
Ripten:
"When we first got our hands on Haze, we were intrigued by the concept of Nectar and its use on the battlefield. Still, we were worried whether this was all Haze had to offer; a game exploiting the concept of exploiting drugs in war. With that confusing thought just escaping our little heads, our mits were on the final version of the game.
Free Radical's latest offering does a good job of implementing asymmetric play in both online and single player and treads new PS3 ground with its seamless online co-op. Nevertheless, its potential isn't quite reached elsewhere."

Alex S. from Link-Cable writes: "When shopping for new video games you can often trust the name publisher or developer on the box to be an indication of the quality of the game. Names like Nintendo, Square Enix, Sony Interactive Entertainment, Capcom, Xbox Game Studios and Sega are world famous because they helped shape the industry by releasing some of the most defining video games of all time. Though sometimes even these great gaming houses stumble and put out a stinker."
Splatterhouse remake . Loved the og’s at the arcade growing up . Hell the best thing about the remake was the og,s were included . And left alive by Square . That game had so much potential , but the gameplay was worse horrendous .
I'm pretty much certain that any Sonic game that comes out will be terrible, I've not enjoyed one since the original side-scrolling days of the MegaDrive.

Guns, drugs, and unnecessary war. Fun for the whole family.
I value Riptens reviews above all others however after eurogamers debacle and many other gaming sites it seems that professional gaming journalism is so ridiculous biased or completely fundamentally lacking that why bother investing my time into reading peoples garbage reviews. There used to be a time when Reviewing games was done with finesse, now all they ever do is rush the first damn review out to get hits on their website, pathetic.
I was kinda expecting this when I saw your PSN comment lolz.