270°

Does Ryse deserve the hate?

It's difficult to think of a recent E3 reveal that went more poorly than XboxOne launch title Ryse. This wasn't like us laughing at the technical follies of Wonderbook or cringing at the awkwardness of Wii Music. This wasn't just incompetence. Ryse was offensive, a manifestation of everything we'd been dreading to see happen in mainstream gaming. It had huge, dumb set pieces, and a huge, dumb protagonist, but worst of all, it had a combat system that relied so heavily on quick time events that some described it as Simon Says in a different skin.

Read Full Story >>
destructoid.com
us_army4563d ago

Played the Game at the GameStop EXPO and was sadly disappointed. This was one of my top X1 games, and something about it just bothered me. It by no means looked up to par with the E3 demo, let alone didnt really look visually stunning at all. Not to mention the controls felt clunky and slow.
Forza is now the top X1 exclusive in my eyes

JhawkFootball064563d ago

In no way. It's one of the better looking and most promising games for the Xbox One. With all that's going on in the campaign footage we've seen so far and the gameplay footage of the Gladiator mode, I am so hyped to get my hands on this game.

abzdine4563d ago

the game feels like a first xbox game. nothing next gen or even current gen in the animation and the gameplay.
when i remember one of the MS execs was saying Ryse is the most impressive thing he's never seen it makes me laugh. bunch of liars once again..

christocolus4563d ago

it was always going to be among my first purchase but now i may have to wait and see reviews first.....deadrising3 is still coming in though....and kinect sports rivals nxt yr

Anon19744563d ago (Edited 4563d ago )

I appreciated this article and thought it provided a fair analysis. I liked the way it broke down the combat in the excellent batman games and offered a comparison.

My problems with Ryse still look that they haven't been ironed out, and that's the clunky animations that others are pointing out. While the game looks stunning, there's something about the way the characters move, and then snap from animation to animation.

There's no fluidity to it like you see in the batman games. It's just an unnatural snap between running to swinging a sword to swinging your shield. Unless it's in one of those quick time, slowed down moments, there's no sense of momentum to anything your character does and it's just awful. I would never pay for this in it's current form, and the fact that they're making huge changes to the way it plays a handful of months before release simply doesn't bode well.

Gozer4563d ago

Ryse is easily the best looking next-gen game so far for either console. You sony fanboys are trying too hard and it makes you look like a stupid liar. Ill have this looker for my X1.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4563d ago
u got owned4563d ago (Edited 4563d ago )

It's been hated like many other exclusives on other platforms. The truth is I will hold judgment until the final game is released. The latest SP video they showed looks great while the MP looks subpar. But i hear the MP its been made by another studio (Ruffian games) so that explain the disparity between the MP and SP.

deep_fried_bum_cake4563d ago

That's the way to go about it. You can't fully judge anything until you see the final product. Just because it looks terrible just now doesn't mean it will upon release.

FanboyKillerwitFacts4563d ago

Agree.

Coolest idea ever - but very bad implementation. The gamecombat looks just bad. -Awful animations, bad hit responding, "press A to kill - QTEs", stupid AI.

It tries to be a game it isn't.

Crytek should stop making games and stick to their engine.

4563d ago Replies(1)
3-4-54563d ago

It looks great. The visuals that is.

It seems like the action though is a weird hybrid version of Assassins Creed & Batman Arkham City.

It doesn't look like Next Gen fighting though. It still doesn't seem that real.

It's missing something.

joe904563d ago (Edited 4563d ago )

Its not been hated by Xbox fans, you know? the people who are going to be buying it.

Its the Piss Stinking Sony Peasants that are scared of it and how good it looks.

T24563d ago

Actually its been getting lukewarm reviews all over so far , by game reviewers , all Sony fans I guess huh ? Conspiracy !!!!!!!
/s

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4563d ago
NYC_Gamer4563d ago

I believe the game fully deserves the criticism based on the demo footage with the mediocre hack&slash gameplay

Minato-Namikaze4563d ago

People dont give driveclub that leeway so Ryse shouldnt get it either,

Ripsta7th4563d ago (Edited 4563d ago )

@Minato- i dont know what your talking about, all they have been doing is prasing driveclub, if anything there is only like a few that decide to critize it but mostly everyone is praising because you knowits a ps4 game. Lol even knack is getting praised even though it looks really boring

TongkatAli4563d ago (Edited 4563d ago )

Knack looks the opposite of boring. One of the creators of Crash Bandicoot is making that game.

I don't think Ryze looks at all bad.

ThatEnglishDude4563d ago (Edited 4563d ago )

Right, and a demo is supposed to demonstrate a game. If that demonstration is disappointing, then they've failed.

If the game is subject to undergo many changes and a possible overhaul, then perhaps you shouldn't 'demo' the game in the first place. The game already looks far different from what we saw at E3, suggesting that it wasn't quite ready to be shown - which by extension gives the impression that Crytek have no idea what they're doing. I want EVERY game to be good, but there's just no sign of originality or creativity with 'Ryse'.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4563d ago
Kayant4563d ago (Edited 4563d ago )

MP yes but I would not say hate more worry because it seems to be very rough atm. Single Player looks awesome though. The main problem with the game is the over emphasis on executions and combat system in general.

pyramidshead4563d ago

They should just stop showcasing the multiplayer and focus on marketing the single player. Especially if they look as drastically different as they do.

theWB274563d ago

Single player is looking very good.

The multiplayer isn't hitting that same level. It's a little strange that Crytek chose Ruffian games, developers of the disappointing Crackdown 2, to do MP separately.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum...

Single player should be EPIC!

Show all comments (85)
40°

Our Story – Episode 2 – Crysis 2 to Ryse: Son of Rome

Crytek : In episode two of Our Story, the team discusses the evolution of Crysis into Crysis 2 and 3 (and the pressures that came with it), how a local connection landed an incredible collaboration with legendary composer Hans Zimmer, and the New York trip that inspired much of Crysis 2. For the gladiators among you, you’ll also get an exclusive behind-the-scenes look at the development of Ryse: Son of Rome and the attention to detail that went into it.

110°

15 Best Ancient Rome Games of All Time

From underrated Xbox One launch titles to absolute emperors of the strategy genre, history heads will love these games based around Ancient Rome.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Leeroyw1045d ago (Edited 1045d ago )

There's fifteen ancient Rome games?

LG_Fox_Brazil1045d ago

Shadow of Rome was so freaking good

Sashamaz1045d ago

I'm still waiting for the sequel.

HyperMoused1044d ago

Ryse was awesome, i have no idea why it wasnt recieved well and why we havnt seen another, Rome conquered so much, you could take the action anywhere, and it looked great when xbox one came out, now would be even better.

200°

Ryse: Son of Rome Deserves a Second Shot

Ryse: Son of Rome was an Xbox One launch title that has been left to collect dust, but Crytek should set aside Crysis and give Ryse another shot.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
AngainorG7X1300d ago

It was a great game, it had issues but it can only go up from here.

crazyCoconuts1300d ago

It was just ok. Looked really good for an Xbox game though

Snookies121299d ago

"for an Xbox game"

Way to subtly throw shade there. It looked amazing compared to any game at the time it was released.

Never played it myself though, wasn't really interested in it personally. Plus it came at a time when I didn't own an Xbox console. But it was at least different than the usual copy/paste games we get. So I hope it gets another chance sometime soon.

Crows901299d ago

It was a crytek game though

1nsomniac1299d ago (Edited 1299d ago )

It was a stunning game on all basis. One of the standout games for Xbox as a whole. I ended up buying on pc as well… and yes nothing looked better than it in PC at the time either. Nothing just ok about it, definitely needs a sequel.

fr0sty1299d ago

@snookies12, don't pretend like the Xbox One didn't struggle with being gimpled by its tiny pool of ESRAM as a frame buffer. It was significantly weaker than the PS4.

crazyCoconuts1299d ago

Metacritic 60, user score 6.4. I'm not alone in putting it into the "ok" category...

VenomCarnage891299d ago

@snookies
Haven't played it but at least you know enough to defend Xbox over it. The game did look good, for an Xbox game. That's not some "subtle shade," it's full on reality.
I remember it being nearly the only graphically decent game on the Xbone for like the first two years after launch, and graphics were that games strength

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1299d ago
CrimsonWing691299d ago

I really enjoyed it. Bought it at launch even.

ManMarmalade1299d ago (Edited 1299d ago )

The qte's were disappointing though. God of war was doing it back in the ps2 days. As gorgeous as the game was, the gameplay needed to be updated.

annoyedgamer1300d ago

I really liked the original Ryse but Crytek doesn't have the funds. The mismanaged their properties and let EA raid them with Crysis for the duration of their relationship. Right now they are working on Crysis 4, I doubt they can spare resources to work on a Ryse sequel.

gamer78041299d ago

It would have to be funded by MS, I really liked Ryse sure it got repetitive but the setting visuals and story were good

moriarty18891299d ago

MS should have funded a sequel to Ryse and Sunset OD. Two good franchises they definitely needed last gen.

annoyedgamer1299d ago

MS is too busy trying to become the next EA, Ryse wont be on their list of titles to finance unless it gets a hipster makeover with lootboxes.

darthv721300d ago (Edited 1300d ago )

I recently bought it for the steamdeck and have to say... 60fps is a game changer. I really wished MS had gotten a one x patch or series boost mode option but sadly, nope. Other games that definitely deserve a second chance (esp on steamdeck/pc) are quantum break and sunset overdrive. Both deserved 60fps support on one x / series but you have to go to PC for that.

Rumor has it Crytek had plans for a Ryse 2 but due to the low turnout for XB (at the time) it was shelved. They really should give this another shot. i dont care if its multiplat on PS and XB and PC and Switch... just so long as part 2 gets made.

babadivad1299d ago

The game is automatically boosted on Series X

darthv721299d ago

sorry... but it's not. It still runs at the same fps the XBO did.

lelo2play1299d ago

Game was good enough, not great.
Graphically it was top notch. Still holds well till this day.

Crows901299d ago

It only needed more enemy variety and few more movesets or weapons to use. That would have made the experience tons better.

MadLad1299d ago

It was a good game.
Only time I saw quick time events actually make me feel engaged.

Show all comments (39)