All Channels
Popular
170°

Is Linux the Future of Gaming?

Eric from GamR Mag writes: "Linux offers a number of attractive features to gaming, but at the same time there’re many aspects, philosophically at least, that could come into conflict with the current shape of the gaming industry. Newell’s speech should be intriguing to anyone passionate about gaming or computing..."

SilentNegotiator4630d ago

It's certainly going to be a part of it. Even if none of the "miniconsoles" see widespread success, Android will always be on phones and tablets.

P0werVR4629d ago

For developers...of course!

For general use...NOPE!

adorie4629d ago

You seem shortsighted, sir. With all due respect, of course.

P0werVR4629d ago (Edited 4629d ago )

^

So tell me, have you actually used Linux as easy as Windows?! 0.o

If so, given that you just might be a fellow user...CAN YOU SERIOUSLY ADMIT WITH A STRAIGHT FACE THE SHEEPLES WILL KNOW HOW TO OPERATE LINUX????

So once again, for developers using it to make great and unique games, hell yes. For "general" use....NOPE!

Ju4629d ago (Edited 4629d ago )

Actually, try LinuxMint, the Cinnamon version ( http://www.linuxmint.com/ ). It looks and feels exactly like the best of Windows and MacOS - with a very familiar user interface, which makes you feel right at home if you use either one - my teenage son, without ever having touched Linux before installed this on his own.

Really, the only thing missing are the games.

(and for the ones interested...it's Debian. Everything which runs on Ubuntu runs in mint).

RegorL4629d ago (Edited 4629d ago )

POwerVR Linux is as easy if not easier than Windows!

My mother, 69 years old, runs Linux. Her problem is never Linux itself. It is more general confusion thinking that it is something wrong with her computer when a web server does not answer.

I myself has run Linux as my main operating system for at least 10 years.

I sometimes gets confused when helping my kids out on their Windows game computer. [lots of old Windows 3.1 Multimedia games does not work anymore]

Can you seriously admit with a straight face the sheeples will know how to operate a car with automatic transmission? (That is a MUCH bigger step from manual transmission, and potentially dangerous too)

Most people do not do more than
- start web browser
- open email (often integrated in web browser)
- edit some documents (libreOffice/openOffice are fine)
- print (drivers for Linux are fine, Apple bought and sponsors)

P0werVR4629d ago (Edited 4629d ago )

Yeah, LinuxMint. But if you knew better you wouldn't even bother suggesting Linux for gaming or just general use.

Besides, if anything I doubt Gabe Newell would even suggest it. You guys are missing the point, because simply you guys don't know what your on about.

@Ju

....-_-

What a bunch of malarky. I can peer right pass your gibberish. You actually had to explain in paragraphs to prove irrelevant points. Lack of conciseness proves it.

"Can you seriously admit with a straight face the sheeples will know how to operate a car with automatic transmission?"

Whaa? We're talking about using a complicated OS.

One point alone that keeps the sheeples scared to even migrate is trouble shooting alone.

Windows is highly optimized and why corporations use it more than any OS. You know how much money you have to spend for training just to start the mundane things, especially for office work where it gets more complicated?!

So, once again. Not for general usage.

forcefullpower4629d ago

Linux is NOT a complicated OS. It is just as easy as using windiws . probably easier. Installing apps is done by downloading a deb file and running it. It will automatically install dependencies for you if the app required it and doesn't moan about it like windows.

Linux was once a more complicated is but it no longer is. I am at the stage of switching completely if devs start releasing AAA games for it.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4629d ago
Zele4629d ago (Edited 4629d ago )

Yes this will be the console generation that Gabe and the Android manufacturers makes sure fails. Android and IOS have already killed handhelds. At the current rate you will be able to buy an APU in 3-4 years for $100 that out performs the PS4 which means a $300 desktop would beat it. The new steamroller APUs coming out soon are 768Gigaflops of GPU power with a cpu that already is much better than the Jaguar octa core in the consoles.

PrimeGrime4629d ago (Edited 4629d ago )

Yea killed handhelds when the Vita has sold 5+ million units and the 3DS has sold over 30+ million units. Definitely killing them both it seems.

Weird every time I am in a game store, I see them still being sold there also.. So odd how they can be dead but people are still buying them. /s

Zele4629d ago

5 million sales are bad. The 3DS did decent because it targeted at younger aged people who don't have smart phones.

Somebody4629d ago

Vita was stumbling about. Near death until Sony bring out PS4 and Vita's connection to it.

Vita needs the PS4 to stay alive. It can't stand on its own when its predecessor didn't even need the PS3 to be successful. WiiU...what happened to that one?

Ju4629d ago

And in 3-4 years the PS4 will still be $399. Of course.

Not.

sorceror1714629d ago

Or a $300 Steam box. Or - if Valve's willing to subsidize, perhaps - a $200 Steam box?

Summons754629d ago

hahaha no.

Wanna know why Linux got taken off of the PS3.....because all of 3 people used it.

Zele4629d ago

They mean to replace windows...

Summons754629d ago

again, highly doubt it with windows being installed on nearly every computer off the shelf and 90% of games having windows and a rising handful having Mac support. Steams Linux collection is nearly bare...and valve is the only one who seems to care.

caseh4629d ago

Linux was taken off PS3 as it could be used to exploit a loophole in system security. There is no other valid reason for it being removed.

rainslacker4629d ago (Edited 4629d ago )

One other valid, although unverifiable reason, that some suggest is that companies were buying up PS3's in high volume to act as interconnected hive servers(which they actually were). Since Sony was taking a loss on each unit sold they didn't want people buying the system without buying games also.

Not saying it's true, just one theory posited every now and again, but refutes your 3 people using it hypothesis.

Caseh's reason above is likely more true. The fact it was taken down soon after the exploit was found lends credence to that.

XboxFun4629d ago

They have been saying this for the longest of long.

Dante814629d ago

Linux is all about open source. I don't think it works with drm-packed game software.

Ju4629d ago

If it uses a store like Steam it will be as safe as Windows. There is no reason why this would not work in Linux. But Linux on it's own might be at risk, e.g. nobody would pack block buster games into a deb file without additional security. However, Steam uses it's own environment anyway (also under Windows). And it works the same way in Linux. What's missing is a wide spread delivery system. And developers actually compiling games for Linux/OpenGL.

RegorL4629d ago

OUYA?

You can always limit multi player gaming.

More difficult with single player that you are supposed to be able to play even when net is down...

Show all comments (25)
170°

Linux PC Gaming Is On The Rise While Windows Trips Over Itself

Linux PC gaming is more of a threat to Windows gaming, now more than ever and yet, Microsoft continues to fumble the ball, while Valve is leading the Linux PC gaming charge.

Read Full Story >>
theouterhaven.net
190d ago Replies(1)
Yui_Suzumiya189d ago

I only use a Steam Deck OLED for gaming so I suppose I'm apart of those numbers, lol

ZycoFox189d ago

Meh.. I and many others still need Windows for plenty of other apps that I like to use as a hobby, no chance I would ever ditch it unless a direct replacement comes along.

If talking gaming only, maybe? It's not for me.

189d ago Replies(6)
Reaper22_189d ago

Fake news. Just another negative article about microsoft. Windows owns the PC and PC game market.

Krablante188d ago

Awww shame! Poor old good guy Microsoft, the company that is fully deserving of our love and sympathy. Poor old trillion dollar victim

Show all comments (27)
140°

Gabe Newell says "people talk s*** at me in chat," but "that's really about their enthusiasm"

Even Gabe Newell isn't immune to being flamed in MOBAs

Read Full Story >>
gamesradar.com
thorstein255d ago

Sorry, couldn't hear you while you're bowing your head on your knees and delisting non-adult games that your master deemed they didn't like.

Christopher254d ago

Pretty much zero choice for them here. Do you want them to not be able to sell to a huge portion of the market because multiple sources of online payment deny them use?

thorstein253d ago

I understand what you're saying. There are alternatives to Mastercard.

But none of that negates what he did. Sure there's pressure, but he bent the knee.

Alos88253d ago

Man he's really lost a ton of weight, good on him.

anast253d ago

The guy is a videogame slumlord. Looks like is on Ozempic.

Michiel1989253d ago

if someone isn't terminally online on a gaming forum talking out of his ass like you are, you might actually get shit done in real life.

anast253d ago

I'm good here boss. I can post a comment and do other things. I' m surprised you haven't figured that out yet.

Michiel1989252d ago

casually making fun of someone's appearance while you're doing other things. What a class act.

tarot10253d ago (Edited 253d ago )

Yes, I'm sure the billionaire white male owner of the company who can close anyone's account really feels threatened.

Next tell me how brave Elon Musk is because he had to deal with someone telling him the Nazi's were actually the bad guys.

Christopher253d ago

Most people in power are narcissists who actually can't deal with this sort of thing like a normal person, let alone many gamers can't deal with it either. Either way, this is just a slice of life look at how even Gabe sucks at games and puts up with people who don't know how to be respectful to others.

AuraAbjure252d ago (Edited 252d ago )

That is sad to think you believe most people in power are significantly flawed in some way. In theory, the strongest and most successful of us are to be admired as inspirations rather than perceived as majorly flawed i.e. "narcissistic."

Christopher252d ago

***That is sad to think you believe most people in power are significantly flawed in some way.***

Common psychological tendencies. It's not sad, just science. And note that 'in power' means CEOs and the like, not just politicians.

Thefeif253d ago (Edited 253d ago )

Looks like Michael Douglas now...weird

Edit Kurt Russell

Show all comments (17)
110°

Battlefield V now broken on Steam Deck / Linux with EA anticheat live

That's all folks. EA anticheat has now been added into Battlefield V, so it's the end of being able to play it on Steam Deck and other Linux systems.

This joins the likes of Plants vs. Zombies Garden Warfare 2: Deluxe Edition, EA SPORTS FC 24, EA SPORTS FIFA 23, Battlefield 2042 and Madden NFL 24 that all have EA's own homegrown anti-cheat that make them simply unplayable on systems running Linux.

Now if you try to run it, you'll be greeted with an error. A shame to see a game that's multiple years old get broken like this and no doubt EA will continue to use their own EA anticheat in future online games. Battlefield 1 is still okay, and Apex Legends is also still running but perhaps it's only a matter of time before EA force it onto those too?

Read Full Story >>
gamingonlinux.com
just_looken779d ago

more comments here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/St...
https://steamcommunity.com/...

47 comments in hours bf5 won't launch anymore ea is saying meh not my prob bitch tosses a faq
https://answers.ea.com/t5/B...

Yes counter cheating that is good but when the ea app on pc is still totally broken and these cheaters are on 2042 same anti cheat this is just putting scotch tape on trumps file cabinet to prevent leaks its nothing more than a stop gap.

I mention ea app as for 4years it was in beta then tossed out with 3 year old issues and i still cant not get the products that i purchased on origin yeah i purchased digital but guess what there is no dvd games on pc anymore.

Philaroni779d ago

Likewise, I'm about to do some games with some friends here but if you wish to PM me I could share my Discord if you like to talk further. Oddly you bring up THQ that I did some work for in the past.

Also for Starfield I have just a Stock GTX 1080. Not even the 1080i version on an ultra wide and with some Ini, changes and other weird things I know I got it working at Series X frame rate. Sure not the the fancy graphics options. I know Bethesda games have always been more CPU then GPU limiting. A good application I don't see many using is Process lasso. It helps with may CPU heavy games on PC. (Battletech is the main one I use it for) Can find it here if you like. https://bitsum.com/

""Xbox has made custom engines like forza/unreal they used to support epic back in the day like slipstream like you said but they make so much cash they do not need to work as much as sony.

But the issue i find is the lack of passion behind games aswell as the mass amount of users that love the broken/microtransantion filled games we get every day. Back in the day when a game was crap or had something wrong it was a oh crap are we going to get shutdown or like thq just poof gone. But today its na who cares fix it later or write it off then oh wait never mind they like it such as the new cod.""

Going to combine me response here. You are right, MS and I do feel like what they do with not just Froza and also the tech they use in Flight Sim. Is not given enough credit. If I am correct the next Fable game is going to be using a mix of things from the Turn 10 Team, maybe Unreal? Hard to say at this point, But MS along with Sony both own a full License of the tech (Days Gone for Sony) I agree with you on the talent and passion part, games have become too much, at least AAA games the 'Milk, butter, eggs and toast" to support places now days. Innovations in gameplay and such has fell lower and lower. I still don't see mechanics and ways of playing games like I did so many years back, its a bummer.

For MS maybe the end as even though they might have a massive advantage in software and services (I use to work in Azure) They can kind of do some things at cost but seem to fail at it a lot. The cloud gaming push I don't think is going to have the effect so many hope for (Not sure why anyone wants that) I still want MS to have a chance but, if I sit here with my magic dice and roll it on MS games over the last forever, it could land on Crackdown 3 (Remember that?) The cloud powered game... and now they are trying to do it again with Kojima some what. As an engineer, its not happening now, tomorrow or anything in the next 24 years. I remember back on this interview with John,

https://www.reddit.com/r/nv...

We are not even at that point yet. So hope we get there and I hope MS is still a player but I do feel you are right in many ways, they are already trying to slowly retreat just by the rhetoric alone.

Ether way again PM me and we should talk more, would love to do so.

Philaroni779d ago

The rough part of all of this is that for those of us on PC mostly be it Windows or Linux based, the anti-cheat sucks up a lot of resources. It kind of reminds me of the conversation between, security and freedom. Too much of ether is both good if managed well or very bad. We just as gamers keep seeing this pop up over and over again. Wish I had some magic wand to stop cheaters... but I don't... hell we just seen what happened with Apex at a high level event.. getting that kind of access and such is not good... but at the same time. Can anyone, one person provide me an example where Anti Cheat has even like a hit rate above 50? I know I'm pulling numbers out of my ass, but it seems the cheaters beat the systems in place time and time again. Where there is a lock, and a smith to make it. We always will have a thief that breaks it.

just_looken779d ago (Edited 779d ago )

I can

Sense everyone seems to have brain rot and forgot the ps3 that is the solution.

The ps3 for its first half had systems that would only launch the game if it saw you had a ps3 controller along with a inhouse operating system and a real gpu/cpu it was way harder to run cheats off of along with the ability to make custom rooms.

Yes there were p2p lag switching then later on thanks to that dev kit leak cheat menus but for years games like killzone/mag had dedicated servers that were hard to crack a operating system/cpu those in public had 0 knowledge how to make stuff on them.

Right now if they put all mp files on the server so we just stream the game that would be a huge step or make the multiplayer run in a sanboxed mode separate on the system.

Philaroni779d ago

I'm glad you brought that up that Killzone had Dedicated servers. I remember the Yellow Dog Linux days of PS3, as well. EA use to do more Dedicated Servers for games but as time went on they would 'rent them out' and slowly the official servers would die down.

P2P Lag always had that magical thing (Gears 2 (Aak the shot gun) and Halo 2,3) fans know as host advantage. That alone allowed for lags switches, booting of others from games. ECT. (Though I admit, was the most fun I had when our team could beat cheaters. Man was that a good time)

I fully agree with you, the fact so much is working how it is has in a hard way compromised network/client security issue. I'll pick on COD for example where some assets are local and other are on server, between games and between even evolutions/iterations of the engines used.

just_looken779d ago

@phil

Thank you for the reply i am glad others on here remember

Now back to the series x having games with the same frame rate as a 2005 xbox 360 but the masses thinking that is fine and next gen.

Starfield on series x native 780ishp fallout 3 xbox 360 720p both 30fps gaming has "grown so much"

Sadly we are not in large numbers and see mp/sp tech wise/cheater wise has gotten worse not better.

Philaroni779d ago

I hate to say it about Starfield I'd have too look at reports from way back when. I swear to god they said it was going to launch with Creation Kit 2 (I worked with 1 alot in Skyrim mods in the block based aka cell based structure) Back then it was great, but for the life of me I don't know how a Studio like Obsidian can make a game same as Bethesda but with less bugs and bull shit. (Fallout Veg and Outer Worlds) Not that it was with out bugs but when a 3rd party does better with your own tech... I find an issue... with it all.

Frame rate stuff I only understand from two points, design and marketing. On the Design part yes back in the day 30FPS was I swear almost more common then now days. It was not a design compromise to keep it at 30 as the hardware and the way the game was being 'displayed' (Key thing there) was as impactful. Now days I feel the Marketing side wants a 4K trailer running likely rendered on a Xbox or PS system with little text saying (Oh wit was on a PC that no one is able to afford... of course teasing there a bit.)

I do understand that Starfield is a 'simulated world' where like every item you drop is there, for like forever... cool, that is not too new now days and design wise, is kind of a dumb thing.... who cares how many carrots you can collect... is it cool sure, makes for good PR in some ways. Lack of tangible game play is the issue. I can't take credit for this but a buddy of mine worked in advertising and I shit you not at Fast food. They would make wax and even 3D print now and then post render foods you would get, just for you as the client at a Burger King to not be given as you where sold on. (((( He did not work for them FYI.. but others)))

Issue with gaming as you are saying is too much is on the 'presentation.' It does not sell like it use too, that type of advertising. Most of it is word of mouth, who my friends tell me is a good game or not, what my friends are playing. Then comes the reviews.

Its dumb that our next gen systems feel like we gone all but up a step that we already went down two to three on. Take Uncharted 4 for example 30FPS SP and 60 MP. That I can deal with, and that was a PS4 game.

I do at times dis Xbox a lot, but come on, they still have yet to make there own damn game engine. Slipstream failed heavily, where Sony and most of their own studios have tech they made for the games they are trying to build. I am unsure how Xbox is again now saying the 'next' system will be the best ever. Sure it will be duh? Tech changes and grows, but I never seen a system use it so poorly. (I blame alot on the bloated Xbox OS FYI)

just_looken779d ago

@phil

You can have both presentation and framerate pc's have been doing both for decades now 4k ray tracing bla bla yeah that is different but starfield is no maxed out minecraft with its seed tech with ray tracing minecraft uses seeds also with huge buildings but for years pc's can do 60fps on that.

I mentioned 30fps because back in the day we had hd consoles alot of users had sd tv's just getting into hd tv's so i get the graphics difference but we are talking about 20years of hardware difference.

A real hardware console 6700 3700x 16gb of ram can run starfield at 60fps not maxed out but its possible this was pre performance patches:
https://youtu.be/hNM488QIKO...

Remember the apu/igpu tablet crap the consoles are using are based off of the 6700

The xbox operating system has always been windows based from windows 2000/xp xbox-xbox 360 the tail end of the 360 using vista/7 then to the series x using windows 10 that is why backwards compatibility works great its all direct x based with the same bc as a window's pc. What we see today is just the change from needing games to survive to making games as a product m$ makes more money in a week than what sony can make in months.

Xbox has made custom engines like forza/unreal they used to support epic back in the day like slipstream like you said but they make so much cash they do not need to work as much as sony.

But the issue i find is the lack of passion behind games aswell as the mass amount of users that love the broken/microtransantion filled games we get every day. Back in the day when a game was crap or had something wrong it was a oh crap are we going to get shutdown or like thq just poof gone. But today its na who cares fix it later or write it off then oh wait never mind they like it such as the new cod.

The new cod is making bank yes users hated it but the sales show the masses that do not post love it sadly

Heck did you see that wow has limited time store items now with hundreds online defending it because they think the store its what's need to keep the game online despite the $15 a month payment and m4 ownership.

I find in the end of this generation Microsoft will go the way of sega they might also just buy sony as everything sony except music/games is not making money they are a cheap buy for microsoft right now so we would just have 2 companies fighting in the gaming ring with papa os watching from the sidelines.

Great chatting 2 you may i recommend looking at rpgm games? they are out there even though i have a i9 4090 custom rig right now along with a ps5 i have been playing 4yr old games or rpgm stuff this year. Its funny i remember being a 2360/ps3 owner stacks of adventures now i am like well time to see what is in the past.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 779d ago