All Channels
Popular
130°

If Microsoft Had A Crossover Fighter

GaminRealm: "We all know Nintendo's crossover fighter series Super Smash Bros., and Sony has their recent Playstation All-Stars that launched last year. But what about Microsoft? Xbox fans are still left in the cold when it comes comes to a game series that includes a mash-up of Microsoft-owned stars."

Read Full Story >>
gaminrealm.com
porkChop4680d ago (Edited 4680d ago )

I don't think Microsoft has enough well known characters to make a big enough roster for a crossover fighting game. That's probably why they haven't done it. Maybe sometime in the future when they have more characters and franchises.

And yes, I know this is a joke article.

Swiggins4680d ago

They'd definitely have to pull in a lot of 3rd party characters to even make an effort.

hennessey864680d ago

They could make up characters, I can see it now " Microsoft man vs vs the windows widow" but nothing would win against "original Xbox controller boy" who just crushes everything in his path

admiralvic4680d ago

@ Kennessey86

Even as a joke... it still wouldn't be a cross over fighter. Just a bunch of stupid accessories fighting.

@ others

M$ doesn't have enough diversity or exclusives to really make this shine. They could put in a couple Halo guys, Gears of War guys, a car from Forza (Sega used a car in their fighting game, why not M$?), maybe Alan Wake, but beyond this we're looking at a lot of distance fighters and third party add ons.

Gamer6664679d ago

Banjo Kazoiee, Gears Characters, Halo Characters, Killer Instinct Characters, Captain Smiley from Comic Jumper, Mr/Ms Splosionman, ilomilo Characters, Perfect Dark characters, Kameo characters, Gunstringer characters, Viva Pinata characters, Battletoads characters, Grabbed by the Ghoulies Characters, Crackdown Characters, and Conker Characters...

Doesn't look like MS lacks characters.

porkChop4679d ago

I said well known characters. The majority of those games wouldn't be known to the masses. In order for this type of game to be successful you need a lot of new, relevant characters. Obviously you can have some legacy/classic characters, but the roster cannot be full of them otherwise the game won't resonate with enough people.

Like I said before, later this gen, or maybe next gen, Microsoft will have built up enough relevant core franchises to make a game like this happen. Right now it just wouldn't make sense.

Gamer6664678d ago

@porkChop...

Someone who is not familiar with sony would say the same about the PS characters... What do they have?

Drake, God of War?

iMaim4680d ago

Don Mattrick
Super: “180-Zynga Combo"
LMAO

gnothe14680d ago

playstation allstars had a bunch of 3rd party characters an multiple characters from a few exclusive games..MS could take 3 from gears 3 from halo alan wake one from fable an viva pinata an a few 3rd party characters an we have the same game...but why would they..those games just dont sell like that..

admiralvic4680d ago

4 regular and 1 DLC is a bunch now? The game also only launched with 1 game with 2 characters, which was good and evil Cole. DLC added Zeus as a second, but that was it.

"MS could take 3 from gears 3 from halo"

The problem is that you're talking about 2 sets of largely similar fighters, which would probably work better as alternate costumes. Maybe two sides for Halo, but it would be boring having a bunch of fighters using guns.

True_Samurai4680d ago

Ms aren't gonna copy one of Nintendo's popular franchises unlike some other company

Hicken4680d ago

Yeah, cuz Nintendo started the genre. I guess all the games before SSB don't count.

admiralvic4680d ago

Cross-over fighters didn't start and end with Super Smash Brothers... so I don't see the problem.

Before SSB we had King of Fighters (believe it or not, this IS a CO fighter), Marvel Super Heroes vs Street Fighter, Marvel vs Capcom, Pocket Fighter, Fighters Megamix and several games had cross over fighters in the past too.

They just have to simply make it different than SSB and we all win.

Foxgod4680d ago (Edited 4680d ago )

Meh, wouldnt be my thing.
Killer instinct is where it is at.

Show all comments (25)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai42d ago (Edited 42d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio42d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing42d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9242d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit42d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing42d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9242d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay44d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn244d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers44d ago (Edited 44d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn243d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown44d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos44d ago (Edited 44d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay44d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay44d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac43d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger44d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300044d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde44d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood44d ago (Edited 44d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde43d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7545d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_43d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.