All Channels
Popular
300°

Microsoft Working on VR Headset for Xbox One, Report Suggests

VRFocus - A new report has surfaced, suggesting that Microsoft is developing its very own virtual reality (VR) headset for use with its Xbox One console. If true, then the device will be going head-to-head with the Oculus Rift VR headset and potentially rumoured PlayStation 4 VR headset from Sony.

Mikefizzled4459d ago

I guess it was to be expected. Hell I'd settle for if they expanded on the Forzarela demo they gave a while back,

NewMonday4459d ago ShowReplies(5)
4459d ago
parentoftheyear4459d ago

I will say this, i will only spend my money one time on a VR headset, thats for sure.

BQ324459d ago

I could not be more excited about the VR era, HOWEVER, with all these companies deciding they need their own device they potentially will ruin it. Very few can or will afford more then one device. It would be much more beneficial to the consumer if the devices could be used across platforms such as a television. It is a type of monitor anyway. It would be like me not being able to use my bravia to play my xbox. I suppose Sony and Microsoft need to at least have have PC compatibility and it will still be a win. Kinect seems like a natural symbiosis with VR but the lack of horsepower in the ONE will reduce the resolution which is paramount for the success of VR.

QuickdrawMcgraw4459d ago

MS just started this week working on a VR helmet...

maddskull4459d ago

So now the vr isn't a gimmick anymore since ms are doing one ha xbots.

3-4-54459d ago

All this money Sony + Microsoft are spending on this could go to games people actually want to play.

ThatOneGuyThere4458d ago

R&D != game studios. The money is separate in order to make progress on both fronts.

webeblazing4459d ago

Everyone jumping on the vr bandwagon when did the bulk of the work. Well see if these rumors are. And definitely will see how they stack up version the competition.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4458d ago
vikingland14459d ago

I would rather have a VR headset than the kinect.

bumnut4459d ago

I think they would work well together, kinect could track your movements.

Gazondaily4459d ago

Indeed. Needs less lag though.

Clunkyd4459d ago

One problem, Kinect is not accurate which will ruin the VR experience.

DawnOfDon4459d ago

Why do we need this? Does anyone even want a VR headset? Also if Microsoft makes it themselves it will be expensive but amazing if they can pull it off

Mikelarry4459d ago (Edited 4459d ago )

MS working on VR headset as well.....

http://a.disquscdn.com/uplo...

desertpunk864459d ago

let the gimmicks begin...AGAIN!!!

i don't understand the obsession to pull in the casual crowd.

WeAreLegion4459d ago

Casual? This isn't meant to pull in the casual crowd. VR will introduce new mechanics and change the industry, entirely. Try an Oculus.

Volkama4459d ago (Edited 4459d ago )

But casuals love buying and wearing big headsets to play their casual games, no? No.

curtis924459d ago

Honestly, I think VR is the least of the gimmicky things we've seen the past decade. It doesn't hinder control or change gameplay, it's focus is to simply immerse you into a digital world and bring it to life. Maybe that's not your cup of tea but it's something I welcome with open arms.

Clown_Syndr0me4459d ago

I disagree that its a gimmick, but certainly not for everyone.
I couldn't possibly use one, it be so unsocial, im a couch and tv gamer with a family - but would love to try one just for the hell of it.

Ninjamonkey824459d ago

When done right there not gimmicks.

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

When made cheaply well...

Jdoki4459d ago (Edited 4459d ago )

Gimmick? VR is the one tech that would actually be a game changer. It would be the biggest step forward since games jumped form 2D to 3D.

Two genres that would benefit massively from VR...
First person horror games
Racing games

Although almost any first person game would benefit. Skyrim, TitanFall etc.

Also, you need to think outside the box...

Imagine if you had a game, like Battlefield 4 or and team based RTS. And they implemented a VR Commander mode. Where one guy sits in a virtual control room and can look around at different screens to see things happening (for example a tactical view on the left. Screens showing the footage from each player by looking right, a screen to issue commands straight ahead and so on).

The ability to create immersive story based games in VR would be huge.

adorie4459d ago

Crystal Cove and Sony's VR are already looming.

Typical Microsoft, always late to the party, not willing to take the risks of doing things on their own, without first examining "interest".

I doubt the people at Occulus cared about interest, more so than making a product that will create interest on it's own.

Lastly, at the very least, if Microsoft are working on VR, at least it's not later on, when VR is already mainstream and a lion's share of said market belongs to 1 company.

Grown Folks Talk4459d ago (Edited 4459d ago )

Right @adorie, they just started on this today. Let's disregard the VR stuff in the documents released well before the system was even revealed.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4459d ago
Show all comments (78)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai33d ago (Edited 33d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio33d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing33d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9233d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit33d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing33d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9233d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay35d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn235d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers35d ago (Edited 35d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn235d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown35d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos35d ago (Edited 35d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay35d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay35d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac34d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger35d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300035d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde35d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood35d ago (Edited 35d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde34d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7536d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_34d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.