Yeah. It's all about sprinkling out a little bit of everything. Helps keep things fresh in the long run. Sad truth is, this is often times a very bandwagon industry and they will bleed something until the point where everyone is bored.

The thing with futuristic/sci fi games though, is that it's so easy to be different and unique, because that time frame hasn't happened yet. The developer can just think of whatever they want and have more fun I feel.

Whereas with old war shooters and modern war shooters, they really can't do anything but the same thing over and over because that's what war is, and it's all in the realm of what we know.

With the future, game makers can do whatever they please to be crazy as hell.

Look at how different Halo is from Time Splitters, is from Star Wars, to Mass Effect etc. They are all VASTLY different (maybe Star Wars and Mass Effect are similar), and that's why I love those types of games so much more.

Time Splitters is one of my most favorite shooters of all time, such an amazing series.

I like the "purity" of the weapons in WW2 games. None of this laser guided missile/gun-mounted grenade launcher/burst fire nonsense, and if you want any amount of accuracy, you gotta use a semi-auto weapon (assuming the game is remotely realistic).

Supposed to be out this year...Summer I believe.

Also yes, there has been a dearth of solid WWII FPS' past few years. Last good one I remember playing was Medal of Honor: Airborne (those helmet headshots!), though many may not agree.

Oh no if it's City Interactive then it really is doomed to be junk.

Lets hope they hired some new talent for this project.

Well, in their defense it is also on PC. Doesn't get any crisper or higher FPS than that.