I agree 100% not only would an mmo be a massive hit they are also missing the chance to get a full 3D version on the Wii U which would no doubt boost sales..

I have no idea why this isn't happening.

Have you seen their online infrastructure?

Exactly, even if they are worried about affecting the handheld titles sales all they have to do is limit the regions at launch. They can continue adding new regions on the handhelds and for the Wii U they can have Kanto and Johto at launch and add expansion packs every year.

Like Colosseum but in an art style similar to the handheld games and the anime. and with wild pokemon.

They've never done this, it would be epic.

As it stands every Pokemon game sells exceedingly well, a 3D Pokemon game would be a GOTY and would save the Wii U.

Because Pokemon is what sells their handheld.There is a lot of people that only bought nintendo handhelds because of Pokemon games.
If they release to WiiU the handheld sales will drop.

They don't want to lose a market they dominates(handhelds) for a market that have strong competition(consoles).

That was a different project. There has been multiple attempts at this and they all end the same.

It's AI slop because it ignores the artists intent and changes the details ESPECIALLY when it comes to character faces. The scariest part of it is introducing it as the next stage of DLSS, a feature where the current iteration already has controversy surrounding it and for quite a lot of games cannot be fully disabled. So reasonably the precident is already set for what path this could take, and it's not good

In case you didn't watch the video then let me point just one part. It overrides the lighting. Then the question of what is the point of ray tracing cost and so on. Many of the lighting deletes shadow, including shadow on the face like eyes even chin.

Why stop at art when it comes to human input - why not just have AI play the game for us, remove human input altogether

And what about when you can't? Cause there's plenty of games where you cannot fully disable dlss already, i mean we're well into an era where it's a major crutch for developers to cover up their cut corners, why would this be any different?

You are playing with people's money and allow Nvidia to scam you.

In case you didn't watch the video then let me point just one part. It overrides the lighting. Then the question of what is the point of ray tracing cost. This is all lie to raise the cost of the graphic card.

Something consumers can do to a product after they have purchased it, entirely optional and can always be undone with a fresh install

VS

The leading gaming hardware manufacturer making this the next iteration of the main AA/Upscaling technique that is heavily relied upod by modern devs and is not optional in most games.

Not at all the same but nice try

It's all about choice in the end. But, I would say that calling it 'more realistic' is quite a stretch. It looks like AI art, and that's rarely realistic.

I had the same exact thought the first time this was brought up in a separate article about a week ago. Took me straight back to the conversations surrounding “horse armor.” Just don’t buy it they said. Years later, many IPs I previously enjoyed are so infected with monetization schemes that I don’t even consider purchasing them anymore.

DLSS 5 and the like are the same thing wrapped in a different package. History rhymes but many of us never learn from it.