All Channels
Popular
340°

Steve Ballmer's Final Speech

In final shareholder speech, Ballmer defends Bing and Xbox as key parts of Microsoft

Read Full Story >>
geekwire.com
ZBlacktt4548d ago

"Ballmer defends Bing and Xbox"

Is that because of the rumor that the new boss is looking to dump the gaming division?

MightyNoX4548d ago

Probably. Seems like the rumor's gaining more and more traction.

ZBlacktt4548d ago

Yep, he is seeing the billions lost. Thus why so many over years have went under. Or out of the console side and more software support for them.

dedicatedtogamers4548d ago

"Ballmer defends Bing and Xbox"

Is that why he was asked to leave?

Keep in mind, he's done with the company. He's made his fortune. Now he simply wants to preserve his reputation and his legacy. Bing and Xbox were the two biggest projects on his watch (including a bunch of smaller, failed projects) and he doesn't want to go down in history as the man who brought financial ruin to Microsoft.

The clock is ticking for the Xbox brand. Xbox One is going to be their last "videogame console". The next Xbox will be an "entertainment hub" and won't be advertised towards gamers. X1 is the intermediate step.

Vojkan4548d ago

I hope they hire that guy that wanted to sell Xbox division

cleft54548d ago (Edited 4548d ago )

Balmer does make a lot of great points and it is clear that their are a lot of talented people working for Microsoft who are dedicated to video games and understands why it is such an important demographic. The problem is that the people in power at Microsoft doesn't have the focus dedicated on a vision needed to capitalize on this golden opportunity. Look at the Xbox division, Julie Larson Green takes over and rather than running that division being her main focus it is just one of the many things she is put in charge of for Microsoft.

All of the big statements coming out of that division was being said by Marc Whiddeon before Albert Penello took up the mantle of PR. The whole thing seems out of place when you have Sony and Nintendo key executives and heads of the company making direct statements to the public and making the big announcements.

It really does feel like if Microsoft's Xbox division is successful it will be in spite of Microsoft and because of the amazing momentum and groundwork laid down by the core Xbox 360 team before Microsoft got rid of them. The whole situation is just unstable, I just hope they figure it all out soon because Xbox One users deserve a unified company that understand what gamers want. Microsoft certainly isn't hurting in the area of talented people I just hope they listen to them.

OrangePowerz4548d ago

@Cleft

Many people who got the Xbox brand where it is left on their own ago around the time they started to shift the 360 away from gaming and towards TV apps and Kinect.

In the case of Larson Green, she shouldn`t oversee the Xbox division in any form. They need to get people on board that know games and gamers, not having those people there got them into the mess the Xbox one is being more designed as a multimedia hub for TV and multitasking rather than a games console.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4548d ago
iamnsuperman4548d ago (Edited 4548d ago )

Pretty much. Ballmer's is the guy who gave the Xbox another chance (as far as I am aware they were going to dump it after the first one except for the intervention of people, mainly Ballmer, who said they shouldn't). Also Bing was Ballmer's idea to try and take on Google (one of the dumbest moves he did as it took a lot of money and resources for very little gain. Some claim the rise of Apple is down to Microsoft focusing on the wrong company, I. E. Google, and reacting too late to Apple's rise)

These are basically Ballmer's babies

darthv724548d ago

Many of the products MS has released are reactionary as opposed to trend setting. And its funny how they get flak for trying to be competitive.

It like the main reason zune failed wasnt because it was MS. it failed because it wasnt an ipod. in fact, many companies that were trying to get a share of the portable media market suffered the same fate. sony, Archos, Creative labs all had products that exceeded the ipod but they werent....ipod so the majority of consumers that were in the market wanted what their friends had which was....an ipod.

bing, in respect to google, does the same job and rewards the searcher with points they can redeem towards products/services. i use bing all the time and have traded in several hundred points towards entries to win an XB1 as well as real $$ for my live account. i may not win the XB1 but hey....free points just for doing basic searches is not bad.

plus i have never gotten a bing redirect virus like i have the google redirect virus.

OrangePowerz4548d ago

How can one defend Bing? Their big feature is it has a changing picture on the main page. Finding what you want works a lot better with Google if you compare the search results for the same things on both.

Thatguy-3104548d ago

It is really important fpr the xbox one launch to go perfectly. If they screw it up the brand might end up being sold.

assdan4548d ago

I think it would be good if they sold it. Imagine if xbox was sold to a company that actually could make a good console.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4548d ago
True_Samurai4548d ago

I hope you have a happy retirement Ballmer

supraking9514548d ago

Bye Ballmer, good riddance Bing and...

Jeedai Infidel4548d ago

I hope not, I use Bing and trade the points I get for searches for one month of Xbox Live, every month. Plus, I prefer the speed and accuracy over Google

Hicken4548d ago

So you're pretty much bribed into using that awful search engine?

Omegasyde4548d ago

Microsoft misled facts saying people prefer Bing over Google.

Source: http://www.networkworld.com...

Jeedai Infidel4548d ago

Hicken, I was already using it when I found out about the points. What's awful about it? I switched because I got better results out of it, and it offers a better UI than Google. Also, I don't get spam/popups related to what I was recently searching on Bing like I was with Google.

daedra4548d ago

They aren't going to get rid of the division, they haven't even decided who's replacing him, stop spreading lies because your failure 4 sucks ass, Everything you said was lies, research a bit kids

IAmSovereign4548d ago

Actually, the old CEO of Nokia is the one who is talking about getting rid of the division, and getting rid of Bing. And it seems like he is a strong contender for the position. How about you do a little research before you run your mouth and automatically default to shitting on the PS4?

Sheikh Yerbouti4548d ago (Edited 4548d ago )

He never mentioned the PS4...?

Edit: Oh I see. He forgot the PS, not the 4. I thought he said you were a lame for not sucking ass.

hellvaguy4548d ago (Edited 4548d ago )

So much anger between these rabbit fanboys and bias links presented as "facts". Cant we all just get along?

Show all comments (53)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio3d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing3d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster923d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit3d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing3d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster923d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay5d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn26d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn25d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown5d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos6d ago (Edited 6d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay5d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay5d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac5d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger6d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster30006d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde5d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde5d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent757d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_4d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.