All Channels
Popular
230°

Microsoft Needs to Learn from Sony's Mistakes

PlayMagazine writes: "With both the PlayStation 4 and Xbox One nearing three months in retail, it's probably a little soon to be making any snap judgments about either console, but there are nevertheless certain parallels that can be drawn between the Xbox One and Sony's PlayStation 3 during its early days in terms of initial sales, hardware performance and the attitude of the manufacturer in the run-up to the console's launch."

Read Full Story >>
playmagazine.ca
oODEADPOOLOo4481d ago (Edited 4481d ago )

TLDR, but skimmed to the end of article.

"Like the PlayStation 3 before it, the Xbox One is a killer piece of hardware, but like the PS3, it's also hardware that'll take time before developers finally realize its potential. The eSRAM issue has been well documented, with many developers feeling its inclusion is causing a bottleneck within the system, bringing with it more issues than benefits, and until better tools are available for studios to work with, it's unlikely we'll see any dramatic improvement."

They shot themselves in the foot by requiring the kinect and had to cheap out on power to keep price relatively affordable. The only thing microsoft can do now is double down on kinect to prove its the killer app they keep talking about. The tv funtionality is a gimmick, though same thing could be said of kinect.

Though it seems to be powerful enough for this:
http://www.ibtimes.com/xbox...

Kingthrash3604481d ago

imo the kinect is indeed powerful...but is it right for games?
to invest that much in a motion sensing camera for gaming was a mistake. does gaming really need motion sensing right now?...maybe when virtual reality comes out, and is a hit. right now its is a gimmik...sorry x1 fans im not knocking it but it just dosent fit right now. constantly repeating commands, bad hand jester reading a tv feature that is rarely used (overall) its looks nice and responsive when you have a clicker though...
all in all its an accessory that they forced on people too early. i think they would have moved more consoles without it...hell they would move more kinects by making it a pc/tablet/x1 accessory. but they took a risk and now they are in a worse place than they thought they would be.

oODEADPOOLOo4481d ago

Yep. Now we gotta wait and see the "Digitial future" they were talking about. Pretty amazing how they thought they were already at that stage with internet not being as widely available or fast enough for it yet for it.

If they ever want to see it happen they are probably gonna have to fight for it with ISP's(to increase caps and speed). Which is probably a good thing cuz it will draw out alot of other big tech companies like also google and their fiber service.

IMO,they would also need a couple other things like:

Harddrive space in the TB range, internet at the 100's mbps down and up or gbps. And pricing to be more frequently discounted like steam. Until more stuff like this a reality they can keep smoking whatever they're smoking.

truefan14481d ago (Edited 4481d ago )

First off, this was actually insightful, a slight change from 98% of the garbage articles I read on here. I agree with most of what was said, I will have disagree on a big point the author made though, he/she talked about how the ps3 launched without games and how they weren't invested enough into games. The exact opposite could be said about the XB1. XB1 had the best option of launch titles and their 2014 is arguably better than the 2014 ps4 lineup. MSFT has invested more than ever in games and it's showing. Phil Spencer is a much better leader for xbox gaming than Don ever was. Also we talk about multi plats being better for ps4, it's such minute differences that 93% of console purchasers aren't even aware of. Think about it lets say ps4 is a 6.5 million after Japan and Xb1 is at 4.5 million, that is practically all of the hardcore gamers. If 150 million consoles are bought by the end of the generation the internet gaming community only makes up 6% of buyers. That is where Kinect can make the difference if they stick with it and keep improving games with it.

@kingthrash Kinect is a lot more than a gimmick, I use constantly everyday and my wife uses it and she doesn't even play video games, unless it's dancing, kinect sports, or fitness. Also the voice recognition is amazing, I watch tv more than I game, so it is definitely useful. Even in games like nba 2k14 I have at least 15 commands I use constantly. People also refuse to acknowledge that Kinect sports was one of the highest selling games last gen and this new one will be no different. Of course there is no problem with giving consumers options, but MSFT has a vision for their console. The same way the developers of the Order have a vision of how they want their game presented in terms of screen aspect.

plasticidolatry4481d ago

More like by the end of Feb 2014 PS4 will be 6.5 mil and Xbox will be 3.5 mil. Why? It's a more powerful system for cheaper, exactly the reason you just downplayed.

FamilyGuy4481d ago

I remember when PS3 launched everyone was saying they should drop the bllu-ray drive to make it cheaper...
"blu-ray isn't needed" they tried to claim.
"Blu-ray disc read speed too slow" that was more real though.

It was hard times for sony.

MSs X1 is selling fine though, it's just not selling as fast as the PS4. I think they should drop the price and leave kinect in the box, just take a hit instead of trying to profit off system sales on top of game and subs.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4481d ago
lifeisgamesok4481d ago

Didn't Sony just post a $1.1 billion loss. I think MS should keep doing what they're doing

And that's to give us great games

Kingthrash3604481d ago

link or nothin...lol i thought they just stated they made profit because of ps4..
u act like MS isnt losing money with the xbox...smh. if they price drop it this year (as rumored) they will lose even more.
but ms has toooooo much money from its software side so really xbox can be cut and they would be ok. some want to cut it right now but hey...smh.

let it be known, i dont want the xbox to be cut at all i'm a gamer and xbox is great for gaming but from a business point of view its expendable as far as MS is concerned.
sony and nintendo's companys are being held by their gaming machines....so yeah post this 1.1 billion loss link.

LeCreuset4481d ago

And MS was posting a profit when their Zune division went under. What's your point?

LeCreuset4481d ago

@mursumaki

That's actually a projected loss. Kingtrharsh is correct. Sony didn't post a loss. More importantly, he is also correct about the gaming divisions and the roles they play within their respective companies.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4481d ago
frostypants4481d ago

Yeah I wondered about that too. The PS3 was a killer piece of hardware for the time, but was hard to master. Even on paper, the One is legitimately hamstrung and underpowered for the price they are asking.

Chaostar4481d ago

Nice long write up, I agree with the vast majority of it.

I admire the writers optimism but evidence suggests that Xb1 will never be able to achieve true parity with multi platform titles unless developers intentionally hold back the PS4 version. This is something that MS and their fans will have to come to terms with sooner or later. Hopefully it forces MS to invest more into their first party offerings.

mhunterjr4481d ago

I think there are similarities between the attitudes of ms and don't with the ps3 and xb1 launches, but they aren't exactly parallel.

Sure the xbox1 isn't selling as well as the ps4, but it has had a pretty impressive launch.in fact, it exceeded many people's expectations after a disastrous reveal. There's a large chance, they'll will reach there target of 5 million units by the end of March, despite being $100 more expensive than its competitor, and releasing in 45 fewer territories.

I also disagree with the notion that MS failed to deliver games like Sony did with the ps3. Forza and DR3, well received project spark, Kinect sports, and of course, titan fall are right around the corner.not to mention D4, sunset overdrive, and quantum break. There's no drought like what existed with ps3, and xb1 currently enjoys a higher attach rate than the ps4.

Can MS have a lot learn from Sony? certainly, but let's not pretend all is badin MS camp.

alexkoepp4481d ago (Edited 4481d ago )

When you look at the hottest games on n4g, titanfall is hotter than infamous and the order 1886 combined. Titanfall is a monster! I played the alpha and it kicks some serious ass, definitely gonna push some systems I think

DigitalRaptor4481d ago (Edited 4481d ago )

That was a good read. well said.

However, a launch lineup has never, ever, ever been anything to criticise as it doesn't represent the rest of that generation in any sense. You buy a console, it will pretty much always have good games. However, MS did bring most of their launch games over from the 360 to bolster their lineup, whilst Sony didn't do that with PS3, nor PS4. I still think that is a pretty backhanded approach, but I guess Xbox one owners have more stuff to buy at retail on their shiny new boxes.

mhunterjr4481d ago (Edited 4481d ago )

I think a lot of early adopters look at the launch line up before they make a purchase.

At launch, the consoles are as expensive as they'll ever be. Why pay a large amount of money for something that won't have the games you want until much later? Wouldn't it make more economical sense to wait until the games you want are available?

That's exactly what people did with the ps3, they waited for the games AND simultaneously benefited from price drops.The xb1 is off to a much better start than that because it does have a strong line up to justify a purchase, despite its cost.

mediate-this4481d ago

How is that backhanded?? You're just nitpicking.

from the beach4481d ago (Edited 4481d ago )

There's a bit of a history in videogaming of companies failing to transfer dominance from one generation to the next, this time particularly Nintendo.

In the case of Sony, no-one really holds that hilarious 2006 conference and initial overpricing of the PS3 against them almost a decade on.

I think it'll be the same with Microsoft, not least because none of the controversial Xbox One policies were actually manifest in the console which was eventually released.

Bennibop4481d ago

I am sure some of those policies will rear there ugly head again at some point!

from the beach4481d ago

I'm not, but if they did it would be interesting to see how they fare with coal-face paying customers, rather than online campaigners.

christocolus4481d ago

I think they have learnt quite alot already. Phil has been making the right deceisions regarding games(both old and new ip). He has put Chris Charla in charge of indies, he interacts with the fans alot more and he seems fully determined to get great content for the xbx one.

i believe things will get alot better for ms over time especially If the rumors are true and they actually plan to reduce the price of the current xbx one model to $399 or less by november

Show all comments (34)
60°

Final Fantasy X 25th Anniversary Website Launches With New Nomura Artwork and Merchandise

Square Enix launches Final Fantasy X 25th anniversary site, revealing new Nomura art, books, music releases, and merchandise.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
-Foxtrot19d ago

Look I know VIII has its issues and all that but how on earth can the do big anniversary events with new artwork and merchandise for VII, IX and X yet VIII got sweet f*** all.

They could have given it something during its 25th anniversary yet all it got was a single Happy Anniversary post on their social media.

solideagle19d ago

they should know that we are OG fans of VIII as it sold truckload as well. not as much as VII or X. I personally didn't like IX but X and VI are my personal fav.

Shadow Hearts 2 covenant is another game I love. I hope one day someone can make remake, I would be delighted

Relientk7719d ago

Final Fantasy VIII is great and you are always the first to defend it in the comments

40°

Star Wars: Bounty Hunter Let Jango Fett Loose

LucasArts gave Jango Fett his own game in 2002, and it pulled Star Wars into a much dirtier, rougher, and more interesting corner of the galaxy.

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
Relientk7723d ago

I remember playing this back in the day on PS2. What a sick game!

270°

We Are Xbox

Dear team,

Xbox has always been different.

We started with a simple idea. Games should bring people together through shared experiences. That led to the first Xbox in 2001, Xbox Live in 2002, and new ways to connect, from friends lists and achievements to parties and play across devices. Today, Xbox reaches over 500 million players around the world, with some of the most important franchises in entertainment.

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
24d ago Replies(15)
Outside_ofthe_Box24d ago (Edited 24d ago )

If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it. They would be turning down immediate money for something that will potentially workout in the long term.

Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box. A lot of their base has moved to PC or jumped to PS. So will be a long road to get back on track.

We have been saying this from day one exclusives are a must if you are going to be selling hardware look at Nintendo and Sony before Jim Ryan. That's the proven formula. You had some that were deluded and blinded by loyalty accepting that multiplat was the future and that MS was merely getting ahead of where the industry was headed, but at least they can finally see the light and agree with what everyone has been saying for a decade+

pwnmaster300024d ago

True, blame it on the rabid fanboys. MS can do no wrong and spinner this multiplatform move. While the actual fans moved on.

I feel like with the new Xbox coming they are hoping to bring back those old fans and then if it goes well. Bring back exclusives.

If the new console is performing like series x and one. Naw they staying multiplatform.

darthv7224d ago

Actual fans dont move on... they can add to their hobby while waiting for the next new release. If you believe what you typed then I guess PS fans moved on too.... you know, since its been a Sahara for 1st party games this gen.

S2Killinit23d ago

The fans didn’t tell them to go multilat. MS was forced to after the 82 billion they spent to destroy gaming. Then, while xbox fans cheered, MS realized they can’t justify the price tag by selling through xbox only, so they went multiplat and in the process began to downplay console gaming.

24d ago Replies(4)
CrashMania24d ago

I think it's too late, xbox sales were diving even before ABK, they got even worse since then even long before the full multiplatform push. I'd be surprised if they even went back to timed exclusivity at this point, Helix is basically a PC and is going to be expensive, they already struggle to sell cheaper xbox consoles, it will be low volume and they'll have a very small 'console' base to sell to, which has already been conditioned to just play via gamepass anyway.

S2Killinit23d ago

They will do what they always do, they will promise the world at the beginning of next GEN and then failed to deliver all generation long. But there will always be some gamers who will buy into their promises.

ocelot0723d ago

Absolutely agree, Do people genuinely believe Microsoft are now going to go. Hang on how's about we go back to 2020. Then GP was stagnating, Games sold where awful because of GP. Outsold by Playstation by a landslide.

They have sold 5m of Forza I believe on PS5. Spite it being a old game. I think Starfield is going to sell well in the end. Halo is deffinetly going to sell well as is Fable and Forza Horizon 6.

I think at best (for Xbox fans). Single player titles like Clockwork will have a timed exclusivity. Multiplayer centric games like Forza, E Day will release day and date on all platforms.

Or all games will release on all platforms day and date. But maybe Xbox and Windows Store copies will have exclusive bonuses. Or may even get timed exclusive dlc like Fallout and Elder Scrolls and COD use to do.

I think they will treat Xbox players like the premium customers or at least act the way. But will serve just the Playstation and Switch 2 customers as well.

Neonridr24d ago

I don't see them removing PC from the equation. Considering MS has a heavy enough investment in the PC market, it would be foolish to abandon them. I could see them taking away games from PlayStation or ensuring they are timed exclusives at the very least. Say what you will but if Call of Duty ends up becoming a timed exclusive to Xbox machines, that would hurt PlayStation, don't pretend like those games don't sell millions.

Outside_ofthe_Box24d ago

They would lose out on a lot of CoD sales tho. Doesn't PS make up most of the sales?

Neonridr23d ago

@Outside - possibly, but it might push people to want Xbox hardware so they can play with their buddies day one.

Who knows.

S2Killinit23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

it would but remember doing that can splinter the COD fan base and in the process damage the call of duty brand which is probably the only franchise in that $82 billion purchase that in anyway gets even close to delivering what Microsoft thought they bought. If Microsoft fudges around too much with the COD franchise, you might even see a competitor franchise show up on the scene and that would be a catastrophe after the huge debt that Microsoft put itself into with the ABK purchase.

But Its almost guaranteed that Microsoft will want to do something drastic at the beginning of the next generation as they always do. We will see.

Pyrofire9524d ago

Their lifeline of solely the Xbox consoles is dry. Good-Great games on a 1st party scale can't be made at a loss so willingly - sent to the Xbox to only sell limited copies.
They invested billions scooping up studios and need to start making returns.
Sucks that nearly every company is publicly traded and have to be so shareholder biased but that's how it is.
Their words are strong but it'll take time to see what their actions accomplish. Lowering the cost of Game Pass and taking CoD off of it was a good clear start.

darthv7224d ago

More like, allot of their base just played game pass. So now they need to encourage them to start buying again.

S2Killinit23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

A lot of their base left for greener (bluer?) pastures.

--Onilink--24d ago

What exactly is the long term goal with exclusives though?

Because for the most part, the hardware side of things has never been the most profitable, even sometimes being subsidized for a period before breaking even. And that’s before the hardware component nightmare we currently live in.

The whole point of exclusives was to get more people to buy your console in order to have a bigger install base, which meant even bigger software sales.

But if their ports to PS5 are selling (for the most part it seems) quite well, then other than negating the cut Sony takes there, unless you are REALLY increasing your software sales on your own console, it probably doesn’t make that much of a difference?

Honestly I don’t even understand Sony’s decision to scale back on it for PC unless they weren’t even recouping the port expenses. They released ports when the hardware sales never really dropped, and now that all consoles will undoubtedly take a noticeable drop in sales due to the ridiculous prices, that’s when they decide they don’t want to sell to a larger install base to more easily recoup dev costs… it’s just weird

Outside_ofthe_Box24d ago (Edited 24d ago )

I agree. I mean once they went multiplat, in theory there should be no going back especially when you have games that have sold really well on other platforms.

Microsoft are the ones that announced that they are reevaluating. So I'm just guessing on what their end goal is. Right now Xbox as a hardware is not a must buy for anyone but fans of the brand because their games can be played elsewhere. Going exclusive would solve this, but you lose out on a ton of money instantly which has always been what the company does not want to do so not really sure what their "reevaluating exclusives" means unless they are pulling a Phil Spencer and are just saying what people want to hear and will continue to do what they are currently doing.

darthv7223d ago

Their ports to PS5 are selling because Sony's output has been so dry... the fans are thirsty, and MS is the oasis.

SIdepocket24d ago

Unfortunately, the studios they buy wither under their leadership.

mcstorm23d ago

Microsoft still has a name with Xbox the issue is the casual games are not looking at the console because its not the same console their friends have. Look at that poll on how many users upgraded from xbox 365 to one and then the X. Part of Microsoft's downfall was thinking that the Wii was the market they had to be in when really it was the core market. If you get the core gamers you then get the market to. As I posted a few minuets ago on another post Microsoft putting exclusives on PS this gen could bold well if they hit next gen with all our games are staying exclusive from this new gen. They will then get gamers wanting Halo, Forza Gears but this is also where Microsoft fell over with the xbox one and X in terms of they did not have may quality 1st party games affter they fell into the Gears, Forza and Halo cycle. If they can get some old IPs back to bring back the old core gamers as well as fresh ips to bring in new gamers things could improve next gen. But as I said in my last post its all if buts and maybes at the moment. No one knows if the next home consoles will be to expensive that people move to pc as we are now seeing or look at the stem deck as a cheepier alternitive.

DarXyde23d ago

"Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box."

That's very optimistic. It's not the only issue, far from it. There is a serious rupture between Microsoft generally and the public caused by their weird Game Pass price fluctuations, taking down physical game space in stores, and being the first to go nuts on hardware price hikes that they themselves played a big part in.

They're also charging beyond a premium for Helix which is just vile at a time when the economy is in shambles.

The company itself is really not doing itself any favors with the approach they're taking Windows. Even France is looking to ditch Windows in favor of Linux.

But the most offensive thing is this AI push. They're doubling, tripling, and quadrupling down on the very technology they're using to replace a considerable proportion of their workforce... And the slap in the face is how they bake copilot into everything when nobody likes it—they couldn't even make Bing stick, so why on earth are they trying so hard? You know it's bad when people would rather use ChatGPT than Copilot which is killing their OS. But aside from their snatching up of farmland to build data centers (and reduce the agriculture capacity of whichever country allows them to build them), they made an AI-generated gamer gurl that loves AI the head of Xbox.

Even if we grant them the full benefit of the doubt, it hardly matters what Xbox wants to do if Nadella says no, and that includes exclusive games. Microsoft's relationship with Xbox is the opposite of Sony's relationship with PlayStation—Microsoft pulls the reins of Xbox, but Sony damn near went under for the PS3.

Tanktopmaster9223d ago (Edited 23d ago )

“If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it.”

Great strategy, especially after Forza selling 5 million on PlayStation and sea of thieves selling at least another million (2 million) for example. In March 2026, Xbox consoles sales ratio vs PS was 10:1.

In addition to that, with Gamepass, which unequivocally cuts out chunks of sales (Cannibalizing revenue from 1st month sales especially).

I’m sure going exclusive again after releasing everything on Ps5 is going to work out great for business.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 23d ago
maximusprime_24d ago

Despite all of that, it's clear that Microsoft's Xbox division is broken beyond repair.

24d ago
BeHunted24d ago

PlayStation is currently draining money on flop after flop. It's Sony that needs to re-evaluate their strategy

24d ago
CrashMania24d ago (Edited 24d ago )

Wonder how much money was lost on perfect dark, hellbalde 2, 300 million lost revenue
by putting cod on gamepass. The recent Jason schrier news that Xbox has cancelled dozens of projects, spent 70 billion just to see Xbox sales further collapse and gamepass see little growth.

The fact is this has been PlayStation's most profitable generation and they are making loads of money and selling plenty of consoles and games. While MS won't give you any sales figures or profit numbers for Xbox, says it all really.

S2Killinit23d ago

Sony PlayStation has deservedly dominated xbox. Facts

Tanktopmaster9223d ago (Edited 23d ago )

Ok tween.

Xbox series SX got outsold 10:1 last month. lol.

23d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 23d ago
shadowT24d ago

"Our presence on PC isn’t strong enough."

Fishy Fingers24d ago

It isnt. But I dont think they mean in 'games', rather, footprint.

They own the OS but as far as gaming is concerned, Steam dominate. I imagine the VAST majority of people who use the Xbox app/launcher are PC gamepass subs. No ones buying their 3rd party PC games through Xbox PC.

badz14924d ago

and many gamers prefer SteamOS for gaming over Windows too. If only Valve would be more uncompromising to the anti-cheat makers that locked out non-windows players, more pc gamers would have moved onto SteamOS by now and not looking back to Windows. overall, Win11 is a terrible, bloated, unoptimized OS which is not what many people want

ocelot0723d ago

Agreed and I think that's where they are going to focus on more. I think cheaper games on Windows/Xbox store (MS IP) compared to Steam and Epic and maybe even compared to PSN store as well.

Show all comments (107)