Nope, because it sucks being always online and there is no point to it at all

Heck no! Why should I have to be online just to play a single player game?

No.

For multiplayer only games yes,but for single player games no,it would just be a coaster in the long run.

No.

The answer is "no". While an "always connected" is the future, a large chunk of people are still without a convenient internet solution.

I tried to get Time Warner to run cable to my house (a service area is only 1mile away) and they won't do it. That leaves me stuck with satellite intenet, which is expensive, slow, and from my understanding, useless for online gaming.

This may be a small demographic, but it is a demographic none the less. Hell, I have 4g phone that I can't even maintain a constant 3g/4g signal with.

Single player isn't going anywhere, people need something to play while online game servers are down.

Single player is the reason i play games, not multi player, i rarely play multi player.

My problem with always online games, digital downloads and DLC is that there is no guarantee the service in which you purchase the content will be available for ever and if the service shuts down then all your purchases will be lost, essentially having wasted your hard earn REAL money on VIRTUAL media. So as long as companies like Nintendo, Bethesda and Rockstar keep making complete games and releasing them through physical media (I wish every company would do this), gaming will continue to be my favorite hobby.