales say it all..

FarEastOrient4358d ago

They ignored the fact that Sony spent time talking about Music and Movies unlimited during last year's presser. But it was a few minutes shorter than the time they spent thus year.

bouzebbal4358d ago (Edited 4358d ago )

LOL garbage media compare the disaster may21st last year with TV announcements and zero games to a conference with 90% games and 10% extra entertainment and it's suddenly a problem.

e3 is Electronic ENTERTAINMENT Expo. It's mainly about games but last time i checked TV is also a form of entertainment, especially if it's related to console gaming.

PS3 is a multimedia platform, PS4 is a multimedia platform, xbox one is a multimedia platform. We all buy them for games but nothing bad in using them for netflix or any music or video app.

xbox doesn't have the luxury to focus or talk about TV services right now because they lost the most important: core gamers from 360 days.
Sony is doing gaming right so this is just the continuity of the success to provide PS4 owners with extra content.

and sales show what's best to do.
you want a 100% gaming console i suggest you check Nintendo systems, and again last time i checked they were crushed by PS4

Gazondaily4358d ago

The biased source aside, it should be pointed out that, thats two E3's Microsoft has spent dedicated to showing games back to back. Sony also did this last year talking about TV.

@abzdine

Yeah but it didnt stop it from being boring as heck. No one wanted to see Layden waffle on or watch TV talk yet again.

MS are a multimedia device too mate, yet they showed off games two years in a row. Its just a critique of the format of the show really.

bouzebbal4358d ago (Edited 4358d ago )

the powers thing was boring cause i dont know what he was talking about tbh, but why do people obsessed on focusing on this all the time?
xbox damaged fanboys try to do a payback for i dont know what reason is the only reason.

The conference wasnt boring at all, there were big games all the time. even Entwined caught my attention cause i am a big fan of rythm games like bust a groove parappa space channel and other.

On the other hand i loved the Ratchet movie and the game remake announcement.
The MS conference bored me to death even if it's only games related. CG trailers, boring games we all know about and not a single surprise. not my types of games really!

people keep crying about 5 min TV or "non gaming" related stuff, but how about tech demonstrations of Move, Natal and co.. never seemed to disturb anyone.
e3 presentations have NEVER been 100% about games and it's not a standard anywhere. I think the xbox live talks in previous xbox conferences were more exciting than all of this year's e3 presentation.

I facepalmed when the guy said in the beginning that the conference will be all about games. it shows how desperate they are to gain some customers.

xbox will never beat sony and nintendo in games quality and variety, that's a fact and you fanboys will never get it

Gazondaily4358d ago

" xbox damaged fanboys try to do a payback for i dont know what reason is the only reason."

Eh? Lets not talk about how many memes were spawned from that TV talk. Also, it was the weaker part of their conference and most Sony fans also recognise that so I don't see what the issue is.

"The conference wasnt boring at all, there were big games all the time."

I didn't say the conference was boring. That last bit however, was.

"people keep crying about 5 min TV or "non gaming" related stuff"

It was more than 5 minutes.

"e3 presentations have NEVER been 100% about games "

Well then Microsoft set a new standard last year and this year?

"I facepalmed when the guy said in the beginning that the conference will be all about games. it shows how desperate they are to gain some customers."

It goes to show, you cant please everyone. Desperate or not, it was all about games. Whilst you were face-palming at their so-called desperation, the rest of us were face-desking at the TV talk, waiting for it to be over.

"xbox will never beat sony in games quality and variety, that's a fact."

No that's an opinion.

bicfitness4358d ago (Edited 4358d ago )

@Septic

Again, you miss the mark, which isn't surprising, given your ability to obfuscate and to be obtuse. Sony showed more games at their presser, period. Count them up, over twice as many as MS had at their event. Oh, and they managed to talk about new hardware and media services too. Any other assessment is hyperbole, willful disregard, or delusion. I imagine you have a rebuttal that falls under all three categories. F2P games count, and they showed a flash reel of over 20, coming over the next 12 months (PS2 and Kingdom Under Fire 2, as the most notable releases). Indies count as games too, and they showed over 12 of those. Plus, there's all the AAA stuff that was showcased at the event. They have so many games coming to the platform that they could not POSSIBLY discuss them all in 1.5 hours.

This "PS4 has no games" narrative that certain out-of-touch lunatics are trying to push. Current "lists" off Metacritic (hint--over twice as many games out there in the wild, too):

(PS4) http://www.metacritic.com/b...

(X1) http://www.metacritic.com/b...

And the trend of the PS4 having more indie, more F2P, more smaller AA titles, as well as having the best performance for multiplats isn't going to change, at all, for this entire generation. Barring some sort of colossal F-up over at Sony HQ.

So spending 20m on secondary features, when they have ALL of that in terms of software, lined up and coming, is an irrelevance, and a new goalpost that certain people are now clinging to. It is not reality.

Funny thing is, I'm not even a Sony "fanboy", I'm more of a PC guy. I only went with the PS4, because, as a tech enthusiast, its the least crappy hardware on the market. I mean, its no better than a well-tuned, mid-range PC, but its certainly better than what the competition put out. And it isn't founded, or based around gimmicks (weird tablet thing, or a marketing-camera). Its the absurdities that some of you people spout that make me feel the need to interject some sense into the madness.

P.S. I've never seen a poster with a more fitting name.

Gazondaily4358d ago (Edited 4358d ago )

@bicfitness

Ah here we go. Time to school you, yet again.

"Again, you miss the mark, which isn't surprising, given your ability to obfuscate and to be obtuse. Sony showed more games at their presser, period."

Irony. I missed the mark?? Where on earth did I say that Sony didn't show more games?

"So spending 20m on secondary features, when they have ALL of that in terms of software, lined up and coming, is an irrelevance, and a new goalpost that certain people are now clinging to. It is not reality. "

No its not an irrelevance. It was a criticism because it was part of the show and the weaker elements of it. Just because you can't fathom any kind of criticism levied against your platform of choice (PC or not), doesn't mean the criticism is any less valid.

"P.S. I've never seen a poster with a more fitting name."

My name aside, clearly you should invest some time into reading comprehension. In fact, I gave the win to Sony in terms of E3 showings:

http://www.gameondaily.com/...

But, because you're having such an inordinantly difficult time understanding the most basic of points, let me help you understand with the aid of some pictures, on a level that you will understand:

http://i.imgur.com/tnPxt1S....

Meltic4358d ago

meaby they actually work togheter.. lol you never know

sinspirit4358d ago

And Sony always sets time aside at e3 for other media and features. That is the main reason they have longer shows is so they still show just as much gaming as the competition but still have extra time to dedicate to other things.

Darkstares4358d ago

E3 really changed this year with Nintendo having a great recorded presentation that many seem to think was a great thing they did. Microsoft just served up a bunch of trailers and didn't talk very much. This is why Sony's E3 all of the sudden felt a little awkward because they were the ones who had bad pacing even though they actually showed the most games.

Pogmathoin4358d ago

abzdiine, love the fact that you refer to everyone else as 'fanboy'. You also state the obvious about PS4 sales, but neglect to mention X1, while falling behind, has still sold a record amount. PS is reknown for quality, but I have to admit, some PS 'fanboys' are much more reknown for ignorance.

bicfitness4358d ago (Edited 4358d ago )

@ Septic.

Allow me to spell it out for you: the spurious premise of this article is that MS and Sony have somehow "swapped messaging". You supported this, in essence, with your rebuttals and claims that the show was "boring" (your words, immortalized--also falls into that "opinion" camp for which you were slamming another poster). The idea that Sony's show was somehow less about games, right there, is wholly untrue. They showed more, empirically, and measurably. What is so difficult to understand, or accept, about that? Sure, they showed other things too, amid ALL THE GAMES THAT THEY SHOWED. In order for a critique to be "valid", it needs to actually be true, and the sentiment that Sony showed less games, or had less of a focus on their platform for games, is not true. That's not a matter of opinion, it is a fact, based on the number of games that they showed. That is quantifiable, that is how logic works. That is the basis of a sound argument, which nether you, nor the person who wrote this click-bait, appear to have.

Do you grasp the essentials of what measurable attributes are? Can you concede to basic reality? Probably not, but at least I tried to help with your befuddlement.

P.S. And lol @ schooling. Says the fellow who defaults to the classic "reading comprehension", and degradation of the other's intelligence, when they can't form a counter-argument. I'm not sure why you shared those links, either, other than to demonstrate how wildly your opinions waffle. Consistency is key. You also need to be smarter than someone, before you can "teach" them anything.

Edit: Its quite sweet that you've taken to obsessing over me enough to do pictographs of your love too, but I should tell you that I'm married, and already taken. You see a new shade of madness each day on N4G, and today you have taken the crown.

Gazondaily4358d ago (Edited 4358d ago )

@bicfitness

Wow. What a load of nonsense.

"You supported this, in essence, with your rebuttals and claims that the show was "boring"

No I didn't. You're making assumptions here. Also, where did I say that the show was boring?

In fact, to go all remedial on you, for your benefit, have a look at my comment above, 'immortalized' as you said:

http://i.imgur.com/ETLwKPx....

I even posted that before you burst in here with your tears.

"The idea that Sony's show was somehow less about games, right there, is wholly untrue. "

Okay! That's fine! That's why I gave them the win! Now relax....

But...it doesn't change the fact that the TV stuff was boring. Why can't you lot even concede about that? That was my point.

"You also need to be smarter than someone, before you can "teach" them anything.

Hence why I'm trying to teach you.

"but I should tell you that I'm married, and already taken."

You lucky chap!

I need someone that can form an informed opinion...and someone that can cook so its probably for the best that we aren't destined to be together.

XisThatKid4358d ago

Um because all in all and realistic. MS didn't really have a choice and Sony is in a position where they can do that and still get in on their games. Sony doesn't have to save face bottom line.
Plus Sony consistantly showed exclusive after exclusive even with multiplatform titles and content.

bicfitness4358d ago (Edited 4358d ago )

@ Septic. Getting all worked up isn't good for you. More deflection, again, with the "tears" comment, as usual. If you haven't noticed, I'm not the one throwing around exclamation points, creating graphics to illustrate my insanity, and generally working myself up into a frenzy. In fact, little of anything in my posts comes off as excited. You, on the other hand, are acting like a chihuahua who got into mommy's speed. It is delightful, however, imagining the red-faced rage on the other side of your screen. A nice diversion throughout my work day. Please, don't stop. Unless you give yourself a heart-attack, and then we can resume when you're up and at 'em again.

As much as you froth about "informed opinions", you fail to see that "boring" is a personal state, reflective of personal tastes, it is not universal. You seem to struggle with separating your feelings from reality. You do not speak for the universe about whether or not something is boring. Therefore, if the crux of your argument is that the 20m segment, was indeed, boring, here is where your argument falls apart. And still you continue to bring objective opinions into a debate, which is not how debates work.

But please, continue to rain insults on my intelligence when you haven't even demonstrated the ability to practice, or understand, what you preach.

Edit: "Also, where did I say that the show was boring?"

Let me show you.

"Yeah but it didn't stop it from being BORING as heck. No one wanted to see Layden waffle on or watch TV talk yet again." BORING.
B. O. R. I. N. G.

There, did you see it that time? Your words, 6th post down. Your first--visible--entry into this thread. I think we're done here. I added an apostrophe because your grammar is so atrocious, but otherwise the quote is untouched. And don't back-peddle now, you were clearly talking about Sony's conference, as evidenced by the following line about Layden.

Gazondaily4358d ago (Edited 4358d ago )

@bicfitness

". In fact, little of anything in my posts comes off as excited. You, on the other hand, are acting like a chihuahua who got into mommy's speed. It is delightful, however, imagining the red-faced rage on the other side of your screen."

Lol! If ONLY you could see how it actually works on my end.

Here I am, with my mate, laughing at your posts as we make these little photoshop drawings and you're talking about me being red-faced! Maybe you put too much emphasis on exclamation marks!1!one! It's Friday and I'm bored at work. You're my play thing. Except, you're as much fun as a cat with 2 legs chasing a mouse.

You're making yourself look like an idiot mate. Well...I'm making you look like more an idiot. Not the hardest thing to do mind you.

"you fail to see that "boring" is a personal state, reflective of personal tastes, it is not universal. You seem to struggle with separating your feelings from reality."

/facedesk

This right here, sums up what's wrong with keyboard warriors and when they cannot admit they are wrong.

I lovingly took the time to craft a pictorial representation to help you reconcile the truth, which, for some odd reason, continues to allude you despite me trying to dumb everything down to help you understand, and you remain ungrateful.

I wish we could do a video chat for all to see. It would be hilarious to see who got red-faced first.

You son...are not prepared.

EDIT- updated drawing incoming further to yout edit! (don't mis-construe the use of exclamation marks for anger or rage...I am excited though)

bicfitness4358d ago (Edited 4358d ago )

@ Septic. You keep making what you believe to be clever analogies, but you have yet to admit that you brought "boring" as an opinion into this discussion. You do not decide what boring is for other people, only for yourself does that judgment apply. But please keep jumping fences and throwing out more and more gibberish whenever you fail to tackle issues that you have raised. Its almost unbearable to read what you write, because its so hilariously full of ranting and poorly worded. I haven't seen you stand by a single point you're raised, you just immediately degenerate into insults when it comes to defending your argument. Exactly like a child having a tantrum. Sadly, you're almost out of bubbles now, anyway. So the tantrum must end. What a shame.

Thank you though, it really has been quite an adventure, watching your meltdown as it occurs.

Gazondaily4358d ago (Edited 4358d ago )

Ye I've run out of bubbles. I need to start riding Sony real hard in order to get a couple like you!

So my last picture. Make sure you print these out and frame them. I know I will.

http://i.imgur.com/1O5B8PV....

Class dismissed.

[EDIT]-
https://warosu.org/data/jp/...

Why o why4358d ago

Lmao..... dat passion guys.... fun to read....total waste of 5 minutes but fun all the same.

Sonys conference was longer. They showed more games and had time to do media.. the media bit was boring. These are my opinions mixed with facts.

Class dismissed!

+ Show (17) more repliesLast reply 4358d ago
Lord Anubis4358d ago

Actually from the very beginning sony laid out their plans to focus on games, game related content, game related updates. Then they would bring out entertainment applications. There is no secret sony would do it this time around. It was well documented.

snookiegamer4358d ago (Edited 4358d ago )

@Lord Anubis

Sony has this all worked out way in advance, which is why they haven't backtracked on anything, so I 100% Agree with your comment.

On a side note...

I see the 'usual suspect' is in here posting nonsense as per usual. I would tell him to stick his fanboy crap up his own ### but I'm afraid his head is already up there LOL.

Suppose he can't help himself tbh. I actually thought it was a one off with this guy, but it's now abundantly clear he gets a kick out of starting pathetic 'Video Game' arguments. I'm guessing it's all he has to look forward to in life.

Always reaching....so,so sad ;/

showtimefolks4358d ago

the way i see it

Sony had the best and most diverse showing at e3

MS had an excellent showing at E3 but too much of the stuff was expected so not much into surprise

Nintendo well they did much better than last year, sadly like sony and ms, most of their biggest titles also hit 2015

EA started out so well than it was just all over the place

UBI had great moments but in between we had to deal with exercise and just dance

just pure numbers wise sony showed the most games, also one game almost everyone is super excited for is coming to PlayStation first(no man sky)

Destiny is getting bunch of exclusive DLC(exclusive for one year)with white ps4

I feel like sony held a lot of its stuff back because MS didn't set the bar as high as we thought they would. I am pretty sure they had a plan B if MS brought their A game

http://www.dualshockers.com...

this link was pretty legit, we got uncharted 4,GTA5 etc, and in the end it says that sony may have plan A and Plan B

SilentNegotiator4358d ago (Edited 4358d ago )

So showing off a few minutes of non-game stuff at the end of a rather long press conference...is the same as what MS did last year?

Yeah, no.

Call me when Sony unveils one of their consoles with more TV shows than games, tells us to buy the last gen system if we don't like its policies, tells us that they can't change them, changes them when they get slammed in preorders, and then has a lame e3 on top of it all. Then you can tell me that they "reversed roles" at e3.

Gazondaily4358d ago

"So showing off a few minutes of non-game stuff at the end of a rather long press conference...is the same as what MS did last year? "

You mean what MS did last year at E3? Back to back games again?

The X1 reveal was botched ye but not E3 mate.

Why o why4358d ago

You got me there septic....my mind retconed the x1 reveal as e3. Lol. You've just fixed that.

I would hardly call it a role reversal. Sony had the longer slot so had more time to do media. I wanted to see more games and surprises but it wasn't to be

johndoe112114358d ago

@septic

Then maybe you need to focus on correcting the author of the article because negotiator was just responding to what was written in the article. But somehow, I don't think you would care to even if you could.

colonel1794358d ago

The PS4 is very weird so far. Sony announced the PS4 as the most powerful console, however, they have been focusing on indies with games that can be done on phones.

Sony also got the hardware and the pricing right and that's what got them the advantage they have now over Xbox. It is a great console, but somehow it feels they are lacking on the games, while last generation Sony was absolutely the king of exclusive, even better than Nintendo (in content and quality, not sales). Maybe it's too soon, but I don't want to play indies on a $400 console.

Sony is actually doing what Microsoft did last generation which was focusing on making deals with third parties instead of making their own games. Sony obviously is making its own games, but definitely not the same amount. Again, maybe it's still too soon. Nevertheless, a little concerning.

Why o why4358d ago

I hear ya but this was how it was at the start of last gen. I remember the 'no games' dig used by media and fanboy. I have every faith sony will replicate their output and probably improve upon it. Their talent didn't just disappear. Maybe thier push on the indies has lead us to believe they're falling off on retail level titles. Worry less I say.

Imalwaysright4358d ago

Sony supported the PS3 to the very end. Games take time to make so its understandable that their 1st party is somewhat lacking right now but they'll turn things around. They did it last gen and I see no reason why it should be different now.

iceman064358d ago

I think your main point of "maybe it's too soon" is about right. If you recall the PS3 launch, there wasn't a large selection right out of the gate either. It took time to get the number of exclusives that the PS3 eventually had. In fact, Xbox 360 had the same issue. It's really just what happens when consoles launch. The first year is usual a pretty dry time for console exclusives. So, the indie/F2P strategy is to fill the gaps between releases. As long as they keep their 1st party studios in tact, I won't be worried too much. They are in a position that they haven't seen in many years, which is that they are gaining mindshare as well as a lead. Rushing anything to market, just for the sake of having games, could prove more detrimental than helpful.
I can see why people would be concerned. But, I wouldn't panic just yet. Give it the customary year (as all consoles need) and then we can approach that panic button.

mmc-0074358d ago

sony supported the PS3 untill the bitter end, if they have saved all the games they released previous year (like MS). They would have over 11 more games on the PS4

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4358d ago
lelo4358d ago (Edited 4358d ago )

Interesting article with valid points.
If Microsoft talk about it's console entertainment capabilities on their conference, they get bashed. If Sony talk about their consoles entertainment capabilities on their conference, they get praised. This is how the gaming world works.

The hate of gaming journalism is strong against Microsoft (maybe they expect big checks from Microsoft, but don't get them). A lot of people hate Microsoft and don't even know why, mainly influenced by sad gaming "journalists".

mmc-0074358d ago

they wanna monopolize the industrie and in no way gamers are gonna let that happen.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4358d ago
Godmars2904358d ago

Both had new bosses with impressions to make, then Sony had commitments to other divisions for the TV show and movie.

miyamoto4358d ago (Edited 4358d ago )

oh boy, not another one of these opinions from the same M$ reputation management and damage control guy.... the same guy who said Sony spent more time on TV, TV, TV than M$ & PlayStation gamers love M$'s TV, TV, TV vision after all..... don't waste your time on this nonsensical M$ damage control clown.

And in popular social conscience the term “pulled a Microsoft” means a succession of continuous PR disasters that lead to Xbox One's E3 2013 disaster that incurred the wrath of millions of people around the world which lead for M$ to a series of "dog chasing it's tail" scenarios, reverse and remove every policy they presented before hand.

LOL! This clown show ain't funny anymore, it's getting sad knowing there are people who think & speak like this.

MrOlympia744358d ago

I happen agree with the author He does bring up a good point. Sony and Microsoft did switch positions, and it isn't fair the Microsoft was ridiculed for doing the same thing a year earlier. Calm the inner fanboy in you

majiebeast4358d ago

Lol Sony showed 1 tv show, Microsoft had their entire unveiling be about TV and sports. The rest of Sony's E3 was about games they had the most at the presser and the most on the show floor plus Morpheus.

miyamoto4358d ago

"... while Sony “pulled a Microsoft” and put heavy emphasis on entertainment services and hardware. To Sony’s credit, they had lots of great games to show as well.

Perhaps the most interesting part is that gamers are loving this side of Sony."

This author is a bad liar and mind twister.

M$ got its butt handed to it because of the #dealwithit, DRM, 24/7 online check, no used games policy, heavy emphasis on its media & cable network partners instead of games, kinect and its focus on TV functionality instead of games etc.

Good thing is... only the gullible Xbox fanboys believe this guy.

Outside_ofthe_Box4358d ago (Edited 4358d ago )

***"I happen agree with the author He does bring up a good point. Sony and Microsoft did switch positions, and it isn't fair the Microsoft was ridiculed for doing the same thing a year earlier."***

I'm really starting to wonder if people really forget things easily. I usually dismiss comments like this as the usual N4G hypocrisy cry, but I've been seeing people make this comment waaaay too much.

E3 2013 Microsoft didn't show "tv, tv, tv" at all. It was in fact similar to this year's E3 where they showed game after game after trailer. The tv focus was during their console REVEAL where they spent the majority of the time on it. That is where the ridicule about the tv focus occurred, not at E3.

Sony's E3 was very similar to last years where they had "non-gaming" portions as well. I don't see this "reverse roles" the author is talking about. MS and Sony had basically the same E3 back to back years respectively. I also don't see why you and others insist on saying that it isn't fair that Sony isn't being attacked for dedicating a segment of their E3 presentation to non-gaming related stuff when in fact Sony had a similar segment last year and on top of that didn't have the majority of their presentation on non-gaming stuff like MS had during their console REVEAL.

jebabcock4358d ago (Edited 4358d ago )

@Olympia

Let me guess you are the one who posted/wrote the article... This is pathetic...

LeCreuset4358d ago (Edited 4358d ago )

@MrOlympia74

"...it isn't fair the Microsoft was ridiculed for doing the same thing a year earlier."

If someone with a history of alcoholism is criticized for having a drink but his neighbor who has no history of alcoholism is not is that unfair?

Despite how fanboys try to spin it to turn MS and its supporters into the most persecuted group on the planet gamers didn't turn away from MS because MS showed TV and entertainment. Gamers turned away from MS because they FOCUSED on TV and entertainment.

As miyamoto points out, MS had a host of issues pertaining to its anti-gamer policies and non-gaming focus that led to the deserved criticism, made worse by their shift in focus to the Kinect over the last few years of the 360 while PS was rolling out games like TLOU for the PS3. MS knew from having to fire Mr. #Dealwithit that there were pressing issues they needed to address with gamers, but they dodged the issue for months, focused on TV and other non-gaming entertainment during the reveal of their console, then tried to get out of dodge, like Wanderlei Silva fleeing from a drug test, hoping they could avoid answering basic, pertinent questions pertaining to how gaming on their system works. You want to compare that to Sony finally announcing a TV show over a year after MS was talking about a TV show and NFL at the reveal of its console?

MysticStrummer4358d ago

MS was ridiculed for a lot of things that happened before and after E3 2013. Sony said other content was coming and they showed some of it this year, while still spending the same amount of time on games that MS did.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4358d ago
pickle12344358d ago

Sony lied to their fans having them believe that their about the gamer only. They're have the same vision as Microsoft, its just that Microsoft has the bigger potential in making it succeed. But either way I'm sure Sony will do a decent job. Its too bad Microsoft has to get crapped on when they do it

imt5584358d ago

Not a great article, especially when it is : microsoftproductreviews.com

Sony and Microsoft showed same number of games. Sony just had a little longer conference for a 20 minutes ( PS Now, PS Now TV's, Morpheus, Powers...) Well, high-end Bravia TV's with PS Now.... much like. :)

jebabcock4358d ago

Sales tend to contradict your comment regarding the ability to succeed... MS did not have focus... without focus the vision is irrelevant. Once you know your focus then you form a vision around that focus. Then it is much easier to sell. They are still trying to figure out what their focus is and save face at the same time... This is much harder to handle when your product is already out the door... MS is doing a decent job of trying to accomplish this now though I think. We will see what the long term result are though.

MysticStrummer4358d ago

How did Sony lie when they said before that other content was coming? Now they showed some of it, while still spending the same amount of time on games that MS did.

DARK WITNESS4358d ago

I honestly can't believe some of the gibberish I am reading.

I know I use to be on the MS coolaid a while back, but it seems like they have added some new secret ingredient that is causing a whole new level of stupid in it's fanbase.

it's like trying to cover up BS with horse sh£"t.

Wow, I am still recovering from that one!

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4358d ago
No_Limit4358d ago (Edited 4358d ago )

Besides the extra 25 minutes dedicated to Ps TV, Powers, and whatnot..both conference basically show the same amount of games and exclusives.

snookiegamer4358d ago

@No_Limit

100% Agree. It was pretty much 50/50 all the way.

I wouldn't say Sony reversed roles at all, they just showed the media stuff at different times/venues.

Both MS & Sony are pushing the media aspect, and of course games. At the end of the day we all win :)

Show all comments (77)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai26d ago (Edited 26d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio26d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing26d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9226d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit26d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing26d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9226d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
29d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted29d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8528d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele28d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk28d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay28d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 28d ago
Athlon10129d ago (Edited 29d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit28d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg28d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10127d ago (Edited 27d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14928d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay28d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn228d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn228d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown28d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay28d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay28d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac27d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger28d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300028d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde28d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde28d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)