All Channels
Popular
180°

Assassin's Creed is Dead

This is Rebel's Gaming post by Kirk Deis on why Assassin's Creed is DEAD.

Read Full Story >>
rebelgaming.com
Jackhass4651d ago

They're worn out this franchise quick.

ExposingLames4650d ago

Half assing the game and having major bugs and glitches really turned the series into crap. Especially the MP. After AC3 I swore I would never buy another one and will keep to that. Just don't know if that games quality speaks to all Ubisoft titles.

nick3094651d ago

Yet it sells millions. Why? Pretty much alive and well. Though not the same, still sells great.

Sovereign594650d ago

Unless I stop having hours of fun doing stupid little things like dropping dead guards off of rooftops to cause panic below, Assassin's Creed will never be dead, not to me at least.

starchild4650d ago

Yep, there is so much to do in every game and to me it's a lot of fun. I love the traversal gameplay, the combat, all the various side missions, the historical settings and characters, and the overall storytelling.

They are simply fantastic games in my opinion. But like any successful thing, there is a certain percentage of people who have to be contrarians and start hating on that thing.

BISHOP-BRASIL4650d ago

Specially in AC3, there were a ton of fun stuff to do, some stuff like that assynchronous online beacon hunt by the end and the boat combat actually let me wanting more!

If wasn't for the bugs (and I won't make excuses for it there, they were plenty) it would easily be my best game from 2012. So I think it's as far away from dead as it could be.

It doesn't mean I'm all pumped for AC4, thought... Arguably it's a little too soon (and other great games I have priority will release around the same time), so maybe I'll hold by purchase 'till early next year (by then I'll either already have a PS4 or will be getting one, depending on the price they announce here), but getting it none the less.

GameSpawn4650d ago (Edited 4650d ago )

I wouldn't ever go to the extreme and say the series is dead. The series is suffering from the "Call of Duty" effect though. The series is pumping out games almost yearly and being "subjectively" watered down.

It hard to deny how much Assassin's Creed has changed from AC1 and AC2. I really think the series plateaued around Revelations and Brotherhood. AC3 did bring a lot of new things to the table but it lost the heart and soul the earlier games had in terms of how objectives could be accomplished.

My problem with AC3, glitches aside, existed in the STRICT linearity of the missions and their objectives. You were forced to complete MANY of the missions in a very exacting and specific way, especially when you were attempting a perfect run getting the bonus objectives. In earlier AC games you were simply told to take out an assassination target and, rarely, in addition take them out either without alerting anyone or with a specific weapon like the hidden blade (didn't mean you couldn't dive attack with it or casually stroll by and "poke" them). This exacting form of gameplay meant you were no longer allowed to explore multiple avenues to the same goal. This all to me killed a lot of the "fun factor" previous titles had.

Another minor problem with AC3 was the changes to the notoriety system. They made it far too complex and at times it made running away very difficult. They have noted that AC4 has a more simplified rule-set for notoriety and detection to overcome some of the pitfalls of AC3's system. I don't expect it to be near as simple as AC1, but more like Brotherhood and Revelations (hopefully).

In short, my bullet list of the pros (++/+) and cons (-/--) of AC3's changes/additions are:
++ Ship battles
+ Hunting/Crafting/Trading
+ Weather/Season/Time changes
+ New Assassination/Kill Combos
- Notoriety/Detection System
- Obscure mini-games
- Lack of "parkour" friendly architecture (I realize this is due to the choice of time period/setting)
-- (Forced) Mission Linearity

Does all this mean AC3 is an atrocious game? No, many of the new elements make up for some of AC3's less desirable features. If you're a completionist the forced linearity caused by the optional objectives might get on your nerves in a few missions, but nothing too game breaking.

Kirkusm4650d ago

That's exactly what I'm saying. "It's not the same." It'll always sell but the franchise has become like a record. The more it's played the less the quality can be heard.

medman4651d ago

Of course it's dead. Funny thing though, why does the dead thing sell millions of copy?

Bzone244651d ago

People love the dead. Walking Dead is a perfect example of this.

theWB274651d ago

Each game gets a 2-3 year dev cycle and the storylines are better than 90% of games released. I'm biased though, it's by far my favorite franchise.

CultOfPersonality4650d ago

Same here, AC is my favourite franchise!, but the MP has never Interested me, but ac4 is looking like the best AC since 2 IMO

starchild4650d ago

I agree with you. If the development cycles were only 1 year long the games would suffer and likely be crap. But they give the games the care and attention they deserve and as long as they continue to be good, I will continue to buy them.

I love the historic settings, characters and story lines in these games. And I love the variety of gameplay in each game. Most games don't have nearly the variety that the Assassin's Creed games do. Assassin's Creed 4 looks like it will be the best of all.

hankmoody4651d ago

Having trouble finding the urge to play through AC3. I will admit though that the multiplayer is still a hell of a lot of fun. And also, AC4 looks more and more interesting. Releasing one of these things every year is just too much AC in general if you ask me. The series felt special at first but now it just feels like overkill.

ZBlacktt4650d ago

AC3 is absolutely nothing like AC4. Please keep that in mind.

kneon4650d ago

I found getting through AC3 to be a slog. I just didn't care about the story or characters so I ignored nearly all optional missions just to get through it.

Show all comments (29)
50°

Ex-Assassin's Creed Boss Sues Ubisoft Over Alleged Forced Firing

In 2025 Marc-Alexis Côté, the head of the Assassin’s Creed franchise and a 20 year veteran of Ubisoft, abruptly left the publisher following the launch of Assassin’s Creed Shadows.

200°

The canceled Assassin's Creed Civil War game was a powder keg waiting to explode

Ubisoft was reportedly working on a game set after the Civil War era, but canceled it due to politics and Assassins Creed Shadows backlash.

lukasmain231d ago

"Ubisoft was uncomfortable with the backlash surrounding Assassin's Creed Shadows' Black samurai protagonist and concerned that the current political climate in America was too fraught."

They are so stupid. There was never a racist backlash to a black protagonist in Assassin's Creed, there was just a backlash because you wanted to have a 7foot black Samurai running around in ancient Japan when you should have had a Japanese local. (I haven't played the game yet, but I plan on it after I finish Ghost Of Yotei)

An Assassin's Creed based just after the American Civil War about a former slave being an Assassin and fight the KKK would have been freakin' EPIC. Something different story-wise in the Assassin's Creed universe. It would have been awesome. When I originaly read this rumor, I felt a bit of a gut punch because that is a game I would have loved to have played. Then I rolled my eyes when I read about Ubisoft's concerns. What a joke.

Were you worried of the fact that the early members of the KKK (after the Civil War) were predominantly Southern Democrats? Is that it? Im joking. But having a Black protagonist, WHERE IT MAKES SENSE, like after the Civl War, is no problem whatsoever. It's a slice from another time that I can't remember playing a game like that before. A former Black slave?. The game could have been really cool. I'm bummed they won't be making this one.

Redemption-64230d ago ShowReplies(9)
Krablante230d ago

There is nothing “EPIC” about assassins creed dude…

lukasmain230d ago

Well THIS idea for a game could have been. I mean I take your point. I've always been a sucker for Platinuming Assassin Creed games. I do them all, but NONE of them have ever been my GOTY. They're more like a guilty pleasure, similar to the Far Cry games

_Decadent_Descent230d ago

"But having a Black protagonist, WHERE IT MAKES SENSE"

You are aware that Yasuke was a real African samurai in Japan, no? How is a telling of his story (albeit a fantastical one) not "where it makes sense"?

FinalFantasyFanatic230d ago

I honestly think the concept of this game really could have worked, having said that, I don't trust Ubisoft to actually execute it in a satisfying way.

senorfartcushion230d ago

There was a backlash.

Americans are very vocal online and now there are police forces hunting foreign-looking people in the streets to deport them - even if they are actual Americans.

Companies are worried about selling “wokeness” to this population of 350+ million.

Then there are countries that are starting to move away from wokeness, to a more racially exclusive “whites only” traditional, like Poland, The UK and The Netherlands.

That’s a lot of sales, and though nations are becoming racist, it’s clear that big corporations only care about money and will sell what they think those countries will accept.

chrisx230d ago

Saying there was never a racist backlash just shows how ignorant you are.

lukasmain229d ago (Edited 229d ago )

It wasn't a racist backlash. Maybe a few poeple, but the overwhleming majority was not a racist backlash. You thinking there was just shows how ridiculous you are and how warped your mind is.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 229d ago
thorstein231d ago

Running around and killing the KKK and former confederates has been done to great effect in Red Dead Redemption 2.

It would be fun to play that with historical accuracy while debunking the lost cause mythos.

Such a wonderfully ripe opportunity. What a shame.

wesnytsfs230d ago

It was a blast in Mafia 3 taking out those racist F#cks.

cbuc1125230d ago

I approve this message!👍

isarai231d ago (Edited 231d ago )

We've had black protagonists before in ac and it wasn't a problem, Bayek, Adéwalé, Aveline, the assassin has always represented the setting they're in, that's why there was so much backlash for shadows, people have been waiting since the first game! for Japan to be represented by some awesome japanese samurai or ninja, and instead we get an african samurai? With the tease for this game starting with the ending of the very first game, and people begging for it for so long, success was handed to them on a silver platter and they decided to pick this one of all the entries to change the formula, it was a dumb move.

Was there a bunch of racist buttholes shouting? absolutely, but a lot of fans complaining were just disappointed to see them finally take on japan only for the protagonist to not even remotely following the same type of lead as LITERALLY EVERY OTHER AC GAME EVER RELEASED!

Couldn't care less about him being black, i always liked yasuke as a mysterious historic figure, and i love him in other media like the anime(underrated soundtrack btw), Samurai Warriors, nioh, etc, but this was a waste of the character imo.

This just screams tone deaf, just like their entire marketing campaign for this game. Whatever! 🤷‍♂️ I got Ghost of Tsushima/yotei now to fill that void

Inverno230d ago

I'm all for people expressing their views and I will defend everyone's right to do so. But I firmly believe that society needs to progress and be more accepting/tolerant and not be so obsessed with how others live their life's because that truth is it isn't affecting your personal life in a negative way, you just think it is. With that said, just as it was necessary to push back on all the annoying sjw stuff we can't forget to push back on all the ignorance coming from the opposite extreme. F*** the KKK and that nazi ish, I say make the game and let it offend em!

-Foxtrot230d ago

Wouldn’t this have made more sense story and setting wise than having a black slave turned Samurai in ancient Japan.

I’d rather have seen this story played out.

-Foxtrot230d ago

But if you had to choose, this idea should have been first

Notellin230d ago

Because we aren't getting both now and that's what is being discussed. Are you able to read and comprehend the words?

ravens52230d ago

Can you read Notellin? "I’d rather have seen this story played out." I asked Foxtrot a question, not you, don't look silly.

FinalFantasyFanatic230d ago

They should have just done this game instead of AC Japan, it would have been receieved much better.

ravens52230d ago

They should've just done both and not change their artistic ideas for losers that talk about Yasuke being in the game more than actual Japanese people. This wasnt the only piece of media he's been in

Show all comments (45)
60°

More Assassin’s Creed Content Is Coming To Reverse: 1999

More Assassin’s Creed content has been revealed for Reverse 1999.