All Channels
Popular
XiSasukeUchiha4380d ago (Edited 4380d ago )

Damn the sweetness is coming like a rap god, rap god.

@Mikey

Maybe it have more time, who's knows!

Mikey322304380d ago

I wonder how much footage? I hope maybe something like 5-10 mins.

GTgamer4380d ago

I'm hoping that too but what will they show at E3 a trailer or gameplay.ಠ_ಠ

UltraNova4380d ago

Is that font from the Order?

theshonen88994380d ago

I read the title as "The resolution will be televised."

Destrania4380d ago

Pretty sure it's The Order. You can see the logo behind the type face. Can't wait!

4379d ago
morganfell4379d ago

@GTGamer,

The Order will be doing a stage demo at the Sony Presser.

starchild4379d ago (Edited 4379d ago )

It's like playing a CGI movie. Freaking brilliant, incredible, stunning. This is a true achievement.

G20WLY4379d ago

Stunning, can't wait.

Here's the link to the less choppy video (still youtube, sadly):

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

redwin4379d ago

@starchild, You are playing a CGI movie. I like more autonomy in a game, but it's too early to dismiss and label this as a game in rails. The division is more of my type of game.

NewMonday4379d ago

the scary thing is they say Uncharted4 will look even better.

Madock4379d ago

Really? getting hyped for few minutes of gameplay?
I feel sorry for us

DOMination-4379d ago

Looks impressive but honestly the gameplay is not convincing from what little they've shown right now.

Oas someone else said - you can compare this to Ryse. Looks beautiful but its not really doing anything. Hope e3 will show it in a better light

hazeblaze4379d ago

The game looks freaking incredible... I love the cinematic gameplay! I can't wait to play it.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 4379d ago
ZodTheRipper4380d ago

I love your stupid comments, here's a bubble :D

Magicite4380d ago

eventually ps4 will have more games than we can handle!

Spaceboy_ca4380d ago

Napoleon, like anyone can even know that.

Dark114380d ago

Not really a huge fan of cinematic/movie games but i will keep my eyes on this.

Old McGroin4380d ago

Well that was...underwhelming. Seem to have copied quite a bit from Gears Of War.

CryofSilence4379d ago

Gears of War didn't invent cover-based third person shooters.

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Irishguy954379d ago

Yeah another overhyped generic game, same as Uncharted and Gears.

4379d ago
sagapo4379d ago

I can agree. Looks amazing graphics wise, but the gameplay reminded me at Gears as well. Nothing wrong with that tho.

Grilla4379d ago

I don't see why ppl are complaining about a cover system. Which is more realistic, taking cover in the middle of a gun fight or standing in the open so you can get shot to pieces?

lsujester4379d ago

-CryofSilence-

And even before Kill Switch there was WinBack.

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

DukeofRandomcat4379d ago

Irishguy95,

Seems like a troll if I've ever seen one.

Also, cover based systems have been used for years now. Don't think you can have a functional Third Person Shooter without it nowadays.

incredibleMULK4379d ago

U crazy. Gears didnt invent 3rd person. Butt hurt fan boy. Xbox losing. Pucker up and kiss Sony anus.

mike_honcho4379d ago

lol research much??.. gears is played out dude.. it's like a less frequent cod imo.. nothing new or fresh about it.. that goes for all ms exclusives.. just stale.. there's not a single xb1 exclusive that's gonna touch the order.. enjoy your #BlunderBoxOne

JMyers4379d ago

Ummm... many games had cover system before Gears. They just made it main stream with a big AAA franchise.

Why would people not take cover in the middle of a gun fight?

badz1494379d ago

@Irishguy95

generic? you mean you comment, right?

DOMination-4379d ago

Lol at 5 people making the same comment. Nintendo didn't invent analogue sticks but most would cite them as the ones who made them what they are today.

Gears was the first game to popularise the mechanic so its convenient to use it as a comparison. If we said it looks like a killswitch clone most people wouldn't understand.

Old McGroin4379d ago (Edited 4379d ago )

@ Puppy_Farts

"I love the insecure weird defense mechanism fanboys have: "Copied from GoW". Yup, Gears totally came up wit cover-based gameplay, totally. It was a sneak peek to garner excitement, and it was pretty awesome."

I'm no fanboy, have all the consoles so in no way am I insecure. Never said Gears created the cover shooter either so I'd appreciate it if you didn't put lies in my mouth to create your own petty arguments. I still stand by what I said, I've played through all the Gears games and this Order clip looked like a carbon copy with spruced up graphics. Deny it all you want, just shows that you're the insecure fanboy, not me.

Actually, there's a few people attacking my comment and saying that I said Gears invented the cover shooter, I would absolutely love for these insecure single console fanboys to point out where I said Gears created the cover shooter. The Order is a Gears competitor and that little clip proves it, just because the fanboys can't accept it doesn't mean it's not true. The Order looks like a good game but the comparison to Gears is 100% justified. Get over yourselves.

@ mike_honcho

I will enjoy the #Blunderbox as well as the PS4 and all the great games both consoles produce. Hope you enjoy being a single console fanboy.

@ incredibleMULK

"U crazy. Gears didnt invent 3rd person. Butt hurt fan boy. Xbox losing. Pucker up and kiss Sony anus."

I WILL pucker up and kiss Sony anus, they are an excellent company and I have been enjoying their platforms and games since the PSone and will continue to do so for as long as they exist. I will also enjoy Nintendo and Microsoft's platforms and games because I'm not a narrow minded butt-hurt single console fanboy like you and most of the fanboy trolls on this site.

@ DOMination-

Exactly, agreed buddy. Good to see there are people on this site with a bit of sense like you.

warczar4379d ago (Edited 4379d ago )

The only thing Gears added to the 3rd person shooter genre was the quick reload, BFD. Try not to make yourself look like the uncultured gamer you are, gaming didn't begin with the XBox 360.

" Never said Gears created the cover shooter either so I'd appreciate it if you didn't put lies in my mouth to create your own petty arguments."

No, you only implied it. There were many 3rd person shooters this generation, why the Gears comparison?

"I'm no fanboy, have all the consoles so in no way am I insecure."

How does owning all the consoles keep you from being a fanboy? I own all the consoles too, doesn't keep me from hating Microsoft. Oh, and threatening to kiss Sony's anus and taking the side of some moron who thinks without Nintendo there would be no analogue sticks isn't helping your case any.

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 4379d ago
CryofSilence4379d ago

I think airing this on twitch was a mistake. It is highly compressed and lagged hugely. It's a gorgeous game, but I feel it would have looked more gorgeous in a better, more controlled format.

Destrania4379d ago

I agree, but I was still blown away. Hopefully Sony re-releases that footage as a normal uncompressed video.

user14394144379d ago

This is ONLY possible on PS4.

BallsEye4379d ago (Edited 4379d ago )

From the video can tell it plays very similar to Gears of War but less fun. A lot of praise from community it gets now. As for the graphics, the dark look and pale/1 color pallete that was hated on n4g in GoW (saying it's to hide graphical compromises and run better) but suddenly is the best thing ever when it comes to TO. Anyway, since no Multiplayer in this game I really hope that campaign is more than cool looks and shooting guys that pop out in scripted places, else a rental for me no matter how pretty it looks.

morganfell4379d ago

Why do you want a game to be better that is on a platform you despise. Do not even pretend otherwise. There is an entire angry and jealous post history that tells everyone exactly who and what you are. You are so transparent you are practically invisible.

DukeofRandomcat4379d ago

One bubblers commenting a lot in this article. Similar to Gears how? Just in the cover system? I see nothing really similar to Gears other than the genre itself here: Third person shooter.

I'm pretty sure that any third person shooter without a cover system is pretty scarce right now, so I don't understand why that seems to make people call The Order generic.

kenshiro1004379d ago

You haven't even played the game yet. Stop with the jealousy crap. The cover system existed way before Gears.

ziggurcat4379d ago

@ballseye:

Just stop, you're an embarrassment. You can't make a deluded, biased, and I'll-informed judgment call on the gameplay of a game that you haven't even played. Also, please explain how MP in GoW changes the shooting of guys that pop out in scripted places in GoW's single player campaign.

And why would you rent a game for a system you don't even own?

imt5584379d ago (Edited 4379d ago )

Yeah, Xbot with Kinect in head instead the brain.

Anyway, this game got visual improvement :

http://abload.de/img/compar...

And this comparison, despite the muddy picture, you can notice fog, lightning, post processing etc, better alpha effects...

http://images.gamersyde.com... http://s5.photobucket.com/u...

warczar4379d ago

I don't know if it's Balls but you definitely got something in your eye.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4379d ago
3-4-54379d ago

Wow that Game looks awesome.

showtimefolks4379d ago

day one buy for sure for me, i have full confidence in ready at dawn

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 4379d ago
Kayant4380d ago

Another streak for shinobi.... Let's go

mike32UK4380d ago (Edited 4380d ago )

So excited for more footage of the order: 1886!

Also - I would really appreciate it if things like this were sent to the [Announcements from PlayStation] notification section that was recently included in the latest firmware... allowing us to watch the stream on the Live from Playstation app

ZodTheRipper4380d ago

This definately needs to happen in the future.

christian hour4380d ago

Yeah I check it every now and then to see if theres anything, never is. Eventually I'll grow out of the habit of checking it and once I've forgotten all about it there'll probably be something posted in it, its always the way :P This would have been a perfect opportunity to use the new section in Notifications.

italiangamer4380d ago

HOLY SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITTTTTT!!! !!!!!!
NEW PANTS INCOMING!!!!!!!!!!!

Show all comments (231)
210°

The Order: 1886 Sequel Would Have Featured Larger-Scale Battles & Multiplayer

A sequel to Sony and Ready At Dawn's action-adventure game, The Order: 1886, would have featured larger-scale battles as well as multiplayer.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
pwnmaster3000357d ago

I missed it when games use to have a multiplayer to them.
Hope Sony revives the game at one point

KyRo356d ago

Killzone, Resistance, Uncharted, TLOU, Motorstorm. Great times. Its a shame how far they've fallen this generation

Muigi356d ago

Oh they still do…its just the whole game now 😂.

-Foxtrot357d ago

Why add multiplayer when the single player (despite enjoying it for what it was) had flaws?

You'd work out the issues with how you craft the single player then once you’ve perfected it do multiplayer after.

RaidenBlack357d ago

https://www.videogameschron...
"Two sequels were planned for the franchise, The Order 1891 and The Order 1899. While the third game was never in development, Weerasuriya says he had planned where the story of the franchise was planned to go, if he had been able to develop the full trilogy."
...
Alas, we'll also might never get the PC version of 1886, which is currently residing in some dev's hard drive, nearly ready for a release if required.

Charal357d ago

It’s a shame we didn’t gave its chance to this franchise.
Game world was very interesting, and gameplay could have evolved to a major hit with sequels.
Not even speaking about graphics that were way ahead of their time.

Reaper22_356d ago (Edited 356d ago )

If "we" is sony, i agree. I liked the game but it was metacritic that contributed to it's death. It's a shame.

AshleeEmerson356d ago

No, we are "us," the gamers who rated it so low on Metacritic, hurting... Killing its sales. I agree it is a shame. I loved this game.

Charal356d ago

No it is not, it is us has a community which crucified this game, which is happening much too often.

CrimsonWing69357d ago (Edited 357d ago )

I think MP being co-op would’ve been awesome. Essentially, I always viewed this as Sony’s take on the Gears series.

However, it really failed to measure up to what I expected. I definitely saw the potential but there were some things that really bogged it down for me like the forced slow walking segments (which I know was to hide loading), the repetitive warehouse werewolf fights, not enough variety in enemies, oddly we fought more humans than Darkstalkers, and the stealth sections were infuriating.

One thing there’s no denying though, this damn game was a looker. Such a shame at the wasted potential.

Show all comments (16)
120°

The Order: 1886, a Ten Year Reunion

WTMG's Leo Faria: "After finally playing the now decade-old The Order: 1886, what do I think about it? Is it really worthy of all the hate it has received over the past decade? Or is it some kind of hidden gem? I honestly think it falls somewhere in the middle. I loved the setting, the story is initially fine, the combat isn’t half-bad, and the potential for some awesome world building was there. It was all bogged down by too much ambition against a tight deadline, as well as poor marketing. As a result, it’s short, full of plotholes, infested with QTEs, and not exactly memorable as a whole. As a game you can grab for less than ten bucks today, I absolutely think it’s worth checking out. It’s one hell of a wasted potential, but for such a discount, I had some fun with it, and I’m sure you will too."

Read Full Story >>
waytoomany.games
SimpleSlave453d ago (Edited 453d ago )

Great setting, great graphics, even decent gun play, but what a trash of a game. The fuck were these people thinking? We could've had something like an Alan Wake 2 meets Mass Effect 2 style game. With investigations, creepy locations to uncover and explore, people to talk to and even recruit, clues to uncover and connect, monsters to slay, side quests to get lost in, and a more expansive lore to go with it.

Instead we got a shitty AAAAAAAAA Third Person Pew Pew snoozfest. Awesome.

_SilverHawk_453d ago

The order 1886 was one of the best games I played on ps4. Within a top 5 best ps4 games I'd put the last of us 2, the order 1886, days gone, horizon zero dawn and God of war.

SimpleSlave453d ago

"The order 1886 was one of the best games I played on ps4. Within a top 5 best ps4 games..."

Jesus H. Christ, bud. You just sound like a Sony apologist. What the fuck? Anyways. Good luck with that or whatever.

coolbeans453d ago

God. The "what could've been" you're describing would've been way better than just being the most empty cinematic shooter slop of that generation.

SimpleSlave453d ago

Right? I mean, I can understand people enjoying this thing ironically. Knowing that it sucks but still enjoying it for what it is. I get that. That's fine. We all have our guilty pleasure no doubt. But to come here and actually pretend that this is a top 5 PS4 game? Wow!

To pretend that this barely there game is anything more than an "empty cinematic shooter slop of that generation," as you said, is beyond ridiculous. But I guess Self-Awareness is some expensive ass DLC still.

Espangerish453d ago

I really enjoyed this game and also think it was one of the best PS4 games. It’s weird to me that this makes you so angry. I’m not a Sony fan at all by the way, very much pc player.

SimpleSlave452d ago

"and also think it was one of the best PS4 games"
"I’m not a Sony fan at all by the way, very much pc player."

Yeah, OK. You want to lie to yourself? You do you, bud. But like I said to the other Sony apologist, "good luck with that or whatever."

-Foxtrot452d ago

Jesus, it had some flaws but you're acting like it was unplayable.

It built a foundation, a rocky one but a sequel is where they could have refined things.

Personally my only issue is I feel like the "Gears of War" like over the shoulder gameplay, especially getting into cover and the like didn't really fit the game as much. In Gears you understand that kind of gameplay because they are wearing super heavy amour and guns but in the Order these guys are super human, they should feel more of a breeze to control, easily jumping over things and being allowed to climb whatever similar to Uncharted.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 452d ago
Inverno453d ago

Im back again to simp for The Order, if ya like games well grounded in their reality with consistency in everything it does then I recommend it if ya haven't played it. Play it thru emulation or on your PS it don't matter just play it.

1nsomniac453d ago (Edited 453d ago )

A great game run down by the media for it's price vs length - Which was understandable, but it shouldn't of been the be all and end all.

At the right price this was a great game & deserved a sequel!

thorstein453d ago

Exactly. What a weird metric that suddenly was important and then, within a few months, no longer mattered.

andy85453d ago

I enjoyed this. I think the complaints were the length if I remember. Nothing wrong with a short good game, at least to physical copy owners 😅

Rebel_Scum453d ago

Put the thing on PS plus already!

Show all comments (16)
310°

The Order: 1886 Dev Pitched a Sequel to Sony, But Was Denied

Co-founder thinks bad reviews were to blame.
Ready at Dawn co-founder has revealed the now-shuttered studio pitched a sequel to PS4 exclusive The Order: 1886 to Sony, but was denied the chance to make it.

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
_SilverHawk_463d ago

I can't believe sony turned down a sequel to the order 1886 which ended basically on a cliffhanger. The game is amazing and I would love a ps5 pro enhanced version just like I'd like a driveclub ps5 pro enhanced version.

DodoDojo463d ago

About 2 million sales and not the greatest of reviews, I can believe it.

Tbh there's a lot of dormant Sony exclusives that are more deserving of a sequel.

ravens52463d ago

Have you played it? Just curious.

ABizzel1463d ago (Edited 463d ago )

2 million probably wasn’t enough to make a strong profit on, and the mid reviews didn’t help, even though it was a solid game just short, and could have expanded way more on the creature mythos.

Days Gone: +7 million / mid reviews (no sequel)
Infamous SS: 6 million / mid reviews (no sequel)
Killzone SF: +2 million (4 mo.) / mid reviews (no sequel)
Driveclub: +2 million (2015 / leaks say 5m) / mid reviews (no sequel)

Basically it looks like for the PS4 generation budgets were getting out of control and Sony made the decision

sales + reviews - budget = sequel or no sequel

goken462d ago

Whatever the number, can’t be worst than concord

SimpleDad462d ago

Glad that Alloy Lego is doing great.

Toecutter00462d ago

Two million in sales for a new IP is pretty impressive. The world-building was in a class on its own. Any moron could see this IP had mad potential and the fact that Sony balked on it makes one question their competence and leadership.

Cacabunga462d ago

Nothing to do with sales. It’s all about the broken vision that Sony is having lately.
Days Gone sold great but they still don’t want a sequel to it.
Sony wants Easy money and they saw it in gaas and lazy games like lego horizon and countless remasters..

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 462d ago
pwnmaster3000463d ago (Edited 463d ago )

Idky you can’t believe it.
This game was shitted on by everyone besides some PS fans.

Don’t blame Sony on this one. Blame everyone who wanted to see this burn. Sony does a lot of stupid shit with their IP and waste a lot of them like bloodborne and days gone, but don’t be surprised with this one.

Outside_ofthe_Box463d ago

Exactly. I came to post exactly this. The game was torn apart upon release. It's not shocking that a sequel was denied.

S2Killinit463d ago

Not “upon” release. There was a whole campaign “prior” to release.

In my opinion they should have made it a bit less linear and it would have been great. I did enjoy it. But the reception it got makes sense that Sony wouldnt want to risk a sequel if it was going to open up a can of worms with people who wanted the first one to fail.

462d ago
Christopher462d ago

I played the game. I 100% believe Sony turned down a sequel.

blackblades462d ago

Well pretty obvious when it was left on a cliffhanger. Many sequels get turned from companies as someone else said above blame the SOB's that always whining.

Sabbath1313462d ago

i 100% agree with you, both of those games were amazing

Bathyj462d ago

What's so hard to believe? Don't you remember this game was crucified by the media.. it was DOA. It's a shame because it was a really fresh new IP it was gorgeous and a play really well . it had some issues but it wasn't the only game with qte repeated bosses and a playtime under 10 hours.

TheEroica462d ago ShowReplies(2)
mkis007462d ago (Edited 462d ago )

It was panned because of the graphics hype. Kind of similar to Ryse and hellblade 2...although the story was pretty interesting in all 3.

As a matter of fact I think Indy's success is partially due to the fact the graphics were not hyped up pre launch.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 462d ago
-Foxtrot463d ago

It’s strange though Sony would be so proud about their work and overall quality but wouldn’t give them an extra year to, give them that quality.

Anyway he talks about if it was in the 70s they’d have had their sequel but Days Gone is at 71 on Metacritic and we don’t have a sequel.

Both games should have one, I think they deserve a second chance at refining and building onto that foundation already laid out.

neutralgamer1992463d ago (Edited 463d ago )

Definitely days gone 2 should happen. Who knows maybe now Sony will let them make it since bend had to cancel its live service game. Days gone 2 for PS6 sounds amazing

As far as order 1886 sequel it would be have been interesting. I think if this game was a RPG with 15 hour story it would have done so much better. Don't get me wrong game is great but you can tell the potential is there if they were allowed to make some drastic changes

Sadly this new Sony is not the PlayStation they are suits and spreadsheet guys. Playstation has lost its touch with gamers. I miss Shawn jack Andrew house etc

At the launch of PS4 Playstation was at its full strength with gamers running the company but not anymore. No we have a guy who loves horizon above every thing else and is willing to fund projects based on that IP

Redemption-64463d ago

So an IP that actually sell? Sony moved away from the type of games you saw during the launch of the PS4 because many gamer didn't support them. I hear people crying more about say Japan Studio closing than actually supporting their games when they were open. Wasn't it shawn layden who said many of these games fail and you hope a few like horizon to make up for the failed games. Maybe if gamers actually supported these games there would be more of them. Shocking right?

Redemption-64463d ago

There is no sequel for Days Gone because it didn't sell. The director himself said "If you love a game, buy it at f****** full price. I can't tell you how many times I've seen gamers say 'yeah, I got that on sale, I got it through PS Plus, whatever'.”

Majority of the sales from days gone came from when it was heavily discounted, and I have seen many gamers say they will not pay full price or the game isn't worth full price, but they will buy it when it's discounted. Yet they get triggered when the studio decides to move away from a game they refused to support at full price

jwillj2k4463d ago (Edited 463d ago )

What this is showing is that the majority of people don’t like the price. It doesn’t mean they don’t like the game. Two different dimensions.

Example: The company Take Two took advantage by selling NBA 2K at $20, completely undercutting NBA live to become the most popular basketball game. High priced games isn’t the only way they can make money.

-Foxtrot462d ago

Well. If we are going to go off that director apparently Days Gone hit 8 million sales around the same time frame that Ghost of Tsushima later did.

https://x.com/JakeRocket/st...

One was considered a failure, the other a massive success so I don't think it just boils down to sales.

Redemption-64462d ago

@Foxtrot

Hey, maybe you clearly know more than the director/writer. If memory serves me right, Days Gone went on sale faster than Ghost. Also, please know budget is a major factor. There is a huge difference between Ghost with a budget of $60M selling 8M, vs Days Gone, with a budget of $250M selling 8M after major price cut. One can be considered a success, because it had a much lower budget.

Don't Complain If a Game Doesn’t Get a Sequel” If You Didn’t Buy It “At F-cking Full Price, clearly shows the game didn't make the money it needed to make within the time frame it needed

Redemption-64462d ago

@jwillj2k4

What is shows is majority of gamers didn't think Days Gone was worth the $60 price tag and clearly Sony agrees with them. You can like a game, but if you don't think it is worth the price tag, why do you complain when the company decides to not invest in a game you don't think is worth what they are charging? They should release the game, lose money, cut the price and then you will support it?

jwillj2k4461d ago

Reading is fundamental. I said start with a reduced price not cut the price after you’ve already released it. It was an example to show how there are other ways they couldn’t make money. The idea is that number of buyers is much greater at $20 than $60. I didn’t think I had the point that out to you.

Redemption-64461d ago (Edited 461d ago )

@jwillj2k4

The number of buyers being greater at $20 than $60 does not equate to more money. You literally have to sell 2-3 times more to makeup the difference. Starting with a reduced price for an AAA that costs say $250M is pure stupidity and again would have to sell 2-4 times more depending on the reduced price break even. Or include micro transactions. They can make it into a free live service game with mtx. Yeah, you are right, maybe they should follow the route 2K NBA took

Clearly many don't think the game is worth $60. Who knows maybe the remaster can give it hope. But it would be funny if they get a sequel and people refuse to buy it at full price. Highly doubt those who think the game isn't worth 60, will be lining up for 70.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 461d ago
S2Killinit462d ago

Days Gone deserved so much better than 71. I’ve noticed that some PlayStation games get attacked and it feels generated. Like money is behind the hate campaign.

-Foxtrot462d ago

Days Gone was that one game which wasn't really attacked by gamers but by journalists.

As soon as it was revealed they really didn't like it for some reason, it was made out to be because it came across as a generic looking open world game or another generic "zombie" game but at the time we had plenty of open world games and a fair few "zombie/infected" games that these journalists didn't bad an eyelid towards.

When the game released broken before the Day One patch it just gave these journalists a massive excuse to slaughter the game in their reviews.

On one hand, a game shouldn't have released in that broken state or at least they shouldn't have given journalists a copy without the Day One patch HOWEVER these are the same journalists who usually gloss over that kind of stuff with so many other games, take Star Wars Outlaws for example, the game was a buggy, broken mess at launch with plenty of issues, bad AI, some clear performance issues and a lot of quality of life improvements needed but it still did a lot better than Days Gone at launch.

Personally I think they knew they could get away with it more because Sony Bend weren’t that high up and respectable, they knew calling their game out as much as they did wouldn't hit them with any major consequences unlike if they hypothetically were like this towards NaughtyDog, Sony Santa Monica or Insomniac.

RaidenBlack463d ago

Yea and there was/is a PC version of 1886 too in 2016 ... but now maybe collecting dust in some dev's hardrive.

Relientk77463d ago

That's lame. It's not perfect, definitely a flawed game, but deserves a sequel. You already have the first game as a starting point just need to improve upon it. This could have been a much better sequel like the jump from Assassin's Creed to Assassin's Creed 2. The IP has potential.

S2Killinit462d ago

But Assassins Creed sold a lot.

Show all comments (57)