Is bigger better or can less be more? We look at recent examples in Red Dead Redemption and L.A. Noire, and see what the best and worst case scenarios of open world games are.
FuRuy has opened a Twitter account called “Project Alice” teasing a new game announcement on April 25 at 20:30 JST.
New report from Skillsearch found that 22% of those surveyed had been laid off within the past 12 months.
It's a step forward for Stop Killing Games.
being dumb isn't always funny ... you have a brain use it and stop acting like attention-whore
You have a point. Just Cause 2, while undoubtedly fun, soon got incredibly boring but mainly due to the horrible A.I.
The reason Rockstar games are so great is primarily due to their use of the Euphoria game engine which provides realistic NPC interaction and makes shootouts,driving and general play so much more enjoyable than other games such as SR3 and JC2.
Also, L.A. Noire was developed by Bondi Studios in Australia and was published, not developed, by Rockstar.
Mmos do a good job. It being real players and all. Rockstar oughta make GTA ONLINE at least 32 players. (64-150 would be the best)
Lol.. Gamers will find a reason to whine somehow. For years it's complaints about narrow linear paths in games and how invisible walls hurt the immersion of the video games...
Now it's whining about open world.
Open worlds = better, it's just up to the developer to fill it properly