All Channels
Popular
30°

Microsoft Is Regaining Gamers’ Affection

SheAttack: "After Sony’s conference and PS4 reveal in February, gamers everywhere were ecstatic. Sony revealed some of the most interesting looking titles that simply took our collective breaths away. After the hype melted its way inside of our awe-inspired hearts, we longed to see what Microsoft had up its sleeve. Would they: a) put more next gen gleam into our lives, or b) flounder in the shadows to what Sony had in their arsenal. At Microsoft’s conference in April, all eyes were on them, but they failed to show us what we had all been waiting for – games. This isn’t to say that Microsoft had a terrible conference; it definitely had its interesting points and drove the point home that it was merely a hardware reveal, yet some gamers still felt let down. With that being said, nobody expected what came after."

Read Full Story >>
sheattack.com
Lwhit64684d ago

Gained my attention I guess but definitely not my money.

ABeastNamedTariq4684d ago

I regrettably have to agree with that. I preordered my PS4 the day after their E3 conference. It was too late by then haha.

black0o4684d ago

they never lost my attention to began with but sure NOT my money same as @Lwhit

corvusmd4684d ago

Proof that you aren't making an unbiased decision

ABeastNamedTariq4684d ago

@corv

Hell no I'm not, you're right I'm biased. I'm going with what I like. And I like PS's exclusive better, not even gonna front like I don't. More potential to me.

I like the XB1 too, and will be getting one most definitely, but Sony definitely got my attention and my money first.

Can't wait to download Forza, Halo, Titanfall, Dying Light (I know it's not exclusive), and other stuff. Next year. Gears if they announce that.

I should be biased when making a decision on a console (I can only get one for now), because it's what I like. You know?

MysticStrummer4684d ago

@corvus - How does that signify bias? Based on the information available at E3, Tariq wanted a PS4. That's not bias.

Automatic794684d ago

They had my attention from day one. Once you love a system, a brand, it content plus features it is hard to deny. Xbox One day one for me.

Note: The games are calling my attention can't wait.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4684d ago
rela82me4684d ago

This PR storm itself has gained ALOT of peoples attention good or bad. With this comes more brand recognition and controversy. That has been Rockstars main source of advertisement is controversy, and it has worked well for them thus far.

They did bad things in the past, or seemingly bad things. Now they are the 'reformed gang member' of the consoles, the underdog rather. I think if we take price out of this, there certainly lies an entertaining piece of technology. I doubt that anyone who would own the console would say it wasn't fun to play.

Whether or not you believe there is a better value or more fun device, the fact still holds that this console seems to deliver a lot of fun. XO probably wont do as well as the PS4 at launch, but I don't see it being far behind in the overall race.

XB1_PS44684d ago

I was a 360 fan the whole last gen. I was convinced I was going to buy a ps4 until Microsoft showed interest in improving. I waited a long time to make sure Xbox One wasn't going to be a horrible choice. I'm still not sure, but fuck it. I'll learn my lesson.

Shuyin4684d ago

Njoi DR3 with 20 frames.
I'm gonna play the shit outta the best games -- the PS exclusives.

Greatness awaits, my Playstation familly.

Death4684d ago

Aren't Skylanders and Knack PS exclusives?

PFFT4684d ago

Ahh no. Dead Rising 3 will not be running at 20fps come launch. MS is hard at work helping the developers to lock in that 30FPS. Dont know how smooth the game will be BUT all i know and CARE about is that DR3 is gonna be fucking SWEET! I cant wait to play it.

levian4684d ago

I'm actually pretty divided now. I've always been a Playstation guy, and I'm for sure getting a PS4. But Dead Rising 3, Titanfall, possibly the new Fable, and Project Spark are really making me interested in getting an XBone.

I really hate to say this, but Microsoft won the exclusives so far. Sony hasn't revealed any really, besides Infamous which we knew would happen, Killzone which I've never personally enjoyed, and The Order 1886 which I'm on the fence about, because in general I dislike short linear shooters.

I am excited for Infamous, it looks great, but XBone is making me want one just for its exclusives alone. Sony really dropped the ball by not revealing anything new besides Indies at Gamescom. They need to show some new IPs and exclusives.

scott1824684d ago

The Order is a "short linear shooter"? I haven't seen anything about it besides a small clip of a battle.... Is there any info on it? It looks cool to me.

ABeastNamedTariq4684d ago (Edited 4684d ago )

Not one bit of gameplay has been shown of The Order..

Plus, why would to want Sony you reveal all of their heavy hitters in the beginning? For one, we'd have nothing to look forward to. Then we'd have to wait AT LEAST two years for Sony's big studios to release more games.

Why does everyone want everything now? NOW NOW NOW, is all I see.

Eddie201014684d ago (Edited 4684d ago )

You have a long wait for Titanfall and fable(blah). They shot there wad on game announcements (many not available till late in 2014) and come next E3 you'll be hearing about many of the same games instead of lots of new ones(talking About Exclusives).

Sony on the other hand will probably be announcing games from Naughty dog, Santa Monica studios,and maybe even Insomniac, along with the rest of the 12 studios that Sony owns.

Dead Rising (cumbersome, monotonous, boring games) Maybe the third one will be better, can't be worse.

Plus what the other guys said.

mistertwoturbo4684d ago

The only two games I'm interested in on the Xbone is Forza 5 and Dead Rising 3. I'll be playing Titanfall on my PC.

JackStraw4684d ago

>dislike short linear shooters
>titanfall (made by the same people who made cod)

hi, logic.

BallsEye4684d ago

@Eddie20101

Where have you been for past few years? It was sony who were showing same games every year. Some games took 4x e3 trailers for game to finally release (hello GT, KZ, the last guardian, FF versus). Microsoft only was showing games that were few months away from release.

levian4684d ago

Whoa, lots of hate it seems.

I'm not sure if it was at E3 or in an interview somewhere, but The Order 1886 was described as a "story driven" game. That typically means linear. It's definitely a shooter - didn't you guys see the guns in the trailer? Games of this nature - Uncharted, Tomb Raider, etc - are usually fairly short games, 10-20 hours long. So that's where I'm getting what I said from.

I'm looking forward to Titanfall because I enjoy having a multiplayer shooter I can jump into for some quick game time when I don't feel like really getting into a long game, but I got sick of CoD after MW2. This looks like it'll be a nice change, and good for some fast paced gameplay. Totally different than a short linear campaign.

And it's good to know that the games I'm interested about on XBone aren't coming out for a while, gives me a year or so to enjoy my PS4 before I get one.

@ABeast

Of course we want to know what games they are making now! When someone shells out $400-500 on a console, lately the decision is made based on their exclusives. Sony sadly hasn't shown many, while Microsoft has shown a fair few new IP's and exclusives. I've never really liked Xbox, but I do think their exclusives this gen look good. I want to know what Sony has to bring to the table, and I'm sure others do too before they make up their mind.

JackStraw4684d ago

so basically you're completely clueless? thanks for the clarification.

levian4684d ago

First off, here's the source:

http://blog.us.playstation....

@JackStraw

I wouldn't say clueless, just making assumptions based on the information given. Way to come across as a hostile asshole.

Taken right from the interview "it’s a linear story-based game. We’re trying to tell a story. It’s what we call a filmic experience."

So do a little research before you get all aggressive next time. Jesus, I don't know what it is about people that has them so angry over literally nothing. You express your opinion on the facts presented to you and people are ready to tear you a new one.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4684d ago
AngelicIceDiamond4684d ago

6) No Don Mattrick

"I’m not sure how much power and influence he truly had with the company, but it has been made clear in certain interviews he’s appeared in that he didn’t really think about the Xbox brand in regards to how it could innovate the way we thought about gaming."

I'm not sure if anyone got the same feeling that I did but in his interviews with the press it seems like they had to constantly remind him or sway there words to remind him that its a video game console first and people want to play great games along with the usual trade them in.

I remember Geoff talked to Don right after the X1 event and Geoff almost HAD to mentioned games because Don was talking about TV, Kinect, Tv, Tv entirely to much.

I can honestly say he did a good job with the 360 but he was holding back the X1 right out of the gate.

See ya Don.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4684d ago
Kingthrash3604684d ago (Edited 4684d ago )

they lost more than they gained.......IF they gained any.
most of ms's blindest fanboys never left, its just now they have something to talk about.
sadly they still look like idiots saying things like
indie indie indie ..like indies are bad. I guess its their answer to tvtvtvtv...
I guess they fail to realize indies are games, some are goth like journey or walking dead or minecraft and fez......id much rather have that then tv bs like fantasy pop ups and ads.....smh xbots are the blindest fanboys.

rela82me4684d ago

To be honest, there is no different of Xbox fanboys saying one concept is bad when a Sony fanboy does it. If you say tv tv tv tv it is just as bad as someone saying indie indie indie indie...

It all falls on what you do and enjoy entertainment wise. If your in to getting a bunch of smaller games to occupy short periods of time, or you enjoy watching a tv show in between game sessions. It's not like the Xbox One will exclude indie games, and it isn't like the PS4 will exclude TV services.

I just think people should try something out before saying a feature is crap. For instance the Kinect, it may not be your thing; however, to say it is crap is unfounded.

Kingthrash3604684d ago

no yeah I NEVER like fanboy jargan.....im just saying xbots have something to talk about. tho I dont like the tv bs on ms or Sony consoles. I want tv id turn on tv and nit my console....but im not busting chops im just speakin in the topic.

creatchee4684d ago

Says he never liked fanboy jargon.

Calls people "xbots".

Sigh.

Kingthrash3604684d ago

lol yeah my understanding is ms fanboys are xbots....sony fanboys are called fonys I know...I said xbot because its a ms article....I stayed on subject. if it was a sony article and aony was in ms shoes id say fonys.....if I was a fony I would have types m$ or call the x1 a xbone...I dont like fanboys check my old posts and you will see that fact in my past posts.
im a gamer I love all gaming consoles...sure I have my preferences like any other gamer.
I dont blame you for thinking im a fanboy, there is so many that its hard to tell when some one is giving a honest opinion or are trolling now days.

that said I stand by my post....ms mess its console chances by being too cocky and trying fu*k gamers over. dont care how you slice it...THATS WHAT HAPPENED... they may be trying to fix what they did but I can no longer trust a company with views like that. I may buy the x1 but not for a year....thats not fanboy bs t hats real customer opinion.

rela82me4684d ago

I can totally respect that you feel that MS was trying to 'fuck you over' however, I kind of look at it from their point.

They have loyal customers who pay $60 for launch games, they spend a good portion of their salary on their product. In one day that game gets pirated to millions across the internet which spits on their customers faces. They have to keep game prices that high because of pirates, they have to spend millions in resources in security because of them.

If anything part of why they were doing it was for their customers. From what I heard they got NO money from the used game sales, only possibly getting license transfers. They also noticed that it would cause a hooplah for some people restricting their console, so they thought of offering a good digital sharing program. They realized that pirating is often attributed to lack of sharing through physical media. So they were trying to get SOME compensation for the way the market is turning out too.

So yes, their fees were restrictive, but I don't see them as trying to screw anyone over... They were simply trying to make money for what pirates should have already paid for, and they were trying to allow people who paid $60 for a game not get screwed over when his buddy at work has all launch titles for free in one day. Restrictive or not, every company should get money for their product.

If you're referring to the kinect somehow screwing people over, I don't see your point. It is mandatory but it is also part of the machine. That like buying the monitor to your pc...

Kingthrash3604684d ago (Edited 4684d ago )

no I dont see tge Kinect as screwing people over....I do see it as an unnecessary part. it was proven when they said it was unnecessary....after they said it was "built in" same for drm it was "part of the x1 and could not be removed" but whadduya know it was removed....and I understand the piracy bs....piracy kills almost everything from movies to music to games. but I dont have to "check in" to watch a movie or not be able to lend my Kendrick Lamar CD to my brother. music and movies have suffered far MORE than ms ever has and they make far less than ms per sold product.
so ms came about the piracy problem in the wrong way...and came cocky with it....telling customers to "deal with it". they are the only company in the entertainment biz to say fffuuuu customers this is what we are going to do. drm may work for the pc crowd but the console crowd isnt having it. the pc crowd still pirate anyway.
thats why we are having this conversation now and why this article was composed. ms messed up in many customers eyes and they know this that why so many 180 spins were performed. they learned the hard way that you cant go about solving business problems by making life harder for you buying customers....we will just leave you and go directly to your competitors.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4684d ago
4684d ago Replies(2)
DonFreezer4684d ago

It's really something to hear Sony chaps talking about blind fanboys.

FrigidDARKNESS4684d ago

Of course they are winning back gamers as pre-orders continue to climb.

Kingthrash3604684d ago

yeah as sonys sold out everywhere........I dont think affection has much to do with it.

Muerte24944684d ago

Microsoft is doing alot to get themselves back in gamer's good grace. While I personally, have yet to be swayed, others enjoy the changes being made. Xbox One was never a bad system, it was just Microsoft's message. After watching the 6 minute video of Killzone Shadow Fall multiplayer, I feel even more secure in my Ps4 pre-order.

Skips4684d ago (Edited 4684d ago )

According to who??? Because all I got was this... On MS's own home turf... http://metro.co.uk/2013/08/...

And this was just yesterday...

Definitely not on Amazon either...
http://www.amazon.com/gp/be...
http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/...

Just curious, and would like to know where you're getting "pre-orders continue to climb" from. lol

buynit4684d ago

To be fair.. Just cause its not on top doesnt mean its not climbing, thats better than falling no?

Chevalier4684d ago

They inched up 20 units in my store, except in the time we sold those 20 units we sold 120+ PS4's.

Launch titles aren't enough for me, don't know why everyone is expecting them to be the best games. I'm pretty sure I can wait for Naught Dog and other first party to reveal their awesome titles.

Automatic794684d ago

Both systems are sold out at my Gamestop. Why not wait till actual figures come out before making judgment.

M-M4684d ago (Edited 4684d ago )

Correct me if I'm wrong Frigid, but did you just admit that gamers weren't after the Xbox One while you continued to say that most people preferred it, and that articles stating that the PS4 was outselling the Xbox One by quite a margin were wrong? I know one thing, and that is that Microsoft hasn't even come close to getting my affection after May 21st. They're making a somewhat decent comeback, but nothing over the top amazing.

Magicite4684d ago

another blind zombified xbot

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4684d ago
memots4684d ago

When its cheaper and i can get a forza 5 game of the year edition and that Xbone support the g27 .. yes

DragonKnight4684d ago

If Microsoft is regaining gamers' affection, why aren't their pre-order numbers for their console, and games, not reflecting that? Especially considering the free Fifa game SHOULD be creating a huge upsurge of pre-orders in Europe and it's not.

I really wish these sites would just be honest and say "we like Xbox One, so Microsoft has our affection" instead of lying like this.

Belking4684d ago

"I really wish these sites would just be honest and say "we like Xbox One"

This has to be post of the year....lol if only sites like this one would do the same for ps4...

Rimeskeem4684d ago

thats mainly because people can buy fifa and the ps4 less then the xbox one still

theWB274684d ago

Because they're preorders. There is 3 months to launch. Which means at this point, money doesn't have to spent. People have other priorities. Some people could still be waiting until launch for everything to be settled.

That's not hard to see. How are they lying? Preorders haven't picked up from where they were? Are they not gaining momentum- try looking at this from a neutral point of view.

From where it was, to where X1 is now...it's gaining. There are 3 months for further gaining of public perception.

Again preorders don't make up everything. 80 million people didn't preorder PS360's last gen.

DragonKnight4684d ago

"Because they're preorders. There is 3 months to launch. Which means at this point, money doesn't have to spent. People have other priorities. Some people could still be waiting until launch for everything to be settled."

Yeah, no. See, sites like Amazon and I'm sure others allow you to make pre-orders without spending a dime until the actual launch day. Your product is reserved for you and your CC not charged until official day of release, so those people with priorities that you mentioned can still focus on those priorities and still have an Xbox One pre-ordered.

"How are they lying? Preorders haven't picked up from where they were? Are they not gaining momentum- try looking at this from a neutral point of view."

Not really, no. Look at the links Skips provided up there.

"From where it was, to where X1 is now...it's gaining. There are 3 months for further gaining of public perception."

Not in any real way. If it's gaining at all, it's not enough to make the claim that Microsoft is regaining gamers' affection. If that were the case, there would be visible proof. Contrary to the members of this site that were buying the Xbox One with the DRM back when it still had it, the entirety of the internet and non-internet world are different.

"Again preorders don't make up everything. 80 million people didn't preorder PS360's last gen."

No one has said they do, but they are a good indication of interest and, currently, the Xbox One doesn't seem to have much more interest in it now than it has had since E3. Think about where it SHOULD be compared to where it is.

bartender644684d ago

Why does everyone in this site are talking like if they know MS preorders numbers?? I don't understand how this people come up with this things. How can they say that PS4 is winning on preorders without concrete numbers? VGChartz, lol!

Chevalier4684d ago (Edited 4684d ago )

Wait so preorders don't matter, but, since xbox one preorders are 'gaining' then they do matter? Cause if they don't matter why mention them?

Preorders are a good measure of how popular and how well something will sell. My store has 250+ preorders and so far for PS4 and preorders are still open, xbox One is at 42 and we have stopped taking orders. Our stores in Canada are only allocated 30-40 units on average whereas Sony is easily 120+ per store, so yeah preorders do matter.

GTA V will be the biggest seller this year and I can tell you that based on the preorders we've received which is quite high. That correlates it being the most preordered game right now.

Also it's not gaining traction at all, don't know how you came to this conclusion. My store in the time we took our last 20 xbox one orders took over 120+ PS4 preorders, so from the retail level there hasn't been a shift at all.

@Bartender64
From my experience I can tell you based on our preorders alone and talking to my friends over at Best Buy/Futureshop in Canada that there has not been a lot of interest in xbox one and a lot of customers along with friends are switching over to PS4. I can tell you we've never seen preorder numbers like this EVER. Not a single launch has ever gotten numbers like this, not the 360/ps3/3ds/Wii/Wii U, not even close. For most of our stores we're talking about dollarwise, if half our preorders showed up for our inevitable midnight launch of PS4 we'd be doing Boxing Day numbers or more.

maniacmayhem4684d ago (Edited 4684d ago )

So sales and pre-orders magically represent gamers attention?

I haven't pre-ordered the Xbox One does this mean I'm not interested in the Xbox One?

Because you would be wrong if you would say I'm not.

DragonKnight4684d ago

Affection maniac. Affection. Not interest. Interest is going "hmm, looks pretty good." Affection is "damn, I'm getting that."

And if pre-orders are not representative of gamer affection, at a point in time where the console isn't out and there are few things that could be used to quantify affection, then what is?

maniacmayhem4684d ago

You are absolutely right, I meant affection.
Which is a strange term to use anyways.

But the point still stands that you are basing affection(ugh!)off of pre-orders.

DragonKnight4684d ago

I don't like the term affection either, but substitute it for any term that doesn't merely mean an interest but something beyond a simple interest.

And again, supply another way to gauge said affection. And N4G discussions aren't a gauge of affection. Pre-orders are actual, tangible evidence. Discussions aren't because they can be tainted.

Hicken4684d ago

Because you CAN base desire to purchase- not as prettily done as affection- on preorders. Call it intent to buy, if you will.

Need to stick your penis is.

Whatever.

Preordering a game or console means you have more than a passing interest in it. The numbers show there's more intent to buy PS4 than XB1, by a wide margin. And whatever minor uptick has been seen in XB1 preorders since Gamescom doesn't indicate much of an increase in intent to buy.

Which means this article's premise is false.

It may not be the 100% accurate, but there isn't a better indicator.

maniacmayhem4684d ago (Edited 4684d ago )

In all honesty, I'm still hung up on the affection/intention word mix-up that just happened.

Too much coffee, I'm outta here...

trafalger4684d ago (Edited 4684d ago )

"I really wish these sites would just be honest and say "we like Xbox One, so Microsoft has our affection" instead of lying like this."

or perhaps you should have a disclosure before every time you write something saying i hate m$ therefore the following will be totally biased and in the most negative way possible.

what we have seen is no matter what m$ does we will always have haters like dragonknight around who seem to get there kicks trying to agitate xbox fans while acting like a shill for sony.

if m$ doesn't focus on games early on while announcing the xbone they pick that apart. then when they show games they change directions and pick apart kinect spying on you, then they make it so you can disconnect it and then it becomes about indies and lack of publishing, then they make every system a developer kit and now they pick on the price. on and on it goes.

we get it, you hate m$ therefore you won't support the xbox no matter what they do. you also see them as the biggest threat to sony which is why they are your main focus, even more than sony. that explains why are you continually in xbone topics?

we should be treating these systems for what they are, entertainment devices.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4684d ago
Show all comments (94)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai52d ago (Edited 52d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio52d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing52d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9252d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit52d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing52d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9252d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay54d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn254d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers54d ago (Edited 54d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn254d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown54d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos54d ago (Edited 54d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay54d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay54d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac53d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger54d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300054d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde54d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood54d ago (Edited 54d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde54d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7555d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_53d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.