All Channels
Popular
230°

E3: Microsoft's Mission Is Complete.

Tashaun Brown writes: "YOU HAD ONE JOB MICROSOFT! Show us the games. We as a gaming collective didn’t want to see or hear anything that wasn’t dealing with a game we will end up playing in the near future. Apparently the message was well received, because Microsoft spent 90 minutes showing a plethora of titles. Some were expected, some were unexpected. Some were well received, some weren’t. None of this is really the point. The biggest takeaway from this conference was that Microsoft is no longer content with their usual approach. They are no longer going to watch Sony amass a diverse library of titles without doing everything they can to keep up. They are no longer going to put the “battle for the living room” first. They finally got it through their thick skulls that the games come first, and everything else comes second. Everybody clap for competition! It’s a beautiful thing."

Read Full Story >>
ourcadegames.com
XiYakushijuAkeginuXi4365d ago (Edited 4365d ago )

They had a pretty good e3 but, they are going to need to do a little better because they aren't selling.

The 399$ model is at #46 on amazon. Yes, amazon does not show sales, but 46?! I thought many people were going to buy it after the price drop.

@ats1992

Do you know another website that displays bestsellers list like amazon? I don't that is why I use amazon and I shop there a lot.

Gamestop same thing. Both PS4 systems is about four pages ahead of the 399$ Xbox One

Edit 2: I just looked at Gamestop and the Xbone is much further back than both PS4's. Is your bestseller list different than mine? lol

ats19924365d ago (Edited 4365d ago )

Why does everyone always think amazon is the only place to buy a console and the only website people use to try and prove a console is not selling. You could look at gamestop and the $399 xbox one is one of the best selling items there but everyone only uses amazon.

Edit: There people go again just because the ps4 is selling more than the xbox one doesnt mean the xbox one is not selling well.

iamnsuperman4365d ago (Edited 4365d ago )

Amazon holds the largest share in online sales.

The telegraph reported this recently. Here in the UK Amazon takes "one in every three pounds spent on CDs, DVDs and console games". Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/...

Amazon is quite good at seeing trends because if something is high on its bestsellers list will sell well for that region

JasonKCK4365d ago

No they don't, they just have a part of it. Amazon has to deal with Ebay, Gamestop Walmart, Best Buy, and thousands of other online retailers.

Hello! brick and mortar stores also ship online.

Utalkin2me4365d ago

@ats1992

One of the best you say, roflmao. Considering they only have a handful of consoles to sell.

user95970824365d ago

Because a lot of people who post on comments sections are idiots.

tbone5674365d ago

I got mine from walmart. NPD doesn't even track walmart.

MysticStrummer4365d ago (Edited 4365d ago )

"There people go again just because the ps4 is selling more than the xbox one doesnt mean the xbox one is not selling well."

That's true.

What proves XB1 isn't selling well is the fact that MS dropped mandatory Kinect from the console so soon after telling us all how important and integral Kinect was to the system. If the console was selling well MS would never have done that so soon.

All of 2013 - "XB1 is Kinect"

Early 2014 - "Not so much"

XB1 sold fine right at first, then after the holidays those sales fell way off. MS obviously saw that even if some of their fans didn't, or won't.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4365d ago
XiYakushijuAkeginuXi4365d ago (Edited 4365d ago )

It isn't selling well. Do you honestly think that Microsoft just got rid of Kinect, lowered their price, talked about all these console performance boosts because it is what the fans wanted? Yes, part of it is the fans; but you cannot deny that all these actions were done because the PS4 is taking in the lead. Microsoft knows PS4 is selling because the PS4 has better hardware. Take off your fanboy glasses and you would see the truth.

@ats actually you are lying when you say you are trying to make me feel better about my purchase. No where did I ever even think of that.

Just because it did well in its first few months does not mean anything. Look at the PS3's long climb it took to gain sales. And as I stated before Microsoft is going to have to do more to persuade people to buy an Xbox One.

P.S. Your "first" and "third" could of been placed together btw

ats19924365d ago (Edited 4365d ago )

First: based on your comment history you really shouldn't be calling anyone a fanboy.

Second: yes they hit a slump in sales but its still ahead of the 360 in its first year of sales so its still the fastest selling xbox.

Third: you are nothing but troll who is trying to compare it to the ps4 sales to feel better about your purchase. In a article about xbox one games that has nothing to do with sales.

DigitalRaptor4365d ago (Edited 4365d ago )

@ ats1992

It doesn't really matter who is a fanboy in this situation.

People bring up Sony's financial situation all the time regardless of the facts that they bring the games and have the best value and treatment of both consumers and devs.

What matters is that despite proving that they have a lot of multiplatform games, and showed a couple of CGI trailers for games that aren't coming out until 2016, Microsoft had no surprises at E3. No megatons, while Sony has some surprises and simply had more to announce. It can't be stated that MS won minds over being "the best place to play" by showing multiplats that look and run better on a console that has more games anyway.

So... When we've finished acknowledging that all 3 conferences were brimming with games, then this comes back round to comparative sales. People can bring up Sony's financials all they want but you can't deny that Xbone is several million units behind PS4 with both launching simultaneously, in an industry that both them and their shareholders planned to dominate the competition and wasted billions developing anti-consumer measures to gain a monopoly that never happened and never will.

We can't deny that Microsoft cares that Xbox isn't the market leader in any sense and is doing everything they can to change that, but it can't work.

Titanfall couldn't move it.

A price drop isn't moving it.

A non-Kinect version isn't moving it.

A pretty gargantuan Halo announcement isn't moving it.

It has to be asked. What will?

bcrazy184365d ago

@Digitalraptor

In defense of the Xbox One, The $399 kinectless Xbox just went on sale this past Monday so there's real way to truly tell if it'll move consoles or not. I think the Master Chief collection as well as the kinectless option will sell a lot of consoles in the coming months but to truly see the impact of the move, it's going to take time. Wait a month or two and we'll see. I've heard of numerous people in the comments section here on n4g that stated they'll be buying the xbox one just for the Master Chief collection so sales will increase.

UltraNova4365d ago (Edited 4365d ago )

@bcrazy18

At 100 less, the XB1 sales will definitely pick up, of that I have no doubt. I can even see those sales staying up for the foreseeable future, turning the current PS4 -XB1 2:1 sales ratio into a 3:2 ratio, probably.

As you said we need time to be sure, furthermore its slow summer now so sales will be down anyway. I estimate when we have 3-5 months worth of sales figures we can draw some concrete conclusions.

What I'm pretty sure of is that if you have any hopes of the XB1 overtaking the PS4 anytime soon then you should prepare your self to be disappointed.

aconnellan4365d ago

@DigitalRaptor

Yeah, the Kinect-less $399 Xbox One only just went on sale, and the Halo announcement was made like 3 days ago. How are we supposed to have an accurate sales prediction over the last couple of days compared to the last 6-7 months?

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4365d ago
christocolus4365d ago (Edited 4365d ago )

@xiyakushiju

You are going offtopic by bringing in sales, amazon and trying to compare. The article is strictly referring to MS delivering a good number of games at E3 which the actually did. I don't know about you or amazon but interest in the console actually increased after e3.most gaming forums I visit now actually have more people looking forward to picking up the console.my friends picked theirs up after E3.the show was great. MS did a good job.

StockpileTom4365d ago (Edited 4365d ago )

Keep in mind other sites might not be reliable as they can reorder the popular list based upon targeted ad algorithms. I would take the Amazon bestsellers at face value and not try to make anything more out of it. The data is too narrow, the X1 demographic is different enough for there to be a sizable discrepancy between Amazon and other sites.

PS4 is selling much better on Amazon.

We will see how E3 changes things within a few months then we can talk about winners.

spicelicka4365d ago (Edited 4365d ago )

It doesn't matter what their sales are or why they changed their strategy, from a gamer's perspective in the end it's huge plus. I am a lot more content on buying an Xbox one now than i was last year, and that's the point.

Ps3 was consistently losing to xbox 360 in sales at the beginning of last gen, but it caught up didn't it? We know MS isn't going bankrupt any time soon, so if selling less consoles means focusing more on hardcore games and listening to fans, whether it's genuine or not, then that's a win in my books. I would prefer they don't win in sales because they'll be serving fans well in trying to catch up.

No_Limit4365d ago

If all else failed...go to Amazon and get hourly sales stats. Lol, the fanbois pathetic. Where was that during last generation?

Yetter4365d ago

Why would I order a console on Amazon when it is available in stores?

user95589034365d ago

I've said it before I'll say it again. I buy a crap ton of video game consoles games and accessories and not once from amazon. Not everyone buys everything on amazon. It's not the Holy grail of sales

xDHAV0K24x4365d ago

NOT a price drop. It's a new SKU. Know the difference

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 4365d ago
incendy354365d ago

It was definitely fun to see, definitely the most game centric e3 I have seen. Even the little favorite games bits were good.

AngelicIceDiamond4365d ago (Edited 4365d ago )

Mission complete indeed. Great third party support. They also have great well received Ip's and proven ones like Halo MCC, Project Spark, Fable Legends, FH2, DR3 DLC, KI Season 2, Crackdown 3 return. On hold is a proper Gears announcement.

new ip's like Quantum Break, Sunset Overdrive, Phantom Dust and Scale Bound look terrific.

Great new indie support and some new particular ones like Ori And The Blind Forest and Inside.

MS delivered yes MS is back. They lost their way but they found it.

XxGrim_Reaper05Xx4365d ago

Good job Microsoft. Going to pick an xb1 when that halo collection releases.

http://i.imgur.com/uRkCFIH....

BX814365d ago

Ms did great this E3. A good mix of games. This e3 was a huge contrast from the last one. Game on.

Show all comments (42)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai26d ago (Edited 26d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio26d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing26d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9226d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit26d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing26d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9226d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay27d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn228d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn227d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown28d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay27d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay27d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac27d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger28d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300028d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde28d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde27d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7529d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_27d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.