All Channels
Popular
330°

Get Ready for an Xbox Spin-Off From Microsoft

An article from Bloomberg today speculates that with Ballmer leaving, there's a very real possibility that Microsoft will spin off the Xbox division sooner rather than later.

PC Magazine columnist John C. Dvorak is a proponent of busting Microsoft into four to six entities, and believes this is a good start. "Some analysts see the proposed Xbox Corporation being valued around $17 billion right out of the chute."

"When you really think about it, the Xbox is unlike anything else Microsoft does. The company stuck with this product and developed a winner by actually being patient for a change. But still, the profit margins are not there insofar as Microsoft is concerned and it might just be spun off to make the books look better."

Anon19744642d ago (Edited 4642d ago )

Interesting read. Certainly an Xbox spinoff doesn't have to be a bad thing. As PC Mag points out, a separate XBox company wouldn't have the pressure or scrutiny on their operations from inside and outside of Microsoft for not meeting the higher profit margins seen in Microsoft's other divisions. On it's own it could be viewed on it's own merits.

The drawback as I see it would be the removal of the safety net being part of the larger Microsoft company brings with it. I think being part of the larger, wildly profitable company has allowed the Xbox to take risks they wouldn't have taken on their own. I was pretty damn skeptical of the appeal Kinect brought when it was announced, but they absolutely hit a home run with the product. If not for the backing of the larger company, would an Xbox company on it's own have taken such a huge risk? I also hadn't considered what this would do the the Microsoft store as we don't have those in Canada.

Personally, it'd like to see Xbox remain part of the larger company.

warewolfSS4640d ago

How are you gonna post a story and the. Be the first person to cement on that.
Especially being a known Sony fanboy.

Rhaigun4640d ago

I agree with you to an extent, but being under the umbrella of a larger company also means you are subjected to oversight. Especially the way MS manages the rest of their divisions. That's why we see the cheaper components for max profitability.

I think a separate entity would bring forth more risk and innovation to make itself more appealing. Eg.,Nintendo

NewMonday4640d ago

"The drawback as I see it would be the removal of the safety net"

exactly!

one big change would be less throwing money around for timed exclusives and heavy advertising because they wouldn't be able to hide it in the big corporate budget.

n4rc4640d ago

it could go either way imo..

We dont really know what agenda shareholders or MS execs are pushing on the xbox division.. would we see the push with Skype and such otherwise? its hard to say.

But not having the muscle and resources of Microsoft behind them may end up hurting the brand.. would we still have access to the Azure cloud if it wasnt? etc

YNWA964640d ago

Since MS are building a one type fits all kind of system as far as windows 8 goes, Xbox 1 is integral to this, so it would not make sense to do this. They want to own the living room, this is the way in.

maniacmayhem4639d ago (Edited 4639d ago )

@Darkride
I disagree, having them spin off will allow them to take more risks and not be under some huge company eye or under multiple execs or managements idea of what the Xbox should be. Especially management who are not even in the Xbox division.

With Xbox being it's own brand and department hopefully they will have a staff that is only dedicated to making the Xbox a better system. To me this is somewhat good news.

P0werVR4639d ago

A spin-off is unnecessary for a company like Microsoft and is already counterproductive to how much they've put into it already.

The truth of the matter is, these are all pure speculations giving in recent news.

What needs to be considered are the already established "infrastructure" and made decisions previously and how that reflects the total opposite of these articles stating otherwise.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4639d ago
Silver3604640d ago

They are totally discounting that Xbox is the only product that MS sells that regular people want to buy. How long will windows be relevant when most people are running to tablets and smart phones. Basic of economics, you have to build new revenue streams as your business ages or you will eventually go out of business. Something new will always come along to make your core cash business obsolete.

CRAIG6674640d ago

Exactly, the xbox division makes billions in profits, why would they dilute that revenue stream? They will fight tooth and nail to stay relevant in the gaming industry, it's probably already clear to them they won't win by numbers this coming gen but it's still very likely they will make the kind of money that we can only dream of...

iamnsuperman4640d ago (Edited 4640d ago )

No it doesn't it makes roughly a billion (if that) for Microsoft. Not billions (otherwise this topic wouldn't happen)

CRAIG6674640d ago

ok 1 billion, not sure how you are with maths but that's a sh*t load of money.

stuna14640d ago

@GRAIG667

For sure it's a lot of money, but you also have to take into account the overall expenditures involved in keeping the Xbox division profitable! Right now a lot of the cost involved are masked by Microsoft the business as a whole.

PlayStation_44640d ago

1 billion is nothing to Microsoft though.

Campy da Camper4640d ago (Edited 4640d ago )

From an investor standpoint, if they see this division making a billion a year and have strong evidence and/or foresight to believe it could make 5 billion a year they will take action to do so.

People seem to forget that Sony and ms are businesses and answer to shareholders and a board of directors whose sole purpose is to make said shareholders money. If there were proof that ms could make double the revenue building kinect trains, guess what? We would soon see kinect trains.

I personally don't like motion controls for gaming. I don't want a camera in my living room and that is why I'm not buying a xbone. That said, there could be uses for it in other applications. Say Samsung bought the license and made some new gaget then I might be interested. This is what I feel is being talked about in the ms boardroom. Not the juvinelle notion to just scrap the gaming division but talking about what other things could be done with their assets. If ms realizes more money could be made as a vendor to third parties then guess what, this could be ms last gaming console.

Red_Devilz4639d ago

Do you know that Xbox division as a whole is in terrible loss for MS? (It doesn't matter to MS because they are making more money in other areas of business)

Source: http://www.neowin.net/news/...

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4639d ago
cellur1114640d ago

@craig667 You do realize that Microsoft is worth over $250 billion? 1 billion to them is nothing.

Magicite4640d ago

I thought it was like 600+ some time ago?

SilentNegotiator4639d ago (Edited 4639d ago )

"They are totally discounting that Xbox is the only product that MS sells that regular people want to buy"

I would think that would be why some investors want it split away from Microsoft; so that they can invest in Xbox, with less baggage.

corvusmd4640d ago (Edited 4640d ago )

This could actually be a great thing for Xbox Fans....Like the article even said, by creating a separate Xbox entity, they would be more free to do what they want. I still think they should look into buying Activision, that way they could have exclusive rights to Destiny and COD

...Uh, why am I getting downvoted for this? It's about being happy about change, am I not supposed to be happy about possibilities?

iamnsuperman4640d ago

Didn't Activision just buy back shares so it can function on its own (I know its parent company wanted to use its profits to sort its financial crisis out but still). I don't think Activision wants to get bought. Just because you have the money doesn't mean you can buy it.

corvusmd4640d ago

Fair enough point, I know they were willing to be bought by MS in the past...I was just thinking it would be a good idea if possible.

n4rc4639d ago

Activision is owned by vivendi... They are massive and in no position to have to sell anything.. I doubt it would ever happen.

n4rc4639d ago

I stand corrected... Didn't know vivendi sold off the majority of their shares 2 months ago

gaelic_laoch4640d ago

Xbox need an experienced hardware company to take over the brand or its dooomed!

hennessey864640d ago

I agree and I think Samsung would be perfect

gaelic_laoch4640d ago

A joint venture with Samsung would be perfect, M$ deal withs the software and network infrastructure and Samsung produce the best hardware available.

After the xbone debacle this year, if there is to be anymore consoles after this upcoming gen there will need to be a major shakeup!

M-M4640d ago

To be honest, I expect Samsung to make their own console for some reason.

Golden_Mud4640d ago

I hope it doesn't get out of Microsoft hands , they have more servers than ever , taking out the Xbox brand is just removing the Xbox Live service

AceBlazer134640d ago (Edited 4640d ago )

Cause Activision would just love to throw away all future profits for some quick cash.

Meant to be a reply.

Show all comments (47)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai16d ago (Edited 16d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio15d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing15d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9215d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit15d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing15d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9215d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay17d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn218d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn217d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown18d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay17d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay17d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac17d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger18d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300018d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde18d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde17d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7519d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_16d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.