All Channels
Popular
360°

Microsoft's Xbox One Is Too Expensive

Microsoft probably thought it had this generation in the bag when it announced its pricing and release strategy in kicking off the annual E3 gaming powwow back in June. It couldn't have imagined that Sony would turn heads a day later by unveiling a lower price for its PS4 and taking shots at the Xbox One's restrictive ways.

ZodTheRipper4637d ago

It would have been competitive at this price if it had at least superior hardware ...or does Microsoft really think people are excited about using Kinect?

pedrof934637d ago (Edited 4637d ago )

"Microsoft really think people are excited about using Kinect?"

They try to make it sound.

ZHZ904637d ago

Xbox One is Kinect and I don't know what is awesome about it.

jimbobwahey4637d ago

I agree with zod18, the price point would be fine if it was justified, but right now Microsoft expects people to pay $100 extra for inferior hardware, which is absurd.

If I pay more, I expect the product to be better than the competition, not worse. Even if the Xbox One was the same price as the PS4 it would feel like a ripoff. It should be $50-$75 cheaper.

MariaHelFutura4637d ago

The Xbox One is like the PS4 just not as good and more expensive. Period. If you like it, that's great. But that doesn't change the facts, the PS4 has better specs and is generally giving you more for less. If you feel that's incorrect, enlighten me.

TheBurger294637d ago

their best kinect game is laggy

thehitman4637d ago

@Jim

Actually I think they couldve sold the xb1 for 350 considering they market the Kinect at 150 at retail when it launched. I am sure they are going to market the Kinect 2.0 later down the road for 150. MS basically put a $150 premium on their console most likely thinking Sony wouldnt go anywhere under 500 and they could try to beat them out head to head. Not only were MS wrong but I am sure they are yelling at each other like whos fucking idea was this and trying to wish for the best.

strifeblade4637d ago (Edited 4637d ago )

oh yeah screw kinect using a ps4 touchpad is much better.

YNWA964637d ago

Is a Toyota Corolla too expensive, compared to Honda Civic? Its how people see it, so no answer. Also Maria, you were down to 2 bubbles a few days ago. N4G, whats at work here?

MariaHelFutura4637d ago

There is how you see it, then there is facts. You see it how you see it, I see it how I see it but these are the facts about these consoles.

Specs: PS4
Multiplats:PS4
Restrictions: PS4
http://n4g.com/news/1338295...
F2P: PS4
Price: PS4
Exclusive Devs: PS4
TV: Both (PS4 does not require your cable box)
http://www.extremetech.com/...
Camera w/ Voice Recognition: Both
Preorders: PS4
Polls: PS4
Recording Time: PS4
Friendlist: PS4
Countries Available: PS4
Headset Options: PS4
Controller: PS4 (doesn't require AA's or accessories)
Indie Support: PS4
Consistency: PS4
http://www.forbes.com/sites...
Previous Console Support: PS4
http://forums.digitalwarfar...

No_Limit4637d ago Show
kreate4636d ago

@ynwa

She has a fan following on n4g. Many ppl enjoy reading her comments.

Except for some fanboys....

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 4636d ago
ala_7674637d ago

Its not too expensive. Its just expensive

slimeybrainboy4637d ago

For me I was expecting and budgeting £350 (I know that sounds like PS fanboy but I got spreadsheets from 2012 to prove it aha) £400 I could live with, and £300 would be amazing.

The Xbox One is £430 so it's expensive but not too expensive. £450 + is getting in the too expensive range. FIFA 14 sweetens the deal abit but if its a digital copy that's not as good. Overall I agree it's definitely expensive but it's just about not too expensive.

ZodTheRipper4637d ago

Yeah it's expensive while the PS4 isn't considering it's better hardware ...so it should bring some arguments to justify that price - and that's pretty much where Microsoft fails right now.

DonnieDarko4636d ago

But then the 360 is supposedly less powerful than the ps3 yet every time I turn my ps3 on it feels so last gen in terms of the xmb. I turn on the 360 it has had an ever evolving interface that just feels so contemporary. I personally feel that no matter what edge the ps4 hardware will have over the one I think the software on the one will trump the ps4 and the ui will be much better hence giving the one a much better feel to it than the ps4

ATi_Elite4637d ago

4K Monitors are expensive, Gasoline is expensive, Organic Food is expensive but XB1 is priced just right!

I'm sure $50 discount will come VERY SOON after Christmas when supply catches up with demand.

ZodTheRipper4637d ago

How is it priced right when the competition has something better while charging less?

nightsurge4637d ago

@zod18, I didn't realize the PS4 came with the PS4 Eye camera? Oh that's right, it doesn't. Xbox One with Kinect is more than justified for the higher price tag.

Whether or not you want the Kinect is a different discussion all together. I just don't get why people on here keep ignoring the fact that for the price of $500 vs $400, the Xbox One includes a more advanced camera peripheral in the price.

Since the internet loves to be spec whores, you should know that the Kinect specs blow the PS4 camera out of the water. In fact, they made it so advanced that it does all of the processing of it's data by itself. No hit for games that want to use Kinect on Xbox One. That and it's 1080p, extremely advanced, tracks up to 6 players, etc.

So it would seem that I am getting something better for my extra money with the Xbox One. I am getting both consoles though. Not a fanboy, here. Just trying to correct some obvious flaws of internet logic.

LordDhampire4637d ago

Its microsoft, you should throw your money at them

BeatDizzle4637d ago

Can't tell if comment is serious or sarcasm?

Eonjay4637d ago

Unless you absolutely have to have a camera interface or a media center device, there is no reason to spend an extra $100 on weaker hardware. Its doesn't make responsible consumer sense.

Responsible consumers don't spend money for something the really don't want or need. If you are a fanboy than go ahead and feel free to support whoever you want but at large most consumers are going to do what makes sense.

Mr1Y4637d ago

Depends on what you plan to use that hardware for ... Some people may buy it for an entertainment device or "Game console/ exclusives " For Instinace, if the ps4 was 500 , and not as powerful as the Xbox one some people would still pay for it weather it be because of loyalty, Exclusives, Game community etc. you can't decide what another person choses for their console even though you think it may be the wrong decision, in their eyes it isn't and is wonderful. Although I am in no way telling you not to tell them facts about the product good or bad . Just let it be, be happy with your product and they'll be happy with theirs, hopefully xD

n4rc4637d ago (Edited 4637d ago )

exactly.. and if those features are what they want, then they will drop $500 on it.. because THAT makes sense

why is that so hard to comprehend?

n4rc4637d ago

its not inferior hardware... its just... different..

with a different focus.. ps4 should be great at playing games but everything else is up in the air as far as im concerned..

its worth $500 to me... my damn phone is worth $600 and its specs are insignificant to either console.. my laptop too..

ZodTheRipper4637d ago (Edited 4637d ago )

Your laptop & phone do the same things the X1 does without having stuff like Facebook, Twitter or Skype behind the paywall. And I don't think that it does this kind of stuff better than those devices, either.

In the end, you buy it because it's a gaming console, and in that point it's inferior to it's competition in many ways.

IcicleTrepan4637d ago (Edited 4637d ago )

'Your laptop & phone do the same things the X1 does'

stupidest comment I've ever heard in my life. You are either vastly misinformed about both types of products or you are wilfully trolling.

stuna14637d ago

All we know is that Microsoft is excited about using Kinects 2.0
When it comes other people not so much.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4636d ago
NatureOfLogic4637d ago

Xbox 360 failed to sell more than PS3 with a year headstart and a cheaper price. There's no way MS can even compete if they release at around the same time, with PS4 at a cheaper price with better specs and features. A higher price doesn't make sense imo.

My_Outer_Heaven4637d ago (Edited 4637d ago )

I guess that's why your called NatureOfLogic? What your said does sound like common sense.. PS4 will win next gen it's inevitable.

just-joe4637d ago

Let's also point out that Microsoft seems to have cut itself from other markets that aren't in North America. No one in Japan is buying a 360 and Europe has always kind of been comfortable with Sony consoles. I'm sure this will be the case with the Xbox One.

True_Samurai4637d ago

But it took PS over 6 years to catch up

n4rc4637d ago

and took a loss on every one of them...

and offered the best and cheapest bluray player on the market... its sales are not entirely applicable..

Hicken4636d ago

Duh. The 360 didn't just stop selling.

And the PS3 has been profitable since 08-09.

Tell more lies, please.

4637d ago Replies(8)
Foxgod4637d ago

Its worth ever penny, tnx to the games on it.

KDD101014637d ago

EXACTLY. The PS4 has no good games that aren't multiplatform. Gamescom was the reason I cancelled my PS4 pre-order because Sony announced diddly squat worth buying it for.

sic_chops4637d ago

The top Sony studios are still gonna announce... Naughty dog > xbox none

Campy da Camper4637d ago

Hi, I'm Earth. Have we met?

AceofStaves4637d ago

It's all subjective. Just because you don't like PS4's launch line up doesn't mean the games aren't good. They're just not to your taste.

MS has shown me no exclusive games to make me consider buying an XB1, but that doesn't mean those games are bad. They're just not interesting to me.

No_Limit4637d ago (Edited 4637d ago )

Agreed Fox. For gamers that are excited what the inclusion of Kinect 2.0 will bring is definitely well worth it.

Heck, with the facial animation, motion body capture,and dialog inclusion for Project Spark, that in itself is worth it for me. Imagine waht gamers can come up with with all these new ways of making games and share them.

ZodTheRipper4636d ago

Yeah, facial animation, motion body capture and dialog inclusion sound exactly like the features I want the most on my gaming console.

SilentGuard4637d ago

I don't see how MS feels the One is worth $100 more just becuase of Kinect. It's nothing but an accessory that allows for novel ways to interact with the interface and as for developers using them for games; that only appeals to those that like Kinect games to begin with. For those that dislike Kinect including it is a turn off to buying an Xbox One since including it may actually require using it.

IcicleTrepan4637d ago

Do some research into the cost of Time Of Flight sensors and you'll understand.

Show all comments (102)
60°

Final Fantasy X 25th Anniversary Website Launches With New Nomura Artwork and Merchandise

Square Enix launches Final Fantasy X 25th anniversary site, revealing new Nomura art, books, music releases, and merchandise.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
-Foxtrot14d ago

Look I know VIII has its issues and all that but how on earth can the do big anniversary events with new artwork and merchandise for VII, IX and X yet VIII got sweet f*** all.

They could have given it something during its 25th anniversary yet all it got was a single Happy Anniversary post on their social media.

solideagle13d ago

they should know that we are OG fans of VIII as it sold truckload as well. not as much as VII or X. I personally didn't like IX but X and VI are my personal fav.

Shadow Hearts 2 covenant is another game I love. I hope one day someone can make remake, I would be delighted

Relientk7713d ago

Final Fantasy VIII is great and you are always the first to defend it in the comments

40°

Star Wars: Bounty Hunter Let Jango Fett Loose

LucasArts gave Jango Fett his own game in 2002, and it pulled Star Wars into a much dirtier, rougher, and more interesting corner of the galaxy.

Read Full Story >>
swtorstrategies.com
Relientk7718d ago

I remember playing this back in the day on PS2. What a sick game!

270°

We Are Xbox

Dear team,

Xbox has always been different.

We started with a simple idea. Games should bring people together through shared experiences. That led to the first Xbox in 2001, Xbox Live in 2002, and new ways to connect, from friends lists and achievements to parties and play across devices. Today, Xbox reaches over 500 million players around the world, with some of the most important franchises in entertainment.

Read Full Story >>
news.xbox.com
19d ago Replies(15)
Outside_ofthe_Box19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it. They would be turning down immediate money for something that will potentially workout in the long term.

Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box. A lot of their base has moved to PC or jumped to PS. So will be a long road to get back on track.

We have been saying this from day one exclusives are a must if you are going to be selling hardware look at Nintendo and Sony before Jim Ryan. That's the proven formula. You had some that were deluded and blinded by loyalty accepting that multiplat was the future and that MS was merely getting ahead of where the industry was headed, but at least they can finally see the light and agree with what everyone has been saying for a decade+

pwnmaster300019d ago

True, blame it on the rabid fanboys. MS can do no wrong and spinner this multiplatform move. While the actual fans moved on.

I feel like with the new Xbox coming they are hoping to bring back those old fans and then if it goes well. Bring back exclusives.

If the new console is performing like series x and one. Naw they staying multiplatform.

darthv7218d ago

Actual fans dont move on... they can add to their hobby while waiting for the next new release. If you believe what you typed then I guess PS fans moved on too.... you know, since its been a Sahara for 1st party games this gen.

S2Killinit18d ago

The fans didn’t tell them to go multilat. MS was forced to after the 82 billion they spent to destroy gaming. Then, while xbox fans cheered, MS realized they can’t justify the price tag by selling through xbox only, so they went multiplat and in the process began to downplay console gaming.

19d ago Replies(4)
CrashMania19d ago

I think it's too late, xbox sales were diving even before ABK, they got even worse since then even long before the full multiplatform push. I'd be surprised if they even went back to timed exclusivity at this point, Helix is basically a PC and is going to be expensive, they already struggle to sell cheaper xbox consoles, it will be low volume and they'll have a very small 'console' base to sell to, which has already been conditioned to just play via gamepass anyway.

S2Killinit18d ago

They will do what they always do, they will promise the world at the beginning of next GEN and then failed to deliver all generation long. But there will always be some gamers who will buy into their promises.

ocelot0718d ago

Absolutely agree, Do people genuinely believe Microsoft are now going to go. Hang on how's about we go back to 2020. Then GP was stagnating, Games sold where awful because of GP. Outsold by Playstation by a landslide.

They have sold 5m of Forza I believe on PS5. Spite it being a old game. I think Starfield is going to sell well in the end. Halo is deffinetly going to sell well as is Fable and Forza Horizon 6.

I think at best (for Xbox fans). Single player titles like Clockwork will have a timed exclusivity. Multiplayer centric games like Forza, E Day will release day and date on all platforms.

Or all games will release on all platforms day and date. But maybe Xbox and Windows Store copies will have exclusive bonuses. Or may even get timed exclusive dlc like Fallout and Elder Scrolls and COD use to do.

I think they will treat Xbox players like the premium customers or at least act the way. But will serve just the Playstation and Switch 2 customers as well.

Neonridr19d ago

I don't see them removing PC from the equation. Considering MS has a heavy enough investment in the PC market, it would be foolish to abandon them. I could see them taking away games from PlayStation or ensuring they are timed exclusives at the very least. Say what you will but if Call of Duty ends up becoming a timed exclusive to Xbox machines, that would hurt PlayStation, don't pretend like those games don't sell millions.

Outside_ofthe_Box19d ago

They would lose out on a lot of CoD sales tho. Doesn't PS make up most of the sales?

Neonridr18d ago

@Outside - possibly, but it might push people to want Xbox hardware so they can play with their buddies day one.

Who knows.

S2Killinit18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

it would but remember doing that can splinter the COD fan base and in the process damage the call of duty brand which is probably the only franchise in that $82 billion purchase that in anyway gets even close to delivering what Microsoft thought they bought. If Microsoft fudges around too much with the COD franchise, you might even see a competitor franchise show up on the scene and that would be a catastrophe after the huge debt that Microsoft put itself into with the ABK purchase.

But Its almost guaranteed that Microsoft will want to do something drastic at the beginning of the next generation as they always do. We will see.

Pyrofire9519d ago

Their lifeline of solely the Xbox consoles is dry. Good-Great games on a 1st party scale can't be made at a loss so willingly - sent to the Xbox to only sell limited copies.
They invested billions scooping up studios and need to start making returns.
Sucks that nearly every company is publicly traded and have to be so shareholder biased but that's how it is.
Their words are strong but it'll take time to see what their actions accomplish. Lowering the cost of Game Pass and taking CoD off of it was a good clear start.

darthv7218d ago

More like, allot of their base just played game pass. So now they need to encourage them to start buying again.

S2Killinit18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

A lot of their base left for greener (bluer?) pastures.

--Onilink--18d ago

What exactly is the long term goal with exclusives though?

Because for the most part, the hardware side of things has never been the most profitable, even sometimes being subsidized for a period before breaking even. And that’s before the hardware component nightmare we currently live in.

The whole point of exclusives was to get more people to buy your console in order to have a bigger install base, which meant even bigger software sales.

But if their ports to PS5 are selling (for the most part it seems) quite well, then other than negating the cut Sony takes there, unless you are REALLY increasing your software sales on your own console, it probably doesn’t make that much of a difference?

Honestly I don’t even understand Sony’s decision to scale back on it for PC unless they weren’t even recouping the port expenses. They released ports when the hardware sales never really dropped, and now that all consoles will undoubtedly take a noticeable drop in sales due to the ridiculous prices, that’s when they decide they don’t want to sell to a larger install base to more easily recoup dev costs… it’s just weird

Outside_ofthe_Box18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

I agree. I mean once they went multiplat, in theory there should be no going back especially when you have games that have sold really well on other platforms.

Microsoft are the ones that announced that they are reevaluating. So I'm just guessing on what their end goal is. Right now Xbox as a hardware is not a must buy for anyone but fans of the brand because their games can be played elsewhere. Going exclusive would solve this, but you lose out on a ton of money instantly which has always been what the company does not want to do so not really sure what their "reevaluating exclusives" means unless they are pulling a Phil Spencer and are just saying what people want to hear and will continue to do what they are currently doing.

darthv7218d ago

Their ports to PS5 are selling because Sony's output has been so dry... the fans are thirsty, and MS is the oasis.

SIdepocket18d ago

Unfortunately, the studios they buy wither under their leadership.

mcstorm18d ago

Microsoft still has a name with Xbox the issue is the casual games are not looking at the console because its not the same console their friends have. Look at that poll on how many users upgraded from xbox 365 to one and then the X. Part of Microsoft's downfall was thinking that the Wii was the market they had to be in when really it was the core market. If you get the core gamers you then get the market to. As I posted a few minuets ago on another post Microsoft putting exclusives on PS this gen could bold well if they hit next gen with all our games are staying exclusive from this new gen. They will then get gamers wanting Halo, Forza Gears but this is also where Microsoft fell over with the xbox one and X in terms of they did not have may quality 1st party games affter they fell into the Gears, Forza and Halo cycle. If they can get some old IPs back to bring back the old core gamers as well as fresh ips to bring in new gamers things could improve next gen. But as I said in my last post its all if buts and maybes at the moment. No one knows if the next home consoles will be to expensive that people move to pc as we are now seeing or look at the stem deck as a cheepier alternitive.

DarXyde18d ago

"Only issue is they've already opened Pandora's box."

That's very optimistic. It's not the only issue, far from it. There is a serious rupture between Microsoft generally and the public caused by their weird Game Pass price fluctuations, taking down physical game space in stores, and being the first to go nuts on hardware price hikes that they themselves played a big part in.

They're also charging beyond a premium for Helix which is just vile at a time when the economy is in shambles.

The company itself is really not doing itself any favors with the approach they're taking Windows. Even France is looking to ditch Windows in favor of Linux.

But the most offensive thing is this AI push. They're doubling, tripling, and quadrupling down on the very technology they're using to replace a considerable proportion of their workforce... And the slap in the face is how they bake copilot into everything when nobody likes it—they couldn't even make Bing stick, so why on earth are they trying so hard? You know it's bad when people would rather use ChatGPT than Copilot which is killing their OS. But aside from their snatching up of farmland to build data centers (and reduce the agriculture capacity of whichever country allows them to build them), they made an AI-generated gamer gurl that loves AI the head of Xbox.

Even if we grant them the full benefit of the doubt, it hardly matters what Xbox wants to do if Nadella says no, and that includes exclusive games. Microsoft's relationship with Xbox is the opposite of Sony's relationship with PlayStation—Microsoft pulls the reins of Xbox, but Sony damn near went under for the PS3.

Tanktopmaster9218d ago (Edited 18d ago )

“If they go back to exclusive games it at least shows that they are finally getting it.”

Great strategy, especially after Forza selling 5 million on PlayStation and sea of thieves selling at least another million (2 million) for example. In March 2026, Xbox consoles sales ratio vs PS was 10:1.

In addition to that, with Gamepass, which unequivocally cuts out chunks of sales (Cannibalizing revenue from 1st month sales especially).

I’m sure going exclusive again after releasing everything on Ps5 is going to work out great for business.

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 18d ago
maximusprime_19d ago

Despite all of that, it's clear that Microsoft's Xbox division is broken beyond repair.

19d ago
BeHunted19d ago

PlayStation is currently draining money on flop after flop. It's Sony that needs to re-evaluate their strategy

19d ago
CrashMania19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

Wonder how much money was lost on perfect dark, hellbalde 2, 300 million lost revenue
by putting cod on gamepass. The recent Jason schrier news that Xbox has cancelled dozens of projects, spent 70 billion just to see Xbox sales further collapse and gamepass see little growth.

The fact is this has been PlayStation's most profitable generation and they are making loads of money and selling plenty of consoles and games. While MS won't give you any sales figures or profit numbers for Xbox, says it all really.

S2Killinit18d ago

Sony PlayStation has deservedly dominated xbox. Facts

Tanktopmaster9218d ago (Edited 18d ago )

Ok tween.

Xbox series SX got outsold 10:1 last month. lol.

18d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 18d ago
shadowT19d ago

"Our presence on PC isn’t strong enough."

Fishy Fingers19d ago

It isnt. But I dont think they mean in 'games', rather, footprint.

They own the OS but as far as gaming is concerned, Steam dominate. I imagine the VAST majority of people who use the Xbox app/launcher are PC gamepass subs. No ones buying their 3rd party PC games through Xbox PC.

badz14918d ago

and many gamers prefer SteamOS for gaming over Windows too. If only Valve would be more uncompromising to the anti-cheat makers that locked out non-windows players, more pc gamers would have moved onto SteamOS by now and not looking back to Windows. overall, Win11 is a terrible, bloated, unoptimized OS which is not what many people want

ocelot0718d ago

Agreed and I think that's where they are going to focus on more. I think cheaper games on Windows/Xbox store (MS IP) compared to Steam and Epic and maybe even compared to PSN store as well.

Show all comments (107)