Imagine a game which is totally build around the concept that it is PC only... OMG - imagine the graphics.. the potential... the adults playing online with you.. sounds like a dream...

The hands holding the gun graphics are identical to COD.

Graphics aside, the game looks fun.

Every little resolution comparison video should be disregarded. Video processing and compression severely ruins the quality, which in turn makes a 1080p video look lower than a 720p quality video.

On the flipside, graphical effects can be compared slightly but, that's about it.

Only real comparison is with the actual thing in front of you or a completely uncompressed raw video.

It's definitely there but I admit that I expected a bigger difference between the platforms. This is reasonably close compared to some other titles.

My setup

AMD XFX Core 7870 2GB (Get double fan version, mine runs alittle hot).

AMD Processor 8350 4hrz(overclockable to 4.5hrz) , 8 core

8GB of ram

High graphics,4x aa,Vsync 2x ,1980x1080 , 60fps

Xbox 360 Wireless controller(ya ya ya I know m&kb is better, I prefer controller tho).

Xpadder to program Z(Voice chat) to right d-pad(Not used anyways).

47inch Vizio (M series 2013, Vizio stepped their game up, don't knock the brand).

PS4 Gold Wireless Headset (Works on PC/PS3/Mobile/Wii U/PS4(duh).

I will need to see a raw uncompressed video on a 1080p display to judge this...with this the differences are minor. Though the edge goes in favor of the PC.

I have a 3ii60U and am not impressed by this game in any way. I hate all shooters except Gears of war tho so it's just my opinion.

Here's a PC beta code. Get it quick
H5F7-KUNR-XC6L-Z9T3-FJQG

So another video that shows that while at high settings the PC version does look better (no real surprise that the PC version would look better than a console version), it's really not by as much as you'd think. True, higher resolution is nice if it doesn't sacrifice gameplay, but this video is almost an argument against how important native resolution is. Again, PC looks better, but not so much that XB1 version looks bad by any means at all. I can also say that while playing the beta, the XB1 version even in it's current state looks damn great. It's only my opinion, but I actually feel like this game lends itself more to being a console game anyway. I can see wanting to play games like ESO on PC rather than console...but this game just feels like it was meant for console. Maybe it's just me cause I don't have any friends that PC game, and it's very much a party type game.

I don't know why everyone speaks about cod like it's all bad. Titanfall has similarities to Cod but it takes the best thing about it. It's in the same damn genre. Of course there are going to be similarities. Next thing you know people are going to say a game is like cod because the player can respawn after death lol Cod has a lot of good ideas. Titanfall takes the best and adds even more amazing stuff.

Hardly a demanding game, as it reeks of CoD.

The developers are ex-CoD makers, so they'll use the same tricks to make the same dull graphics run fast (if you count 60 FPS fast, which it isn't).

It won't take much to run this on max settings on PC. Just like Tomb Raider.

Did anyone read the article!? the game apparently aims for 60fps per second, but currently only sports 2x MSAA, and is rendered currently 792p the final retail is said to be pushed to 900p. Its currently missing ambient occlussion and shading, no dynamic lighting, the environment models for the PC version of the game shares the same models as the XBO version with higher resolution, STABLE 60fps and up to 8x MSAA... On foot on the XBO the game runs at 60fps, but when you take to the mechs frame rate drops and runs between 35-45.

aparentely they are making huge cutbacks due to the source engine being so old!

They say its still a specatble to behold but the engine isnt sporting anything that seems overly taxing. :/