
Kenneth Shepard writes: "Seeing that Sucker Punch decided to canonize one ending when they’d done a decent enough job not doing so between the original Infamous and Infamous 2 was very disappointing. In a way I felt like I’d been robbed of my vision of the character of Cole MacGrath, that my version of him was the “lesser” or “fake.”"

From Marvel’s Spider-Man 2 and Batman: Arkham City to breakout hit Dispatch and new Marvel Cosmic Invasion, these are 10 of the best superhero games you can play today.

Huzaifah from eXputer writes, "My favorite type of genre in games is when enemies are merely animal fodder in the eyes of the protagonist's sheer power."

Fans of the action-adventure franchise have been eagerly awaiting news of a potential sequel to one of the best games on the PS4.
Umm ... how about this?
First we get the Tushima sequel(coz its most rumored)
Then a new Resistance (need new PS SP FPS)
Then a totally new IP (new IPs are always interesting)
And then a new inFamous?
I had a great time with the second son. Never got to play the originals and hope they get remastered one day.
If I had a choice between another Infamous game and another Spider-Man game, I choose Spider-Man. Sony should spend its resources on its winners.
infamous 2 good ending mentions that people with conduit genes start dying all over the world not all people with the gene start dying, that pretty much makes it all believable that some survived, due to the beast destruction, people started to doubt and emprison conduits.
the cole legacy Dlc for infamous second son will brief us i all the details we are missing
See this articles right, it doesn't make sense.
Is anyone actually surprized they went with the good ending, they went with the good ending in the first game so I don't see why they wouldn't for inFAMOUS Second Son.
Cole is supposed to be a good guy, the evil path is optional so they don't force you to be on one path.
I mean considering the fact in the evil ending Conduits take over and lead a rebellion against humans I highly doubt Second Son after showing the Government being in control and cracking down against conduits is the evil ending.
This article was a good read...and i think it would be cool but i think they found a way to make 2nd son connect with the good ending somehow...like maybe there was another incident that recreated condiuts again who knows...dam u march 21st u too far!!!!
The Ending for infamous were very similar! So going evil or good still had little impact to the events for I2... Kessler warned of the Beast, and I2 was preparing for the arrival of the Beast! The twist is the Beast arrived Sooner than rather than later so the search to become stronger became the central plot.
I2's endings were written well, and very different compared to Infamous... The Developers chose I2's Good ending because more people played and completed the good ending. The evil ending was actually what was written as canon, but because of trophy data they chose the good ending.
Now the RFI inhibitor was to kill all conduits alive! Even the ones who didn't know! The effects were far reaching, but it didn't kill everyone. Secondly, not all people who have the gene are conduits, there are some who simply pass the gene to their offspring, like genetic illnesses, Mothers are carriers but passes the gene illness to there sons who end up being reactive... Sucker punch wrote the universe to have many stories. Instead of getting up in arms about the story, preorder the game and play the Cole's Lagacy DLC that prefaced the 7 years that leads to Second Son!