someone should tell her Mr. Ed wants his teeth back!

Those teeth made me uncomfortable for some reason

The point is that it's realistic looking. Perfection is not realistic. Those girls you see in magazines don't exist. It's photoshop. Real people like this girl. I was impressed by the quality of the CGI. It'll be cool when games look this good in real-time.

I take it you were a big fan of Mr. Ed ^^^

I wonder if this is MS's answer to Heavy Rain..ahahaha

You just put a vid up and claim that it's "ALL" CGI without any article or references attached. For all we know it could be the same type of CGI used in vampire movies where it's part the real actor and part CGI. Also, I think it's pretty immature to call me out like this just because I want legit news for this site and everyone that visits it. So here's back at ya VIRTUOZIUS.

"For all we know it could be the same type of CGI used in vampire movies where it's part the real actor and part CGI" Thats still cgi and i would still want my games to look that good. Are you going to say that games with motion capture are not cgi because they are based on humans or that golom from lord of the rings is not all cgi because andy serkis does the facial animations.

I wish games looked as good as The Polar Express lets say. But I'm not saying the video is motion captured. What I'm talking about is something like The Santa Clause where they CGI certain frames by combining real footage superimposed by layers of CGI. This is exactly why I didn't want to approve this, for the lack of information that comes with it. To say that the video is completely CGI without any sources is just asinine. We shouldn't expect the readers to verify that stories are true, that burden falls on the journalist or the contributor in this case.

It's AI slop because it ignores the artists intent and changes the details ESPECIALLY when it comes to character faces. The scariest part of it is introducing it as the next stage of DLSS, a feature where the current iteration already has controversy surrounding it and for quite a lot of games cannot be fully disabled. So reasonably the precident is already set for what path this could take, and it's not good

In case you didn't watch the video then let me point just one part. It overrides the lighting. Then the question of what is the point of ray tracing cost and so on. Many of the lighting deletes shadow, including shadow on the face like eyes even chin.

Why stop at art when it comes to human input - why not just have AI play the game for us, remove human input altogether

And what about when you can't? Cause there's plenty of games where you cannot fully disable dlss already, i mean we're well into an era where it's a major crutch for developers to cover up their cut corners, why would this be any different?

You are playing with people's money and allow Nvidia to scam you.

In case you didn't watch the video then let me point just one part. It overrides the lighting. Then the question of what is the point of ray tracing cost. This is all lie to raise the cost of the graphic card.

Something consumers can do to a product after they have purchased it, entirely optional and can always be undone with a fresh install

VS

The leading gaming hardware manufacturer making this the next iteration of the main AA/Upscaling technique that is heavily relied upod by modern devs and is not optional in most games.

Not at all the same but nice try

It's all about choice in the end. But, I would say that calling it 'more realistic' is quite a stretch. It looks like AI art, and that's rarely realistic.

I had the same exact thought the first time this was brought up in a separate article about a week ago. Took me straight back to the conversations surrounding “horse armor.” Just don’t buy it they said. Years later, many IPs I previously enjoyed are so infected with monetization schemes that I don’t even consider purchasing them anymore.

DLSS 5 and the like are the same thing wrapped in a different package. History rhymes but many of us never learn from it.