All Channels
Popular
200°

This Isn't The First Time Microsoft Aired a Console Ad Without Games

People have been brutally criticizing Microsoft for airing an Xbox One commercial without showing any videogames.

Read Full Story >>
geekparty.com
Muerte24944651d ago

though. That's primarily direct at gamers?

NatureOfLogic4651d ago

You're first console commercial and you don't show the console or games? *scratches head* MS focus is clearly not on games.

AngelicIceDiamond4651d ago

Well its an Xbox. People know what it is and what they're buying.

I criticized it little myself, but it makes sense to advertise its NFL capabilities seeing how the first kick off was last night.

Plus this is not the only advertisement you'll see come launch trust me.

malokevi4651d ago

"focus".

hmm.

I see games that I like. I think that's pretty much all that matters.

Mass appeal is a good thing, me thinks.

nukeitall4651d ago

Looks at MS games: Forza 5, Ryse, Dead Rising 3, Titanfalls, Quantum Break and so on.

Looks at competition: indies, indies and more indies.

Looks at both MS and competition gaming features and sees MS matches everything and adds SmartMatch, SmartGlass, dedicated servers, the cloud and so on.

...but hey, let's focus on the ad. MS is clearly not focusing on gamers!

malokevi4651d ago

"People have been brutally criticizing Microsoft for airing an Xbox One commercial without showing any videogames."

Oh, really? Quelle grand suprise!

People are obviously bored. Who cares? I thought the commercial was nifty! Some crazy camera angles.

Godmars2904651d ago

How odd is that MS repeated the exact same "mistake" they did with the first XB1 presentation? How much does it say about their thinking or how much their original intent has changed in light of all the reversals.

GryestOfBluSkies4651d ago

i think this and their other recent comments (drm was 'ahead of gamers', for example) suggest that they still believe in all of their original policies. they only changed these things because of pre order numbers.

rainslacker4651d ago

The commercial in question was aimed at people who watch football. They were marketing it not to gamers, but football fans.

While I question their focus overall, this particular ad was meant to reach the audience that was watching it.

OTOH, Sony did have a GOW ad for the online SuperBowl broadcast.

Godmars2904651d ago

Think about that. Sony, who makes games and sells a game system, bought ad time during the Superbowl to sell a game. Whereas MS did an ad to let people watching football know that they could watch football, talk to friends via skype and run a fantasy football league, via their media center.

rainslacker4651d ago

I don't really need to think about it. It has not gone unnoticed by me that they seem to have a overly zealous fetish for being primarily a media box that also plays games, instead of the other way around.

My point was though that they want to get those football watchers on board. The reason for this is probably because that market is very lucrative, and MS seems to want a piece of all the pies.

It's not a bad strategy overall, just not terribly appealing to me. For our part, as gamers, we don't care about what MS has to offer, but it is in MS best interest to advertise those features to people that do care about them.

Godmars2904651d ago (Edited 4651d ago )

And the problem with *THAT* is that MS has a history of not developing games. Of spending more money, far more, and advertising and exclusives which often turn out to be limited. Even their indie push was more about generating "content", stuffing their library with titles for the sake of stuffing it with titles, than making new much less quality IPs.

So then the issue at once is if this NFL thing does bring in NFL viewers, where will MS's attention go to? Nevermind that this is another example of how their attention is limited.

At the very least you have to admit that, yet again, MS have opened themselves up to ridicule. It also says something that, when looking at the launch line-ups of both systems, the games don't present a "casual" face to the general consumer or anything new or different from what's come before.

negative4651d ago ShowReplies(2)
sAVAge_bEaST4651d ago (Edited 4651d ago )

They paid big bucks for the NFL -Marketing- partnership,. -dat casual crowd.

EXVirtual4651d ago (Edited 4651d ago )

It's not even that they showed an ad that was solely about multimedia. Sony has done the same thing I believe.
It's that it's the first commercial for the XB1. It completely shafts gamers. It really shows what they want the XB1 to be first and foremost: A multimedia hub. And because of that, I think that the number of exclusives coming out for the XB1 will lower massively in about 2 years.
@corvusmd, it isn't fanboys just filling the place with bad XB1 news, it's because of the fact that there has been a pile of nothing but bad XB1 news and very little good news. On the PS4 side, there has not been that much bad news, almost next to none. It is reasonable to say that MS repeating the mistake of the initial reveal. It wouldn't even be that bad if they showed both the multimedia and games, but there were no games. Zero. And again, this is the first commercial.
@mars290, the point is there were NO games.

corvusmd4651d ago

Sony has, they do it all the time actually...I posted some links yesterday, but the bottom line is these fanboys are just looking for anything to talk trash about the XB1 for. They don't care if it's reasonable or not, they just want to fill the internet with bad news about the XB1 cause they are feeling the pressure now and have staked their entire online persona on PS4 crushing XB1...and if it doesn't...they have to admit they were wrong...so it's all about the Smear campaign.

Godmars2904651d ago

Yes. Like this one:
https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Or this one:
https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Or this one:
https://www.youtube.com/wat...

And who could forget this one - sackboy version:
https://www.youtube.com/wat...

Overall point: when they talked about media, they talked about everything else. It wasn't just about one and one thing only.

That commercial says that the XB1 is an NFL viewer which has apps which help you watch the NFL.

nukeitall4651d ago

@mars

"That commercial says that the XB1 is an NFL viewer which has apps which help you watch the NFL."

It is called targeted advertisment. Nothing wrong with advertising the most appealing thing, you know NFL viewer, to NFL viewers!

Whoaa... what a revelation and not a total conspiracy theory by a known Sony fangirl!!!

hop3lessfray4651d ago

I feel like both consoles are designed to be that. Microsoft hasn't been shy about it (All in One). Sony has done a better job of catering towards the gamer audience while eventually reminding people briefly at E3 that they're Sony and can offer a shit ton of music, movies, and television shows.

Hicken4651d ago

Bubbles for well said. That's really the bottom line. Rather than spending a bunch of time on it, Sony just reminds people from time to time.

rainslacker4651d ago (Edited 4651d ago )

Is it really necessary to advertise to gamers on TV right now. If it's not available right now, or within a couple weeks, why try to get the regular gamers to buy it. Besides right now GTAV is on everyone's mind, not to mention the other rather high profile games that have come out recently.

We already know almost everything about it, and most of us have made a decision. It would be a waste to spend a lot of money on us right now when a press release will achieve the same thing.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4651d ago
Show all comments (50)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai33d ago (Edited 33d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio33d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing32d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9232d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit32d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing32d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9232d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay34d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn235d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers35d ago (Edited 35d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn234d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown35d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos35d ago (Edited 35d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay34d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay34d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac34d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger35d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300035d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde35d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood35d ago (Edited 35d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde34d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7536d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_34d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.