All Channels
Popular
90°

The Evolution of Linux and Gaming

Although Linux ultimately “lost” the PC gaming battle, it ultimately will win the technological war; Linux couldn’t win the game, so it changed it. Linux is PlayStation, Android, Ouya, the Steam Machine, TVs, Blu-ray players, refrigerators, microwaves, stoves, and even toasters. Linux is everywhere, it is unavoidable, and it is moving in the direction that free and open-source advocates said it would fifteen years ago.

Read Full Story >>
pixelvolt.com
Qrphe4539d ago

If it wasn't for gaming, I'd be 100% Linux at home. If Valve has success, Linux will see a lot more support than the already gigantic steps it's had since Steam went beta on Ubuntu.

Prime1574539d ago

Yeah, MS cornered the game market a long time ago. They were smart, but information has changed now. It'll be interesting to see how things adapt vs how the 90's happened lol.

SilentNegotiator4539d ago (Edited 4539d ago )

Almost the same for me, but also one or two important programs that I use aren't available on Linux. Sure, there are alternatives but either ones that aren't quite equivalent or are considered unacceptable by a picky professor.

4538d ago
Nujabes_4539d ago

"This year is the year of Linux gaming"

This is something I've been hearing for almost a decade.

LeRise4539d ago

Linux is moving towards desktop slowly, but confidently. And that's great, because we finally get an operating system where everyone can participate in its development. Instead of paying for a new closed version Windows with minor changes.

All we need right now is porting programs of everyday use, enough people are afraid to go Linux just because there's no Photoshop on it. Valve's initiative to sell software can help a lot in this effort.

Prime1574539d ago

Or a new version of windows which sucks (vista, 8)

8 was banned from benchmark testing, yet they keep pushing it on other devices.... xbox....

3xkrazy4539d ago

Once you go gentoo, you don't go back.

MartinB1054538d ago (Edited 4538d ago )

Yes. I've been using Gentoo as my main (and only) OS for over a decade. :)

ninjahunter4539d ago

If by some miracle, they got Direct X Legally running on linux, that would be big.

3xkrazy4538d ago

Why would it be illegal? SteamOS is opensource.

CrusRuss4538d ago

Ummm because Microsoft owns direct X.

3xkrazy4538d ago

Opps, mixed up Direct X with Xorg, woops

MartinB1054538d ago (Edited 4538d ago )

There are already legal implementations of DirectX for Linux, such as Crossover Games and the now-defunct Cedega.

They tend to be pretty buggy and have issues with lots of games though.

Show all comments (15)
30°

Top Racers Need Top Gear – Introducing the Forza Horizon 6 Limited Edition Controller and Headset

Omar writes: "With the Horizon Festival coming to breathtaking Japan, you’ll need the essential gear to prove you’ve got what it takes to become a Horizon Legend as you cruise, drift and explore an open world full of spectacular driving experiences. That’s why we’re happy to announce the newest Limited Edition Xbox Wireless Controller and Wireless Headset collection, featuring inspired designs from Forza Horizon 6. The bright cyan and lime colorways celebrate the Horizon Festival’s recognition of iconic cars and hit music, with special features that are sure to impress any collector."

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
Killer2020UK10d ago

Oh my, that is one gaudy design

40°

EasySMX D05 review

You can get Hall effect controllers slightly cheaper, but you'd struggle to find as feature-rich a package without some heavy, heavy sales.

70°

"It's Just So Lame" - RTGI Modder Thinks DLSS 5 Is Impressive But Shares AI Slop Sentiment

Pascal Gilcher calls DLSS 5 impressive but shares the "AI slop" sentiment, explaining the likely tech behind it and why he dislikes it.

Read Full Story >>
wccftech.com
CrimsonWing6936d ago

I fail to see how this is AI shhhhlllloooop. Looking at the different games they showed, this has made many of them look far better.

isarai_lee36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

It's AI slop because it ignores the artists intent and changes the details ESPECIALLY when it comes to character faces. The scariest part of it is introducing it as the next stage of DLSS, a feature where the current iteration already has controversy surrounding it and for quite a lot of games cannot be fully disabled. So reasonably the precident is already set for what path this could take, and it's not good

blacktiger36d ago

In case you didn't watch the video then let me point just one part. It overrides the lighting. Then the question of what is the point of ray tracing cost and so on. Many of the lighting deletes shadow, including shadow on the face like eyes even chin.

Chard36d ago

Why stop at art when it comes to human input - why not just have AI play the game for us, remove human input altogether

theshizer36d ago

If you don’t like it, just don’t enable it. Personally I think it looks great from the videos I have seen.

isarai_lee36d ago

And what about when you can't? Cause there's plenty of games where you cannot fully disable dlss already, i mean we're well into an era where it's a major crutch for developers to cover up their cut corners, why would this be any different?

blacktiger36d ago

You are playing with people's money and allow Nvidia to scam you.

In case you didn't watch the video then let me point just one part. It overrides the lighting. Then the question of what is the point of ray tracing cost. This is all lie to raise the cost of the graphic card.

Andrew33636d ago

Making characters look more realistic not ok because we want the developer to decide on how the game was intended to look. - Internet

Change entire game through mods thus changing how the developers intended the game to be is ok. - Internet

isarai_lee36d ago

Something consumers can do to a product after they have purchased it, entirely optional and can always be undone with a fresh install

VS

The leading gaming hardware manufacturer making this the next iteration of the main AA/Upscaling technique that is heavily relied upod by modern devs and is not optional in most games.

Not at all the same but nice try

jwillj2k436d ago

At the moment you need 2 5090’s just to get an image on the screen so this is all vaporware until proven otherwise.

Andrew33636d ago

The good news is you can just not use it as well.

Christopher35d ago

It's all about choice in the end. But, I would say that calling it 'more realistic' is quite a stretch. It looks like AI art, and that's rarely realistic.

Urrakia3436d ago

All the comments I see are reminding me of how we got to the current state of gaming when microtransactions were first introduced: "It's completely optional guys, we promise! If you don't like it just don't buy it!"

I think we all know how that ended up.

Popsicle36d ago (Edited 36d ago )

I had the same exact thought the first time this was brought up in a separate article about a week ago. Took me straight back to the conversations surrounding “horse armor.” Just don’t buy it they said. Years later, many IPs I previously enjoyed are so infected with monetization schemes that I don’t even consider purchasing them anymore.

DLSS 5 and the like are the same thing wrapped in a different package. History rhymes but many of us never learn from it.

blacktiger36d ago

Biggest Scam. Overrides lighting and shadow. So why keep Ray tracing? It's all a scam to raise graphic card. We now see Nvidia with Microsoft downturn anything against them. Sony is next!