All Channels
Popular
270°

What Sony didn't say at E3

If Sony didn’t have the digital rights dragon of Microsoft’s Xbox One to slay at E3, would we still all be saying they won on the strength of their games alone? They said all the right things as far as policy was concerned, but their software have more to say than Microsoft's?

Read Full Story >>
weeklyrift.com
_FantasmA_4725d ago

M$ did what M$ does and that is screw gamers, but give them shiny shooters to make fughetaboutit when it comes to thinking twice about handing over their cash for fees and subsciptions and crappy hardware. I don't care what games M$ brings, even the exclusives because of their business policies. I don't like their restrictions, limited options, and higher price tag for less gaming that were part of the Xbox 1 and 360 cycles, so why would I want to throw my money away just so M$ can ask for more money for a third time? Sony covers all my bases, even though shooters are my favorite genre, M$'s policies will keep me from ever going back to them again.

Belking4725d ago

Stop all that silly fanboy talk. Just don't buy it i'm sure they will survive without your money in which you probably were never gonna give anyway. We all know how things go here on this site.

_FantasmA_4725d ago (Edited 4725d ago )

You're right I won't buy it. I am not falling for it 3 times! I don't like buying boxes that will become useless once M$ gets tired of them and considers them old.

georgeenoob4725d ago

Oh look, another Sony fanboy.

malokevi4725d ago

@Fantasma

Oh, so your Xbox360 is obsolete? Funny, because MS promised me that MY xbox360 would relish in years of continued support.

You must have the specialized "screw this kid" version.

TheEvilWithin4725d ago

Is this article for real? We see some first party support for the first time in YEARS from Microsoft and all of a sudden there the gaming gods of next generation? If HISTORY serves them right this is IT from Microsoft. Where SONY is SPITTING games left and right. Hell the PS3 ALONE right now is DESTROYING Xbox gamers on games. Umm game of the year contender The Last Of Us. Beyond Two Souls? Plus I keep seeing JRPG support coming to the PS3 as well. Tiered of X bro gamers trying to say Microsoft brought the games. NO! They brought you TRAILERS!!! Oh and ANYONE who keeps saying well well Microsoft has TITAN FALL! Guess what??? If this is supposed to be the COD killer game that everyone keeps stating then why is it going to be only on one system when COD is launched on every platform out there??? You can't compete with that if your not playing on ALL fields. BECAUSE ITS NOT AN EXCLUSIVE. Remember when Microsoft said we spent a billion dollars on games? It was for timed exclusive games. Xbox fans need to start cooling down with the whole Well Microsoft showed me games at E3! CONGRATS! They did what they were supposed to do Show games at a gaming convention. SONY has ALWAYS brought games and GAME OF THE YEAR GAMES. What's the last game of the year game from Microsoft?

CrossingEden4725d ago

the trade off is that games generally run better on 360 because of the easier to develop for hardware, that may change with ps4

kreate4725d ago

For a second, I thought u were evildead360 and got a bit confused reading ur comment.

nypifisel4725d ago

This is true, I can't see MS keep supporting internal development for much long - and even less so in the future than now seeing how the X1 is even less of a game focused machine.

I'm sorry but if anyone believe MS will beat Sony in software, based on what was shown on E3 you got serious amnesia.

CrimsonStar4725d ago

Oh look ..... someone bringing up MS negatively in the very first comment for a Sony related article ..... how original .

SMH

ThatCanadianGuy5144725d ago

Oh look... another new account that joined just hours ago, crying and complaining about PS fanboys.

It's literally the only thing you guys ever do.

Why o why4725d ago (Edited 4725d ago )

Lol, well spotted dayZ..multi account confirmed.. when it comes to output sony has earned the right for me to trust games will come.

Sony haven't front loaded like ms has. Time will tell if ms has changed but as of now I see one company with 6 titles coming out this year varying in genre and size. 3 of which are new ips. I've not even included some of the smaller psn games. Sony have been consistent. They have already announced more exclusives to be revealed at gamescon and tgs......you really think they'd have nothing to show like actual gameplay or trailers which some are now using as fodder......lol.

Some can project all they want....history gives an indication; time will be the proof giver

AngelicIceDiamond4725d ago (Edited 4725d ago )

Unlike most people on here, I'm not having night sweats on weather MS will continue to support games for 4 or 5 years down the line, because that's ridiculous to worry that far ahead. I'll look on what's on plate now than worry about later.

Multiplats that I want to play: The Division, Watch Dogs, Destiny, The Witcher 3, BF4 and Mirrors Edge.

Excluives: Ryse, killer Instinct, Quantum Break, Dead Rising, Titanfall, Halo 5 and yes even Sunset Overdrive.

MS is still committed to Crack down http://www.oxm.co.uk/56528/...

Its only natural to look forward to what other games MS could announce. I hope that 1 billion dollars invested into games is worth it.

AngelicIceDiamond4725d ago

If you wanna see the rest see Sony's games. Stay tuned at Gamescon.

I know I will.

kreate4725d ago

And I thought u said u will worry about games now and not later ... than ur looking forward to the 'later' games ....

Its a bit ridiculous to look at 4-5 years down the road. That 1 billion? I can only hope they use it to make games and not throw money to secure timed dlc.

Clarence4724d ago

The only game that looked good on the exclusive list is titanfall.
Don't hold your breath for crackdown.

hakesterman4725d ago

Time Cures all Broken Hearts. You will go back once they give you a wink wink and a Free Braclet to come back home. It's inevitable.

palaeomerus4725d ago (Edited 4725d ago )

If the bracelet makes XBoxOne run without Kinect attached and it's $400 then MAYBE.

But I already preordered a PS4 and I really don't need TWO $60 a year online subs.

medman4725d ago

The "author" of this article is going to feel very foolish when some more of Sony's first party developers show what they have been working on for the PS4 at Gamescon. Game over. PS4.

Concertoine4724d ago

You're ridiculous.
"I don't like their restrictions, limited options, and higher price tag for less gaming that were part of the Xbox 1 and 360 cycles"
The xbox 360 was cheaper than the ps3 no matter which model you bought. You also say microsoft makes crappy hardware, when the pc-based architecture pioneered in the xbox (though it started with the DC) has become the industry standard as the ps4 moves to pc based architecture as well.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4724d ago
Virtual_Reality4725d ago (Edited 4725d ago )

The E3 Part 2 continues at Gamescom.

Sarobi4725d ago

EverQuest Next! I hope it makes its way to PS4

MysticStrummer4725d ago

Yeah I'm hoping for that also. Seeing Legends of Norrath in the featured games list made me remember Champions of Norrath. I wouldn't mind a PS4 version of that.

GusHasGas4725d ago

The author of this article said that Sony didnt really shine with exclusives, to which I respond, wait for Gamescom. Reportedly, Sony will be showing off 30 new games for the PS4 at Gamescom.

fr0sty4725d ago

That's a bit inaccurate. They have 30 exclusives in development right now, with 20 of them due to launch within the next year. I seriously doubt all 30 are in enough of a completed state to be revealed. There's a good chance we'll at least hear about some of those 20 that are due within the year, however.

When you're in this business, even if you have 30 games being developed, and even if they're all ready to show, you never want to blow your entire load on one show. You highlight a few of them at a time, and let hype build around those titles. If you threw all of them out at once, many of them would be lost in a sea of hype surrounding all the titles. It just wouldn't have the same impact. It's all about strategy. If I were Sony, I'd be saving a heavy hitter AAA title for when MS reveals the new Halo (as in, not a crappy 30 second pre-rendered trailer).

_FantasmA_4725d ago (Edited 4725d ago )

The Order>everythingelsethatwas hown

MysticStrummer4725d ago

That's supposed to be a bad thing?

lol

smh

fr0sty4725d ago (Edited 4725d ago )

30 titles in development by Sony Computer Entertainment Worldwide Studios does not equal "indie". That's first party, about as un-indie as you can get.

Edit: I can't believe there are actually people dumb enough to disagree with that. The word "indie" means INDEPENDENT. As in, not owned by another publisher. SCEWWS is a publisher, so if SCEWWS is developing 30 games, none of them can, by definition, be INDIE games.

Virtual_Reality4725d ago

You are confusing 1st Party Exclusives games from Indie line up of games.

MysticStrummer4725d ago (Edited 4725d ago )

Right after Gamescom is SOE Live

https://www.soe.com/soelive...

I imagine they'll at least talk about the PS4 versions of Planetside 2 and DC Universe Online, and hopefully have more to announce.

CrossingEden4725d ago

so now its ok to say wait for the "x" convention, YOU were making fun of people saying wait for e3 when it came to xbox 1 exclusives, hypocrite -_-

fr0sty4725d ago

Ahem... Sony showed 4 exclusives before E3, One more at E3, and announced 30 of them with 12 being new IP.

Microsoft didn't show much of anything other than TV shows and one game/TV show hybrid at their reveal, and only had a couple exclusives to talk about at E3. They're both pretty much on even ground as far as what has actually been shown and what is exclusive.

As such, now is the time where we do have to wait for both to show what else they have coming down the line.

qxrex4725d ago

wow you are really smart
then look at PS3 and X360
tell me what you Concludes from it
and what will happen in the future

Hicken4725d ago

Sony's got a history, though, of showing off new games at events other than E3. They've also got a track record for bringing out lots of exclusives for their devices.

Either one of these two things is enough to be patient. Both of them together? That's a no-brainer.

I give your attempt to flip the script a 2/10.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4725d ago
Ragnaarock4725d ago

For some reason when I was reading this I was thinking:
Wouldn't it be awesome if a company adopted a policy that was a free premium account that you can donate money to each month. You would get to play online multiplayer with the account and you can unlock the bonus games(using ps+ free games per month as example) with a minimum donation. The donations would go towards making the online system better and users can feel free to donate as much as they feel like, kinda like the humble bundle.

Anyway those are just my thoughts that I felt like sharing.

fr0sty4725d ago

Not a bad idea, but it would depend on exactly what kind of costs that they are facing by upgrading their network infrastructure. They already spent $380 million buying Gaikai and all of their server centers and cloud gaming patents (That's 7.6 million 1-year PS+ subscribers needed just to pay for that alone.). They also are upgrading PSN with other features as well, so I would imagine that there is a significant investment going on with PSN right now.

I'm just not sure that a donation system would be enough to cover those costs.

hakesterman4725d ago

Do you know how many 1 Cent donations there would be? They wouldn't have enough money in the pool to service a gumball machine.

Ragnaarock4725d ago

Thats why I said minimum donation, on humble bundle it's 1 dollar to get the base and beat the average to get more. So $5 min I would assume. Plus there will always be the people who appreciate the value they get and donate more.

CalibriSerif4725d ago

random shill websites on the attack! lol @microsoft tactics. they used it 7 years ago and will employ the same this generation.

Parapraxis4725d ago (Edited 4725d ago )

Protip: don't use the word "shill", it basically discredits what you are saying with rational people aka: the majority of people.

I bet you frequent /r/conspiracy huh.

Show all comments (55)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai32d ago (Edited 32d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio32d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing32d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9232d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit32d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing32d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9232d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
80°

(For Southeast Asia) New Price Changes for PS5, PS5 Pro, and PlayStation Portal remote player

For Southeast Asia, new price changes.

Prices effective starting May 1st, 2026.

Read Full Story >>
blog.playstation.com
35d ago Replies(1)
BeHunted34d ago

Looks like PlayStation took a hit with Marathon and is now quietly adjusting prices worldwide to recover the losses

andy8534d ago

Lets be honest raising prices doesn't do that when no one's buying it. I imagine the profit it greater selling 10 times more at a lower price

Pergele34d ago

Whatever you say buddy, let's all wear the tinfoil hats.

IceKoldKilla34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

LMFAO Your comment alone says a lot more about you than anything else. When has one game not selling 10 million copies made a company raise the prices of their console? Then Xbox would be costing $5000 by now lol. You remind of the crazy drug addicts on the street rambling on about conspiracies. xD You sure you don't need a hug, buddy?

ChunkyMonk34d ago

One game that Sony payed $200 million for. lol
Also, you sure were quick to get triggered. Maybe your the one who needs a hug?

Eonjay34d ago

If nothing else, we should be united against the real issue here. AI and unnecessary tariffs that are effecting all gamers.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 34d ago
Athlon10134d ago (Edited 34d ago )

The price increases are due to the RAM demand associated with AI and the US-Iran war. You can look to any business news website and local news to see that. Heck, even the 2026 Asus Zenbook Duo I've been eyeing has faced delays and has had a price increase of $400; that laptop has two specs. Asus is doing a staggered release with per-orders for the lower spec now and shipping in May and pre-orders for the higher spec that I'm eyeing starting in June. Basically, all computer manufactures are affected. It'll most likely start affecting smart phones too if it hasn't already. I can't remember the last time any major console maker (Nintendo, Sony, Sega, etc) increased the price of their console mid cycle outside of Microsoft just to make more profit.

S2Killinit34d ago

Its not the war. Its the RAM issue.

jznrpg33d ago

War is causing gas prices to rise. Transport of everything requires gas so the prices of those items go up as well. So it does have an impact

Athlon10133d ago (Edited 33d ago )

The blockage of the Straight of Hormuz due to the US-Iran war has affected raw components used in semi-conductor manufacturing such as bromine, aluminum, and helium. Iran had attacked the liquified natural gas (LNG) plant in Qatar which is a large producer (1/3 globally) of helium which is used in semiconductor etching. So it's the both the war and the RAM crises.

badz14934d ago

Oh no...should I get the Pro now before the price increase?

70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay34d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn234d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn234d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown34d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay34d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay34d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac33d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger34d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300034d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde34d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood34d ago (Edited 34d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde34d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)