All Channels
Popular
530°

Xbox One CPU speed increased by 9.375 per cent

Microsoft has revealed that the Xbox One final production hardware features a 9.375 per cent increase to CPU speed, with the eight-core AMD processor now running at 1.75GHz - 150MHz faster than the beta hardware.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
Maddens Raiders4643d ago ShowReplies(13)
kenmid4643d ago ShowReplies(7)
thrust4643d ago

Can not wait for the benchmarks to come out for both consoles!

Eonjay4643d ago

Neither chip is anthing too special in the way of power. Both consoles will be relying heavily on GPU and that is a good thing. For example the Samsung Galaxy 10.1 Tab was revealed today. It will sport a 1.9GHz octa-core chip. This IS faster than the CPU in the Xbox One.

Halochampian4643d ago

Are you basing that merely on the frequency?

Eonjay4642d ago (Edited 4642d ago )

@HaloChampion without a doubt, it cannot be argued that the CPU in the Samsung Galaxy 10.1 Tab operaters at a frequency faster than the Xbox One. That is exactly what I am asserting. The number 1.9 is in fact greater than 1.75. There are other factors to be considered when determining data throughput of course including how many addressable bits the CPU manages every clock but math compels you to understand that the clock of the Galaxy tab iterates it signal more times every second than the CPU in the Xbox One.

Halochampian4642d ago

@Eonjay Run some benchmarks once the two machines are out. I can almost guarantee that the Xbox One and PS4 will outperform the Galaxy Tab 10.1. We dont even know what chip set is being used in the 10.1. We just know a 8 core 1.9. That's it. We have no idea what the cache is or anything.

Eonjay4642d ago

@Halochampion in terms of data throughput I have no doubt you are absolutely correct. I was merely giving a purely technically correct answer regarding the frequency itself.

An example of how you are correct would be comparing the PS4 GPU to the Xbox One GPU. Even though the throughput of data every second is 500 GFlops higher on the PS4, it would be inaccurate to say that the PS4 GPU is faster because speed refers to the amount of clock per second. The Xbox One GPU is faster because it clock iterates more times a second than the PS4 GPU.

Speed isn't an indication of power as the two GPUs show so you are in fact absolutely correct.

superspeedybull4642d ago

@Eonjay

I think you need to gain a better understanding of how CPU's and GPU's actually work before saying which one is stronger than the other. The fact that you mention the CPU clock speed of a Galaxy Tab shows you have a lack of understanding on computing specs. Not calling you dumb or anything I just think you need to be educated on the subject.

The speed of a CPU is determined by many things other than Clock Speed. If that was the case then why is the next gen consoles much faster than the current gen consoles? I mean the 360 and PS3 have much higher clock speeds than the PS4 and X1.

Eonjay4642d ago (Edited 4642d ago )

@superspeedybull Thanks for the response. I do realize the difference between clock speed and power in CPU's and GPU. Its my fault that I wasn't more clear in my initial comment. I was trying to show that speeds don't indicate raw power of a processor (CPU or GPU). Thats why I gave the example about the GPUs of both machines. I wanted to assert that I understand that just because the Xbox One GPU is producing more clock every second (hertz), that it didn't automatically equal more power (computations).

I also realize that if the Xbox Ones CPU is clocked at 1.75Ghz it will still be beaten by a PS4 CPU clocked at 1.6Ghz. For example, if you completely ignore unified memory, and negate the CPU main memory bus bandwidth (which is mysteriously unknown for Xbox One), you will find that data within main memory can be manipulated at a much faster rate on the PS4.

JsonHenry4642d ago

Lol @ the Tab comparisons. Yes the frequency is faster but we all know that means nothing at all when comparing two CPUs.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 4642d ago
SegaSaturn6694642d ago

Explosions and overheating on the X1 up a startling 633%

Fishy Fingers4643d ago

Thought they'd upped it again, this was reported several times over the past few days. Good news though, anything extra they can squeeze out is only going to help. If nothing else it shows they've obviously got a good cooling solution this time around. Win win.

Kleptic4643d ago (Edited 4643d ago )

well...lets hope its a good cooling solution...and not just lucky chip yields...

in either case...the bump is so small it shouldn't effect heat cycling tangibly more so than before...meaning, if the cooling is bad...the apu would probably fail regardless of this slight bump to clock speed...

so i totally agree...everyone wins...this shouldn't hurt integrity at all, unless there is some fundamental design flaw...which would've showed its head anyway...not nit picking, just pointing out...its happened before...

CalamityCB4643d ago

That is definitely a impressive improvement and possibly a more faster CPU than the PS4s rumored 1.6GHZ.

CalamityCB4643d ago

I've gotten dislikes for a truthful statement, really shows you how pathetic people really are on this website and how protective they are of their selected platforms.

hellzsupernova4643d ago

I'm a playstation fan and even I get murdered for stating facts. Fuck the fan boys play what you want where you want

dodo1014643d ago (Edited 4643d ago )

This is not truthful sony has not announced any clockspeed of the cpu

CalamityCB4643d ago

@dodo "Rumored" Dumbass.

Mini05104642d ago (Edited 4642d ago )

LOL A truthful statement? Ok. But is it a fact? Noooo
So therefore people should be able to disagree with it. You said it's an impressive improvement. What if someone else thinks that it's not an impressive improvement. There you go, you got a disagree.

yeah... and we are pathetic. hahah. You don't even think. YOu are just butthurt.

What dodo101 point it out was probably the reason for your disagrees. But nevertheless, you wrote half opinion and half reasoning. Can't blame people for disagreeing with you if part of your sentence is an opinion LOL

DarkHeroZX4642d ago (Edited 4642d ago )

well actually we have no fact on the PS4's CPU speeds. There are many rumors from 1.6GHz to 2.0GHz rumors. Since the official unveiling of the PS4 Sony has been extremely quite on the clock speed of the CPU. We have next to nothing on it's speed.

old rumor

http://ps4daily.com/2013/02...

this rumor suggests that the PS4's CPU will have a turbo mode that can adjust CPU speeds.

http://www.inquisitr.com/93...

this report litterally has nothing to compare the new CPU boost to the Xbox One.

http://www.extremetech.com/...

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4642d ago
Show all comments (156)
60°

Final Fantasy X 25th Anniversary Website Launches With New Nomura Artwork and Merchandise

Square Enix launches Final Fantasy X 25th anniversary site, revealing new Nomura art, books, music releases, and merchandise.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
-Foxtrot24d ago

Look I know VIII has its issues and all that but how on earth can the do big anniversary events with new artwork and merchandise for VII, IX and X yet VIII got sweet f*** all.

They could have given it something during its 25th anniversary yet all it got was a single Happy Anniversary post on their social media.

solideagle24d ago

they should know that we are OG fans of VIII as it sold truckload as well. not as much as VII or X. I personally didn't like IX but X and VI are my personal fav.

Shadow Hearts 2 covenant is another game I love. I hope one day someone can make remake, I would be delighted

Relientk7724d ago

Final Fantasy VIII is great and you are always the first to defend it in the comments

40°

Star Wars: Bounty Hunter Let Jango Fett Loose

LucasArts gave Jango Fett his own game in 2002, and it pulled Star Wars into a much dirtier, rougher, and more interesting corner of the galaxy.

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
Relientk7729d ago

I remember playing this back in the day on PS2. What a sick game!

270°

We Are Xbox

Dear team,

Xbox has always been different.

We started with a simple idea. Games should bring people together through shared experiences. That led to the first Xbox in 2001, Xbox Live in 2002, and new ways to connect, from friends lists and achievements to parties and play across devices. Today, Xbox reaches over 500 million players around the world, with some of the most important franchises in entertainment.

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
30d ago Replies(15)
Outside_ofthe_Box30d ago (Edited 30d ago )

If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it. They would be turning down immediate money for something that will potentially workout in the long term.

Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box. A lot of their base has moved to PC or jumped to PS. So will be a long road to get back on track.

We have been saying this from day one exclusives are a must if you are going to be selling hardware look at Nintendo and Sony before Jim Ryan. That's the proven formula. You had some that were deluded and blinded by loyalty accepting that multiplat was the future and that MS was merely getting ahead of where the industry was headed, but at least they can finally see the light and agree with what everyone has been saying for a decade+

pwnmaster300030d ago

True, blame it on the rabid fanboys. MS can do no wrong and spinner this multiplatform move. While the actual fans moved on.

I feel like with the new Xbox coming they are hoping to bring back those old fans and then if it goes well. Bring back exclusives.

If the new console is performing like series x and one. Naw they staying multiplatform.

darthv7229d ago

Actual fans dont move on... they can add to their hobby while waiting for the next new release. If you believe what you typed then I guess PS fans moved on too.... you know, since its been a Sahara for 1st party games this gen.

S2Killinit29d ago

The fans didn’t tell them to go multilat. MS was forced to after the 82 billion they spent to destroy gaming. Then, while xbox fans cheered, MS realized they can’t justify the price tag by selling through xbox only, so they went multiplat and in the process began to downplay console gaming.

30d ago Replies(4)
CrashMania30d ago

I think it's too late, xbox sales were diving even before ABK, they got even worse since then even long before the full multiplatform push. I'd be surprised if they even went back to timed exclusivity at this point, Helix is basically a PC and is going to be expensive, they already struggle to sell cheaper xbox consoles, it will be low volume and they'll have a very small 'console' base to sell to, which has already been conditioned to just play via gamepass anyway.

S2Killinit29d ago

They will do what they always do, they will promise the world at the beginning of next GEN and then failed to deliver all generation long. But there will always be some gamers who will buy into their promises.

ocelot0729d ago

Absolutely agree, Do people genuinely believe Microsoft are now going to go. Hang on how's about we go back to 2020. Then GP was stagnating, Games sold where awful because of GP. Outsold by Playstation by a landslide.

They have sold 5m of Forza I believe on PS5. Spite it being a old game. I think Starfield is going to sell well in the end. Halo is deffinetly going to sell well as is Fable and Forza Horizon 6.

I think at best (for Xbox fans). Single player titles like Clockwork will have a timed exclusivity. Multiplayer centric games like Forza, E Day will release day and date on all platforms.

Or all games will release on all platforms day and date. But maybe Xbox and Windows Store copies will have exclusive bonuses. Or may even get timed exclusive dlc like Fallout and Elder Scrolls and COD use to do.

I think they will treat Xbox players like the premium customers or at least act the way. But will serve just the Playstation and Switch 2 customers as well.

Neonridr29d ago

I don't see them removing PC from the equation. Considering MS has a heavy enough investment in the PC market, it would be foolish to abandon them. I could see them taking away games from PlayStation or ensuring they are timed exclusives at the very least. Say what you will but if Call of Duty ends up becoming a timed exclusive to Xbox machines, that would hurt PlayStation, don't pretend like those games don't sell millions.

Outside_ofthe_Box29d ago

They would lose out on a lot of CoD sales tho. Doesn't PS make up most of the sales?

Neonridr29d ago

@Outside - possibly, but it might push people to want Xbox hardware so they can play with their buddies day one.

Who knows.

S2Killinit29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

it would but remember doing that can splinter the COD fan base and in the process damage the call of duty brand which is probably the only franchise in that $82 billion purchase that in anyway gets even close to delivering what Microsoft thought they bought. If Microsoft fudges around too much with the COD franchise, you might even see a competitor franchise show up on the scene and that would be a catastrophe after the huge debt that Microsoft put itself into with the ABK purchase.

But Its almost guaranteed that Microsoft will want to do something drastic at the beginning of the next generation as they always do. We will see.

Pyrofire9529d ago

Their lifeline of solely the Xbox consoles is dry. Good-Great games on a 1st party scale can't be made at a loss so willingly - sent to the Xbox to only sell limited copies.
They invested billions scooping up studios and need to start making returns.
Sucks that nearly every company is publicly traded and have to be so shareholder biased but that's how it is.
Their words are strong but it'll take time to see what their actions accomplish. Lowering the cost of Game Pass and taking CoD off of it was a good clear start.

darthv7229d ago

More like, allot of their base just played game pass. So now they need to encourage them to start buying again.

S2Killinit29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

A lot of their base left for greener (bluer?) pastures.

--Onilink--29d ago

What exactly is the long term goal with exclusives though?

Because for the most part, the hardware side of things has never been the most profitable, even sometimes being subsidized for a period before breaking even. And that’s before the hardware component nightmare we currently live in.

The whole point of exclusives was to get more people to buy your console in order to have a bigger install base, which meant even bigger software sales.

But if their ports to PS5 are selling (for the most part it seems) quite well, then other than negating the cut Sony takes there, unless you are REALLY increasing your software sales on your own console, it probably doesn’t make that much of a difference?

Honestly I don’t even understand Sony’s decision to scale back on it for PC unless they weren’t even recouping the port expenses. They released ports when the hardware sales never really dropped, and now that all consoles will undoubtedly take a noticeable drop in sales due to the ridiculous prices, that’s when they decide they don’t want to sell to a larger install base to more easily recoup dev costs… it’s just weird

Outside_ofthe_Box29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

I agree. I mean once they went multiplat, in theory there should be no going back especially when you have games that have sold really well on other platforms.

Microsoft are the ones that announced that they are reevaluating. So I'm just guessing on what their end goal is. Right now Xbox as a hardware is not a must buy for anyone but fans of the brand because their games can be played elsewhere. Going exclusive would solve this, but you lose out on a ton of money instantly which has always been what the company does not want to do so not really sure what their "reevaluating exclusives" means unless they are pulling a Phil Spencer and are just saying what people want to hear and will continue to do what they are currently doing.

darthv7229d ago

Their ports to PS5 are selling because Sony's output has been so dry... the fans are thirsty, and MS is the oasis.

SIdepocket29d ago

Unfortunately, the studios they buy wither under their leadership.

mcstorm29d ago

Microsoft still has a name with Xbox the issue is the casual games are not looking at the console because its not the same console their friends have. Look at that poll on how many users upgraded from xbox 365 to one and then the X. Part of Microsoft's downfall was thinking that the Wii was the market they had to be in when really it was the core market. If you get the core gamers you then get the market to. As I posted a few minuets ago on another post Microsoft putting exclusives on PS this gen could bold well if they hit next gen with all our games are staying exclusive from this new gen. They will then get gamers wanting Halo, Forza Gears but this is also where Microsoft fell over with the xbox one and X in terms of they did not have may quality 1st party games affter they fell into the Gears, Forza and Halo cycle. If they can get some old IPs back to bring back the old core gamers as well as fresh ips to bring in new gamers things could improve next gen. But as I said in my last post its all if buts and maybes at the moment. No one knows if the next home consoles will be to expensive that people move to pc as we are now seeing or look at the stem deck as a cheepier alternitive.

DarXyde29d ago

"Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box."

That's very optimistic. It's not the only issue, far from it. There is a serious rupture between Microsoft generally and the public caused by their weird Game Pass price fluctuations, taking down physical game space in stores, and being the first to go nuts on hardware price hikes that they themselves played a big part in.

They're also charging beyond a premium for Helix which is just vile at a time when the economy is in shambles.

The company itself is really not doing itself any favors with the approach they're taking Windows. Even France is looking to ditch Windows in favor of Linux.

But the most offensive thing is this AI push. They're doubling, tripling, and quadrupling down on the very technology they're using to replace a considerable proportion of their workforce... And the slap in the face is how they bake copilot into everything when nobody likes it—they couldn't even make Bing stick, so why on earth are they trying so hard? You know it's bad when people would rather use ChatGPT than Copilot which is killing their OS. But aside from their snatching up of farmland to build data centers (and reduce the agriculture capacity of whichever country allows them to build them), they made an AI-generated gamer gurl that loves AI the head of Xbox.

Even if we grant them the full benefit of the doubt, it hardly matters what Xbox wants to do if Nadella says no, and that includes exclusive games. Microsoft's relationship with Xbox is the opposite of Sony's relationship with PlayStation—Microsoft pulls the reins of Xbox, but Sony damn near went under for the PS3.

Tanktopmaster9229d ago (Edited 29d ago )

“If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it.”

Great strategy, especially after Forza selling 5 million on PlayStation and sea of thieves selling at least another million (2 million) for example. In March 2026, Xbox consoles sales ratio vs PS was 10:1.

In addition to that, with Gamepass, which unequivocally cuts out chunks of sales (Cannibalizing revenue from 1st month sales especially).

I’m sure going exclusive again after releasing everything on Ps5 is going to work out great for business.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 29d ago
maximusprime_30d ago

Despite all of that, it's clear that Microsoft's Xbox division is broken beyond repair.

29d ago
BeHunted29d ago

PlayStation is currently draining money on flop after flop. It's Sony that needs to re-evaluate their strategy

29d ago
CrashMania29d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Wonder how much money was lost on perfect dark, hellbalde 2, 300 million lost revenue
by putting cod on gamepass. The recent Jason schrier news that Xbox has cancelled dozens of projects, spent 70 billion just to see Xbox sales further collapse and gamepass see little growth.

The fact is this has been PlayStation's most profitable generation and they are making loads of money and selling plenty of consoles and games. While MS won't give you any sales figures or profit numbers for Xbox, says it all really.

S2Killinit29d ago

Sony PlayStation has deservedly dominated xbox. Facts

Tanktopmaster9229d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Ok tween.

Xbox series SX got outsold 10:1 last month. lol.

28d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 28d ago
shadowT30d ago

"Our presence on PC isn’t strong enough."

Fishy Fingers29d ago

It isnt. But I dont think they mean in 'games', rather, footprint.

They own the OS but as far as gaming is concerned, Steam dominate. I imagine the VAST majority of people who use the Xbox app/launcher are PC gamepass subs. No ones buying their 3rd party PC games through Xbox PC.

badz14929d ago

and many gamers prefer SteamOS for gaming over Windows too. If only Valve would be more uncompromising to the anti-cheat makers that locked out non-windows players, more pc gamers would have moved onto SteamOS by now and not looking back to Windows. overall, Win11 is a terrible, bloated, unoptimized OS which is not what many people want

ocelot0729d ago

Agreed and I think that's where they are going to focus on more. I think cheaper games on Windows/Xbox store (MS IP) compared to Steam and Epic and maybe even compared to PSN store as well.

Show all comments (107)