All Channels
Popular
240°

Face-Off: Wolfenstein: The New Order.

Eurogamer : "Having now completed our analysis, it's clear that the PS4 gains an advantage with smaller drops in resolution that occur less frequently than they do on Xbox One. Metrics in the area of 1760x1080 are found on PS4, while on the Xbox One this can drop to an extreme of 960x1080 in some scenes. This is usually identifiable by an increase in the amount of jaggies on screen, along with a slightly fuzzier appearance to the already gritty aesthetic that Machine Games employs throughout the game.

Outside of the more aggressive dynamic framebuffer on the Xbox One, there's little to separate it from the PS4 game. Shadow quality is slightly better on the PS4, but the artwork, effects and lighting are all basically identical. The PS4 holds up the closest in delivering a native 1080p experience at 60fps, so benefits from slightly more consistent image quality. As such, once again it's the PS4 release that is our preferred console choice. However, the differences between the two consoles are minor and Wolfenstein is really a worthwhile purchase no matter which one of these systems you own."

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
imt5584396d ago

Oh my! I'm gonna shoot myself.:)

GarrusVakarian4396d ago (Edited 4396d ago )

So, PC>PS4>X1.

No surprise here. I think we can pretty much expect this throughout the entirety of this gen.

@jack

True, it does depend on your rig. But if your PC is good enough, you will have the best possible version, so that's why i put it first.

jackanderson19854396d ago (Edited 4396d ago )

depending on the set up you could say PS4>X1>PC if the framerate for you is king while maintaining a 1080p based on this line "However, it's hard work calibrating the game to play as consistently well as the locked frame-rate console versions."

all in all solid work up by ID tech 5

@green really you're going with Eurogamer being pro-sony? if anything you'd lean them more towards being pro-MS then anything else and this is coming from a MS fan...DF are generally spot on with their analysis and if they do make a mistake they tend to own up on it or explain the discrepancies... hell they were one of the first, if not the first, to notice the oddness about Killzones MP

GarrusVakarian4396d ago (Edited 4396d ago )

@MPOG

Ah, there you are. I was wondering when you were going to show up, with your bitterness and denial.

Sorry, but the most popular and comprehensive multiplat analysis website in this industry disagrees with you. You can post whatever obscure 'Google translate'(lmao) website you want to try and prove your point. It doesn't change the fact that - "Xbox One this can drop to an extreme of 960x1080 in some scenes. This is usually identifiable by an increase in the amount of jaggies on screen, along with a slightly fuzzier appearance ". Not to mention the lower res shadows on the X1 version.

And please, stop with the conspiracy BS every time something doesn't work out your way. It's beyond desperate. Did Eurogamer have an anti-MS agenda when they exposed the Killzone SF 1080p lie (this example right here should squash any accusations of them being pro-Sony)? Did they have an anti-MS agenda when they pointed out that multiple games lacked AF on PS4 (Thief and Stryder)? Did they have an anti-MS agenda when they said that Thief had a worse framerate in the cutscenes when compared to the X1 version?

You accuse Eurogamer of ignoring certain things, whilst mentioning others....but that's exactly what you're doing. You're picking and choosing all the "negativity" towards the X1 in these comparisons and making up BS conspiracy theories based on that ignorance. Eurogamer tells it like it is with these comparisons, they always have done, get over it. The X1 version is slightly inferior to the PS4 version, and both console versions are inferior to the PC version...GET OVER IT.

Are we really going to go through with every game this gen? People like you not being able to accept that their version is the least favourable and making bitter, resentful comments and conspiracy BS? Going to be a loooong generation for you if you insist on doing this for every game. Sorry, but you're going to have to deal with it. You made the choice to buy the X1, now deal with it's capabilities.

Also, wasn't it IGN that said they had the 1080p version of Ghosts?

akaFullMetal4396d ago

Wow PowerofGreen, face facts, because if you can't do that, then no body will ever take you serious.

Visiblemarc4396d ago

It's so funny Lukas, when desperate people try to discredit the media based on the misreporting of the COD Ghosts resolution, what they all forget is that most if not all outlets were staying stuff like "the resolution is different, but I have trouble seeing it."

There is such a strange tone to some of this fanboy conspiracy stuff. Very Fox News-ish.

WrAiTh Sp3cTr34396d ago

Lol, I love that fence Lukas sits on :P

Concertoine4396d ago (Edited 4396d ago )

Why did you reply to imt558's comment? I mean his comment was pretty nonsensical and vague but i can't see why you read that and typed this for any reason other than to be at the top.

OT: This game looks pretty good considering its 1080p 60 fps on xbox one. I wouldnt mind games of this visual caliber if it meant high res and framerate.

GribbleGrunger4396d ago

This I find interesting. When you enable AA on the PC version, you lose the reflections:

With no AA: https://farm3.staticflickr....

With AA enabled: https://farm3.staticflickr....

JCOLE131954396d ago

@MPOG
Here you go again man. Seriously just let it go. I've been playing a Wolfenstein on my X1 just fine and I could care less that its the inferior version. I'm an Xbox fan like you, but you don't see me going around spewing BS that just isn't true. The facts are in the analysis. The Xbox One version still plays and looks great and that's all that matters. So just enjoy the fact that you get to play the game in the first place.

its_JEFF4396d ago

@MorePowerOfGreen

Right on time... Here he comes to save the day! XboxMan!!! (superman theme)

The thing you brought up about COD Ghost being 720p then getting a patch later to up res it to 1080p... I believe that review/conclusion was made using a version of Ghosts that was 1080p, the discs going out to consumers were already being stamped. They either would have had to delay the game or patch it in after launch. It wasn't part of some industry wide conspiracy theory against your beloved Xbox.

disKinected4396d ago (Edited 4396d ago )

@MPOG

Don't embarass yourself further.
I know it would be hard for you to digest the reality since your head is mostly into mrX nonsense but the earlier you realize the facts the better for you.

UltraNova4395d ago (Edited 4395d ago )

Why do people still insist on replying to george/more power of green when he is clearly delusional in a medically justifiable way, I might add or paid by MS to troll like this, is beyond me.

Just call him out for what he is and stop giving him credit by going into lengthy replies. He's not worth it.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 4395d ago
akaFullMetal4396d ago

I guess the pay off of doing 60fps were dynamic resolutions, it drops a little on ps4 to something like 1760 x 1080 compared to xbox one 960x1080. The xboxone really needs more esram in it to stream data better or more rops (but thats impossible to implement because of hardware).

givemeshelter4396d ago

This game for the PC is locked at 60FPS no matter what GPU setup you have. Moreover advanced IQ settings are not all there for PC gamers. This game was obviously made with the console in mind first and foremost.
If you're rocking a Crossfire or SLI equipped PC rig, your money is wasted on this game unfortunately

DoesUs4396d ago Show
MasterCornholio4396d ago (Edited 4396d ago )

Essentially PC>PS4>XB1.

That was what I expected.

Anyways I'm glad to hear that the framerate is great in this game. Kind of dissapointed in the visuals but the games really fun which is what matters the most.

P.S Looks like Eurogamer proved KNWS wrong. I knew he was wrong with what he was saying about how tiled resources would improve the quality of the megatextures.

Show all comments (28)
60°

Fanatical's Explosive bundle is now live and lets you save big on 16 Steam Deck-friendly games

Fanatical has launched its new Explosive bundle, and this one can help you save big on a collection of Steam Deck-compatible titles.

100°

Wolfenstein: The New Order Is The Last Of Its Kind

Wolfenstein: The New Order turns ten years old today, so we decided to play it again and discovered just how much of an extinct kind of game it is.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
SovereignSnaKe747d ago

It's an outstanding game and so was The Old Blood. Also a lost era of gaming. Interesting, I received a physical copy of The Old Blood 9 years ago today from Poland. It was digital only in North America initially upon release so I had to import.

140°

Wolfenstein: The New Order - A Highly Rated FPS That Hasn't Stood the Test of Time

Wolfenstein: The New Order launched 10 years ago today, but can it stand up to the modern FPS titles it inspired?

Seth_hun747d ago

I disagree. Its still a fantastic game, with very good gunplay and a surprisingly loveable cast of characters and a good story trough many different and interesting setpieces

hiawa23747d ago (Edited 747d ago )

All The New Order needs for my tastes is a this gen enhancement patch.

ChasterMies747d ago

I played New Order a couple of years after launch and I give it an 8/10. The shooter holds up because it is focused on being a good shooter. There is no crafting, no RPG elements, no open world find the question mark Weapons are fun. Enemies are fun. Levels offer a nice mix of stealth and shooting. You get to be the predator; this isn’t a game about fending off waves of enemies while a robot companion unlocks a door. Most importantly, New Order is the last of a dying breed of single player shooters.

Skuletor747d ago

Singleplayer shooters are still getting released every year, just look up "boomer shooters" and you'll find an an abundance of them. AAA fps campaigns, not so much.

Last year had Trepang2, RoboCop: Rogue City, Turbo Overkill, Warhammer 40,000: Boltgun, Dread Templar, Sprawl and more

DustMan747d ago

The games you mentioned are not from AAA developers. Wolfenstein likely had a budget that was probably as big as all those games you mentioned combined. I'm not knocking the new wave of retro shooters. I absolutely love them (I think some get much higher review scores than they deserve though). I just really wouldn't describe Wolfenstein as purely a boomer shooter based on the relatively cohesive story, with cut scenes and is fully voice acted. Full set piece moments.

AA development seems to be focused keeping the single player solo experience alive. But the big developers are only concerned about the MTX and milking players who enjoy multiplayer.

ChasterMies746d ago (Edited 746d ago )

The age of AA shooters. I’m not saying it’s a bad thing. I like less expense, shorter games.

Abear21747d ago

Weird all the Wolfenstein articles.

Can you guess what will be announced at Xbox showcase?

DefenderOfDoom2747d ago

What Machine Games did with Wolfenstein franchise is awesome. The game play definitely to me , is still very fun to play !!!

Show all comments (11)