All Channels
Popular
230°

Xbox One: Cloud Power

Hardcore Gamer: Even Microsoft isn't entirely sure of what the Cloud could do in the near future, but here's a list of cool things it will definitely be capable of.

Read Full Story >>
hardcoregamer.com
Kayant4662d ago

As of now Xbox live cloud are just dedicated servers for MP. Forza 5 is claiming with the power of the cloud their AI will be 600% more capable http://www.vg247.com/2013/0... That's a massive improvement if true but the only way we will know if Xbox live cloud computing works is if MS shows us before release or when people get to play on these *cloud* powered games. Until then they are just dedicated servers for MP.

JokesOnYou4662d ago (Edited 4662d ago )

Well no one can deny that this so called "cloud" exists....I mean its widely used for for various computer applications now. So then we know microsoft is at the very least ATTEMPTING to bring the cloud into gaming for more than just game saves. The only reason why sonyfanboys hate on microsoft attempts to market the cloud for gaming purposes is because sony is NOT, sony basicly has a very limited vision of cloud streaming with gaikai and that wont even be ready until sometime in 2014??? Thus as usual sonyfanboys fear anything the competition does until sony does it because whether it can actually be useful or not is irrevelant they just don't want anybody to enjoy anything they don't.

p0tat0stix4662d ago

Nicely put Jokes.

Couldn't agree with you more.

Sarobi4662d ago

The thing is Gaikai isn't aimed to be used the same as Microsoft's cloud. Gaikai is strictly to stream games and that is that. Sony will have a similar approach to Xbox One's cloud, and that will through OpenStack (a service provided by Rackspace). Sony will be attending the OpenStack summit in November to explain how this service will work.. so when it comes right down to it, both systems will be using cloud the same exact way.

scott1824662d ago (Edited 4662d ago )

"sonyfanboys fear anything the competition does until sony does it because whether it can actually be useful or not is irrevelant they just don't want anybody to enjoy anything they don't."

I don't understand this fear you speak of that "sonyfanboys" have, is it because of the amount of servers? And why would you feel people wouldn't want you to enjoy microsofts "cloud"? Paranoia? Also I was wondering how Sony's vision is limited for cloud gaming, they claim they can use the cloud for whatever they want, including game streaming, and their cloud servers themselves will no doubt be greatly expanded on... I don't see why that's a limited vision, also they have had many games with dedicated servers in the past.

Kayant4662d ago (Edited 4662d ago )

Cloud features/functionality are not limited to either platform the amount of servers/infrastructure is. Both can do the same thing (Game streaming or cloud computing) if they wanted.Why MS is trying it is because on like Sony they have the established infrastructure to attempt it and provide access to all devs Sony don't as seen from their purchase of Gaikai. Also what Sarobi said.

I wouldn't say they have a completely limited vision of using the cloud after all they wouldn't be using it for Remote play or being able to control another person's game and confirming that cloud processing can work on PS4. I think it's more to do with the fact they don't have the vast infrastructure MS has.

Am just saying it's hard to see how much of an improvement it actually makes to a game since it hasn't been done to that extent before I think.

LordDhampire4662d ago

jokes on you if your parents dont want you choking up their internet

Brix904662d ago

I think it could be looked at like MS is pushing Sony to invest more in cloud technology like Sony pushed MS to change its policies at E3. Either way competition is good without it there would be no push for imagination.

JokesOnYou4662d ago (Edited 4662d ago )

"Also I was wondering how Sony's vision is limited for cloud gaming, they claim they can use the cloud for whatever they want, including game streaming, and their cloud servers themselves will no doubt be greatly expanded on..."

scott182 you basicly answered your own question, claiming and doing are two very big differences Microsoft is leading the way in this area by not only promoting cloud use but doing it at launch, sure sony CLAIMS THEY CAN but I don't even think they have spoken about their VISION at all to this point, this doesn't mean I don't believe they CAN upgrade and eventually have the infrastructure in place on a lesser level than micro with enough to get the infrastructure to get the job done but micro has the advantage of years of cloud building from their other business portfolio and its very expensive so we'll see to WHAT EXTENT AND WHEN sony has this in place. As it stands NOW yes Gaikai is limited compared to Azure.

@Sarobi, since you brought it up, heres the deal: Openstack Rackspace isn't doing very well, actually their biggest client NASA left them for Amazon and as of May 2013 they were said to be losing momentum. Hopefully the sony deal will help them out but frankly they are small time compared to Amazon and Azure.
http://www.wired.com/wirede...
http://talkincloud.com/clou...

-Also you have to realize sony is clearly in the early stages as a reaction to Microsoft touting the cloud so again sony will be playing catch up in this area.

scott1824662d ago (Edited 4662d ago )

Yes claiming and doing are two different things, very true. Neither micro nor Sony has DONE anything yet. That's why I used the word claim. You have no idea whatsoever that Sony's Gaikai plus Openstack will be any less capable than Micro's azure. NASA moving away from Openstack was for financial reasons (they are a bit more expensive than other solutions), Not because they are "small time" saying stuff like that is fanboy nonsense.

GABRIEL10304662d ago

LOL !

The magic power of processing graphics in the cloud: no one knows it, no one has it, no one understands it, no one develops it, but it's sold out!

slivery4662d ago (Edited 4662d ago )

@Sarobi & Jokes

No, Gaikai can cloud compute. I don't know where you people pull this information from. Your imagination? See the problem is none of you even know what you are actually talking about.

It is a fact Gaikai uses cloud computing for the PS4, Sony would not be able emulate old games like they plan to if it was purely a streaming service. Say PS3 games on the PS4 would not work without it. Same for any older generation game that will be streamed on the PS4, this is all done with cloud computing.

Sony never claimed any of that like you guys are trying to make it seem. Unlike Microsoft they were very humble and realistic about the whole thing. They never made it seem as if their cloud tech is going to make their system more powerful without anything to prove so.

Sony didn't claim they could use cloud computing, they straight up confirmed they could. They said they are already using it to compute tasks in games and said it wouldn't be possible to even have past generation games streamed on the PS4 without cloud computing. They confirmed that Gaikai can cloud compute, not like I didn't already know that way before Sony even bought the company.

The huge difference between Sony and Microsoft on this one is the fact Microsoft is trying to make claims that it will significantly make the Xbox One so much more powerful, Sony is giving very realistic answers to how it will be used for now, they aren't making any ridiculous claims about their cloud compute tech.

.. and yes the claims are ridiculous on Microsoft's end because nothing they have shown validates anything they have said.

You won't find a single article where Sony is claiming the PS4 is going become more powerful because of cloud computing like Microsoft has.

Sony is smart enough not to rely solely on servers for power.

Just imagine when something happens with those serves, what is your Xbox One going to be lacking a ton of cloud compute features in games or is the thing just going to explode because it offloads so much to a cloud, the actual system isn't even capable of handling all of that currently? It just seems impractical period to rely on servers like that. I don't care how many you have, servers always fail eventually.

Just like everyone tries to act like Xbox Live is flawless but even that has ran into several problems before.

I just think its far fetched right now for anyone to rely on the cloud like Microsoft is planning to but it doesn't matter because as far as right now, the Xbox One is not doing anything the PS4 isn't doing with its cloud computing.

I get sick of copy and pasting articles over and over.. Just use google for christ sakes if you don't believe a word I said. Its all confirmed out there.

Seriously Sony has never claimed anything like you are saying Joker. Like I said, they have been very upfront about what it will be currently used for.

ShwankyShpanky4662d ago

Xbone fans really aren't in a position to disparage others for features unavailable at launch.

"Thus as usual sonyfanboys fear blah blah blah..."

https://i.chzbgr.com/maxW50...

Hicken4662d ago

Can't believe you get Well Said for such comments.

Yeah, they're ATTEMPTING something. And there's not much to prove that they're succeeding. Stop pretending like what they're doing is anything exotic; it's damn sure not increasing the power of the console like they claimed. The AI thing with Forza is interesting, but it's really nothing THAT groundbreaking.

Sony's vision isn't "limited," but realistic. They're not making grandiose claims. And anything they've said they're doing with the cloud, we can SEE. Gaikai is already doing more than Azure is, as far as gaming is concerned. And if you think it's not capable of anything Microsoft's doing, then you're deluding yourself.

... Well, we already know you're doing that.

Yes, Gaikai is currently slated for implementation next year. But that's something we've known for quite some time. It wasn't sprung on us out of nowhere. And what it can do is far more complete than Microsoft's talk.

Nobody's saying it can't be useful. That's just you trying to spin the situation in a direction that suits your argument. What people ARE saying is that it's not going to be doing what Microsoft says it's gonna be doing.

And anybody who isn't as blindly in love with Microsoft's every word- or who isn't getting paid to make a game on their console- can see that.

LucasEVille4662d ago

Can Sony afford to play cloud catch up over the next 6-8 years of this up coming gen let alone the one after? Because Microsoft aren't going to sit on this they will keep pushing the cloud boundaries. As an xbox owner I worry about Sony's perils like when they were pretty much forced to sell their real estate to stay profitable.

All the industry from software to hardware is pushed forward by competition and I hope xbox & PS have very successful futures still for decades to come.

pyramidshead4662d ago

+bubbs slivery. Nice read.

Silver3604662d ago

In the simplest terms MS will have more servers available than Sony. MS owns the servers so they can charge developers what they want to. They have complete access to these servers and can spin up virtual ones depending on the demand. If only 100 people playing then only enough servers for them, if a million players in a game then enough for them. SONY just doesn't have the infrastructure to really be competitive on this front. Gaikai may help, but Openstack is going to want to make a profit.They won't be able to match MS low prices without serious subsidies from SONY.

ShwankyShpanky4661d ago (Edited 4661d ago )

@Silver360: You obviously don't understand what OpenStack is.

"but Openstack is going to want to make a profit"

The project is managed by the OpenStack Foundation, a non-profit corporate entity established in September 2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

This is just another example of Sony going an open-source route, while MS pushes their proprietary systems.

+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 4661d ago
Eddie201014662d ago (Edited 4662d ago )

Just them calling it the power of the cloud seems so stupid. Sounds like a charmin comercial or White Cloud, you know, like something I'd wipe my ass with.

Cloud computing has been around for a while now but Microsoft has to call it the power of the cloud like the god of olympus came down and gave it to them. Way too dramatic for something that is just servers and software that basically any company can do.

denawayne4662d ago

Marketing 101. Every company does it, including Sony.

XboxFun4662d ago

Exactly, not everyone outside this site is technically savvy or aware so yes this is why we have marketing and PR.

It's just like blast processing, the power of the cell or "it only does everything" slogan.

Why is it that MS gets slack for doing something everyone else does?

P0werVR4662d ago

^^^

I believe this is truly a game changers. We've seen it's potential already and for anyone down playing this...well they'll wish they took it back.

Microsoft of course will claim more than enough about it, but they've always made sure to tell us that down the road (probably 2 yrs) we will see true benefits of it besides dedicated servers.

stuna14662d ago

@Xboxfun

Because as of now Microsoft has made themselves a bed of nails, and if they can't sleep on it, they don't have a chance in hell of anyone else sleeping on it!

All these stories floating around N4G, Microsoft has unaccounted dgpu in the Xbox 1, Microsoft has 15 co processors unaccounted for, Microsoft games are doing what the competitors can't, Every Xbox 1 is a dev kit, The Xbox 1 is capable of 204 TF, The power of the cloud, can make the Xbox 1 three times more powerful, and many other things, but they all have 1 thing in common! No demonstrated proof! Right now is not the time keep secrets, considering they are the cause for their own problems up to this point.

It just seems counter-intuitive and counter-productive to continue doing the same things that got you into the mess you're in to begin with. Secretive when harmful rumors that could hurt your credibility started floating around, they did nothing, even though most of the rumors were true. They could of at least tried to make reparation for incoming sh#tstorm, but they didn't even do that! You want to know why they didn't? Because they were so confident that the fanbase that they've aquired thoughout the years would accept any terms/ restrictions they set forth.

stuna14662d ago

@denawayne

I agree its Marketing 101, but the question everyone should be asking is when does that marketing border on false advertising? I'm sure plenty of people could say that kinects was a product of false advertising.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4662d ago
buynit4662d ago

If any company can do it then why hasnt sony done it as big as ms and Do you have any idea how many servers ms has for the cloud?

The only thing dramatic is you hating it cause they call it the power of the cloud... I guess they should have just said greatness awaits, i bet that wouldhave made you feel worm all over..

Nekroo914662d ago

because most companys create their own dedicated servers thats why theres no need for many servers.

KillrateOmega4662d ago (Edited 4662d ago )

"If any company can do it then why hasnt sony done it as big as ms and Do you have any idea how many servers ms has for the cloud?"

News Flash: MS hasn't done it yet either. All they have done is make claims. That's it. Just as Sony has officially claimed that they too are quite capable of cloud computing.

MS has Azure. Sony has Gaikai and OpenStack. We have to wait until the next-gen arrives before we can see if any of these claims from Sony AND MS come to fruition.

Pixel_Enemy4662d ago (Edited 4662d ago )

MS is just using the phrase "Power of the cloud" to level the playing field regarding PS4's higher specs. The truth is, unless they actually use cloud computing to process in game graphics or physics to boost what the system hardware is actually capable of, then it doesn't actually level the playing field at all.

MS are coming up with creative ways to use the cloud like ghost racing your friends in Forza but there is literally nothing stopping Sony from doing the exact same thing if they wanted to. Sony is using Gaikai to stream games Onlive style to the PS4 which Xbox One is not.

Eonjay4662d ago (Edited 4662d ago )

You Mighty Morphin Power Rangers!

buynit4662d ago

Neckroo.

So please explain to me why most games dont have dedicated servers.

Deadpoolio4662d ago

Because of the cost plain and simple...Except for Microsoft who were just plain lazy using a simple P2P connection for their matchmaking....Even with the "power of da cloud" How many companies do you think are actually going to pay MS or Sony to use dedicated servers.....Answer A TINY HANDFUL....MS has already stated that NO not every game will have them because they are A not free and B publishers have to choose to use them.

As for the 300,000 servers MS is full of crap....They are not only 1 for ALL Microsoft products, not just Xbox One80, but 2 VIRTUAL could servers they cannot handle the capacity of actual physical hardware....Some of you xbots are just delusional in your dream that these 300,000 servers are all for XBL because they aren't....And you actually buy into MS crap in making it sound like they are just for live....

And this crap about graphical enhancements, yeah that needs to just stop NO the cloud will NOT improve graphics on the One80 at all in anyway shape or form, Azure is NOT again NOT designed to have anything to to with the GPU or Graphics at all....The only and I mean ONLY company who actually has and is working on a cloud that will do that is Nvidia....

There are going to be a lot of sad Xbots when they figure out the cloud is not going to get anywhere close to what MS is claiming or what they are dreaming in their own little head....Most of the moron Xbots are using Wal mart wireless connections and YES the cloud will eat the crap out of bandwidth making it useless for anyone short of people with FiOS....MS and you Xbots obviously do not have a clue when it comes to network infrastructure because most people in the US do NOT have the capability to handle actual cloud computing. There is a reason it is generally used only in business because they can afford to pay for the necessary bandwidth...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4662d ago
jhoward5854662d ago (Edited 4662d ago )

LOL

I'll call on the cloud power.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

mt4662d ago

I was in here for this comment, I was expecting it, I wasn't disappointed.

corvusmd4662d ago

It is rather funny that this is the area of the XB1 that gets Sony fanboys so upset and insecure...they want to shoot it down so bad and make it seem unimportant...even though all proof points the other way and they have no proof of their own. It's cause Sony doesn't compete here at all...even IF it was just dedicated servers...that's already an amazing improvement, and PSN is already in the wrong league.

YNWA964662d ago

Just say Xbox and Sony fanboys swarm allover you like the creatures in pitch black. Right now you pretty much do not stand a chance with the agree/disagree system here... Open to abuse to easily. Even well thought out articulated comments get hammered because these guys are so in love with Sony.

PIayStation4662d ago

Right right. Ive seen you whine about people bashing the Xbone and having never tried it. Yet you sit here and draw out PSN like you've had been testing it for months.

XabiDaChosenOne4662d ago

Say corvusmd, on a scale of 1-10, how much does this link hurt your feelings?
http://m.neogaf.com/showthr...

Regis4662d ago

Since when did gamers believe everything Neogaf says?

ShwankyShpanky4662d ago

@JOY: "even though all proof points the other way"

Feel free to share some of this "proof" of which you speak.

@Regis: Since the source of the information is a RackSpace earnings report conference call.

http://seekingalpha.com/art...
"And finally, Sony PlayStation recently signed a services agreement with Rackspace, under which our developers and architects will be consulting and supporting the PlayStation team with their OpenStack private cloud deployment."

ZHZ904662d ago

@ShwankyShpanky, well said.

walkincarpet4662d ago

it really is funny when you see sony fan boys try to compare the X1 with the PS4. They will go into all kinds of detail how the PS4 is so much more powerful than the X1 which isn't even evident at this point but then they list both systems having the cloud and leave it at that without the slightest hint that the X1 cloud is vastly capable than the gaakai cloud... they do the same with Kinect vs Eye.... funny stuff.

Deadpoolio4662d ago

You know Sony already confirmed that they are working on cloud computing right? And NO not just Gaikai, jeebus you Xbots are stupid

ZHZ904662d ago (Edited 4662d ago )

You do know that Sony is making Dedidicated services right more than just Gaikai. ;)

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4662d ago
gigoran4662d ago

And in 10-20 years when that cloud is gone? Games that require it to function will themselves stop functioning and become circles of plastic. This is the beginning of the consoles that will never be retro (collectable) gaming machines with games that won't work in the future. At least I can be happy in knowing my snes, dreamcast, saturn, n64, and ps1/2/3/4 will all still be playable in the future.

ricochetmg4662d ago

I agree. These is no way they will offer it for a life time.

Foxgod4662d ago

Cloud computing is a significant thing, with quantum computing around the corner humanity will only rely more on cloud solutions.

Besides, no game will require the cloud to function this generation.
And when it comes to emulation, i am sure that cloud functions can be emulated too in a limited way.

gigoran4661d ago

So Microsoft are just blowing smoke out their rears? They have said on multiple occasions that their games are going to run better and look better because they are the only console with this magical ability.

Show all comments (61)
60°

Final Fantasy X 25th Anniversary Website Launches With New Nomura Artwork and Merchandise

Square Enix launches Final Fantasy X 25th anniversary site, revealing new Nomura art, books, music releases, and merchandise.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
-Foxtrot45d ago

Look I know VIII has its issues and all that but how on earth can the do big anniversary events with new artwork and merchandise for VII, IX and X yet VIII got sweet f*** all.

They could have given it something during its 25th anniversary yet all it got was a single Happy Anniversary post on their social media.

solideagle44d ago

they should know that we are OG fans of VIII as it sold truckload as well. not as much as VII or X. I personally didn't like IX but X and VI are my personal fav.

Shadow Hearts 2 covenant is another game I love. I hope one day someone can make remake, I would be delighted

Relientk7744d ago

Final Fantasy VIII is great and you are always the first to defend it in the comments

40°

Star Wars: Bounty Hunter Let Jango Fett Loose

LucasArts gave Jango Fett his own game in 2002, and it pulled Star Wars into a much dirtier, rougher, and more interesting corner of the galaxy.

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
Relientk7749d ago

I remember playing this back in the day on PS2. What a sick game!

270°

We Are Xbox

Dear team,

Xbox has always been different.

We started with a simple idea. Games should bring people together through shared experiences. That led to the first Xbox in 2001, Xbox Live in 2002, and new ways to connect, from friends lists and achievements to parties and play across devices. Today, Xbox reaches over 500 million players around the world, with some of the most important franchises in entertainment.

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
50d ago Replies(15)
Outside_ofthe_Box50d ago (Edited 50d ago )

If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it. They would be turning down immediate money for something that will potentially workout in the long term.

Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box. A lot of their base has moved to PC or jumped to PS. So will be a long road to get back on track.

We have been saying this from day one exclusives are a must if you are going to be selling hardware look at Nintendo and Sony before Jim Ryan. That's the proven formula. You had some that were deluded and blinded by loyalty accepting that multiplat was the future and that MS was merely getting ahead of where the industry was headed, but at least they can finally see the light and agree with what everyone has been saying for a decade+

pwnmaster300050d ago

True, blame it on the rabid fanboys. MS can do no wrong and spinner this multiplatform move. While the actual fans moved on.

I feel like with the new Xbox coming they are hoping to bring back those old fans and then if it goes well. Bring back exclusives.

If the new console is performing like series x and one. Naw they staying multiplatform.

darthv7250d ago

Actual fans dont move on... they can add to their hobby while waiting for the next new release. If you believe what you typed then I guess PS fans moved on too.... you know, since its been a Sahara for 1st party games this gen.

S2Killinit49d ago

The fans didn’t tell them to go multilat. MS was forced to after the 82 billion they spent to destroy gaming. Then, while xbox fans cheered, MS realized they can’t justify the price tag by selling through xbox only, so they went multiplat and in the process began to downplay console gaming.

50d ago Replies(4)
CrashMania50d ago

I think it's too late, xbox sales were diving even before ABK, they got even worse since then even long before the full multiplatform push. I'd be surprised if they even went back to timed exclusivity at this point, Helix is basically a PC and is going to be expensive, they already struggle to sell cheaper xbox consoles, it will be low volume and they'll have a very small 'console' base to sell to, which has already been conditioned to just play via gamepass anyway.

S2Killinit49d ago

They will do what they always do, they will promise the world at the beginning of next GEN and then failed to deliver all generation long. But there will always be some gamers who will buy into their promises.

ocelot0749d ago

Absolutely agree, Do people genuinely believe Microsoft are now going to go. Hang on how's about we go back to 2020. Then GP was stagnating, Games sold where awful because of GP. Outsold by Playstation by a landslide.

They have sold 5m of Forza I believe on PS5. Spite it being a old game. I think Starfield is going to sell well in the end. Halo is deffinetly going to sell well as is Fable and Forza Horizon 6.

I think at best (for Xbox fans). Single player titles like Clockwork will have a timed exclusivity. Multiplayer centric games like Forza, E Day will release day and date on all platforms.

Or all games will release on all platforms day and date. But maybe Xbox and Windows Store copies will have exclusive bonuses. Or may even get timed exclusive dlc like Fallout and Elder Scrolls and COD use to do.

I think they will treat Xbox players like the premium customers or at least act the way. But will serve just the Playstation and Switch 2 customers as well.

Neonridr50d ago

I don't see them removing PC from the equation. Considering MS has a heavy enough investment in the PC market, it would be foolish to abandon them. I could see them taking away games from PlayStation or ensuring they are timed exclusives at the very least. Say what you will but if Call of Duty ends up becoming a timed exclusive to Xbox machines, that would hurt PlayStation, don't pretend like those games don't sell millions.

Outside_ofthe_Box50d ago

They would lose out on a lot of CoD sales tho. Doesn't PS make up most of the sales?

Neonridr49d ago

@Outside - possibly, but it might push people to want Xbox hardware so they can play with their buddies day one.

Who knows.

S2Killinit49d ago (Edited 49d ago )

it would but remember doing that can splinter the COD fan base and in the process damage the call of duty brand which is probably the only franchise in that $82 billion purchase that in anyway gets even close to delivering what Microsoft thought they bought. If Microsoft fudges around too much with the COD franchise, you might even see a competitor franchise show up on the scene and that would be a catastrophe after the huge debt that Microsoft put itself into with the ABK purchase.

But Its almost guaranteed that Microsoft will want to do something drastic at the beginning of the next generation as they always do. We will see.

Pyrofire9550d ago

Their lifeline of solely the Xbox consoles is dry. Good-Great games on a 1st party scale can't be made at a loss so willingly - sent to the Xbox to only sell limited copies.
They invested billions scooping up studios and need to start making returns.
Sucks that nearly every company is publicly traded and have to be so shareholder biased but that's how it is.
Their words are strong but it'll take time to see what their actions accomplish. Lowering the cost of Game Pass and taking CoD off of it was a good clear start.

darthv7250d ago

More like, allot of their base just played game pass. So now they need to encourage them to start buying again.

S2Killinit49d ago (Edited 49d ago )

A lot of their base left for greener (bluer?) pastures.

--Onilink--50d ago

What exactly is the long term goal with exclusives though?

Because for the most part, the hardware side of things has never been the most profitable, even sometimes being subsidized for a period before breaking even. And that’s before the hardware component nightmare we currently live in.

The whole point of exclusives was to get more people to buy your console in order to have a bigger install base, which meant even bigger software sales.

But if their ports to PS5 are selling (for the most part it seems) quite well, then other than negating the cut Sony takes there, unless you are REALLY increasing your software sales on your own console, it probably doesn’t make that much of a difference?

Honestly I don’t even understand Sony’s decision to scale back on it for PC unless they weren’t even recouping the port expenses. They released ports when the hardware sales never really dropped, and now that all consoles will undoubtedly take a noticeable drop in sales due to the ridiculous prices, that’s when they decide they don’t want to sell to a larger install base to more easily recoup dev costs… it’s just weird

Outside_ofthe_Box49d ago (Edited 49d ago )

I agree. I mean once they went multiplat, in theory there should be no going back especially when you have games that have sold really well on other platforms.

Microsoft are the ones that announced that they are reevaluating. So I'm just guessing on what their end goal is. Right now Xbox as a hardware is not a must buy for anyone but fans of the brand because their games can be played elsewhere. Going exclusive would solve this, but you lose out on a ton of money instantly which has always been what the company does not want to do so not really sure what their "reevaluating exclusives" means unless they are pulling a Phil Spencer and are just saying what people want to hear and will continue to do what they are currently doing.

darthv7249d ago

Their ports to PS5 are selling because Sony's output has been so dry... the fans are thirsty, and MS is the oasis.

SIdepocket49d ago

Unfortunately, the studios they buy wither under their leadership.

mcstorm49d ago

Microsoft still has a name with Xbox the issue is the casual games are not looking at the console because its not the same console their friends have. Look at that poll on how many users upgraded from xbox 365 to one and then the X. Part of Microsoft's downfall was thinking that the Wii was the market they had to be in when really it was the core market. If you get the core gamers you then get the market to. As I posted a few minuets ago on another post Microsoft putting exclusives on PS this gen could bold well if they hit next gen with all our games are staying exclusive from this new gen. They will then get gamers wanting Halo, Forza Gears but this is also where Microsoft fell over with the xbox one and X in terms of they did not have may quality 1st party games affter they fell into the Gears, Forza and Halo cycle. If they can get some old IPs back to bring back the old core gamers as well as fresh ips to bring in new gamers things could improve next gen. But as I said in my last post its all if buts and maybes at the moment. No one knows if the next home consoles will be to expensive that people move to pc as we are now seeing or look at the stem deck as a cheepier alternitive.

DarXyde49d ago

"Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box."

That's very optimistic. It's not the only issue, far from it. There is a serious rupture between Microsoft generally and the public caused by their weird Game Pass price fluctuations, taking down physical game space in stores, and being the first to go nuts on hardware price hikes that they themselves played a big part in.

They're also charging beyond a premium for Helix which is just vile at a time when the economy is in shambles.

The company itself is really not doing itself any favors with the approach they're taking Windows. Even France is looking to ditch Windows in favor of Linux.

But the most offensive thing is this AI push. They're doubling, tripling, and quadrupling down on the very technology they're using to replace a considerable proportion of their workforce... And the slap in the face is how they bake copilot into everything when nobody likes it—they couldn't even make Bing stick, so why on earth are they trying so hard? You know it's bad when people would rather use ChatGPT than Copilot which is killing their OS. But aside from their snatching up of farmland to build data centers (and reduce the agriculture capacity of whichever country allows them to build them), they made an AI-generated gamer gurl that loves AI the head of Xbox.

Even if we grant them the full benefit of the doubt, it hardly matters what Xbox wants to do if Nadella says no, and that includes exclusive games. Microsoft's relationship with Xbox is the opposite of Sony's relationship with PlayStation—Microsoft pulls the reins of Xbox, but Sony damn near went under for the PS3.

Tanktopmaster9249d ago (Edited 49d ago )

“If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it.”

Great strategy, especially after Forza selling 5 million on PlayStation and sea of thieves selling at least another million (2 million) for example. In March 2026, Xbox consoles sales ratio vs PS was 10:1.

In addition to that, with Gamepass, which unequivocally cuts out chunks of sales (Cannibalizing revenue from 1st month sales especially).

I’m sure going exclusive again after releasing everything on Ps5 is going to work out great for business.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 49d ago
maximusprime_50d ago

Despite all of that, it's clear that Microsoft's Xbox division is broken beyond repair.

50d ago
BeHunted50d ago

PlayStation is currently draining money on flop after flop. It's Sony that needs to re-evaluate their strategy

50d ago
CrashMania50d ago (Edited 50d ago )

Wonder how much money was lost on perfect dark, hellbalde 2, 300 million lost revenue
by putting cod on gamepass. The recent Jason schrier news that Xbox has cancelled dozens of projects, spent 70 billion just to see Xbox sales further collapse and gamepass see little growth.

The fact is this has been PlayStation's most profitable generation and they are making loads of money and selling plenty of consoles and games. While MS won't give you any sales figures or profit numbers for Xbox, says it all really.

S2Killinit49d ago

Sony PlayStation has deservedly dominated xbox. Facts

Tanktopmaster9249d ago (Edited 49d ago )

Ok tween.

Xbox series SX got outsold 10:1 last month. lol.

49d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 49d ago
shadowT50d ago

"Our presence on PC isn’t strong enough."

Fishy Fingers50d ago

It isnt. But I dont think they mean in 'games', rather, footprint.

They own the OS but as far as gaming is concerned, Steam dominate. I imagine the VAST majority of people who use the Xbox app/launcher are PC gamepass subs. No ones buying their 3rd party PC games through Xbox PC.

badz14950d ago

and many gamers prefer SteamOS for gaming over Windows too. If only Valve would be more uncompromising to the anti-cheat makers that locked out non-windows players, more pc gamers would have moved onto SteamOS by now and not looking back to Windows. overall, Win11 is a terrible, bloated, unoptimized OS which is not what many people want

ocelot0749d ago

Agreed and I think that's where they are going to focus on more. I think cheaper games on Windows/Xbox store (MS IP) compared to Steam and Epic and maybe even compared to PSN store as well.

Show all comments (107)