All Channels
Popular
270°

Mozilla launches Firefox 3.0 RC1 early

Mozilla Corp. on Friday rolled out the release candidate for Firefox 3.0, bringing the open-source browser one step closer to its first major overhaul in nearly 19 months.

The appearance of Firefox Release Candidate 1 (RC1) came earlier than expected. As recently as last Saturday, Mozilla's chief engineer said that although the company had locked down RC1's code, it was planning to publicly launch the build in "late May."

Firefox RC1 is available now for download from Mozilla's servers, and is also being offered as an update to users running Firefox Beta 5, the final beta edition that shipped six weeks ago.

Read Full Story >>
computerworld.com
TheIneffableBob6632d ago (Edited 6632d ago )

RC1 is noticeably faster over the betas, both in startup time and the loading of pages (which is quite impressive considering the betas were actually quite fast already). I'm guessing it has to do with the removal of a lot of debugging code.

Also a positive: RC1 fixed the Adobe Flash problem I was having with Beta 5.

Sadly, Adblock is not compatible yet. I'm going to have to endure ads for a day or two. :(

madness6632d ago

FF3 beta 4 was okay but 5 was whack!

should i download this first version of FF3? or stay with FF2 for now?

Premonition6632d ago

So this means i can watch youtube vids without it stopping at the 2sec mark?cause the only problem i had with my firefox, where when i watched almost any video it wouldnt load.

Jdoki6632d ago

I'm looking forward to moving to FF3. From what I've seen so far it renders far quicker than any of the competition.

Just need all the various Add-Ons I use to become fully FF3 compatible and I'll be ready to go.

Premonition6632d ago

Yep I just finished unpacking the files, and works pretty fast :)

jmiscavish6632d ago

I'm using it right now, and it's the fastest I've ever used. I really liked FF3b5, but this is waaaaaaay better than that. In a few weeks (or days), most of your extensions should be working with RC1. I'm still waiting on TMP and forecast fox. I've been waiting on TMP for some time.

Condoleezza Rice6632d ago (Edited 6632d ago )

Once AdBlock is compatible,FF3 is mine.

With love,
Solid Rice.

Tsalagi6632d ago

I like it though. It's finally compatible with Fox's on demand player and pages load a lot faster. The only problems are it remembers what i enter in the search bar even when i have it set not to, the text resets to small every time i close it, and it erased all my bookmarks.

Show all comments (9)
30°

Top Racers Need Top Gear – Introducing the Forza Horizon 6 Limited Edition Controller and Headset

Omar writes: "With the Horizon Festival coming to breathtaking Japan, you’ll need the essential gear to prove you’ve got what it takes to become a Horizon Legend as you cruise, drift and explore an open world full of spectacular driving experiences. That’s why we’re happy to announce the newest Limited Edition Xbox Wireless Controller and Wireless Headset collection, featuring inspired designs from Forza Horizon 6. The bright cyan and lime colorways celebrate the Horizon Festival’s recognition of iconic cars and hit music, with special features that are sure to impress any collector."

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
Killer2020UK84d ago

Oh my, that is one gaudy design

40°

EasySMX D05 review

You can get Hall effect controllers slightly cheaper, but you'd struggle to find as feature-rich a package without some heavy, heavy sales.

70°

"It's Just So Lame" - RTGI Modder Thinks DLSS 5 Is Impressive But Shares AI Slop Sentiment

Pascal Gilcher calls DLSS 5 impressive but shares the "AI slop" sentiment, explaining the likely tech behind it and why he dislikes it.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
CrimsonWing69110d ago

I fail to see how this is AI shhhhlllloooop. Looking at the different games they showed, this has made many of them look far better.

isarai_lee110d ago (Edited 110d ago )

It's AI slop because it ignores the artists intent and changes the details ESPECIALLY when it comes to character faces. The scariest part of it is introducing it as the next stage of DLSS, a feature where the current iteration already has controversy surrounding it and for quite a lot of games cannot be fully disabled. So reasonably the precident is already set for what path this could take, and it's not good

blacktiger110d ago

In case you didn't watch the video then let me point just one part. It overrides the lighting. Then the question of what is the point of ray tracing cost and so on. Many of the lighting deletes shadow, including shadow on the face like eyes even chin.

Chard110d ago

Why stop at art when it comes to human input - why not just have AI play the game for us, remove human input altogether

theshizer110d ago

If you don’t like it, just don’t enable it. Personally I think it looks great from the videos I have seen.

isarai_lee110d ago

And what about when you can't? Cause there's plenty of games where you cannot fully disable dlss already, i mean we're well into an era where it's a major crutch for developers to cover up their cut corners, why would this be any different?

blacktiger110d ago

You are playing with people's money and allow Nvidia to scam you.

In case you didn't watch the video then let me point just one part. It overrides the lighting. Then the question of what is the point of ray tracing cost. This is all lie to raise the cost of the graphic card.

Andrew336110d ago

Making characters look more realistic not ok because we want the developer to decide on how the game was intended to look. - Internet

Change entire game through mods thus changing how the developers intended the game to be is ok. - Internet

isarai_lee110d ago

Something consumers can do to a product after they have purchased it, entirely optional and can always be undone with a fresh install

VS

The leading gaming hardware manufacturer making this the next iteration of the main AA/Upscaling technique that is heavily relied upod by modern devs and is not optional in most games.

Not at all the same but nice try

jwillj2k4110d ago

At the moment you need 2 5090’s just to get an image on the screen so this is all vaporware until proven otherwise.

Andrew336110d ago

The good news is you can just not use it as well.

Christopher110d ago

It's all about choice in the end. But, I would say that calling it 'more realistic' is quite a stretch. It looks like AI art, and that's rarely realistic.

Urrakia34110d ago

All the comments I see are reminding me of how we got to the current state of gaming when microtransactions were first introduced: "It's completely optional guys, we promise! If you don't like it just don't buy it!"

I think we all know how that ended up.

Popsicle110d ago (Edited 110d ago )

I had the same exact thought the first time this was brought up in a separate article about a week ago. Took me straight back to the conversations surrounding “horse armor.” Just don’t buy it they said. Years later, many IPs I previously enjoyed are so infected with monetization schemes that I don’t even consider purchasing them anymore.

DLSS 5 and the like are the same thing wrapped in a different package. History rhymes but many of us never learn from it.

blacktiger110d ago

Biggest Scam. Overrides lighting and shadow. So why keep Ray tracing? It's all a scam to raise graphic card. We now see Nvidia with Microsoft downturn anything against them. Sony is next!