@morganfell,

That will probably be based off of experiences with the old dev kit and not Crystal Cove. Hopefully both kits will be more on par with each other once Cove gets into the hands of the devs.

To your comment below:-

I don't see what Keighley's intelligence has to do with anything. In any case, the following EDGE article has been cited a few times this week.

http://www.edge-online.com/...

The latest rift is 110 fov 1080p Grizz with 1440p version coming.

Edit: Love the disagrees for just answering his question truthfully :) If you want to be mad about something be mad that Sony just said they are using lcd instead of oled.......

90○ field of view??? That's not great.

I would say since the Sony dev kit is relatively new those are new impressions that include Crystal Cove. Geoff is a dumb guy but not that dumb. You are going to have to accept that Sony may have built a superior project. And word of Sony's superiority started leaking out weeks ago.

E3 is going to be a bloodbath for some people.

@nicksetzerderp

you are aware that a 60-70 degrees field of view equates what the human eye perceives of the real world, right?

so guess what, 90deg is more than you actually need, like it or not.

@nicksetzer

90 degrees +

That the exact same view as the new Occulus Rist

@nicksetzer1

Not impressed with anything Sony are you? 90 degrees is more than enough for a field of view...

@peasfor

http://www.artinarch.com/vp...

"Humans have a total field of view between 160 to 208 degrees, about 140 degrees or so for each eye and by regular field of 120 -- 180 degrees."

Not sure where you're getting your info, but it's wrong. They even say the 110 fov of the latest OR isn't enough to cover all of your vision.

@peasfour it is absolutely hilarious how you can make such an outrageously incorrect statement and get almost all likes, this site is unbelievable. I can literally see directly to my right (that is 180° btw. In fact tunnel vision (lowered field of view) starts at 100°. Are you saying that the average human suffers from medically extreme versions of this highly rare condition? I'll assume the more likely realization that you along with you're bafoon like posse are just morons.

go read again, an eye isn,t a plural noun form, btw you have two eyeS

but hey, if you have a total of 200° fov and can see behind your head....erm..well thats PRETTY FRICKING AWESOME!

EDIT:nicksetzer1
btw piss off with your pm spamming, you may be mad but keep it for yourself.

@pea

I don't have to read it again to know you make no sense. All I have to do is open my eyes to see you're not right. If you can only see a 60-70 fov with either eye I suggest you pickup your phone and make the earliest eye appointment you can get. I also recommend that you have someone else drive you to said eye appointment. I can easily see that I have 180 or more fov while I'm typing this message.

@PeaSFor:

Where the hell do you people keep coming up with this garbage information?

First it's "people cannot see more than 30fps" now this?

This is just crap made up by console fanboys who don't want to accept the limitations of the hardware they use.

The human eye can dynamically view between 15 and aprox 5000 fps, depending on what is being viewed. As for FOV the human eye has a nearly 180 degree horizontal FOV and aprox 95 degrees vertical.

Direct quote from an actual optometrist, aka someone who knows alot more about the human eye than you.

"The approximate field of view of an individual human eye is 95° away from the nose, 75° downward, 60° toward the nose, and 60° upward, allowing humans to have an almost 180-degree forward-facing horizontal field of view. With eyeball rotation of about 90° (head rotation excluded, peripheral vision included), horizontal field of view is as high as 270°. About 12–15° temporal and 1.5° below the horizontal is the optic nerve or blind spot which is roughly 7.5° high and 5.5° wide.

The Rift has about a 110 degree field of view if I remember correctly. http://www.keenandgraev.com...
When I used it I was still able to see darkness at the sides of my field of view, but your brain does do a pretty good job of tuning it out after a while.

Just to add to my last post, here are a few comparison shots from Skyrim.

65 degrees: http://i1266.photobucket.co...

90 degrees: http://i1266.photobucket.co...

110 degrees: http://i1266.photobucket.co...

You have to except PS fanboys won't except anything that Dont make Sony look superior . OR is ahead and Sony is only this far because OR damn near everyone what they discovered. Even if the catch up they are not going to be on the same level on the experience your getting . Because PS vr is is going to be tied down to what it can do by the ps4. OR is focus on higher resolutions, while we still Dont know how well games are gonna run for this.

If they just cosigned OR with the 60fps like OR wasn't teaching everyone for the last couple of years, than what are they gonna do because we are not seeing games @ 60fps let alone locked at it on the ps4. So are they gonna have it at a lower res, downgrade gfx.

Your starting to see it. People need to start asking question instead of loosing it when someone call out the bs.

Oh since I hear console only gamers say they hate options. Would that mean if these problems come up you want the dev to lower the gfx in the gfx of the game that will be playable regular and in vr, while PC player get best of both worlds. Instead of great looking regular vers and OK looking vr vers.