All Channels
Popular
140°

Microsoft Removing Xbox One DRM Shouldn't Remove Key Features

Everyday Digitals - The benefits Microsoft touted as to why DRM was necessary shouldn't have to go away for any legal, financial or technical reason. Why not allow those that want to install their games on their hard drive do so and opt-in for 24 hr authentication...

Read Full Story >>
everydaydigitals.com
Ray1864717d ago

Gamers didn't go along with their plans, and they have to be punished somehow.

Anthotis4717d ago

This.

Microsoft are just being vindictive and butthurt because it has now been made clear even to them that they were gonna screw themselves with their idiotic policies.

Gazondaily4717d ago

Not this.

You want to have your cake and eat it at the same time. Welcome to the real world. MS are't being vindictive. This was the trade-off for removing the policies that people made such a noise about.

A-laughing-horse4717d ago

Vindictive???

Are you one of those people that think their system or the company releasing it actually care about them personally?

demonddel4717d ago

@A-laughing-horse Sony cares about us

Why o why4717d ago

Sorry septic. They did not have to remove the feature. Why the silence from them. Sorry. This is Microsoft we're talking about here. They could still implement the family without having across the board drm. Sony achieved it so why can't ms. Sonys version was exploited somewhat but ms could still enforce a level of drm. . Just more excuses if you ask me, plus nobody was absolutely sure how the family share system worked.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4717d ago
Wikkid6664717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

Not being punished at all. DRM is now disc based... so there is no way for the disc to be in multiple places at once.

NihonjinChick4717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

They could have done sharing as a digital only feature.

Now that I think about it, that would have been a better technique than forcing everyone to go digital. If you want people to go digital, give them better features with digital copies and let them ease into digital games by themselves.

This technique could have helped form their vision. It may take longer but it's better than trying to cram it all down the the consumers throat at once and change it all over night.

EverydayDigitals4717d ago

You know I do address that in the article. They could've done an opt-in approach for game installs/online check to allow you to play physical games on any Xbox One.

I'm not sure if its vindictive or just wanting all of this to be behind them but I think they missed any opportunity to make most people happy.

GameCents4717d ago

So remove the online check in but allow gamers to install games and play without the disc?
Family sharing however should make a come back, albeit for digital games only and not retail discs as it would be impossible to track whether or not somebody still owned a game or not.

DEEBO4717d ago

dude family sharing is just a hour-long demo.MS employee said it himself.after that hour you have buy the game to keep playing it.but it saves the spot in the game were the demo ends.they pull the article from n4g.

rainslacker4717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

What's ironic is that this feature wasn't discussed much outside of those who were using it as a reason to validate DRM.

Now it's like everyone wants it, and the removal of it is either bad for those that said so before, or bad because it is a talking point for the console war.

I personally liked the feature, but never saw it by itself being a good enough feature to go along with the over restrictive DRM.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4717d ago
falviousuk4717d ago

More stupid comments from fanboys, and backwater websites looking for hits.

deathstriker4717d ago

The article is hardly flamebait from what I read, and what's wrong with a site being indie? I guess you just want your articles from the top 1% of sites that are owned by CBS, Viacom, etc rather than people who simply have a passion for what they do and probably aren't making any money.

EverydayDigitals4717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

Thank you deathstriker! Not sure how the website is "backwater". I'm a writer and designer with nearly a decade experience in the video game industry. If there is something you don't agree with on you can address it here or on the comments of my website and we can discuss.

Just because you've never heard of something or isn't owned by a multinational corporation doesn't mean it's not good or valid.

Perjoss4717d ago

Microsoft the creators of the 360 have done a 180 on the console formerly known as the 720

Convas4717d ago (Edited 4717d ago )

Eventually, I think MS will allow people to opt-in to the Cloud/Digital Upgrade they originally wanted for Xbox One.

But after all the backlash, they won't be forcing it back on anyone else, not after all of the negative attention they've gained. You take the good with the bad, mandatory DRM is gone, and so too are the "cool" features that you may have liked. #Dealwithit?

DEEBO4717d ago

i hope the game sharing is not one of those cool features this article is talking about.game sharing was just an hour-long demo then you get the option to buy the game.someone took down the article of the MS employee ranting about MS doing the 180 but he let it slip out that game sharing was just a way to demo the game for an hour.so no it's not some amazing feature you would come to believe it was.

Show all comments (34)
70°

Microsoft Gaming Revenue Drops 7% Year-on-Year, Content and Services Down 5%, Xbox Hardware Down 33%

Microsoft announced its financial results for Q3 of fiscal year 2026, including an update on its gaming Xbox business and more.

Read Full Story >>
simulationdaily.com
Jin_Sakai21d ago (Edited 21d ago )

Not looking good. Hopefully Asha Sharma is able to turn Phil’s disaster around.

dveio20d ago

To me it's still quite remarkable how they can cash-in 5.3bn in revenue in a single quarter, since their hardware is basically dead.

Jingsing20d ago

The stock mark is what makes Microsoft remarkable, They have convinced every institutional and retail investor to just keep piling money into them. Like many big tech giants they are just a big growing pyramid scheme. As long as people keep dropping money into ETF's that cover the market Microsoft will always be liquid. At the same time it is completely stifling innovation and competition. People need to start being more discreet in how they invest their money as it's killing the system.

Tanktopmaster9220d ago

Once they re-evaluate exclusive all will be fine….

S2Killinit20d ago

Riiiiight because people will just flock back to them for one or two games per year.

Jingsing20d ago

15+ years of bad performance is what they call irreparable in business. It is time for them to sell off the assets and get out of entertainment.

Tanktopmaster9220d ago

These declines are on the back of extra revenue received from releasing games like Forza horizon 5 on PlayStation. So I’m being sarcastic here when I said they should go back to exclusives. Killing off a revenue stream from Ps5 sales will only make things worse

Show all comments (13)
70°

Xbox boss: Memory crisis could impact next-gen hardware pricing

Xbox boss Asha Sharma has discussed how component shortages will impact the company's plans for Project Helix.

Read Full Story >>
gamedeveloper.com
Eonjay22d ago

When does this end? Its killing everyone. Consoles and PC. And for what? AI? The benefits of AI are completely outweighed by the negatives. And the government should have never allowed one company to buy up all the RAM.

Lexreborn223d ago

This kind of proves this is an after thought product, most products like this are in r&d 5 years before they start mass producing. So they typically have the cost of components and things worked out long before assembly starts.

This is an assumption still, but I wouldn’t be surprised if project helix is similar to Scalebound,perfect dark and sod3. They had an idea but no actual execution other than concept stage. Being impacted by the ram shortage likely would also put this device 3-4 years out.

I’m not even sure MS has that endurance with Xbox yet

Fishy Fingers23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

I mean.... what?

We're at a point that Samsung wont even provide their own phone department ram because they can sell it at higher prices to 3rd parties (AI). Its more profitable to sell the ram than make their own devices with it.

You think because R&D starts 5 years ago the 3rd party component manufacturers will honour that price? They'll sell it to whomever is paying the most today, not some gentlemens agreement they made years ago. AI farms will buy more volume at higher prices than any console manufacturer will. It'll be the same for Playstation.

Lexreborn222d ago

Contractual agreements are not the same as “gentlemen” agreements. If you think that they work with their distributors a month before production then their entire business model is trash. They work with companies like nvidia constantly for building the graphics cards they need. They work with companies that build motherboards years in advance. This is what proper business planning does.

They are not buying components on a whim like a consumer. So again, considering the ram isn’t a singular module and is integrated into the motherboard I highly doubt they wouldn’t have a final schematic that they are supposed to be building around.

If they are delaying production another 3 years then it’s obvious again this is an after though project and is just trying to be responsive to their bad execution they had the last 14 years.

It also isn’t far fetched to use their failure to produce first party titles the last 7 years including the highly anticipated games I mentioned all being cancelled. That they would continue to you know… lie

Sitdown22d ago

You don't really know how this works huh?

Profchaos23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

Helix is going to be stupidly expensive

Instead of leaning into smarter upscaling techniques they're brute forcing hardware that will cost them dearly and it remains to be seen if it's genuinely going to provide a meaningful differential

I know in the oc.doace people like to brag about not using frame gen or dlss to get to high on a game but for the majority of players they happily use those technologies without a second thought

That's going to be ps6 vs Helix

Eonjay22d ago

Yeah with FSR 5 they should be able to offer a much cheaper version of Helix.

Eonjay22d ago

While this does seem to be the case, I am encouraged by the statement from Microsoft about wanting to provide affordable options. If this means a Series S style Helix, at least there will be something affordable being offered.

XBManiac22d ago

Series S is what has killed Xbox Series so... Will they dare?

blacktiger23d ago

It's called systematic inflationary. Yes we get it Microsoft, keep raising in the name ofall kinds of stuffs

pwnmaster300023d ago

Honestly if there was thing I learned from this generation is that new consoles arnt day one anymore.
I can wait 1-3 years.

DarXyde22d ago

Another important lesson from this generation: while Nintendo showed us that prices don't necessarily need to ever drop, we've now learned that waiting 1-3 years does carry some risk that prices increase. This generation is just bizarre in all the wrong ways.

LucasRuinedChildhood22d ago (Edited 22d ago )

The factors are largely external. Covid and Russia-Ukraine war causing inflation led to the first price increase in 2022.

Then we get Trump's tariffs increasing hardware prices, AI boom causing a RAM crisis, war on Iran causing a worldwide fuel crisis which impacts the cost of everything.

Gaming doesn't exist in a vacuum. The last few years have been a shitshow and lot of it was definitely avoidable.

DarXyde22d ago

LucasRuinedChildhood,

For sure. No disagreement on the external factors doing a lot of this. Where I have to gently push back however is on two fronts:

1. The pandemic definitely caused some issues: asynchronous development was a big issue and really complicated timelines and affected game quality. At the same time, when it comes to price hikes, it's really difficult to know what was genuine necessity and what was taking consumers for a ride. The pandemic brought about "stag-flation" which was increasing prices and stagnant wages, which was a problem caused by supply chain constraints. There was also "Greed-flation", where companies that were slightly affected or had no issues took advantage of the situation and squeezed everyone citing supply chain issues when there were none.

2. It's definitely true that the tariffs, AI boom, and RAM crisis were all things enabled by tech broligarchs throwing money at this caricature of a world leader, one of them being Satya Nadella. I don't think Sony and Nintendo have contributed much to this problem if at all, but Microsoft's Nadella I feel was instrumental in causing every one of those issues. Microsoft as a company contributed to both candidates (though they gave Harris 4x as much if I recall), but Nadella was all in on letting AI run wild. He paid for unregulated AI, and got a war that's not a war (even though Trump called it that at least five times on television) that screwed up helium access. So for me, I feel that one of the players in the gaming industry is a key architect of these issues, and for that reason I struggle a bit to think of it as "external".

Show all comments (28)
50°

'The big things that we're thinking about'

In an exclusive interview with Game File, new(ish) Xbox boss Asha Sharma and Xbox chief content officer Matt Booty explain their vision for Microsoft’s gaming division

Read Full Story >>
gamefile.news
Agent7524d ago

A good start would be to release games to go with the console. My Xbox Series X has gathered dust virtually from launch. My advice would be to ditch a next console and release games on PC, PlayStation and Switch. Another idea would be a hybrid console based on Xbox Series X tech and go the same route as Nintendo. Another idea would be to pull out of gaming altogether. Plenty of options there.

Reaper22_21d ago

Why would they pull out? They have the momentum. Sony has been getting nothing but bad news lately.