All Channels
Popular
110°

Why Nintendo Will Stand When The Rest Fall

Say what you want about Nintendo and the Wii U but one thing you can not deny is that Nintendo has a strict focus on gameplay experience.

Read Full Story >>
wiiumadgamers.com
Dahui4402d ago (Edited 4402d ago )

"gaming is enjoyed by men in women in their late 20′s" I know what he meant; just a funny typo.

Good article.

DarthZoolu4401d ago

What a reach! Any company that doesn't follow what gamers want can fail

randomass1714402d ago

lol Derp. That was good for a laugh. :)

deafdani4402d ago

Well, I love gaming in women in their late 20's. The claim is not inaccurate.

chronoforce4401d ago

Sounds rather uncomfortable for both parties.

staticdash224402d ago

If Nintendo took risks, we would be seeing new IP left and right. Fine, if nintendo is so confident in taking risks,I dare them to not release a mario or zelda game next year and instead release a new IP.

Now ask yourself would nintendo be willing to put away a guaranteed money maker for a while to build up a new property? The big three all bring very different additions to the game industry. All of them have been beneficial to our hobby. Nintendo keeps the fun, and forces us to remember that is what gaming is all about. They make new strides in gameplay. Microsoft brings new innovations and upgrades to multiplayer gaming, and helps open new ways to connect gamers together. Just look at xbox live last gen, that blew up pretty big and party chat is now a standard. Sony always strives to push the boundaries of storytelling in ways we haven't seen before. Games like the last of us, uncharted and heavy rain are movie/T.V quality stories. They're focused on memorable moments and characters liek ratchet and clank, Sly cooper, Nathan Drake, Ellie, Colonel Radec, etc

Like I said,a ll three bring innovations to gaming. They each have strengths and weaknesses, but the exploitation of those weaknesses are due to the state of the market. Gamers/consumers can be fickle in what they want, this is because fads change, interests change and yes, kids do grow up. The market is looking for experiences that Xbox One and PS4 can provide. Not to say Wii U can't be successful, it can carve out it's own niche but the lion's share of the market is PC/PS4/XB1. You can't say that's a coincidence and that people are stupid for wanting what they want. That's their choice if they don't value the same gaming stuff that you do.

plaZeHD4402d ago (Edited 4402d ago )

They take risks more than any other in this industry, but they are not stupid.
For every innovative game/risk there needs to be a game or at least something to fund it, or else they will end up like SEGA.

randomass1714402d ago

New IPs are not always a good business strategy, especially when Nintendo's generally go unnoticed. Frankly it's just as much of a risk to bring back an IP that hasn't been touched in ages. For example, would creating a new original title be any more risky than making Ice Climbers 2 on Wii U? It's hard not to call Nintendo's current business model a risk since most of the successful games out there are for older gamers but Nintendo continuously caters to a family audience. Mario and Zelda are very successful in a mostly violent game oriented industry. That's pretty interesting, I think.

for we are many4402d ago (Edited 4402d ago )

Nintendo takes risks where it counts and that is in Gameplay mechanics and art style, not just by making "New characters and story" and duct-taping them to the same linear QTE-fest derivative gameplay like others do. Nintendo introduces new gameplay ideas and sometimes radically different art/visual style in nearly every iteration of their major franchises, take Zelda for example, from 2D to 3D, from top-view to 3rd person, realistic to cell shaded to pastel colors, z-targeting, touch control, motion control and dual screen, etc. Doing all this and more while still managing to be considered the gold standard in quality for almost 30 years, one should simply give credit where credit is due.

Gemmol4402d ago

stop smoking, Wii Sports, Wii Fit, Wii Music, are all new ip's.......theres a ton more, all the new ip's lets just say you do not like, so instead of saying Nintendo do not make new ip's change it to Nintendo do not make ip's that I like. This is a much better way to get your point across, because if you say it the other way you and everyone else who agree with your post would look like an idiot, which is the majority of people who make articles on here or people who assume they know the specs on the Wii U. Please do not get offended by what I said, I mean no harm, just clearing up your words, for the people who do know all of nintendo new ip's I say congrats to you all already. I know someone will comment back on what I said about the system specs, so I will say what I said in my other post, all the post I seen about Wii U specs are assumptions, I have not seen one person show me any facts, only estimations and etc that are not 100 percent facts, like how Sony showed of the ps4 specs, that is 100 percent fact, the numbers everyone post for wii u is not 100 percent, just estimations. I am not saying its stronger then ps4/xbox 1, all I am saying I have not seen any concrete facts, just like I said in my other post even the people who open up the Wii U first when it first came out said it was heavily customized they did not know themselves...now back to the original topic, check it out Nintendo create many new Ip's, just look them up.....my new favorite one from them is The Last Story Wii, I missed out on having a Wii so learning that the Wii U can play wii games bring me pure joy, its one of my top favorite RPG now, if they make part 2 I will preorder today even if it comes out 4 years later

millzy1024402d ago

The Wonderful 101, that game was a huge risk and new ip so stop your gibberish

LOL_WUT4401d ago

How was that much of a risk? Didn't Nintendo ship like a certain amount of copies at launch? Even they didn't believe in their own game. ;)

truechainz4402d ago

Miyamoto already confirmed to be working on one. Also new IP does not necessarily mean innovation and risk. If you don't consider the gamepad to be a risky move by nintendo then I don't know what you would. It was a bet that could've gone better if they marketed the focus and taken more times to show use in games, but overall is was a bet that they were destined to lose. Now they can take the hit and try harder to be fully prepared next time.

N4g_null4401d ago

Most of the new ip are on the stronger platform, handheld. Fanboys will downplay any none successful while putting up a mediocre new ip on a sony console it seems because they like stories. Yet don't seem to read books because sony stories are subpar most of the time. If Nintendo does merge the handheld and home console then suddenly you no longer have to make two mario and two zeldas... the one game will work on both. Now you will get to see the nintendo I grew up with, where new ip came at you right and left. They have just been building the platform for this to happen.

Fatal frame does scary movie better than most. Luigi mansion does comedy better than most. Nintendo does innovative game play better than most. Nintendo also makes more types of games. Where is sony rts, rpg, 2d adventure, puzzle games, local multilayer games, imaginative action adventure, creative simulation games. An impressive looking story based game doesnt change the fact that sony does know gaming. The key word is game, you know something you can play over again and get a new experience from by playing creatively and getting better at it.

There was a panel on online gaming and designers are reeling from the lowering of skill have and gamers not wanting to play their games and need online just to have fun. These same gamers call themselves hard core but seek achievements like grade schoolers rather than true skill. The only local gamers left are story buffs. This is why ms created rise... If heavy rain is a great game then rise should have been up your ally. Lots of gamers give sony the story bias which is all they have now. The power game is going to get old if account gaming is done by the major ip holders in this industry.

Then you have them perfecting motion control in hardware and in their own engines. The wii fit u, resort, play, sports and the current club online play gives them great motion control gaming test online now. It is all done without extra power being taken away from gaming. This is a missing link any vr headset will have.

Once the os thing is setup you have an nes type of situation. Nintendo could offer radical different features while the core features still work.

The ip is hardware and software based and they both work. Once the duplication of games is not needed think about getting double the amount of games just from nintendo and of course a console pokemon would suddenly make sense.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4401d ago
protocol104402d ago

Thats not what the article was saying. This article was just in defense to what Nintendo has to offer the industry.

stragomccloud4402d ago

I think anyone who really follows the industry already knows this, and also knows, we are seriously racing to another crash. Nintendo seems to be the only one that won't fall into the trap since they refuse to enter the industry hurting system of bribing for content.

randomass1714402d ago

^One of the few companies to never handle DLC in a poor manner and always offers full gaming experiences for one's money. I think that's pretty undeniable of them in the end.

plaZeHD4402d ago

I absolutely agree with you, video games are becoming more and more expensive for publishers to manufacture and for consumers to gain access to, and this will lead to a big crash.
I mean we are at point were we have to pay another 60$ every year, to play a game we have already paid for.

N4g_null4401d ago

One of the few companies that let online be free and includes backwards compatibility because they actually have a legacy of great games that are not popular based on hype or online. I must golf clap to the pr teams that where able to turn gaming on consoles into sub budget pc gaming... where the consoles are devoid of any real console games. You have to ask why is Nintendo the only company allowing pc vs console online play. If ms or sony did this then they are afraid gamers will realize online is so much better on a real pc. Nintendo isn't afraid of this...... why? They make console games not pc games.

There is a reason why ps1 2 games are not fun to play anymore because few where actually fun it was all graphical hype. The same can be said of the neo geo and I loved that system. Yet i rebuy nes snes n64, ngc games and love my wii catalog. It was the art the game play... not the story or graphical tech.

Really it is just showing that investors and new gamers just don't know what was really fun about gaming. The gaming press doesn't seem to be smart or old enough to bring up these topics. Basically we got a bunch of posers because nintendo stopped making console like games for a few years. The n64 issue is still being fixed today.

It is possible nintendo is saving it's best for the big crash? Could nintendo be waiting out sony as they die wearing an expensive suit of praise?

Id use to complain about movie industry waste from movie cgi artists. Now these guy are the norm. None of them can draw or do handcrafted animation. The programmers don't want to learn the best practices.... they would rather copy and paste. It may take the industry crashing for the talent to come back.

Yet the Indie scene is looking good. Nintendo best move is realizing we have a bunch of money chasers rather than creative smart people. Indies don't get a salary and spend most of their time trying not to do work. You make what you love till others love it or die!

Show all comments (33)
50°

U.S. patent examiner rejects Nintendo’s summoning characters patent as obvious: non-final ruling

The rejection is non-final (and even when such rejections are labeled as “final”, the process is far from over, given that there can be, at minimum, an appeal to the Federal Circuit).

Read Full Story >>
gamesfray.com
Relientk7739d ago (Edited 39d ago )

Good, as they should! A game mechanic like that shouldn't be locked behind a patent, and Nintendo didn't invent it either.

PRIMORDUS38d ago (Edited 38d ago )

Nintendo wants to keep wasting money on bullshit lawsuits, real smart in this economy. They should put that money aside for other game projects. On the other hand, I don't care if they waste it all either, and they are screwed in the future maybe that will teach them a lesson.

40°

Nintendo Completes Share Repurchase and Sets Price for Secondary Offering

Nintendo completed its share repurchase and set its secondary offering price at 8,347 yen ahead of March 16 delivery.

Read Full Story >>
4scarrsgaming.com
60°

Nintendo Suing U.S. Government Over Tariffs

Nintendo filed a lawsuit in the United States Court of International Trade.

Nintendo of America is suing the United States government over the sweeping tariffs President Donald Trump put in place last year, according to a complaint filed Friday in the U.S. Court of International Trade and obtained by Aftermath.

Read Full Story >>
aftermath.site
Deathdeliverer64d ago

Well dayum lol. Old agent orange pissing off every industry and nation.

0hMyGandhi63d ago

The fact that you have ANY disagrees will forever baffle me. And to the (apparent) MAGA contingent that exists on this website, enjoy your 8-9 dollar gas.

AuraAbjure63d ago (Edited 63d ago )

Yes, they had better be pissed after Trump told them the way they rip off the USA is over.

EveryPlatformGamer64d ago

LOL I read this on gaff, will they refund the money back to the gamers? highly unlikely. Didn't they just raise prices and pass it onto the gamers? Only Nintendo would send out the Ninjas to the US government.

-Foxtrot64d ago

That’s what I was thinking, imagine them winning hypothetically, getting a s**t load of money back which they would have lost if they hadn’t raised their prices and it’s business as normal.

It would just mean people paid more for no reason since they got the money back anyway.

Outside_ofthe_Box63d ago (Edited 63d ago )

A lot of companies partially passed the cost to consumers instead of all of it. They would still have to at least pay that back to gamers, but we know that won't happen. What's also sad is that prices won't come back down after the initial hike caused by tariffs.

People didn't understand the full repercussions of tariffs. That alone should have cost him the presidency if people knew it was a permanent price hike for consumers

Inverno64d ago

The people should sue these companies for having to over pay cause of these tariffs.

Eonjay64d ago

Naw they should sue the government for forcing the tax to begin with. No one reasonably expects these companies to absorb the taxes. Many smaller companies tried and were shut down or faced to increase prices to try to maintain their business. The tariffs effect everyone.

Inverno62d ago

I meant it mostly as a joke cause we all know the costs of these tariffs were passed onto the consumer. But it's seems no matter how vocal we are here in the states our "representatives" don't seem to care enough to represent us. And things are about to get worse.

Killer2020UK63d ago

The companies were doing what the law required then to do, the tariffs however were illegally implemented. Usually it's criminals we punish, you seem to have different ideas 🤷‍♂️

Show all comments (18)