All Channels
Popular
180°

Iwata Refusing To Resign, No Management Changes Planned For Nintendo

GR: In case you haven't heard, Nintendo didn't have a particularly great 2013, especially when considering the underwhelming performance of Wii U. That said, company president Satoru Iwata has no intention of resigning.

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com
4502d ago Replies(1)
-Foxtrot4502d ago

Why not? He obviously doesn't know what he's doing anymore with the Wii U, why not get someone more "understanding" of the constant changes to this gaming industry so Nintendo can at least try to be up to speed on things and I'm not saying do exactly what Sony/MS are doing but at least be close to them so your not dragging behind because when it is time to catch up your going to be so far behind it will take ages to get back on top, I mean take Nintendos online for example we are in a new gen and it's still crap compared to XBL and the PSN, a game like Super Mario 3D World should of been the perfect online Mario game to play with friends, why go all out with 4 characters and team work in your game and don't allow gamers to go online with it, what if your friend can't come over because they are too far away or at Uni in another part of the country.

Seriously he's done alright with the 3DS but the main consoles is what we should be focusing on here, he's done a pretty louzy job right down to when he first "announced" the Wii U, is it a gamepad add on? Is it a new handheld? Is it a new console? He couldn't even get that across at the time, then we have the name it's self, thinking he could latch onto the success of the Wii brand by thinking because it's sold so well everyone will buy a console named the "Wii U" when it's pretty much had the opposite effect.

We really need someone in charge who can keep up with current trends and actually do what gamers want instead of just picking something THEY want to do.

You know people think this is hating on Nintendo but really it's just tough love. I don't want to see Nintendo end up like SEGA or end up a shipwreck.

ChickeyCantor4502d ago

" He obviously doesn't know what he's doing anymore with the Wii U,"

His immense experience by working for nintendo over at least 15 years and business understanding makes him valuable.

He made one mistake, ONE.

"ke Nintendos online for example"

What says the next guy will greenlight heavy designs on an online infrastructure?

"We really need someone in charge who can keep up with current trends and actually do what gamers want "

They tried, twice ( n64 and gamecube ) and financially, to them it simply wasn't that exciting.

"I don't want to see Nintendo end up like SEGA or end up a shipwreck."

Sega didn't know what they were doing. That's why they almost went bankrupt. Nintendo is loaded with cash. They could start over a 100 times. To express this pretentious concern is just laughable. Highly dramatic.

iamnsuperman4502d ago (Edited 4502d ago )

He made one big mistake that is costing them. It's a reason why these people get paid alot. Great when things work but when things go horribly wrong it is their fault. Iwata did well last generation but as it's competitiors grew Nintendo didn't. Iwata failed at his job in this regard. Nintendo needs new blood (same process Sony went through)

ChickeyCantor4502d ago (Edited 4502d ago )

Sony went through that because that person almost broke them financially. There is the difference. Iwata didn't break Nintendo. His DS legacy ( 3DS ) is making a F'ton. As well as last generation.

Iwata simply needs to do what he did best last gen : Promote his products like it's the second coming of Jesus.

They did that with the Wii. they went on tours to show everyone the console. They had loads of commercials running. With the WiiU he expected it to be there already because of branding. That's his mistake.

But this notion that he needs to step down because he made one mistake? Delirious. If you don't fall, you won't learn.

Death4502d ago

The Vita has been nothing short of a failure. Cerny was the one that designed it for Sony. After the Vita, they put him in charge of the PS4.

The WiiU is a seriously under rated console. It's not pushing pixels like the Xbox One or PS4, but it still looks very nice. The new gamepad is adds quite a bit to the gaming experience and can also be used when the tv is being used for non-gaming functions or can be used to watch Netflix. The library of games is also coming around nicely with quite a few must haves.

The WiiU is not targeting my demograph, but I still find it enjoyable with and without my children. I see no reason for Iwata to resign. Nintendo does not cater to the same audience as Sony and Microsoft. It's easy for Sony or Microsoft only gamers to dismiss the WiiU, but they are the ones losing out on some great gaming.

kayoss4502d ago

You can say what you want to say. People missing out, people not giving it a try, blah blah but the problem is that nintendo is unable to reach the audience regardless. At this point its all talk... The Wii U may have a chance if the PS4 and xb1 did not exist but now that they are out we all knew the Wii U will be in a worst situation.
Developers been clammering for a more power home console and Sony and Microsoft gave them that in the mean time Nintendo released the Wii U which is slightly more powerful than last gen. Who you think developers going to make games for?
It seems to me that when Nintendo made the Wii U, they were more focused on their first party games then 3rd party.

-Foxtrot4502d ago (Edited 4502d ago )

We're not talking about the Vita though we're talking about the Wii U

A hand-held is a little different to a console although I'm going to lie and defend the PSV because it isn't as doing well as Sony had hoped.

Anyway the thing is with Sony the PS3 is still selling well, the PS4 is doing well so far while the PSV is lagging behind

However with Nintendo

The Wii U is not selling well, the Wii is totally non existent but the 3DS is doing well.

At least for Sony despite the PSV not doing as well as they hoped they have TWO other products that are...and both of them are consoles, while Nintendo is relying solely on the Nintendo 3DS

You know what Iwatas problem is? He's too stuck in the past and with traditions. It never helped Sony with the PS3, they thought with their traditions they could continue to do what they did with the PS1 and PS2 but it cost them a good launch and for Microsoft to have the lead on them for a few years, not in sales but it most gamers hearts. Then we have Mark Cerny, an American guy to develop the PS4 with developers in mind and actually asking them input, Sony broke tradition and look at whats happened the PS4 is fantastic and developers love it.

Death4502d ago (Edited 4502d ago )

Nintendo has never relied on third party support. They always had the highest production costs and royaties. They aren't looking to compete head to head with the Xbox One or PS4. Only fans think they are. The Wii targeted the casual gamers, not the core gamers. Many of these casual gamers have moved to tablets and smart phones for their gaming needs. Core gamers really are the ones missing out if they dismiss the WiiU. Nintendo will do fine as they always have. The Wii was a fluke for Nintendo, they have always catered to their own niche market and focused on moving their first party IP's.

As for Cerny, that's a story released by marketing. Ken Kutaragi was the designer of the Playstation, PS2 and PS3. He resigned over the PS3's failures which was a shame. With Kutaragi san no longer with the company and very limited resources to develop a new console in house, they turned to Cerny. Mark did nothing remarkable. He turned to AMD just like Microsoft and bought their APU which was a budget tablet solution AMD was working on. The PS4 is as much of a parts bin system that can be created. Microsoft's design is identical with the exception of the more complex RAM solution for the APU. Microsoft chose a more CPU driven approach and Sony went more with the GPU as being the main focus. As for getting feedback from developers, this is something both companies do during the development process. The only difference this gen is Sony listened more than they usually do since they weren't creating custom hardware for the first time.

kayoss4502d ago

@Death
"...Core gamers really are the ones missing out if they dismiss the WiiU."
yes its true core gamers are missing out on great 1st party nintendo games. But Nintendo need the core gamers. Casual gamers will buy less numbers of games compared to core gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4502d ago
fossilfern4502d ago

I think Nintendo needs someone younger/fresher, someone in their 30s/40s who have a grasp on the modern world of electronics and entertainment.

Nintendo banked too much on the success of the Wii carrying the WiiU but the majority of people who bought a Wii bought it for the novelty and for 1 or 2 games!

The casual have moved onto phones and tablets so maybe Nintendo should focus more on the core gamers and bring games like Metroid, Star Fox, Fzero etc.

I dont think releasing new and powerful hardware so soon after the WiiU launch is the answer but getting games on the WiiU is the answer!

kayoss4502d ago

Super mario 3D world didnt sell that well and Super mario is their money maker. When the star of your franchise cant even do anything to help you know you're in big trouble.

Concertoine4502d ago

1.6 million copies sold and still in the top 20 on japan and american charts. Also helped sell 500k wii us in december. 3D world was successful, just not as much as people hoped.

Death4502d ago

The problem is they aren't advertising the WiiU properly. They are relying on word of mouth which is cheap, but not necessarily effective. From a gamers perspective, the WiiU was the focus of this last holiday in my household even though I own an Xbox One. I picked up over a half dozen games for the console that my kids have been playing since Christmas day. The console caters to a different demograph and isn't in competition with the Xbox One and PS4. They have their own nitch market.

lonelyplayer4502d ago

it's worth noting that nintendo shares are down http://finance.yahoo.com/q?... almost 15%

Sev4502d ago

Wow. I really feel bad for them. The Wii gave them such a false sense of direction and security.

Metallox4502d ago

Iwata won't go because of this:

http://www.nasdaq.com/artic...

Anyone who puts money on Nintendo finishes to win more money. You won't have the same results in Sony, for example. This is why he is extremely important, the reason that Nintendo won't let him go. Notice I really want his resign, but that's the reason.

Show all comments (32)
50°

U.S. patent examiner rejects Nintendo’s summoning characters patent as obvious: non-final ruling

The rejection is non-final (and even when such rejections are labeled as “final”, the process is far from over, given that there can be, at minimum, an appeal to the Federal Circuit).

Read Full Story >>
gamesfray.com
Relientk7745d ago (Edited 45d ago )

Good, as they should! A game mechanic like that shouldn't be locked behind a patent, and Nintendo didn't invent it either.

PRIMORDUS44d ago (Edited 44d ago )

Nintendo wants to keep wasting money on bullshit lawsuits, real smart in this economy. They should put that money aside for other game projects. On the other hand, I don't care if they waste it all either, and they are screwed in the future maybe that will teach them a lesson.

40°

Nintendo Completes Share Repurchase and Sets Price for Secondary Offering

Nintendo completed its share repurchase and set its secondary offering price at 8,347 yen ahead of March 16 delivery.

Read Full Story >>
4scarrsgaming.com
60°

Nintendo Suing U.S. Government Over Tariffs

Nintendo filed a lawsuit in the United States Court of International Trade.

Nintendo of America is suing the United States government over the sweeping tariffs President Donald Trump put in place last year, according to a complaint filed Friday in the U.S. Court of International Trade and obtained by Aftermath.

Read Full Story >>
aftermath.site
Deathdeliverer70d ago

Well dayum lol. Old agent orange pissing off every industry and nation.

0hMyGandhi69d ago

The fact that you have ANY disagrees will forever baffle me. And to the (apparent) MAGA contingent that exists on this website, enjoy your 8-9 dollar gas.

AuraAbjure69d ago (Edited 69d ago )

Yes, they had better be pissed after Trump told them the way they rip off the USA is over.

EveryPlatformGamer70d ago

LOL I read this on gaff, will they refund the money back to the gamers? highly unlikely. Didn't they just raise prices and pass it onto the gamers? Only Nintendo would send out the Ninjas to the US government.

-Foxtrot70d ago

That’s what I was thinking, imagine them winning hypothetically, getting a s**t load of money back which they would have lost if they hadn’t raised their prices and it’s business as normal.

It would just mean people paid more for no reason since they got the money back anyway.

Outside_ofthe_Box69d ago (Edited 69d ago )

A lot of companies partially passed the cost to consumers instead of all of it. They would still have to at least pay that back to gamers, but we know that won't happen. What's also sad is that prices won't come back down after the initial hike caused by tariffs.

People didn't understand the full repercussions of tariffs. That alone should have cost him the presidency if people knew it was a permanent price hike for consumers

Inverno70d ago

The people should sue these companies for having to over pay cause of these tariffs.

Eonjay69d ago

Naw they should sue the government for forcing the tax to begin with. No one reasonably expects these companies to absorb the taxes. Many smaller companies tried and were shut down or faced to increase prices to try to maintain their business. The tariffs effect everyone.

Inverno68d ago

I meant it mostly as a joke cause we all know the costs of these tariffs were passed onto the consumer. But it's seems no matter how vocal we are here in the states our "representatives" don't seem to care enough to represent us. And things are about to get worse.

Killer2020UK68d ago

The companies were doing what the law required then to do, the tariffs however were illegally implemented. Usually it's criminals we punish, you seem to have different ideas 🤷‍♂️

Show all comments (18)