Call of Duty: Ghosts currently has a 74% rating and a user score of 2.1 on metacritic.com, which is pretty bad to say the least. However, these reviews came out too late to have any effect on pre-order or pre-sales figures, meaning that Activision made $1 billion on the first day of selling a game that was average at best.
Chance Glasco, one of the co-founders of Infinity Ward and creators of the Call of Duty franchise, has claimed that Activision once pressured the studio to include an invasion of Israel by Iran.
Former CEO describes lawsuit filed by Swedish pension fund as a "collateral attack" on Activision Blizzard.
Kotick Made $155 million from MS in the buyout, the little b*tch needs to stop whining. Thanks to this Microslop deal and massive industry consolidation thousands upon thousands of devs and other workers lost their livelihoods. This greedy piggie pervert needs shut up and f-off.
Windows Central: "The money may keep rolling in, but Microsoft is the custodian of one of the biggest selling video game series in history. If something doesn't change, I fear we'll reach a breaking point and irreparable damage will have been done."
In my view, they should probably merge MP with Warzone and essentially make it free to play like Halo Infinite. The campaign/zombies mode can be $30 yearly DLC. I know this would be insanity as most COD players essentially pay the full price of the game simply for the MP. However-with a shrinking player base they may have to consider it. Making it free would bring in a ton of players.
To late MW3 should have been a lesson but here we are two years later with a steaming pile a shite called blops7
Nothing lasts forever, eventually something will come along to make people forget about COD
Replies(1)
@Oumba:”We’ve heard that story many times before 😂”
You know what we seen many times good franchises been run into the ground by bad management like h___o , f___a and most of the sports game oh I forgot the dynasty warriors
Oh forgot to say
Happy thanksgiving to all the N4G members
🥳 🍗 🦃
Halo killer once arrived and technically call of duty killer also arrived, its name is Fortnite
Call of Duty was riding the revenue horse and charts for ~20 years. Whether undeserved or deserved.
But I endorse everyone to remind you that Microsoft could have decided differently when they took it over.
The money was certainly there, and they could have taken their time revamping the franchise:
Current-gen tech, manageable microtransactions, not imitating Fortnite and returning to core values of the franchise's origin.
They didn't.
Let's see next year. Hopefully without the then 13 years old PS4 and One hardware.
That massive difference in user score to review score reveals a hell of a lot. I mean, if even the fans of the COD franchise say it's a shit game, how can reviewers say it's ok? What does this say abt reviewers? Are they so out of touch with what gamers expect from a decade old franchise? And that's just one of the many questions this article raises
So they made $1 billion by selling their game to fish by convincing them it's about their ghosts? Damn I want to make that kind of money too.
Not surprised at all to say the least
Not a shock but still, 2.1 user score seems a bit biased as well :(
I had a go at multiplayer last night, and I was disappointed. The levels I had seen are uninspired, gameplay is what is to be expected from CoD but still nothing specifically awe-inspiring or groundbreaking. That being said, looking at BF4 as an incremental improvement over BF3, there is a significant and positive difference, whereas with this CoD, it feels like it has gone backwards somewhat...