880°

How Mandatory Game Installations Will Work On PS4

Call it installation or call it caching, but the bottom line is that you will have to save large chunks of PlayStation 4 games to the system's hard drive. It's not an option. It's mandatory on Sony's next-gen system. Today, at a stylish waterfront hotel in New York City that's been taken over by Sony for all things PS4, the system's lead architect, Mark Cerny, explained just how these requirements work.

GarrusVakarian4498d ago (Edited 4498d ago )

Physical gaming ftw! No need to buy a new HDD for quite some time for me. Ill just delete the install data when im done with a certain game...then if i want to play it again i will just re install it and start playing while it is doing so. Nice.

slimeybrainboy4498d ago

I agree with Lukas Japdolski!!!

GarrusVakarian4498d ago

LOL, i think ill use that for my next PSN ID or gamertag if anything happens to my current one, if you don't mind XD.

darthv724498d ago (Edited 4498d ago )

Why cant the ps4 just play from the disc?

edit...i guess it wasnt designed to do that. oh well. At least it will vary from title to title in regards to how long you wait to play after a game begins to install.

dantesparda4497d ago (Edited 4497d ago )

You's make it sound like its no problem, no problem at all, when in reality is it, its gonna eat up the HDD way to quick. Heck even if they had included a 1TB HDD, i would still be concerned. They need to come up with a better solution than this im my opinion

Ju4497d ago (Edited 4497d ago )

There is no waiting with the disk version of a game. The game runs off the disk but installs in parallel during the first run. After that it runs from HDD. You won't need to wait. It's nothing like PS3. You wouldn't even notice it installs - until you run out of HDD space.

It differs from online, where you have to download a certain amount of the game.

Gridloc4497d ago

Ted would use Lukas Japdolbrewski....

ShinMaster4497d ago

@ dantesparda

After about 12 games maybe. But I don't think I'll be playing 12 major titles at the same time, back to back.

4497d ago
CaddyLss4497d ago

@ EPiCDiNGO thats not the point. it doesnt matter if i can switch out the HDD in 2.5 secs. If im going to pay for a new system, 2 games, ps plus, warrenty, a extra controller, maybe the cam for the total exp of the ps4...You expect a bigger HDD.. I guess sony just wants us to drop a cool 9 bills for a complete game exp that will last us a solid of 7 years of gaming.. SMH dont even get me started on the no mp3 music on the ps4.. lol

rainslacker4497d ago

@Caddy

Or, you could do what you do on the PC, the X1, the 360, the Wii U, or the PS3, and just delete the installation files of games you don't play anymore.

From the looks of things, once the initial "cache" of the game is installed, you can start playing while the rest of it installs. It's not like now where you have to wait forever for it to install.

Unrelated to your post:

I do hope Sony offers the option in the future to auto-delete games which haven't been booted in a while. I'll likely be getting a larger hard disc though when the prices and sizes go up more.

MazzingerZ4497d ago

I agree as well but for some reason I get the feeling last gen and this one, many still don't know game data and save data are 2 different things, that you can save one without affecting the other

JackBNimble4497d ago

@Caddylss

500GB does seem kind of small when games are so big, but at least with the PS4 you have options to upgrade the hdd unlike the xboxone.

Being a PC gamer I have all my games installed on my hdd, and I prefer it that way. I am going to upgrade to the largest hdd that I can.

You can't be mad about having options.

Ju4497d ago

"You expect a bigger HDD"...why? $399...you'd expect more than 500Gigs...maybe your expectation is wrong here.

Boody-Bandit4497d ago

Cache on the fly is a lot better than waiting for a mandatory install.

From what was reported yesterday from RGN, the X1 requires a mandatory install for their games. If this turns out to be true I would much rather buy a game, put the disc in the console and go right to gaming over waiting for it to fully install before I can play it.

kreate4497d ago

again, its the same thing as the ps3's installs.
sure its mandatory with ps4 but its pretty much the same thing. not really news. stop recycling the same news that the ps3 already does and make it sound like its exclusive to ps4.

juggulator4496d ago

KZ Shadowfall is 45gb required HDD space. That's a huge didference from the 5mb that KZ3 required. Its obviously a sign of how huge the game may be but hopefully GG can minimize that load as they work more with the PS4.

dantesparda4496d ago

Im sorry but you fanboys are being stupid here. You's all know damn well that this is an issue, especially with all the free Plus games coming. The PS4's HDD is like 408Gb's after formatting and the system takes it reserves and with games being between 30-50GBs, its going to get filled up quick. I dont want to have to manage storage (at least not so quickly). I want to be able to have many games on it, not just a dozen. This is fanboyism gone bad. This is worst than a PS3 with a 320GB HDD, cuz at least on that you can put way more games on it than you can on the PS4's larger HDD, Im getting 3 (maybe 4) games and then there is Resogun, Contrast and all the the F2P games. There goes half the HDD right off the rip. And its only just begun

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 4496d ago
Lunarassassin4498d ago

That's what i plan on doing. Just delete the game and not your save.
I don't see why people are upgrading their HDD when you can just delete the game and spend the saved money on more games!

GarrusVakarian4498d ago (Edited 4498d ago )

Exactly. Spend a few minutes deleting some data or buy some new games. Easy choice. Unless you have a preposterous amount of games to juggle.

DonMingos4497d ago

People are upgrading HDD and allways will on ps4 because PS+ is to big, to fast, to strong, to good... (Stacey King style)

Underworld4497d ago

I don't like deleting and reinstalling. Plus, add on all the DLC and all the content from PS+, and it's not gonna take long to fill it up, even with deleteing some game installs.

badz1494497d ago

there should be 1 reason and 1 reason only that people are planning to upgrade their PS4's HDD is because PS+!

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4497d ago
aCasualGamer4498d ago (Edited 4498d ago )

See, i'm a little pissed at Mark Cerny and Sony. What is it with these companies and their marketing? You can't say one thing, and then not deliver on it when people buy the products.

----------------
If a PS4 user decides to download a game, they will have to wait longer to play. Cerny couldn't provide as narrow an estimate on how long a player who decided to download Knack would have to wait. That depends in large part on a user's Internet connection speed. Ideally, he said, they wouldn't have to wait more than >>>>> an hour <<<<<< before beginning to play the partially downloaded games. Other games may be set up differently, allowing users to start playing them sooner or requiring them to wait longer. With these kinds of download speeds and requirements, players may want to queue their PS4 downloads long before they want to start gaming or download in the background while doing something else. Or just drive to the store and get a disc.
----------------

From Playstation Meeting, Mark Cerny: "PS4 has a secondary custom chip that manages uploads and downloads... and we're taking this further, digital games can be played even while they're being downloaded. When you purchase a digital title >>>>you download a fraction of the data and begin playing<<<<< the rest is being downloaded in the background as you continue to play."

Since when is an hour a fraction of the download time?

yellowgerbil4498d ago

an hour is a amazingly fast amount of time considering you are downloading nearly 50GB of data. I downloaded Hitman on PS+ it was 17gb, it took 11hrs to download the ENTIRE thing. So with my internet connection if I download knack the ENTIRE game would take like 24hrs to download. So the 1 hour fraction is incredibly convenient

aCasualGamer4498d ago

I'm really pissed. I mean, people aren't talking about these kinds of manipulative marketing when it comes to Sony, only to Microsoft.

I'm sick of all the fanboyism. It's right to Microsoft when they have shitty policies. I fully support that! BUT i also fully support any criticism against Sony for lying and making it seem PS4 is heaven on earth, when it's really not that innovative as we expected from Playstation Meeting. I mean, i remember going away from watching that meeting that i was going to get a true nextgen experience come launch. But now i don't think that it'll happen. It will just be a slightly upgraded PS3/PC with the only innovation being put in the hands of game developers.

Yes, it's amazing that Visual Concepts are pushing for nextgen experince... unlike other companies... but that shouldn't be it when purchasing $400 consoles.

Outside_ofthe_Box4497d ago (Edited 4497d ago )

Reading comprehension is your friend.

***"you download a fraction of the data and begin playing"***

Where in this line is download ***TIME*** even mentioned? The answer is that it isn't.

How quickly you get to play depends on how quickly you can download. This is how it's ALWAYS going to be when it come to downloads. If you have extremely slow internet don't expect to play your games within 5 minutes... Let's be real now, you can't expect to play a game with only 5 kilobytes worth of data.... lol

***"i also fully support any criticism against Sony for lying and making it seem PS4 is heaven on earth, when it's really not that innovative as we expected from Playstation Meeting."***

The "innovation" isn't how quickly you get to play, but rather how much you have to download before being able to playing instead of having to download the entire game before being able to play. No company can control how fast your internet is expect your internet provider. Either get on the phone and see if you can upgrade your service or simply get a better internet provider if you are unimpressed with your download speeds. Don't blame Sony or MS for your poor internet.

thehitman4497d ago

@aCasusalGamer

Not sure if you are genuinely mad or just trolling.. BUT ill give you the benefit of the doubt.

Try downloading anything off the internet from ANY server that is more then 1gb in size and see how long it takes. Then compare that to 30-50gb size games. I would probably never want to buy a digital copy this gen unless its lower than 10gb in size and its an arcade or psn only title. The time in which you can downloand and play is almost SOLELY based off your OWN connection speeds. Mark was just giving a ruff estimate. There is nothing deceitful in what Sony has done or claimed. In fact you can already do it on the ps3 its the SAMETHING!!! there are no smoke and mirrors like what MS does so please dont compare Sony to MS its pretty disrespectful.

aCasualGamer4497d ago

@outsidethebox

When did i mention my internet speed?

I simply said that saying "you only need to download a fraction of the download and start playing" is a bit misleading when you take into account what he said in this article, that it'll take minimum of an hour to start playing.

AN hour is alot. It's stupid beyond belief to even mention "you only have to download.... before you can play" when in reality it'll take an hour. It was said in a way that made it seem it was being able to give players instant game downloads.

And you need reading comprehension not me. I never said anything about internet speed. I personally have pretty good internet speeds on my wireless router.

Ju4497d ago

Excuse me...maybe you should respect physical boundaries and not accuse people of lying. It is physically impossible to "stream" 50GB of data in a way that you can start playing immediately. This quite a technical challenge and calling Sony liars is disrespectful. Some data simply must be available for a game to function (random access) and are simply not suited for "streaming" over the internet. Some games can be partitioned into levels and this can be loaded ahead and is the minimum of data the game needs to function. Over time this will hopefully be streamlined and optimized, but today, this size is ~7GB to begin with.

aCasualGamer4497d ago

@hitman

Why would you think i'm trolling? Is it because it's against Sony? Dude, lay off with the fanboy shit. I don't follow brands, in fact i've been a PS owner since i started gaming, i haven't bought an xbox. I've played many times on it but have never bought one.

Yes, i do believe it's deceitful to say it in a way that makes people think it will be fast to play downloadable games... but i don't thin an hour is fast. He probably should have mentioned that on the PS Meeting so people don't get confused later, like myself.

Yes, i believe it is deceitful. I really enjoyed and got excited during the PS Meeting. It was one of the features i was mostly looking forward to... you know since the PS4 is supposed to "simple, immediate... etc".

There was some magic after that meeting about the PS4 and how the user experience would be like. It's gone now. I don't feel a sense of excitement for the PS4 UI or the user experience. I only expect it to be like PS3, which is sad considering this is a new generation and i wanted something new. This goes hand in hand with my disappointment over the lack of "immediate" download and play from PSN store. But hey, if i'm the only one with balls enough to talk about it then so be it.

aCasualGamer4497d ago (Edited 4497d ago )

@ju

Listen, i'm not too familiar with the technical requirements for games to work, but i figured they would stream the first part of the game until the download was at a point where it could start playing from the HDD. But what can i say, it isn't the reality we'll see come 15th november. I guess i really did expect something "impossible" to be possible with a next generation console. Call it too high expectations if you want but it seemed like that was the least to expect during the meeting conference.

I'll never make that mistake ever again when it comes to Sony.

edit: And don't say i'm not understanding the physics of how large games are and how slow downloads really are... just watch Sonys trailer of the user interface and you tell me if that took a minimum of an hour or a couple of seconds(took him about 30 seconds to be exact) for the guy to download and start playing the multiplayer portion of Killzone Shadow Fall...

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

That's the magic i'm speaking of... the true PS4 user experience... not the "an hour to download and start playing" experience.

thehitman4497d ago

@ Casual

After reading your last two posts it seems you are confusing what this all is.

1) There is the installations that work when you buy a physical disc from a retailer. You put it in start it and it installs. The game can take probably 1-5minutes before you can play it while its still installing. It probably will be the same for xbox.

http://n4g.com/news/1391724...

This article for reference its not an hour if you bought the game from the store.

2) The hour Mark was talking about is when you start downloading the game from the PSN store as a digital game. That time is MUCH longer because the data rate is solely based off your connection. Data transfer speed of the internet is not as fast as a physical disc.

I hope that clears things up for you. If you still have problems then idk what to say to you or what you expect... and I would have to conclude you are really trolling or dumb.

Rhaigun4497d ago

I honestly don't know what you expected. How long do you think it takes to download games digitally on the PS3? Now consider the fact that games now are 10x that size. That fact that you can start playing within an hour, is amazing. By the point, you will have only downloaded something like 4% of the total game.

Outside_ofthe_Box4497d ago (Edited 4497d ago )

First off...

***"And you need reading comprehension not me. I never said anything about internet speed"***

Huh? Why'd you say this then?

***"Since when is an hour a fraction of the download time?"***

The amount of ***TIME*** it takes for you to download something depends on your internet speed, no?

The hour Cerny gave was an estimate based off what he thinks the average gamer's internet connection speed is. The faster your internet the less time you have to wait which is why I brought up internet speed. Your issue is the amount of time you have to wait, isn't? So if you want to decrease the time you have to wait then you have to increase the speed of your internet. That is why I made the suggestion...

***"It was said in a way that made it seem it was being able to give players instant game downloads."***

I'm sorry you got that impression, but that just isn't possible right now. Instant game downloads? How would that be possible without fast internet connection speed? Also note that he said "ideally you ***WOULDN'T*** have to wait more than an hour" So it's possible for you to have a waiting time of less than an hour... it isn't the minimum, but in actuality the average. So if your connection is indeed faster than average like you claimed then you'd be done well before an hour has passed assuming Cerny's estimate is accurate. So you're good to go and should have no worries...

Sevir4497d ago

Its a case by case basis with some of these games. also keep in mind that not all games will have this feature, and i suspect that open world games wont while more linear games will support this feature.

in reference to your complaint, what was said at the PS4 conference in feb, where a gamer can buy a game from the PS store Download a fraction of the game and play while the rest downloads, is not a lie, o far whats been documented out there so far is that most games in linear progression is able to execute and start playing after the user has downloaded 7gb of the digital title. Killzone Shadow Fall is confirmed as the first to have that small a requirement...

Now the caveat here, is how fast your connection is, It took me 6 hours to download Hitman Absolution on my connection and that was a 17gb game on PS3 from the PSN store... by comparison, Remember Me took me 1 hour and that game totaled in at 6.5gb.

You simply cant expect to beable to play a digital game immediately after you start a download, its far more technical. Cerny stating that it may take an hour for gamers is as rough as he can get. he's got no way give a precise response because Download speed is all based on the quality of your ISP's network and how much bandwidth they are willing to give you without capping and throttling you.

I think you should temper your expectations, In our current connected lives, ALL digital is still in its infancy and just not feasible, The world itself still isn't 100% on broadband, internet connections in first world countries are variables at best! You're ok with going physical!

rocky0475864497d ago

"That's the magic i'm speaking of... the true PS4 user experience... not the "an hour to download and start playing" experience." aCasualGamer

There's reality and then there's fantasy, what you want isn't in the realm of reality and has been explained to you a lot over the course of this post. I'm a bit late but I still thought I'd say this anyway. It's like getting angry at a TV show for showing someone traveling from America to Japan in 10 minutes!

It's a commercial to show off what the PS4 can do, time elapses will occur to show off what the system can do. So when he started the multiplayer download in the store then went back to Knack you have to assume SOME time went by before he could actually play it.

JackBNimble4497d ago (Edited 4497d ago )

"That depends in large part on a user's Internet connection speed. Ideally, he said, they wouldn't have to wait more than an hour before beginning to play the partially downloaded games. Other games may be set up differently, allowing users to start playing them sooner or requiring them to wait longer".

If this is a problem for you then buy the disc based game and play with in minutes.

EDIT: By the way , nowhere does he say minimum an hour.

Hicken4497d ago

Maybe you're not trolling, but you certainly are bitching about nothing.

Read it. Again. Whether it's physical or digital, you can play the game while it downloads/installs. Meaning you don't really have to wait forever to start playing.

Furthermore, a 1 hour download for the file size you're acquiring is damn good. Obviously, it's gonna depend on your internet connection, but grabbing 30+GB in an hour or so is impressive no matter how you slice it.

And you even twist your own words around:

"you download a fraction of the data and begin playing"

"Since when is an hour a fraction of the download time?"

You're pissed at Sony because your reading comprehension skills are lacking. Again, you may not be trolling, but if you calm your happy ass down and take the time to process the words in front of your eyes, you'd have your answers, and far less pointless anger.

AndrewLB4497d ago

You guys are hilarious! How the hell is it "disrespectful" to call out Sony on comments that were clearly meant to deceive?? You act as if Sony is your mother and someone just called her fat. LoL!

You guys need to understand that Sony lies, Microsoft Lies, and even your Mother lies. Heck, I just saw a great youtube video which clearly showed Obama lie 20+ times about us being able to keep our healthcare plans... period. Yet Just this last week 15 million Americans had their insurance canceled because for example my policy didn't have maternity and prenatal care. WTF"??

I respect the office but not the man. And he's a liar. Just like Sony in this instance. :)

aCasualGamer4497d ago (Edited 4497d ago )

@outsidethebox @rocky @hicken and others...

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

This is a video from a year back demonstrating how fast the downloads is through Gaikai... which Sony bought. It takes a couple of seconds before this man has booted up FIFA 12 from download.

I was expecting something like this because it was demonstrated to work in this trailer:

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

In conjunction with what Mark Cerny said about downloads only taking a fraction of what they used to take.

NOW... you can call me out and say "Hey, you had too much expectations, and that's not possible"

BUT! It's not like my argument was based on air. I actually made references to my claims by both Mark Cerny and Sony's marketing team.

So why are you attacking me for being mad at Sony for bringing me something less than what was advertised? I'm not attacking a brand nor am i a fanboy, but you guys act like i am.

I'm just trying to understand why "a fraction of the download" means "an hour" in general terms.

YES! I do understand that downloading 50GB of data takes ALOT of time. My internet speed is really good, i donwload 5GB in less than 50 minutes. My point isn't "hey if you have faster speeds you can download faster" DUH! My point is that they advertised it differently.

Now we can argue back and forth over this but that doesn't take anything away from my argument that THEY ADVERTISED IT THEMSELVES!!!! It was in their commercial, their conference speech and some unconfirmed gaikai tech demo video.... SOOOO, it's only natural to think that that's what the PS4 will be like.

Not enough... okey... here is another part from the PS Meeting explaining how Gaikai can make "Instant play" work for downloadable games on PS Store(ala the PS4 trailer i linked earlier).

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

Starts at 2:30 into the video.

Please don't start saying "hey it's download speed that matters and nothing else". I UNDERSTAND that download speed is vital. But an hour and what they were advertising earlier, there is a difference there.

Call it high expectations or not, but you can't argue the fact that they did market it differently.

darthv724497d ago

Perhaps acasual is likening the download and play side to how you purchase a digital movie. There is a certain amount of data that is buffered before the movie plays but it usually starts playing within a couple of minutes.

i know a game can be much larger than a movie but the concept is still the same. so it should only take a couple of minutes to buffer a portion of the game data to allow the player to actually begin their game.

The player plays while the game continues to install/buffer.

What acasual seems rather vocal about is the percentage of the game data requirement will be roughly 7gb (as an example) for certain games and much smaller for others. Its that 7gb buffer having to fill up (install) before the game can even be started.

He isnt that far off base. Digital game should be like on demand instead of having to wait an hour (just for example) to begin play. obviously a physical game will let you start playing within minutes of putting the disc in. If they can refine their digital process to be 10 minutes from start of download to the game start process then we are talking.

i believe that IS what gaikai is touting as the future delivery system for PS digital games but it isnt ready.....yet.

JamieL4497d ago

Wow aCas, I guess no one here can see past there "Sony defense mechanisms. I understand what you are saying, ALL tech aside they did make it seem that it would be so much faster. They advertised it wrong, I don't know what else to call that but a lie. They made it seem like it’s would be this "super amazing NEW thing" and it is not. now everyone else is here calling you out when that is 100% true. It came off to me the same way, with the alien fast RAM and duel reading whatever’s, I thought it was about to do some amazing "NEW" stuff. Not the same old but a little better stuff. That’s how it’s been on this site since the announcement. The PS4 is just so far advanced for so cheap MS has no chance. All that from a company hanging by a thread. A little too good to be true? I don’t know but I do know that’s why they are so quick to discount your legitimate concern. Imagine if this was a MS problem, I don’t think they would be so understanding, and you’re not even a fanboy and they turn on you so fast.

+ Show (16) more repliesLast reply 4497d ago
wsoutlaw874498d ago

10 minutes is way better than some of the installs this gen even though its over 30 gb. There new system is much better.

sypher4497d ago

He didn't say 10 minutes. He said 10s of seconds. You won't see an install bar or anything, the game will just play seamlessly. Doing the cache/install as you are playing in the background. That initial 10s of seconds you will be waiting is to load the initial boot for you to begin playing (menus etc)

:)

RedHawk024498d ago

I agree with you completely. Some games just don't need to always be on the hard drive.

JunkieJedi4498d ago

That's all very well and good - but it's when it comes to down to PlayStation Plus that things start to get a little more complicated than that when it comes to storage.

tanis_halfelven4497d ago (Edited 4497d ago )

Oh Dang Sony gives me too many free games! I Have no HD Space! :)

#PS4Problems

Jaqen_Hghar4497d ago

As long as you stay subbed (not sure why you wouldn't) you can redownload any games that have been free at any time during your subscription. A man just redownloaded Borderlands which had long been off the IGC.

Blaze9294497d ago

the fact that its mandatory installs on both PS4 and Xbox One lead me to believe both companies were planning similar ideas for DRM.

"The disc installation is required on PS4 because the console is not designed to read games off of discs. "

So pretty much, similar to MS's original XB1 approach, discs after their first use would not be needed anymore really. But obviously the backlash might have changed that for both companies.

If we see the return of online passes lol then well, i guess we know why.

Just a thought

darthv724497d ago

it does seem like both were on a similar path at least in regards to game installs.

Salooh4497d ago

I think they had a deal with specs but not in policies. Never saw sony being so greedy like MS except for online not being free any more. As for installs i think it's common sense to do the same thing since both are using the same Blue ray tech ...

XboxFun4497d ago

Very interesting thought Blaze. It does sound like both had the same ideas for games.

Of course one was a little bit better at hiding it than the other.

thehitman4497d ago

@ Blaze

In the article Mark Cerny explains the reason for it that developers didnt like the bottleck of the loading from the discs and the HDD was faster. However I still think there should always be an option and hopefully something is done about it later on in the generation. I normally dont come back to games after I finish beating them but I also dont like having to worry about clearing space all the time either. This maybe my biggest gripe with next-gen. I did buy a 1TB HD for my PC that I might end up swapping into my ps4 will see...

PsylentKiller4497d ago

Beat me to it. Sony had similar policies in place but the royal screw up by MS made them think twice. Although, I didn't see anything wrong with their idea of what the future of gaming should be like. It was their idea of how to execute that plan that I had a problem with.

Sevir4497d ago

If thats what you think then you are looking at a reason to drag them into MS's own pit falls,

Mark clearly stats the reason for this is because it was faster to read information from the HDD in comparison to the disc. Not because Sony was on a path to DRM but changed heart because MS came under fire!

The technology of streaming or reading from HDD has even been present on the 360 in which you can install a whole game to the HDD from the disc and have it read from the HDD. Its nothing foreign.

MS's plans for the xbox is their own plans, and you were very much ready to accept it and you were wishing the PS4 and Sony would follow suit!

doesnt make sense, They Announced the console in FEB 2013, and the opening of it was play games the way you enjoy them on PS3. but you'd miss that if you were looking for reasons to say Sony was up to no good.

rainslacker4497d ago (Edited 4497d ago )

And? That isn't the case. So what's your point?

The fact that it's mandatory installs on both PS4 and Xbox One lead me to believe that both companies looked for ways to improve game performance by using the much faster hard drive to store content. Optical media is painfully slow, particularly when it has to fill up 4-6 GB's of memory. Have fun with those loading screens without installing it.

Funny how what I was lead to believe and what you were lead to believe could both be right, however, in my case, I'm sure that at least the end result was correct.

Quite frankly, MS probably would have had mandatory installs regardless of their DRM policies for the same reason Cerny stated. Hell, most of the big AAA games nowadays don't even use the optical drive for data loading.

MarkusMcNugen4497d ago (Edited 4497d ago )

BL3H. Sony is just like any other company and wants to make as much money as possible. They dont really care about gamers, they just put that facade on to trick you into thinking they care. Microsoft and Nintendo do the exact same thing too.

For all corporations its about the bottom line. Thats why they can spend insane amounts of money on R&D which will be recouped as long as the system sells decent and they arent losing a profit on every console sold.

Both Microsoft and Sony took this route which is why certain other aspects of the system seem to be drull. Namely the HDD. They are very cheap these days, but if that one item was going to put them in the red for every console sold, then they say screw it. The gamers can spend more money on another HDD, just as long as they are making a profit.

Think about it. This is the first time in the past two generations where the console isnt be sold at a loss at launch.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4497d ago
ZBlacktt4497d ago (Edited 4497d ago )

Comment sounds familiar, lol.

http://n4g.com/news/1388593...

GarrusVakarian4497d ago

*checks link*

First sentence is similar.

s8anicslayer4497d ago (Edited 4497d ago )

True, but a 2tb HD never hurt no one..;).

GarrusVakarian4497d ago

True, true. I guess i will have to get one at one point when i have a mass amount of games, but i think the standard 500GB will do me fine for a long time.

s8anicslayer4497d ago

Yeh but the size of these games are such a factor now, and 500gb is hardly enough.

AndrewLB4497d ago

Yea... $150 later. And you can't use an external, which sucks. It would be nice to be able to use a 3tb external 3.5" drive ($119 @ newegg) because it's much faster than laptop 2.5" drives. Guess that's a +1 for xbone.

Mosiac774497d ago

i don't mind not playing it from the disc. when you install it the system is quieter because the drive is not running. in my 360 i install all my games when i play it. Personally i think the system will last longer. it is easier to replace the hard drive if it goes bad vs the disc tray.

CaddyLss4497d ago

But what will you do when you D/L plus games that you like and want to keep. Mind you that i know theres enough GB for now.. But if this is going to be a 8 years system..Then 500GB is as much as a joke as 20gb system. (mind you that i share dlc with my gf and friend as they do with me) AH the waiting game here we go again.. hopefully sony doesnt take too long b4 they re-milk the gamers with a decent size HDD model.

showtimefolks4497d ago

So both consoles are taking the same route, great now one less issue fanboys will fight and argue over

Can't wait be gamers not fanboys

clouds54497d ago (Edited 4497d ago )

Haha. N4G... Let me translate that.
"This sucks, but I'm so in love with Sony and PS4 that not even the fact that I have to install every game like on PC and juggling installations or invest money in a bigger harddrive right away can change my fanboyism.
I JUST TURN THIS INTO A GOOD THING IN MY HEAD."

sorry but everyone has to troll once in a while :-) People buy consoles over PC because they are easier to handle? These times are obviously over... And PC has still better graphics.

boneso824497d ago (Edited 4497d ago )

All of my comments have more agrees than disagrees yet I have recently lost a bubble? WTF?

Yet this troll above me has 5 bubbles! Who administrates this shit?

+ Show (11) more repliesLast reply 4496d ago
Stringerbell4498d ago

Well at least I will be able to upgrade the size of the drive.

AaronMK4497d ago

I don't see the 500GB as small enough to need to upgrade. People usually only stick to a few games they are playing at a given time, and the system can hold at least nine games for instant access with plenty of room for all your saved games.

Swapping something back in from blu-ray it seems takes less than a minute before you are playing.

It will only be an issue if you opt to purchase "digitally" and have to wait hour(s) for enough to download, and on metered Internet, use a good chunk of your monthly data, to swap games in.

Ju4497d ago (Edited 4497d ago )

I'm gonna go with disk less this time. Prefer it on the PS3 and remote play is just the icing on the cake. Means, I can actually pick a game through the Vita without the need to put a disk in. With that said, a 500GB drive only has room for about 10 games. I have much more already on the PS3 and I am constantly full with games much smaller. I hope I can replace it with 1.5TB or a 2TB drive ASAP.

bobsmith4498d ago

large chunks of a game? it better be the whole game so the disc doesnt spin all loud the whole time, like xbox 360 just the first minute to verify it

Irishguy954498d ago

Hope so too, just for the sake of the Disk drive lasting longer and to kill off any potential noise the disk drive may produce as it gets it's wear and tear

bobsmith4498d ago

ya man have you played bf4 disc on ps3
the campaign the disc reading sound is so bad non stop the whole time I was cringing didnt even want to finish it. I stopped half way and returned it to red box I have a brand new ps3 slim too.
gona get all my games digital if this is the case. too bad gt6 wont get digital like gt5 but that games good at not having loud disc reading

s8anicslayer4497d ago

I don't understand why they just didn't go with 1tb HD's? especially knowing this gen how big the files for these games were.

Aceman184498d ago

doesnt the game still spin while in the drive even after some of the info is installed?

Irishguy954498d ago

Depends, not sure what PS4 is doing. PS3 had partial installs so the disk was required. Xbox had full installs so the disk was essentially DRM. But it only span for the first minute or so to confirm you owned the disk still and didn't sell it. THen it stopped spinning. Xbox 360 installing was basically the same as downloading a game onto your harddrive on either Xbox or Ps3

Aceman184498d ago

that's what i'm wondering if the disc still spins it's not full DRM like some people hope it will be so they can have something to complain about.

BLKxSEPTEMBER4498d ago (Edited 4498d ago )

Scratch that...10 second wait time is not bad at all

Show all comments (125)
170°

Mark Cerny 'Loved' Legend of Dragoon, But Admits It 'Can't Possibly Be as Good' as He Remembers

The Legend of Dragoon is held in very high regard by Sony stalwarts, a JRPG developed in-house for the original PlayStation. While it never achieved the same success as other games of that era, it's retained a cult status, and you still see calls from fans today for Sony to return to the land of Endiness. Now, fans can say that Mark Cerny, lead system architect for the PS4 and PS5, ranks among their number.

Read Full Story >>
pushsquare.com
no_more_heroes93d ago

There's definitely parts of it that haven't aged well, for sure. It would be interesting to see how a remake could fix the things that need it while somehow maintaining the game's charm.

gold_drake92d ago

i think the combat could definitely be almost like expedition 33, with the precision input thing.

no_more_heroes92d ago

My thoughts exactly. It's been a long-ass time since I've played it, but I remember there being weirdness with the plot regarding a female character. I'm on the fence about whether I'd want an FF7 Remake-style approach, or just a warts-and-all approach of it being the same exact game with 21st century graphics and presentation.

Even with regards to the goofy voice acting lol!

Part of me wants that FF7R style treatment.

Relientk7793d ago

A fantastic JRPG that should return. I wish Sony would just remake this already. I mean Bluepoint Studios makes fantastic remakes... there you go Sony.

-Foxtrot92d ago

They do…and as soon as Sony bought them they decided to waste their talents on a GaaS title for 5 years before cancelling it.

Such a shame

We could have had at least a remake from them with the next one close to being teased

MDTunkown92d ago

Jrpg age well it’s not like replaying driver.
And its flaws like to much random encounter and slow combat can easily be fixed

Knightofelemia92d ago

It's still one of those hidden gem JRPG's I love the game. I wish Sony would do something with the title whether an HD remaster or give it the remake treatment like Square did with FF7. I also wish Sony would do something with the Wild Arms franchise and another JRPG franchise I love as well.

Miraak82 92d ago

Story and charecters were good, cinematics were top notch and gameplay was fun for its time but world and exploration left much to be desired especially after playing games that came out before it like FF and Xenogears . It's a shame we never got another in-house made Sony rpg , kinda surprised they never tried to acquire Level-5 for all they rpgs they've made for them

Show all comments (21)
370°

PS5 Pro Getting Big AI Upgrade While Sony Hints Toward PlayStation 6

PS5 Pro upgrades this year? Future consoles, PCs and the cloud?
CNet's Sean Booker learned all about Project Amethyst and what it means for the future of gaming hardware -- PlayStaton and beyond.

247d ago
CrimsonWing69246d ago

Cool and all, but this is just more of a reason for me to sit out until PS6.

KyRo246d ago

Tbh after this generation, you're probably right to if you haven't dipped already. It's been the most underwhelming generation and with the constant price rises, I dread to to think how next generation is going to fair when so many people are still playing PS4 and Xbox One

CrimsonWing69246d ago

Yea it’s crazy how terrible the gen has been. It used to be each generation had a defining library of titles that were only available on the current-gen console… we’re still doing cross-gen releases.

FACTUAL evidence246d ago

Absolutely agree. 3rd party and indie really saved this gen.

Eonjay246d ago (Edited 246d ago )

Sure I can get that but one very important thing he noted confirmed that Sony codeveloped FSR 4 and that the full fat codeveloped FSR algorithm is coming to PS5 Pro: "It's not a cut down of the algorithm, it's the full-fat version of the co-developed super resolution."

Thats huge. To me it means the opposite. It means that my PRO will probably last me a ways into next gen.
Given the price, this pleases me.

CrimsonWing69246d ago

Sure but when I’m into next-gen that last thing I want to be on is a last-gen console. I mean, technically you could’ve stayed on a PS4 Pro this gen, but why?

Babadook7246d ago (Edited 246d ago )

"last thing I want to be on is a last-gen console."

FSR4 will be on PS5 pro next year. It won't be last gen, it will be the best visuals of any console.

andy85246d ago

You got a point there, if price madness does happen and next gen ends up being 4 figures (which it wont, I still think itll be less than the Pro, that's an optional console they can price it how they want without excluding the casual gamer from new games . The Pro will probably still play games well for a quite a few years

Miraak82 245d ago

I'm gonna sit out ps6 and just go PC at this point , everything that will get released on ps6 will also be on ps5 or PC . There are very few games that could warrant exclusivity or enough capable developers to truly utilize the technology even now to justify another console upgrade at this point.

CrimsonWing69245d ago

If it ends up being $1000, I don’t blame you. Hell, I should, but I’ve always been a console pleb. This PS5 Pro has just been a major joke to me, and that’s coming from someone who supported and saw the value in getting the PS4 Pro.

You’re right, games have to specifically support the PS5 Pro to even take advantage of that 30% GPU boost, and even then there have already been reports of it being janky in some titles. I won’t forget Silent Hill 2. With the PS6 coming up, you’ll get all those features and more, plus the ability to play PS6 games.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 245d ago
crazyCoconuts246d ago

Given that this will continue to be the premiere console for the next 3 years or so, it's good PS is continuing to invest in it. PS6 is still a long way away

gold_drake246d ago

Mark saying that 2027 seems too early makes me happy for my wallet ha

NXFather246d ago

HAS MARK CERNY STATED OR IMPLIED THE PS6 WOULD RELEASE LATER THAN 2027 AND LATER THAN 2028?!

ChatGPT said:
Yes. Based on Mark Cerny’s own words, he’s strongly suggesting that the PS6 won’t arrive before 2028—and possibly not until 2029 or later:

🧩 What Cerny Has Actually Said
In a recent Tom’s Guide interview, Cerny acknowledged that while AMD’s next-gen GPU tech appears around 2026, Sony itself is on a “multi‑year” development path—indicating the PS6 is much farther out
thesun.co.uk
+14
playstationlifestyle.net
+14
theverge.com
+14
.

Outlets like PlayStation Lifestyle and Notebookcheck interpret “multi‑year” starting mid‑2025 to mean the earliest possible launch is late 2028 or even 2029
playstationlifestyle.net
.

⏳ Industry Consensus
Most industry observers and analysts now expect a 2028 launch, with some pushing it to holiday 2029
facebook.com
+13
tweaktown.com
+13
neogaf.com
+13
.

Even on forums like NeoGAF, insiders interpret Cerny’s “years” to rule out any talk of PS6 before 2027 or 2028
thesun.co.uk
+10
neogaf.com
+10
theverge.com
+10
.

✅ Conclusion
Mark Cerny has clearly stated or strongly implied that the PS6 release won’t happen before 2028, and it may well be 2029 or later—ruling out earlier launch windows.

Sources

NXFather246d ago

CHECK REPLY TO POPSICLE COMMENT UNDER THIS ONE. HE DID NOT EXPLICITLY TERM A STATEMENT WITH A PS6 RELEASE DATE HOWEVER.

VariantAEC246d ago

From main article: "'We at PlayStation were beginning to think about what sort of hardware would be ideal for future consoles and what sort of algorithms would be running on it,' Cerny continued "and I'm not talking about immediate needs, we just shipped the PS5 Pro, I'm talking about years in the future." My ears perked up. Cerny has said that each console takes about four years of development. If Amethyst began development in 2023 then we might be seeing a new device, possibly, in 2027."

Firstly, can we acknowledge that Sean Booker is clearly a dumb••• for thinking PS6 or another device will ship in 2027 when Project Amethyst has little to do with HW? With that out of the way, Mark said it takes roughly 4 years to develop a console and Pro shipped less than a year ago now.

2024+4=2028 <- Just some basic rocket vasopnumoneurology for you.

It's of course possible that PS has multiple HW teams cooking up new accessories and consoles that can ship sooner than 2028, but it's not looking likely. I'm sure we'd have heard of some airtight PSP2 rumors by now or some rumors about games with how leaky all these companies are.

Popsicle246d ago

I read the opposite. Article states “Cerny has said that each console takes about 4 years of development.” “If Amethyst began development in 2023, then we might be seeing a new device, possibly, in 2027.”

Did I miss something?

NXFather246d ago

AI Mode
All
Images
News
Forums
More

Mark cERNY saying that 2027 seems too early makes me happy for my wallet ha
Your comment reflects the relief many gamers feel about the potential for a later PS6 release date, as suggested by Mark Cerny.
Here's why Cerny's statement is interpreted this way and why it's good news for many:
Multi-year timeframe: Cerny, the lead system architect for PlayStation, indicated he's focused on a "multi-year" timeframe for the next generation of consoles. This suggests that a PS6 release isn't imminent and may be later than previous speculations of 2027/2028.
Focus on the current generation: The comment implies a focus on continuing to support and develop for the current PlayStation 5 generation, potentially offering more years of enjoyment and a robust game library before a new console arrives.
Financial relief: For many gamers, a later release provides more time to enjoy their existing consoles and potentially save up for a significant investment in new hardware when it does eventually become available.
Essentially, a delayed PS6 release allows gamers to enjoy the PS5 for a longer period and avoids the pressure of needing to upgrade their console too soon.
AI responses may include mistakes. Learn more

What other reasons might Sony delay the PS6?

Elaborate on Cerny's role in PS6 development and its impact on release strategy

What are the benefits of a longer console generation?

3 sites
PS6 Release Date Window Hinted at by Sony, Doesn't Seem ...
PS6 Release Date Window Hinted at by Sony, Doesn't Seem Soon. ... PlayStation architect Mark Cerny has given a new interview which suggests that the PS6 release...

favicon
Yahoo
Sony not going to talk about PS6 for "years", more ... - NeoGAF
I know we have been hearing rumblings about a PS6 coming soon, but this may indicate they won't talk about it for another couple of years at the earliest, and a...

favicon
NeoGAF
PS5 Pro is getting a big upgrade in 2026 - Tom's Guide
"Big chunks of RDNA 5, or whatever AMD ends up calling it, are coming out of engineering I am doing on the project," said Cerny. "And again, this is coming out ...

favicon
Tom's Guide
DID HE SAY OR IMPLY THIS STATEMENT?!
Based on information from a recent interview with Tom's Guide, Mark Cerny implied a later PS6 release date by stating that his timeframe for the next generation of consoles is "multi-year".
Here's why his statement is interpreted as suggesting a later release than the previously speculated 2027/2028 window:
"Multi-year" timeframe: Cerny's use of this phrase, according to Yahoo News (among other sources), indicates that Sony isn't aiming for an immediate release, especially since AMD, their hardware partner, is reportedly moving quickly on their next-gen tech, expected in 2026. This suggests that Sony's own plans for the PS6 extend beyond that immediate timeframe.
Contradiction with previous hints: This statement has led to debate about whether it contradicts a previous investor fireside chat where PlayStation boss Hideaki Nishino indicated that the future of the platform was "top of mind" and that many gamers would welcome new hardware.
In short, while Cerny didn't explicitly state a specific release date, his "multi-year" timeframe implies that the PS6 is not expected to launch in the very near future.

Lightning77246d ago

Mark Cerny is also hyping PS6 also. Talking about pushing the boundaries of graphics. He also abandoning PSSR in the pro which can only mean no new PSSR iteration.

Man we've heard it allll before. "Pushing the limits of graphics" it's all over exaggerated PR that we've heard over and over. He even exaggerated the Pro. Graphics will look more the same with better locked in frames maybe higher res. PS5 cross gen holding it back probably more than ever imo. Now we're hearing more promises and hype from these consoles. MS even said the same boring hype PR with "cutting edge" tech in the new xbox.

Can't stress this enough and I really think this gen is the worse one easily.

246d ago Replies(7)
IanTH246d ago (Edited 246d ago )

I think there's a weird expectation/understanding surrounding PSSR. I get it, as it feels like it was initially billed as almost the primary selling point of the Pro. However, we've gotten a lot more information through leaks and interviews over time that seem to paint a fairly clear picture: The Pro was ready to ship, FSR4 was not, so PSSR was used as a stopgap solution.

It wasn't long after launch that we heard about Project Amethyst, telling us all what the future held for their upscaling tech. They co-developed the tech, so it's clear this is where they were always ultimately heading, whether they opted to call the tech PSSR or not.

It really feels like this comes down to semantics. Yes, if they drop the PSSR branding, they technically abandoned PSSR in a fairly short timeframe. But they are co-architects of FSR4. They aren't abandoning upscaling, they aren't just licensing some off the shelf software solution, they are moving from the transitional PSSR to their planned upgrade of FSR4.

PSSR, as a product name, doesn't have all that much general awareness/mindshare, and had some rough patches at the start. Eschewing it to instead say "PS5 Pro has FSR4" seems a pretty sensible choice. It's had nothing but praise from the start, and is talked about as being within striking distance of even Nvidia's newest iteration of DLSS - the upscaler with the most positive sentiment/mindshare, hands down.

andy85246d ago

It delivered though. I've played multiple 60 fps games that were pretty comparable to the quality mode on the regular PS5

Eonjay246d ago (Edited 246d ago )

To clarify about PSSR: Cerny stated that the algorithms that they codeveloped are marketed on PlayStation under the 'Spectral' branding. So any update to the super resolution tech on Pro will be another iteration of PSSR. So expect the introduction of PSSR 2.0 in the near future. So saying they are abandoning it indicates that you didn't read the article.

KwietStorm_BLM245d ago

PSSR is just a branch of FSR with PlayStation in the name. It's literally the same tech, just not as advanced. It's why you hear terminology like "full fat," because it implies no compromises. Nothing is being abandoned. It's evolving into its next iteration. It very well could still go under the same PSSR moniker but upgraded to FSR4.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 245d ago
Show all comments (37)
390°

Mark Cerny: FSR 4 for PS5 Pro is the "next evolution of PSSR"

The RDNA 4 upscaler is the first result of AMD/Sony's Project Amethyst collaboration.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Muigi360d ago

Excited by this news lets see how things play out.

Eonjay360d ago

They are basically working together to co-devlop the cnns and strategies for game graphics. So the research benefits borth products and they will share similar capabilities. So its not exactly FS4 that comes to PS5 but rather the models that then used by PSSR. Their long term goal together is to develop hardware that maximizes the execution of ML. This longterm goal will impact things like the PS6 but doesn't sound like it is focused on acceleration graphics only ML. This is big for AMD and will make them more competetive in the AI landscape.

Fishy Fingers360d ago

I always saw PSSR as basically a FSR4 beta.

ZycoFox360d ago

Still behind DLSS but I mean Nvidia have done a ton of research and they're still top dog in AI apps.

hennessey86360d ago

I don't understand the disagrees, the new transformer model along with ray reconstruction is on another level to the very good FSR4

Eonjay359d ago

To be fair we know that FSR4 will bring Ray Reconstruction like tech in the future. Also FSR4 beats DLSS3 and even some aspects of DLSS4. The era of Nvidia having a huge leg up in ML is over. Its not on 'another level'.

hennessey86359d ago

Show me where FS4 4 beats the new transformer model anywhere, I'll wait. It is however better than DLSS 3 like you say, DLSS 4 is on another level when it comes to detail and image stability

360d ago Replies(1)
Destiny1080360d ago

that's good news for pro users, PSSR is about to get a whole lot better

360d ago Replies(3)
Show all comments (46)