Exactly! It feels like any time you like titanfall/praise it, you get hate. As a PC gamer, I didn't really see how much Sony fans dominated the site until Titanfall which is also on PC. Suddenly all the Sony fans were praising the PC version and saying no one was getting it for the one and suddenly the 360 was going to stop the one from selling. Then suddenly the game was a cod clone even though it really isn't. Lol and all this from Sony guys that apparently have PC which can handle the game at max settings lol

Or those who own both but thought it was not very good (me)

What's wrong with it?

I don't think you understand what an engine is exactly? A game using Frostbite doesn't mean it will turn into Battlefield 4. You can have vastly different games on the same engine. Frostbite definitely has some excellent performance, and is a very versatile engine.

frostbite being one of the better optimized engines and great for benchmarking. Is not up to par in terms of hit registry and fluidity. Basically its sh*t for true competitive gaming.

the Source engine that Titanfall is built on has been optimized over the years to give you fluid gameplay with optimal hit registry. Balance and alot of the competitive fun-factor in an fps begins with these very very basic fundamentals. Often overlooked by ambitious developers.

Take Cod4 for example. While the series may have gone to crap. It released the same year as Crysis a classic gameplay vs. graphics comparison. At its core what made cod4 great was that it produced extremely fluid gameplay, hit registry was spot-on, game menu was simple and load times were perfect. Yet it couldn't hold a candle to how great Crysis looked.

Thinking about it I just commented on a game where the developers at Respawn had a huge role in creating. It just tells me they havn't lost sight of what made Cod4 a great game.

Except Respwn isn't an EA studio