All Channels
Popular
260°
7.5

Ninja Gaiden 2 Impressions (PlatformNation.com)

One of the first reviews for the game. Here is what PlatformNation.com had to say:

"How should I sum up Ninja Gaiden 2? I guess the easiest way to sum it up is to tell you about it. Here is a little description of the game that is taken directly from Xbox.com:

'Ninja Gaiden II makes its long-awaited debut on Xbox 360 as the blockbuster action-packed sequel to Ninja Gaiden. Ninja Gaiden II features a new and improved game engine, developed from the ground up exclusively for Microsoft and Xbox 360 by Team Ninja and legendary game developer Tomonobu Itagaki, creator of the famed Dead or Alive franchise.

Guide Ryu Hayabusa on a mission to avenge his clan and prevent the destruction of the human race. Armed with an assortment of ninja weaponry, help Ryu to skillfully maneuver through a world fraught with peril and danger. Ninja Gaiden II features an all-new gameplay engine, new auto-health regeneration system, levels, adventures, enemies, and thrilling combat with an extensive assortment of ninja weaponry, representing a true evolution of the highly popular franchise.'

Now why did I just tell you what they said? Well, that's because I feel that it isn't worth my time and effort to come up with something new. Kind of what Team Ninja did when they released Ninja Gaiden 2. Now, I'm not doing a full review of this games because the game just got old and, like I said before, this isn't anything really new. I've been there, done that and, for that reason, this game was a major turn off for me. Let me go ahead and get right into the scores."

Read Full Story >>
platformnation.com
Tmac6570d ago (Edited 6570d ago )

"Now, I’m not doing a full review of this games because the game just got old and, like I said before, this isn’t anything really new. I’ve been there, done that and, for that reason, this game was a major turn off for me. Let me go ahead and get right into the scores." -Steve

Wow, I'm not approving this junk. Subjectivity is a bias, you rate the game on the fun factor, the polish the over all immersion, not your basic opinion of it. Objectivity is the goal and this surely lacks it.

You failed to be neutral for that I give your review of the review a C-.

Proof read your review as well.

Steve5196570d ago (Edited 6570d ago )

what do you think a review is? is an opinion of the game. I have spent some time on the game, more then what I really wanted because the game didn't suck me into it. It wasn't as enjoyable as the first one and it didn't give me that feeling that I wanted to keep playing to find out more and advance the story. The review talks about NG2's good points as well as bad points. To me, I would say that is being neutral.

Tmac6570d ago (Edited 6570d ago )

Well "Steve" you're clearly unfit for the job. You should have passed this off to another editor if you had the choice.

Maybe you should take Journalism 101.

lodossrage6570d ago

If he had given this game a bunch of A's, most of you would be saying how good and professional his review is.

I'm not saying all of you are like that, but damn sure MAJORITY of the people here at n4g are.

JOLLY16570d ago (Edited 6570d ago )

I think it was an honest opinion. That's all that a review is. It is hard to have an opinion that the hardcore disagree with, but you just wrote how you felt. That takes some courage. Don't worry about this site too much, we all have a little angst in us. I personally really liked the first and if the second is just an upgraded NG I will be happy.

*edit* Congratulations on the baby also

Tmac6570d ago (Edited 6570d ago )

I keep seeing 'Review = opinion'. Incompetence is what I see when I see those words together.

@ Below

EXACTLY, professional journalism is dying, it's not what it used to be.

lodossrage6570d ago

Then just about any/every review thus far this generation should be considered incompetent.

I mean seriously, how many "professional" reviews have we seen where he/she installs their personal opinions into their review

JOLLY16570d ago

were there graphics? yes
were they good? can't answer that...it's my opinion
was there a story? yes
was it good?...well I think you get the point

Tmac6570d ago

"Now why did I just tell you what they said? Well, that’s because I feel that it isn’t worth my time and effort to come up with something new. Kind of what Team Ninja did when they released Ninja Gaiden 2. Now, I’m not doing a full review of this games because the game just got old and, like I said before, this isn’t anything really new. I’ve been there, done that and, for that reason, this game was a major turn off for me. Let me go ahead and get right into the scores." -

Yeah, because that's journalism.

Amanosenpai6570d ago

If u didnt like it or u just do not consider "profesional enough" to this reviewer, get out of here and go check some of the "profesional journalist" reviews.
People in N4G are mature enough to decide if they consider this review as a fact for its buying or NOT...

Thanx for the review.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 6570d ago
Maddens Raiders6570d ago

re: the half-assed review,

"I’m not doing a full review of this games because the game just got old and, like I said before, this isn’t anything really new. I’ve been there, done that and, for that reason, this game was a major turn off for me."

That's quite harsh.

pp6570d ago

He calls that review what a d*ck head

Dark Collosis6570d ago (Edited 6570d ago )

Not even bothering with this site or link. This guy should find a different occupation due to obviously not knowing anything about reviewing a game. What a half a$$ed half brained biased opinion this review is... Whatever he gets paid if ANYTHING is TOO much already...

timmyrulz6570d ago

What a joke of a man and a review, the game is a sequel which in my mind means more of the same with certain improvements on the flaws on its predecessor, when you look at dmc4 that game was not only more of the same but half a game that was mirrored to give us 8 hours of ps1 action yet it was well recieved by most reviewers. Here is why i think he wrote this review.
He turned it on, got half way through level one and was killed several times, i think it was far too challenging for him,

ceedubya96570d ago

His overall tone about the game seemed to be frustration. I'll admit that the Ninja Gaiden games were challenging, but they were far from unbeatable. If you're continuously getting beaten, then sometimes its a good idea to just take a breather or a good bit of time off from the game and come back fresh with a clear mind. Works wonders sometimes.

I know the game isn't for everyone, but I don't think you have to be an elite gamer to finish a NG game. I know that I'm in no way an elite player. What's this guy's excuse?

Show all comments (39)
90°

Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2 - Team Ninja at its Finest

Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2 debuted in 2009; ahead of Wo Long: Fallen Dynasty's launch, it's time to look back at one of Tecmo Koei's best titles.

MIDGETonSTILTS171184d ago

Disagree.

Black > Sigma1 > Sigma 2

210°

The 10 Hardest PlayStation 3 Platinum Trophies

With the release of games now slowing on the PlayStation 3, Twinfinite take a look at the 10 hardest platinum trophies on Sony's older system.

Read Full Story >>
twinfinite.net
DarkOcelet3752d ago

I almost got the Lost Planet 2 one, but that get no One in the Leaderboards was effed up.

Many of those trophies are just time consuming, if we are going to talk some seriously hard platinum trophies, put MGS4 in there.

I will never forget the day i got that Big Boss Emblem.

Complete the game in less than 5 hours
Use no continues
Use no health items
Kill no enemies
No alert phases
No special items
Complete the game on The Boss Extreme

One of my proudest trophies :)

skcej3751d ago

yeah the Lost Planet 2 one was pretty ridiculous with the amount of time you had to put in but when I researched the list I found a lot of people saying that the Nom de Guerres were really annoying/ quite tricky to get. I did think about putting MGS 4, maybe it should have got an honorable mention. Impressive trophy to have though dude! :)

kotaku773751d ago (Edited 3751d ago )

Yeah! specially when you got to play over and over MGS4, when you could be playing, idk, MGS3 or any other game

FallenAngel19843752d ago

I'm only one Trophy away from getting the Platinum in MGS4, but unfortunately it has to be that damn Songs of the Battlefield one that requires me to get all the emblems. It's such an eyesore to be so close only to be set up against such a daunting task

kotaku773751d ago

Mortal Kombat 9
Star Ocean: The Last Hope International
Lost Planet 2
Far Cry 2
Wipe Out HD
Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2
Super Street Fighter 4
Persona 4: arena
Raiden IV
NBA 2K16

Knushwood Butt3751d ago

+1 for Raiden IV

What is your best score in Overkill mode (online ranking rules) ?

kotaku773751d ago

I don't know what you're talking about

Knushwood Butt3750d ago

Raiden IV

Shhoting game

High score?

100°

Are AAA Games Too Easy?

"Perhaps extreme difficulties are still here, just presented in different ways. Multiplayer focused shooting games (for the most part), have average (to-below) difficulty within their campaigns. However, jumping online and playing competitively can produce a welcomed contest." KJ of Play Legit Writes

Read Full Story >>
playlegit.net
itsjustexuma4055d ago

From Software thinks differently

bacrec14055d ago (Edited 4055d ago )

Real Talk. Wish more companies would get the memo.

joab7774055d ago (Edited 4055d ago )

So do I. Unfortunately, it doesn't sell so it doesn't get made. At least it doesn't sell 5-10 million like Assassin's Creed, And all the others. Bloodborne is one of the best games I've ever played, and it ruins other games b/c it expects better of you. It wants you to play it for awhile, instead of moving on to the next big thing a week later.

It's goal is to consume you, and not just your time, but your patience and your will, and it promises, unlike other games, to reward you for that time w/ actual satisfaction.

breakpad4055d ago

eeh ?? have you heard bloodborne or Souls games ? ..no if the develeopers dont seek wide casual acceptance (aka all kids must play the game) no ... are not easy

bouzebbal4055d ago (Edited 4055d ago )

i think western games are getting much easier than ever.
japanese are the only ones who dose difficulty. Games like Ninja Gaiden, Souls, Bloodborne raise the level.

johndoe112114055d ago

Why? That makes no bloody sense. Most games have varying levels of difficulty, if you are someone who likes to be constantly punished and frustrated while playing a game simply start off playing the game on it's hardest difficulty. Why the hell should they make all games with only one level of frustrating difficulty, to pander to a select few who have nothing better to do than spend 10 hours trying to pass one level?

This argument makes no sense and since bloodborne released people act like they've forgotten about difficulty settings. People saying all games should be difficult and punishing are selfish and inconsiderate and don't give a damn about anyone else's time or preferences. if gamers want to spend over a month trying to finish every game then they should not complain when only 5 or 6 games get released every year. It's a senseless foolish expectation.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4055d ago
rawrock4055d ago

From Soft makes Souls games hard the wrong way. Slow clunky controls and questionable mechanics and design. Anybody can make a game where you die a lot. It takes more talent to make a game with a good difficulty balance and smooth gameplay. I have not played Bloodborne but at least it looks to be step up in gameplay over the Souls games.

4055d ago
freshslicepizza4055d ago

from software became a aaa developer based on expanding its fanbase who often felt neglected to play games where if you die you suffer for it. the first demons souls game was not marketed as a aaa game, it grew from word of mouth and they managed to fill an area that was being ignored.

lots of aaa games are made easy and that makes sense since they want the barriers of people to play them to be as wide as possible. the more accessible the more will play is what they are thinking because aaa games cost a hell of a lot more money to make now than they did 30 years ago.

AngelicIceDiamond4055d ago

The industry doesn't use the word easy but "accessible" so yes games are easy.

joab7774055d ago

It's because they know that you won't be playing long. Only certain games get played over a period of time longer than 2 weeks. They just want your money, and want you to finish it. And they know that if you get the Souls reputation, you are screwed.

700p4055d ago

it depends on the game really.

BitbyDeath4055d ago

Depends on the difficulty setting.

Perjoss4055d ago

I find the souls games a bit too hard personally but I think Bloodborne has perfectly balanced difficulty.

KryptoniteTail4055d ago

Too hard, actually. Well, not "hard" but complicated, with long boring tutorials, and unbalanced sections and they try your patience with collectathons, bulls*** missions and try to make up for it with half hearted multiplayey and/or bitchy trophies.

I prefer more indies these days. AAA can still be the best around but most are boring rehashes and DLC fests.

Show all comments (26)